Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mel Kiper's newst mock draft has us taking....


Recommended Posts

29) - T.J. Clemmings - Indianapolis Colts (11-5)


COLLEGE: Pittsburgh


Class: Sr


HT: 6-4


WT: 309


*: OT


Analysis: It's tempting to look at the defensive line here because the need is pretty obvious, but at this point Clemmings becomes extremely attractive because the potential is so significant. In terms of raw tools you're looking at maybe the best physical package in the draft for a future NFL left tackle. But Clemmings is a converted basketball player, a major physical talent who can be exposed by pass-rushers who have a few tricks. The Colts are OK on the left side but could definitely use another tackle in the portfolio and just talent, period, on an offensive line that took a step forward in 2014 but isn't close to a top unit.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard good things about him from the Senior Bowl and the Combine. Kiper doesn't know jack tho. Irritating putz :thmup:

 

He may be irritating to you,  but the man knows his stuff.   He's been doing this well for 30 years.

 

You don't last this long without knowing your stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate it ... There's tackles/guards in FA dt/de/ilb

None of them come with a rookie contract. There is one thing we should know. That you never really have enough talent on the o-line. After starting about 10 or 12 different line ups last season it's not that hard to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He or Cam Erving in the 1st with Tre Jackson in the second and our OL will be built for years. Cam was the ACC OT of the year 2 years in a row and played center the last few week, tearing it up. Tre Jackson is a freaking road grader, big powerful and dominate. Both may be gone by the time we pick in the first and second, if not...TAKE!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may be irritating to you,  but the man knows his stuff.   He's been doing this well for 30 years.

 

You don't last this long without knowing your stuff.

Kiper is a self proclaimed expert. Several guys on this board could do as well as he does if given the time. Kiper is nothing more than a personality and that's what gets him on TV. Bill Tobin was spot on, he's a wanna be. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper is a self proclaimed expert. Several guys on this board could do as well as he does if given the time. Kiper is nothing more than a personality and that's what gets him on TV. Bill Tobin was spot on, he's a wanna be. JMO

Ah I would not call Kiper a wanna be, He is pretty good with his stuff...He is not my favorite but he knows what he is talking about often...Not always, Like any prediction your going to miss on players and your going to hit...Do it long enough and those hits and misses even out over time, Kiper has whiffed bad a number of times but so have GM's.

 

Predicting how good these players will be in the NFL is literally not possible(To many variables, Injury, work ethic and so on) unless one can look into the future. What sets those analysts and draft gurus apart is not x number of guys they hit or whiff on...(Given time Im sure I can hold my own in regards to numbers and percentage with them to be honest and others on here could do the same who study film a lot and do some reading)......But they know what to look for at positions....Most fans don't...They just see the player they are looking at was either A)a playmaker who put up good numbers in college or B)A player who did not put up good numbers and was not a playmaker..............Many fans cant tell you why in either case...Everyone who puts themselves out there scouting or trying to scout a player and what he is capable of in the pros will miss sometimes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah I would not call Kiper a wanna be, He is pretty good with his stuff...He is not my favorite but he knows what he is talking about often...Not always, Like any prediction your going to miss on players and your going to hit...Do it long enough and those hits and misses even out over time, Kiper has whiffed bad a number of times but so have GM's.

 

Predicting how good these players will be in the NFL is literally not possible(To many variables, Injury, work ethic and so on) unless one can look into the future. What sets those analysts and draft gurus apart is not x number of guys they hit or whiff on...(Given time Im sure I can hold my own in regards to numbers and percentage with them to be honest and others on here could do the same who study film a lot and do some reading)......But they know what to look for at positions....Most fans don't...They just see the player they are looking at was either A)a playmaker who put up good numbers in college or B)A player who did not put up good numbers and was not a playmaker..............Many fans cant tell you why in either case...Everyone who puts themselves out there scouting or trying to scout a player and what he is capable of in the pros will miss sometimes

"wanna be" in the sense that he wanted to be in an NFL front office but didn't have the pedigree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want my first round OTs to be successful immediately. You can keep the ex-basketball athlete who gets burned by pass rushers. I prefer a guy like that in the 3rd or 4th round.

I don't believe that OT exists in this draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that any player who will be there at 29 will actually be worth 29, comparing to a typical draft.

That's kinda what I have been thinking to...The whole draft save for the first 10 maybe 15 players is kinda blah to me, Lots of depth, Not sure many future stars or starters but there will be a few

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper is a self proclaimed expert. Several guys on this board could do as well as he does if given the time. Kiper is nothing more than a personality and that's what gets him on TV. Bill Tobin was spot on, he's a wanna be. JMO

 

You know who else calls him an expert?    Everyone else.

 

ESPN has been using him for 30 years.     They don't do that with wanna be people.

 

Now, everyone has a Mel Kiper.      And no one asks the question now.    No one takes shots at him other than his hair.

 

But his talent is not questioned anymore.    He's as good as anyone else and better than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know who else calls him an expert?    Everyone else.

 

ESPN has been using him for 30 years.     They don't do that with wanna be people.

 

Now, everyone has a Mel Kiper.      And no one asks the question now.    No one takes shots at him other than his hair.

 

But his talent is not questioned anymore.    He's as good as anyone else and better than most.

"wanna be" in the sense that he wanted to be an NFL front office man but didn't have the pedigree.

 

Some have the previous NFL front office experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"wanna be" in the sense that he wanted to be an NFL front office man but didn't have the pedigree.

 

Some have the previous NFL front office experience.

 

And his work is just as good as theirs.      And that's the point.     

 

He does this for a living and doesn't embarrass himself   (beyond the hair)

 

He knows what he's doing.     He's right far more than he's wrong.

 

He's accountable and he owns his mistakes.

