Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Early Look at the Colts 53-man roster


Caleb3502

Recommended Posts

This is my way too early prediction for the Colts 53-man roster.  We will probably have at least one UDFA on the roster, but I didn't include one in this projection.  Who do you think the Colts will have on their roster for Week 1?

 

QB: Andrew Luck, Scott Tolzien

HB: Gore, Turbin, Mack 

WR: Hilton, Moncrief, Dorsett, Aiken, Rogers 

TE: Doyle, Swoope, Williams 

OT: Castonzo, Clark, Banner

OG: Mewhort, Haeg, Good, Schwenke

C: Kelly, Blythe

 

DE: Anderson, Langford, Hunt, Ridgeway, Stewart

DT: Hankins, McGill, Woods 

OLB: Sheard, Simon, Ayers, Basham, Maggitt

ILB: Spence, Jackson, Bostic, Walker Jr, Morrison 

CB: Davis, Wilson, Hairston, Melvin, Morris

S: Hooker, Butler, Green, Geathers, Farley 

 

K: Vinatieri

P: Locke 

LS: Overton 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mingo has a good shot at making the roster.  I just wasn't sure who's place he would take on the roster. Possibly Maggitt.  I don't see Party making the roster.  Off the field issues and I think McGill and Woods are better.  With Marlon Mack being drafted I think Ferguson will be cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Caleb3502 said:

Mingo has a good shot at making the roster.  I just wasn't sure who's place he would take on the roster. Possibly Maggitt.  I don't see Party making the roster.  Off the field issues and I think McGill and Woods are better.  With Marlon Mack being drafted I think Ferguson will be cut.

Parry*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Caleb3502 said:

Mingo has a good shot at making the roster.  I just wasn't sure who's place he would take on the roster. Possibly Maggitt.  I don't see Party making the roster.  Off the field issues and I think McGill and Woods are better.  With Marlon Mack being drafted I think Ferguson will be cut.

 

I prefer to carry 4 RB's, so Ferguson has chance. Most teams I think carry 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Caleb3502 said:

This is my way too early prediction for the Colts 53-man roster.  We will probably have at least one UDFA on the roster, but I didn't include one in this projection.  Who do you think the Colts will have on their roster for Week 1?

 

QB: Andrew Luck, Scott Tolzien

HB: Gore, Turbin, Mack 

WR: Hilton, Moncrief, Dorsett, Aiken, Rogers 

TE: Doyle, Swoope, Williams 

OT: Castonzo, Clark, Banner

OG: Mewhort, Haeg, Good, Schwenke

C: Kelly, Blythe

 

DE: Anderson, Langford, Hunt, Ridgeway, Stewart

DT: Hankins, McGill, Woods 

OLB: Sheard, Simon, Ayers, Basham, Maggitt

ILB: Spence, Jackson, Bostic, Walker Jr, Morrison 

CB: Davis, Wilson, Hairston, Melvin, Morris

S: Hooker, Butler, Green, Geathers, Farley 

 

K: Vinatieri

P: Locke 

LS: Overton 

Who is your return man since you don't think they will keep Bray?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bluefire4 said:

It's more likely they keep 3 QB with Luck's health than 8 d-linemen. Hunt or McGill will have to go.

I think it'll be Parry or Hunt...McGill was one of our best DL last year when he played, so unless he has a major drop off I doubt he'll be gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Who is your return man since you don't think they will keep Bray?

I think they'll use Rogers as the return man, but I think there is a good chance they keep Bray as a returner.  I just wasn't able to find a spot for him when I made up this 53-man roster.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it'll be only 7 d lineman, and 4 ILB. With that being said that could open up spots for a 4th running back, and possibly (if they want) a 6th receiver, which could be Bray (him and Rogers could handle return duties). But those are big IF'S..i can see them keeping 4 running backs but im not sure about the 6 receivers! Could be used for a extra QB as well (due to Lucks health) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Caleb3502 said:

This is my way too early prediction for the Colts 53-man roster.  We will probably have at least one UDFA on the roster, but I didn't include one in this projection.  Who do you think the Colts will have on their roster for Week 1?

