Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

KC Chefs (-6.5) vs. Indy Colts


ColtsBlueFL

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's it? Really?

 

The Colts haven't put together two halves of football since Denver, and haven't had a solid game on the road since Week 3 @ Niners. We struggle to run the ball, and the offense has struggled on third down. Meanwhile, the Chiefs just obliterated the Raiders in Oakland, whom with struggled with in Indy. The Chiefs don't even get a touchdown? At home?

 

I was expecting this line to be closer to 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colts are my team since 1970's. When the season started I was skeptical,and was pretty right on at first,then they are 6-2 and look great,then things happens and they look like a below average high school team for the better part of the rest of the season and clearly have no shot at the super bowl,hence I lower my expectations so the disappointments(which have been plenty) arent so harsh during the game,season,playoffs. Its like nascar, I knew kenseth years ago and he had a new team this year,not sure how that was gonna from a fans stand point so didnt expect much,and he ended up the winningest driver this year and missed championship by only 16 pts (2nd place)I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colts are my team since 1970's. When the season started I was skeptical,and was pretty right on at first,then they are 6-2 and look great,then things happens and they look like a below average high school team for the better part of the rest of the season and clearly have no shot at the super bowl,hence I lower my expectations so the disappointments(which have been plenty) arent so harsh during the game,season,playoffs. Its like nascar, I knew kenseth years ago and he had a new team this year,not sure how that was gonna from a fans stand point so didnt expect much,and he ended up the winningest driver this year and missed championship by only 16 pts (2nd place)I think

I too have lowered my expectations. When I see your garbage comments. If you really are a Colts fan, then I like cous cous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the coaches prepare this team for this game we have a good chance of winning I have seen some good things in the last 2 games which are positive, The colts are showing progress in the passing game the opposition cannot worry about ty or fleener the colts have 5 good receivers, I see the running game getting a little better between TR and Brown working together anything possible. The D still need a little tweaking at the LB spots and the corners are starting to come around. We will see this week if the team and coaches progressed or regressed against a tough advisory 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A solid second half against Bengals (well second half plus a goal line stand at end of first half); a lopsided game this past Sunday...receivers starting to produce; TRich looking better and better...a defense that has shown signs of good play with Toler (someday I think!!!) about to return; an Oline that finally is keeping Luck upright. I am suddenly optimistic. If we play KC tough, I'm not taking the backseat to anyone in the playoffs. If we do a repeat of the Cards and Rams, my optimism will vanish. We might show up and be that team on a roll heading into playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very surprised its that low..

I thought it would be Indy (+10) at KC

Colts have major problems scoring..and have lost a lot of playmakers

KC has not done well against teams with winning records. They are hard to predict in the big matchups because you dont know how much of what they do is a mirage. The lower spread is uncertainty about KC.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KC has not done well against teams with winning records. They are hard to predict in the big matchups because you dont know how much of what they do is a mirage. The lower spread is uncertainty about KC.

 

 

That spread will go up. Trust me. Its +7 in some places...

 

  Colts are the most unpredicitable team in the NFL..and they';ve been routed by far worse teams than KC...

 

Plus..Indy does not have to win and might benefit by losing....since a rematch in Indy is VERY likely

 

KC must win to stay alive for the AFC West title.

 

That spread will rise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That spread will go up. Trust me. Its +7 in some places...

Colts are the most unpredicitable team in the NFL..and they';ve been routed by far worse teams than KC...

Plus..Indy does not have to win and might benefit by losing....since a rematch in Indy is VERY likely

KC must win to stay alive for the AFC West title.

That spread will rise

Indy can easily move up the seeds and not play them in the post season by winning out. Its far easier for the Colts to move up than the Chiefs. Your argument is invalid.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That spread will go up. Trust me. Its +7 in some places...

 

  Colts are the most unpredicitable team in the NFL..and they';ve been routed by far worse teams than KC...

 

Plus..Indy does not have to win and might benefit by losing....since a rematch in Indy is VERY likely

 

KC must win to stay alive for the AFC West title.

 

That spread will rise

what?... huh? 