 

I know there are a number of people here who don't care for him.   I think they're missing the Big Picture.

 

You don't stay around for as long as Kiper has doing as well as Kiper has without knowing what you're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do they just won't be on the board when the Colts draft.

I found a couple I like, Clemmings, Erving (Though could play Center), Flowers, Mcann I all like but don't expect any to be a great success from the start. La'el Collins Im warming up to at RT or LG but I'd bring him along slowly, His balance scares the hell out of me, Cant block on your belly or ***....I'd draft him in a trade down only if he is still on the board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want my first round OTs to be successful immediately. You can keep the ex-basketball athlete who gets exposed by pass rushers....I prefer a guy with that description in the 3rd or 4th round.

 

That means you never want a first round OT. Every rookie tackle will get worked by NFL pass rushers. Almost without exception.

 

Unless your objection is that he once played a different sport. 

 

Clemmings is a Day 1 starter, IMO. Or would be on our team, at RT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found a couple I like, Clemmings, Erving (Though could play Center), Flowers, Mcann I all like but don't expect any to be a great success from the start. La'el Collins Im warming up to at RT or LG but I'd bring him along slowly, His balance scares the hell out of me, Cant block on your belly or ***....I'd draft him in a trade down only if he is still on the board

 

I'd include Humphries. He has terrible hand placement (actually, just inconsistent, but it's a major failing), and isn't aggressive enough at the corner, but the physical tools are obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means you never want a first round OT. Every rookie tackle will get worked by NFL pass rushers. Almost without exception.

 

Unless your objection is that he once played a different sport. 

 

Clemmings is a Day 1 starter, IMO. Or would be on our team, at RT.

Just based upon the description Kiper gives, he sounds like he is projected in round 1 due to his overall athleticism, not his proficiency at football thus far. I basically mean that I want my round 1 OTs to be proficient football players. Sure, even AC struggled some as a rookie.

Besides, I think it was Cummings who struggled quite a bit at the Senior Bowl. And he's only 6'4"...more of a G height. I think it all adds up to being over drafted at 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"wanna be" in the sense that he wanted to be an NFL front office man but didn't have the pedigree.

Some have the previous NFL front office experience.

Who cares if they have front office experience. Most of those guys did a horrible job anyway.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just based upon the description Kiper gives, he sounds like he is projected in round 1 due to his overall athleticism, not his proficiency at football thus far. I basically mean that I want my round 1 OTs to be proficient football players. Sure, even AC struggled some as a rookie.

Besides, I think it was Cummings who struggled quite a bit at the Senior Bowl. And he's only 6'4"...more of a G height. I think it all adds up to being over drafted at 29.

 

Cummings is closer to 6'5" then he is 6'4" ....   even NFL.com lists him at 6'5"

 

But more important is the arm length....   35+ inches....     he's got the measurables and the potential to get better.   He's only played OT for two years.      He was a DL before that.

 

Here's his profile.

 

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2015/profiles/t.j.-clemmings?id=2552365

 

One last thought.....    this is an average draft at best.....    odds of getting a player with a 1st round grade at 29 are not good.

 

So,  you want to get a guy with as much upside and possible high ceiling as possible.    That's Cummings.

 

If we can get him at 29,  I'd consider ourselves very fortunate....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In one of the interviews I listened to with Scott and a Tenn Titans reporter a few months back he was asked what's one of the things that separates you? He said probably what is between my ears. High football IQ, understanding of the game and instincts.
    • Agree with you on the draft takes.   For AR's season, I think mediocrity is what we should hope for( compared to other QBs). We should not forget,that this is basically his rookie season and he's still only 22. So if that would get us to 10-7.....HOORAY !
    • Less than 2 months away when the greatest crushes this Jake Paul guy. Tyson in 3. Tyson is getting in great shape, he looks fast and strong as of now.    When I list boxers where they rank all-time, I go by peak. You have to when it comes to boxing because most fighters Don't last long. Mike Tyson from 1985-1995 only lost once in 10 years. His record in that time frame was 43-1 37 KO's. Buster Douglas KO'd him in the 10th round in a fight where Mike didn't even train for and Mike actually KO'd him in the 8th, Douglas got a 13 count.    Notable wins in that 10 year frame.   Berbick Holmes but he was old, still it was Holmes. Tucker  Spinks Bruno Ruddock (twice)      
    • I'm excited about our future. I think Ballard put together 2 very nice drafts in a row. Never thought we would get Latu, thought we had a better chance at Bowers. Still holding out hope for Cross, he flashes greatness than dissappears, hope he's consistent. Hope Woods takes lead in TE room. I keep writing off Granson, but he keeps impressing. Even if Richardson has a mediocre season I think the team around him could get us to 10-7. 
    • I think you understood his words in a "positive" way, but that's not what he said.   He DID NOT say that "most of you would choose to get married..."   That's your implication. Of course, only women can bring children in this world and most of the women will choose to be married and have children, but that's not exactly what he said.   He said, "doing so - while some others will go on to lead successful career in the world - will take you closer to God's Will"    Here's what he said from the transcript:    He could've said, "even if you go on to have a very successful career, and get the greatest accolades of the world, I think the most important title of a woman is :  Homemaker. And, that would take you closer to God's Will"    But, he didn't say so because he wanted to say exactly what he believes women should do and brought God into that by saying that's His Will.    I think he made a mistake of implying that women are generally excited about marriage and having kids and being a homemaker, when that's only part of a woman's life - even though that could be the most cherished and blessed part of the life.   He only looked at how that made his wife's life - his words, not his wife's words by the way - and projected that to all the women. 
  • Members

    • atapcl

      atapcl 83

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,806

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts.com

      Colts.com 6

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JMichael557

      JMichael557 495

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,368

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,302

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,416

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...