 

QB: Andrew Luck, Scott Tolzien

HB: Gore, Turbin, Mack 

WR: Hilton, Moncrief, Dorsett, Aiken, Rogers 

TE: Doyle, Swoope, Williams 

OT: Castonzo, Clark, Banner

OG: Mewhort, Haeg, Good, Schwenke

C: Kelly, Blythe

 

DE: Anderson, Langford, Hunt, Ridgeway, Stewart

DT: Hankins, McGill, Woods 

OLB: Sheard, Simon, Ayers, Basham, Maggitt

ILB: Spence, Jackson, Bostic, Walker Jr, Morrison 

CB: Davis, Wilson, Hairston, Melvin, Morris

S: Hooker, Butler, Green, Geathers, Farley 

 

K: Vinatieri

P: Locke 

LS: Overton 

 

Love seeing all that depth in the trenches, it's definitely a sight for sore eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

Love seeing all that depth in the trenches, it's definitely a sight for sore eyes.

Dont think we keep Darryl Morris or Maggitt. 7DL is more like it on defense. I totally forgot about Ayers. Between Basham, Sheard, Simon, Ayers, and Mingo along with an improved DL we should have a much better pass rush this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a couple of things that caught my eye

 

I dont see how woods gets in over parry even with his arrests.

 

I dont think we need 5 safeties.

 

Id be shocked if Morris made the roster

 

I think Mingo has a better chance at making the roster then bostic

 

I think if morris outplays tolzein again, he'll be our number 2

 

love that you kept maggit:thmup:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Kirk said:

He will at least be on PS unless they find someone better

 

Not sure if this is correct, but I think because he was on the team last year, hes not eligible, but I think he needed to be active in those games for atleast 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Not sure if this is correct, but I think because he was on the team last year, hes not eligible, but I think he needed to be active in those games for atleast 6

Well if hes not , oh well . I wasn't real impressed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, krunk said:

Dont think we keep Darryl Morris or Maggitt. 7DL is more like it on defense. I totally forgot about Ayers. Between Basham, Sheard, Simon, Ayers, and Mingo along with an improved DL we should have a much better pass rush this year.

Yep...and better coverage on the back end can give those guys that extra second or two to get home. It all plays hand in hand. I think we've finally got some pieces in place, now we'll see what happens and what our coaches can do with it. There is no excuse now for not having something to work with in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, krunk said:

Dont think we keep Darryl Morris or Maggitt. 7DL is more like it on defense. I totally forgot about Ayers. Between Basham, Sheard, Simon, Ayers, and Mingo along with an improved DL we should have a much better pass rush this year.

Yes I'm with you , and that in turn makes the secondary much better especially with the talent. In fact the whole D will be much better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we will make some use of D Butler at nickel in some situations the other corners outside of Davis, Melvin, Wilson I think will be Charles James and Tevin Mitchel. If not we will see some free agents brought in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, weslo1812 said:

I think it'll be Parry or Hunt...McGill was one of our best DL last year when he played, so unless he has a major drop off I doubt he'll be gone. 

McGill barely played so obviously he is thought of less by the staff than by the members of this forum. He could definitely be cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Bluefire4 said:

McGill barely played so obviously he is thought of less by the staff than by the members of this forum. He could definitely be cut.