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take the money line on the colts we don't need points as we will win this game outright by AV field goal late in the 4th or a TD in OT by luck to Rogers

 

dont care how we win, lets just win, as always go Colts

 

the year Peyton had knee surgery and no practice / preseason we won a few early in quite strange ways, like Sage Rosenthal doing a helicopter trying to go over colts defender only to lose ball and we get a long return for a TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the dbs cover and help in run support like they did last week I think we can pull it off. Make them one deminsional. I have been against pep and manusky but last week kinda opened my eyes to neither really have the tools they need. But I dont think we should play conservative unless we have a huge lead in the third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about it.

 

We'll almost certainly host KC on jan 4-5....

 

it could change but we're 4 and theyre 5

 

Show them little..and let them think they have the edge

but if we win, we have a legit shot at the #2 seed. Ravens look good right now and will probably beat the Pats in Balt. and all the Bengals need to do is slip up once against the Vikings (looked pretty good last week without AP) or the Ravens at home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but if we win, we have a legit shot at the #2 seed. Ravens look good right now and will probably beat the Pats in Balt. and all the Bengals need to do is slip up once against the Vikings (looked pretty good last week without AP) or the Ravens at home. 

You've very optimistic.. I thought the Ravens offense was less than mediocre Monday night.. 

 

Its not impossible.....Baltimore could beat both NE and Cincy 

 

 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but if Houston and Oakland beat Denver making them 11-5

 

and Indy beats KC and Jacksonville..making Indy 11-5

 

and Balt beats NE .....

 

 Cincy loses at home to Baltimore.and Minnesota,..making them 10-6

 

Baltimore wins their division at 10-6....Cincy is out

 

KC loses to Indy and at San Diego.....making them 11-5

 

KC loses the division tiebreaker to Denver

 

and NE loses at home to Buffalo,..making them 10-6

 

the Colts beat Denver on a tiebreaker and they could still get the No.1 overall seed, right? :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would honestly think the spread would be hi

 

That's it? Really?

 

The Colts haven't put together two halves of football since Denver, and haven't had a solid game on the road since Week 3 @ Niners. We struggle to run the ball, and the offense has struggled on third down. Meanwhile, the Chiefs just obliterated the Raiders in Oakland, whom with struggled with in Indy. The Chiefs don't even get a touchdown? At home?

 

I was expecting this line to be closer to 10.

 

Not to mention that our D hasn't been doing very good lately with the exception of containing the Texans (which isn't saying a lot).  While at the same time KC's offense has been picking up recently.  

 

Charles had a great game against the Colt's last year when he had no QB.  He's doing even better this year and just came off a game where he put up 5 TD's.  Granted that was against the Raiders but I'm not sure our defense is really much better then the Raiders D.  

 

So I'm a bit surprised that the spread is so low.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've very optimistic.. I thought the Ravens offense was less than mediocre Monday night.. 

 

Its not impossible.....Baltimore could beat both NE and Cincy 

 

 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but if Houston and Oakland beat Denver making them 11-5

 

and Indy beats KC and Jacksonville..making Indy 11-5

 

and Balt beats NE .....

 

 Cincy loses at home to Baltimore.and Minnesota,..making them 10-6

 

Baltimore wins their division at 10-6....Cincy is out

 

KC loses to Indy and at San Diego.....making them 11-5

 

KC loses the division tiebreaker to Denver

 

and NE loses at home to Buffalo,..making them 10-6

 

the Colts beat Denver on a tiebreaker and they could still get the No.1 overall seed, right? :thmup:

Not really. Pats are struggling. I think the Ravens will be favored in that game. All Cinci needs to do is lose one of 2 which is very possible. Any given sunday. We win against the Chiefs, no way do I see us losing to the Jags at home. 

