Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

vitoaf27

Report: Colts in talks for Alex Mack (mega-merge)

Recommended Posts

I really hope they keep Castonzo's big deal in mind next year. They'll need to keep a good amount of money for him and for other free agents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But couldn't this be a win-win for Ravens? They put a big offer on the table for Mack, and then Browns either have to match and pay more dearly than they should or they lose him to a rival? I don't get it.

 

 

Yep, that's the risk you take I guess. Ozzie isn't going to put in some ridiculous offer that is going to string up his team though, he just signed Monroe and he has 100 million dollar QB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they didn't give him the franchise tag. Meaning they have reservations about paying him

Yeah they could match any deal, but they obviously have a limit.

 

This is a very interesting, and less discussed fact. There HAD to be a reason they didnt just Franchise him. They have a limit on the money they want to spend for that position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want one person to explain a logical way for this to happen that the Browns wouldn't match. So far all these other theories in this thread are just nonsense and not realistic.

 

Just because they have used the transition tag does not mean they place an infinite value on the Center position. Basically, if the Colts get him, they grossly overpay...and given the deficiencies within our O-Line, that would not surprise me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want one person to explain a logical way for this to happen that the Browns wouldn't match. So far all these other theories in this thread are just nonsense and not realistic.

 

 
Just because they have used the transition tag does not mean they place an infinite value on the Center position. Basically, if the Colts get him, they grossly overpay...and given the deficiencies within our O-Line, that would not surprise me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does the transition tag works? i mean if nobody offers him a contract, doe she play for 1 year for the browns? or how many years?

 

if someone offers him a contract, and browns propose a new one that has as much money as the other team does the play have any say? like i want that team even you are offering same/less money?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic, but you guys think this means anything?

Um my phone just told me Vontae Davis, Matt Hasselbeck and 14 others I follow just followed Steve Smith

— Brent Fatig (@ShouldntBragBut)

March 12, 2014

I hope not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does the transition tag works? i mean if nobody offers him a contract, doe she play for 1 year for the browns? or how many years?

 

if someone offers him a contract, and browns propose a new one that has as much money as the other team does the play have any say? like i want that team even you are offering same/less money?

If nobody offers him a contract, than he works out a deal with the Browns. If the Browns can't get a deal done, he plays for one year, 10 million. If someone offers him a contract and he signs, then Cleveland has the right to match. If Cleveland matches, then Mack is forced to stay there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want one person to explain a logical way for this to happen that the Browns wouldn't match. So far all these other theories in this thread are just nonsense and not realistic.

They used transition tag. They could have used franchise tag (which is only 2 million more i think?)

 Why would they do that? They must have a set price for him and wont go up of that. they might also be bluffing other teams with what you just posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want one person to explain a logical way for this to happen that the Browns wouldn't match. So far all these other theories in this thread are just nonsense and not realistic.

 

The Browns work out an under the radar deal with Evan Dietrich-Smith or Bryan de la Puenta while other teams make outrageous offers to Mack, and when the time comes they just decline to match the offer.   :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If nobody offers him a contract, than he works out a deal with the Browns. If the Browns can't get a deal done, he plays for one year, 10 million. If someone offers him a contract and he signs, then Cleveland has the right to match. If Cleveland matches, then Mack is forced to stay there.

so if I offer him 10 million 5 year  and the browns offer him 10 million 5 years he is forced to play with the browns 5 years? that sucks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no harm in the Colts offering an attractive offer for Mack. More than likely Browns match it... but perhaps they don't place enough  value in the position to pay him 8 million a year, or maybe they don't see the point in paying 8 million for a player that does not want to be there.

 

For a blue chip player like Mack, it's worth a shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does the transition tag works? i mean if nobody offers him a contract, doe she play for 1 year for the browns? or how many years?

 

if someone offers him a contract, and browns propose a new one that has as much money as the other team does the play have any say? like i want that team even you are offering same/less money?

 

 

Mack has to "sign" an offer from another team. 

 

Browns can match or let him go.

 

If those two don't happen, we can negotiate a contract or he can sign his tender.

 

His tender would be 1 year for $10 million.

 

If he signs his tender we can still try to negotiate a long term deal. 

 

Next year, if he isn't under contract we start it all over again or let him walk. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very interesting, and less discussed fact. There HAD to be a reason they didnt just Franchise him. They have a limit on the money they want to spend for that position.

 

It's simple, really. The franchise tag costs more, and it's more adversarial. If they gave him the FT it basically gives him no options. No team is going to give the Browns two 1st-round picks for a Center.

Giving him the transition tag lets him guage his value and opens up opportunities for him to at least explore other options, yet still give the Browns the ability to match - something Mack told them he would let them do all along.

Franchise Tag - adversarial and gives Mack no options

Transition Tag - allows Mack to do exactly what he said he wanted to do while still protecting the team's interests

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely believe that the Colts are interested, they should be. The Ravens should be too, both teams need a center badly.

You have obviously never heard of former Colts legend AQ Shipley, who now plays for the Ravens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don't see a realistic scenario. The only way I don't see Cleveland matching is if we offered somewhere in the 13 million dollar range and they won't do that. Anything much lower than that and Cleveland will match. They'd be fools not to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want one person to explain a logical way for this to happen that the Browns wouldn't match. So far all these other theories in this thread are just nonsense and not realistic.

