Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts sign Olympic Sprinter


TKnight24

Recommended Posts

I haven't seen anything on here about the signing but we signed WR Marvin Bracy who was an Olympic sprinter and 3 time national champ at 60 meters. He's not just a sprinter. He was an all-american football player and played for Florida State as a freshman before deciding to become a professional sprinter. I say he's the fastest I'm the NFL because a Tennessee sprinter who has almost identical times in the 60 meter sprint ran a 4.12 40 so it makes sense that Bracy can run something similar. What are the chances he makes the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2017 at 1:28 AM, SteelCityColt said:

 

To be fair I think most teams do the bottom end churning of the roster, especially now. The problem with Grigson was that there was no top end.

 

It's not that.  Grigson had a thing for fast WR's.  

 

Question. . . what is the 40 time of the slowest wide receiver that Ryan Grigson drafted??

 

Answer: Donte Moncrief - 4.40 

 

Grigson never drafted a big body WR.  Instead he always seemed to prefer pure speed.  At least in the draft.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

It's not that.  Grigson had a thing for fast WR's.  

 

Question. . . what is the 40 time of the slowest wide receiver that Ryan Grigson drafted??

 

Answer: Donte Moncrief - 4.40 

 

Grigson never drafted a big body WR.  Instead he always seemed to prefer pure speed.  At least in the draft.  

 

Kinda talking about different things here, I was talking more about low end roster churn without being position specific and not really about drafting guys. 

 

I do agree though that he loved physical measurables (Adongo!) over proven talent. However he's not exactly the only GM guilty of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, isn't that kind of a base level journalistic integrity and ethics? I don't think he's setting up some arbitrary litmus test. I'm no journalist and have no idea what the professional standard is, but this to me seems like a pretty reasonable standard - if you are writing about someone and a source is sharing pretty disparaging information that might affect the subject to the tune of millions of dollars, the least you should probably do is to ask for comment from said subject, before you print that information.
    • Kind of seems like you're setting up a litmus test for whether a reporter is "good" or not based on whether they do this thing you don't like. So maybe you could share some well-respected media in your opinion -- sports would be most relevant -- and then we could share some examples.    I agree that the best practice would be to reach out to the subject for a response. But if the subject declines or doesn't acknowledge the request, now what? Add a line saying 'subject declined to respond,' and now the unnamed sources are viewed with more legitimacy? 
    • You want a pricey decending player, Ballard needs ascending players for our next SB run in a year or two. Simmons would be a waste here.   Cross over performed his last couple games Hawkeye, maybe you should lighten up Francis. Besides, Ed Reed couldn't cover both sides of the field when neither of his corners could cover deep. That is where the heartache is coming from again.  
    • Give me an example of that. A report by a reporter from a legit news organization that doesn't at least attempt to give the subject a chance to respond. I think you can find bad journalism examples of what you're saying is common, but I don't think you can find good journalism examples - by which I mean examples from well-respected reporters and well-respected media. What you're suggesting is okay definitely isn't okay based on what they teach in journalism schools.  
    • I just read the article again to see the structure. You probably are right. It looks like he's starting to list the players in the ranking with quotes from scouts and it just cuts out at some point in the Harrison part and you have to pay for the rest.   So yeah... Please ignore my semi-conspiratorial allusions above. That's my bad.   Still not sure how ethical it is to post such disparaging comments about the character of a young player when those quotes are coming from scouts that might have conflict of interest in sharing such information before the draft.
  • Members

    • Superman

      Superman 21,092

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 1,002

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 5,311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 7,099

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,973

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 5,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,671

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,523

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SurfinKal

      SurfinKal 264

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...