 

And yes the #1 seed is still in play hypothetically but do you see Denver losing to Houston AND Oakland? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's the most quiet time of the season in terms of overall sports (Sorry baseball and golf fans) so I figured we can discuss position by position to see where there's potential, where we're gonna be pretty average, and where we have cause for concern.    Potential    QB - Easy one to start with as 12 quarters is hardly enough to gauge what AR is, but what he could be especially in Shane's offense still gets me excited. Keep in mind, AR scored 7 tds in 12 quarters which is essentially 7 tds in 3 games. In 17 games, that's approximately 40 tds which is insane and that was without Taylor in the backfield with him.   WR - Pittman clearly is the WR1, but the potential after him gets me very excited. Downs was coming into his own before he got hurt, Pierce hopefully can be used more in the passing game instead of just a decoy with AR back. I saw a funny statistic that Pierce ran the most miles throughout the season without getting targeted which can be taken as a good thing or a bad thing depending on how you want to interpret it. Mitchell really gets me excited. His catch radius is ridiculous. It's Hopkins like. I honestly think Mitchell gives us that big play potential our WR room is missing.   DL - imo, this is the best the dline has looked in Ballard's tenure. Buck is still one of the best DTs in the league, Grove is a monster in run defense and has improved his pass rush, and Paye, Dayo, and Ebukam almost each had double digit sacks. I get what everyone is gonna say, yes we had 51 sacks however it was sporadic especially in the final game of the season. I still think the potential is there to have one of the best units in the league and it's gonna get better with the additions of Latu and Raewkon Davis.   Average    RB - I'm not talking about Taylor. I think he's poised for his best season since 21. I'm referring to the entire unit. Right now the backs behind Taylor are Sermon, Goodson, and Hull. If anything were to happen to Taylor, the room becomes a run at the mill group with different skill sets.   OL - While I do think the oline got better from 22 to 23, I think as an overall unit that the oline is average. Raimann did look good this season and Fries was steady, but I'm worried if health is getting to Nelson, Kelly, and Smith. I think Nelson first four years was a lot better then Nelson the last two years. Just seems like Nelson isn't the immovable object he use to be. I'm not saying he's not playing at a high level, but I do think he's dipped from where he use to be. Kelly for almost two years looked like he needed to retire, but looked much improved last season and hopefully he can stay healthy. Smith concerns me the most. Just constantly hurt and/or not playing at the level we've grown to expect from him. The depth is mostly young and inexperienced as well. While I do think our oline is still a good unit, it's not where it use to be in terms of position strength at this time.   TE - While we do have a lot of different types of TEs on the team to help stabilize the position, there are still question marks. Granson imo is our best TE in terms being able to move everywhere on the field. Olgetree seems to be a very good blocker and can bust the seem. Woods flashed as a rookie, but was hurt last year. MAC I see more as another olinemen. He can make plays in the passing game, but his value is more at blocking. Mallory is your traditional find an open spot in the defense and sit there as a safety valve. Collectively, they each bring something to the table, but the room doesn't have that TE1 presence imo.   Concern   S - I think this is everyone's concern as imo it's the weakest unit on the team. Blackmon returning does help, however Cross and Thomas have not proven either one can start full time and the only other potential starter at S is Ronnie Harrison. I would like to believe eventually Ballard will sign Simmons or Diggs.    CB - While I do think Brents and Jones played really well as rookies, this unit concerns me as the room is made up of mostly second and third year players with Kenny being the lone vet. Flowers returning can definitely help as I thought he was playing very well before he got hurt, but the fifth and sixth CB spots imo are completely open.   LB - Yes Franklin has established himself as the best LB on the team, there really isn't much depth afterwards. This will be the first season Speed is the full-time starter, Oubi and Stuard are more for STs, and Carlies is converting from S to LB.
    • It’s been 27 years since the Reds have won a playoff game. The longest drought in all of sports…    Since that time and since the Castilinis bought the team, we’ve only reached the post season 4 times… 
    • Definitely see him in the rotation especially if God forbid Grove or Buck get hurt. The 6 games Grove was suspended was brutal in terms of run defense. Eric Johnson and Bryan were just constantly pushed back
    • Yea those wobbly ducks weren't pretty, but they were effective 
    • I think the line changes will be the same as last season, except adding in the new guys (Davis and Latu).   But those two should be an upgrade.     I agree that Davis is a key add.  The drop off from when Grove is out should be a ton less damaging.  Bryan was out of position and it was obvious he couldn’t fill Grove’s shoes.     With our uncertainty in the D backfield, the Dline better be what we expect.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...