 

I don't see how the Browns would keep him at a $20M cap hit this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don't see a realistic scenario. The only way I don't see Cleveland matching is if we offered somewhere in the 13 million dollar range and they won't do that. Anything much lower than that and Cleveland will match. They'd be fools not to.

 

 

I do a "Blind auction" fantasy draft every season. We have "restricted keepers" meaning, any other player can bid. Last year I kept Mike Stanton and someone bid $71 of his $300 cap on him, I told him he was foolish adn stuck him with the contract. Needless to say Stanton sucked last year. 

 

Very similar, we're gauging Mack's value, hopefully it comes back reasonable or lower than we expected. If someone gives him 12 million a year for 5 years, we are going to stick them with that bad contract, you can count on it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'd have to give an amazing contract that the Browns can't match. We'll have to be creative if we want him, but if we get him it fills a HUGE need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Grigs could pull this off, or even another top tier Center, I'll be jumping up and down for a month straight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic, but you guys think this means anything?

Um my phone just told me Vontae Davis, Matt Hasselbeck and 14 others I follow just followed Steve Smith

— Brent Fatig (@ShouldntBragBut)

March 12, 2014

I hope not.

Please no

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do a "Blind auction" fantasy draft every season. We have "restricted keepers" meaning, any other player can bid. Last year I kept Mike Stanton and someone bid $71 of his $300 cap on him, I told him he was foolish adn stuck him with the contract. Needless to say Stanton sucked last year.

Very similar, we're gauging Mack's value, hopefully it comes back reasonable or lower than we expected. If someone gives him 12 million a year for 5 years, we are going to stick them with that bad contract, you can count on it.

We won't offer that much. That would be asinine. I'd love to have him, but if we offer anywhere near market value, he's staying in Cleveland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see - negotiate with Cleveland to over-pay for a Center. Get out butts handed to us, again.  Probably cost us next years first round draft pick like Richardson.  Or, sign EDS?  No brainer.

 

Let Mack end up playing quarterback for Cleveland ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see - negotiate with Cleveland to over-pay for a Center. Get out butts handed to us, again. Probably cost us next years first round draft pick. Or, sign EDS? No brainer.

you realize EDS would have to agree to it. You can't just assume he will play here because you want him to. I would rather have him at a reasonable rate as well, but it takes two

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you realize EDS would have to agree to it. You can't just assume he will play here because you want him to. I would rather have him at a reasonable rate as well, but it takes two

Most cases it's money first approach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In need of agent!!! Now taking applications

Everyone keeps talking about this Alex Mack guy, whoever he is..

Some quick stats for you to show I'm more than qualified:

Position: Center

Height: 6 foot

Weight 230

Career games: 25

Career starts at Lucus oil Stadium: 2

Games played at LOS: 3

State runner up champ

post-15879-0-76687900-1394660560_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic, but you guys think this means anything?

Um my phone just told me Vontae Davis, Matt Hasselbeck and 14 others I follow just followed Steve Smith

— Brent Fatig (@ShouldntBragBut)

March 12, 2014

I hope not.

that is... interesting..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should be trying to get BDP instead of going for Mack. The brownies will no doubt match anything we offer Mack, and by the time we find that out BDP will have been gobbled by some other team. Then were in a real pickle!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I dont see us spending that kind of money for his guy   Could be wrong.......   I would love to have him   But.......   We have a packed UT spot..... with 4 guys that play it   Ward, Autry, Lewis.......  I think McCoy is better, but we have a decent rotation at the spot   McCoy would be in the rotation   Do you pay 10-13 Mil for a rotation guy who is on the wrong side of 30     I dont see it happening.......   The Colts have probably pegged the guy at 7-9 Mil..........     They have proven to almost always drop out of bidding war
    • Which of the following did you mean?   He needs to come through, for us to be a top 5.   He needs to come through for us, to be a top 5.   Subtle difference, different meanings.
    • Not according to Football Outsiders. They have GB’s pass protection ranked as follows:   2018 - 21 2017 - 28  2016 - 11 2015 - 23 2014 - 13 2013 - 26   Not really much “up” and mostly “down.” Rodgers hasn’t had top-tier pas protection for an entire decade...and it’s often pretty bad...and has gotten him injured (like Luck).   His pass protection in 2017 was actually almost as bad as Brissett’s...and he ultimately fractured his collar bone after being flushed out of the pocket. But in the 9 games he did play, he put up a 97 passer rating.    From 2009-2014, his average passer rating was 110...and only one season did he have an OL above 23rd.   The guy is the best ever IMO. Suffice to say...I think he would have managed alright on the 2017 Colts...unlike the others you mentioned.        
    • Irsay can afford anything Ballard wants to do.     He can easily afford to spend up the limits of the salary cap and we’re far from being even close to the salary cap limit.   What do we have to spend?    $65 mill?  $70 mill?    The most in the NFL.   We’re in position to extend the deals of guys like AC and TYH and others.  If we DON’T sign McCoy it won’t be because we don’t have the money to spend.  It will be because we decided not to spend that much money.   Those are two completely different issues. 
    • I said 2 years 25 mil. I still think thats enough to get him, but there is sone serious competition for his services
  • Members

    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 794

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisfarley

      chrisfarley 1,039

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,166

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,696

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Peterk2011

      Peterk2011 500

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jshipp23

      jshipp23 1,563

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...