Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2016 NFL Draft Thread


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I don't think it's realistic on draft day, in later rounds. And in any event, it's a guideline, not a fixed formula. Oh well. Getting an extra fourth rounder sounds good to me, and the board wasn't looking that great. I'd have taken Reed, but oh well.

I am with you on Reed...but we all thought he was a top 20 guy...look how far he's fallen...we're either missing something or the dynamics of the draft have been altered because of the stacked defensive line prospects...It's been a really odd draft, that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, CopenhagenColt said:

Surprised we wasn't all over Reed. He could and probably should have been a first rounder.

 

Based on what that 31 GMs didn't see, most of them twice?

 

 

Hack!  Poor Jets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gavin said:

Reed has some agility but at the end of the day I think he is a 2 down player who I would not have touched till day 3. Way to early to draft him for me

The DTs taken thus far in round 2 are really not much different than what we already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Not really. It's the difference between a team with 6 picks and a team with 12.

Well, that's part of being a good front office - stack up on the best commodity in football - cheap rookie contracts(draft picks). It gives you maneuverability and it gives you the chance to take swings on multiple prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, swankdizzle said:

You don't trade down if someone you want is on the board.

Yes yyou do, if you think you can still get them where you traded down to. It's a little something called maximizing value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had this crazy idea in my head that Whitehair and Billings would be gone so the Colts end up taking Nick Martin to play Gaurd/backup Center. Texans must have thought the same thing... not mad though. The forum would have gone ballistic! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

None of the DTs taken yet in rnd 2 are really not much different than what we already have.

I'd take Day or Ridgeway here if we go DT/ Both are disruptive rotational D Linemen. Im also still looking at Calhoun and Fackrell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

There are more than 6 good players left

nope draft is over after those 6. Pack it up....we have to fill out our team with CFL guys now lol. I'm really intrigued with Alexander. He has some attitude and swag....kinda like our CB we took last year. Might need a year but could put together a nice young core back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't care that we traded back if we weren't wild about what we'd get....

 

What I care about is that we didn't come remotely close to getting value.

 

We lost 90 points and got back 48.        Not even close to a good trade.

 

We must have really, REALLY wanted that extra 4.    (Sigh....)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't care that we traded back if we weren't wild about what we'd get....

 

What I care about is that we didn't come remotely close to getting value.

 

We lost 90 points and got back 48.        Not even close to a good trade.

 

We must have really, REALLY wanted that extra 4.    (Sigh....)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...