Not neccasarily, we don't know exactly why he may have been played less, there could be a variety of reasons. But I do know when he played he was probably more effective in his time then Parry ever really has been. Parry just got washed out of the way like a pebble more than I care to remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct, the weak side, so we agree.  Paye is better suited for the strong side.  Now Dayo, talk about a swiss army knife!  Can play both ends, 3 tech, and NT on obvious passing downs, love the kid :).  
    • When you write...Only you have these views...that is singling out me from some group you have in mind.  The word Only does that.  Including the word VIEWS, it suggests that you are singling out my views from a group.  That would be the consensus.  It appears that you don't remember what you wrote.   I said that teams have their TOP 250 ranked Prospects pretty much the same, because the evaluation process uses the same inputs and metrics, give or take some weighting, and based upon if its the top 30 prospects or the last 220 to 250 prospects.  I said their draft boards could be different, and gave an example of having their #12 ranked prospect, JJ McCarthy, ahead of their #3 ranked prospect MHJ on their draft boards.  So what you said about draft boards...like anybody pays attention to you over 13 years...probably doesn't disagree with what I said either...so relax.   This comment seems full of itself.  It doesn't read like a 50/50 disagreement of opinions.  Approaching someone who has a different opinion by TELLING them its has gobs of flaws looks more like an 85/15.  Sorry, but neither I nor many on this board are going to treat you like the 85/15 knowledgeable guy you want to be treated like (and some others here).  You just haven't earned the chops.   Hmm.  You "explained to me"...and so did others?  There goes that 85/15 relationship you...and others...sort of demand.  And you...and others...haven't earned.  And BTW, you didn't even get my opinion right.   This thread should not be talking about opinions you think I've had the past two years...not sure why they are relevant.  But you are not representing them correctly so they need to be corrected (I'm sure everybody cares to read it. LOL)   As far as Woods:  I never said Ballard got lucky with Woods at 73.  I said Ballard overvalued Woods relative to other teams at 53.  Ballard's own words in his own draft day video showed him debating who to take at 53...AP or JW...and he finally says "lets go with the wide-out".  And then Woods fell to 73, where Ballard stopped him from falling who knows how far by picking him.  So him debating closely to take JW at 53 shows he strongly considered taking him at 53 when he did not have to strongly consider it.   As far as Raimann.  I did not ignore the age thing that you..(and others?)...explained to me.  I discarded it for being bad.  Every GM E.V.E.R.Y one of them would have been glad to spend a first round pick on a 25 year old LT who is playing like a top 10 LT and have that player under a rookie contract for 5 years (except the GMs who already had an All-Pro at LT).  EVERY GM who's team needed an LT as badly as the Colts probably would have traded up from 53 to get him...if they knew what he would be this early.  Being 25 is completely irrelevant.  LTs have longevity, and they still have to deal with a second contract.  They'll gladly take the top 10 play for the next 5 years (lets see) over the risk of what he will be like 5 years from now.  The same player evaluation process that prevails throughout the NFL failed Raimann.  And Ballard got lucky that such a good player was able to be picked with his third pick of the draft.     Hmmm, as if NO ONE explained to me?  Who would that be?  Just another guy on the forum?   Or the ones with 5 figure post counts that feel that their role is to explain stuff to others?     Saying Ballard got lucky is not negative nor is it belittling.  Especially when I also say that ALL GMs get lucky, which I exampled by mentioning Polian/Mathis, Polian/Saturday, NE/Brady, and Lynch/Purdy...etc.   They all get lucky.  I'm sorry that you feel putting Ballard in the same Commoner bucket as all other GMs belittles his Majesty.   Which is what Ballard tended to support by his own words that said "nobody knows how this stuff (the draft day activities...rankings, draft board, and draft pick trades) will play out".     Sorry, but for what...7 years...you have been trying to sell this notion of Ballard being Smart and right...like there is a bright line separation between those GMs who are, what, dumb and wrong?  Ballard has sort of deflated the idea that there is a bright line between GMs.  BTW, the great John Lynch sure did mess up that Trey Lance trade up didn't he? Good thing he got lucky with Purdy pick to sort of bail him out of the important QB position issue. 
    • Latu will occupy the side where he is rushing the passer. That is his job. To get to the qb!!  I am not sure who will go where. I expect Paye to play LDE and I am not sure where Sam and Dayo will line up. I really wouldn't be shocked if Paye isnt even a starter to open the season on the left side. I think what will be clear is Latu will be starting and those other 3 will be doing a lot of switching around but I do think Dayo will become a starter soon into the season
    • I do think the entire dline will take a step forward with an experienced dline coach this year. It’s very exciting to have someone with so much experience. 
    • People act like he had one or two sacks all season.  He had almost ten. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...