Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Andrew Luck knows the 49ers defense


BlueShoe

Recommended Posts

I am not sure why so many people believe the Colts are going to lose.

 

Vic Fangio used to be our DC when Mora was the head coach and now he is the 49ers DC. Many may remember that Mora was fired because he refused to fire Fangio, 

 

Fangio was the DC at Stanford in 2010 and followed Harbaugh to the NFL. 

 

Luck practiced against Fangio's defense the entire 2010 season and he has a photographic memory. I do not think Stanford changed the defense in 2011 when Derek Mason took over either. We are going to light that secondary up all day long.

 

This is why I believe we are going to score often. Luck might throw for over 400 yards and 5 TD's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am not sure why so many people believe the Colts are going to lose.

 

Vic Fangio used to be our DC when Mora was the head coach and now he is the 49ers DC. Many may remember that Mora was fired because he refused to fire Fangio, 

 

Fangio was the DC at Stanford in 2010 and followed Harbaugh to the NFL. 

 

Luck practiced against Fangio's defense the entire 2010 season and he has a photographic memory. I do not think Stanford changed the defense in 2011 when Derek Mason took over either. We are going to light that secondary up all day long.

 

This is why I believe we are going to score often. Luck might throw for over 400 yards and 5 TD's.

Don't get over confident though cause some people consider that as being cocky. I think it will be a good game as long as we don't have those same mistake as the last two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's Harbaugh going to tell his team? That Luck is a good player? Sure they will know some of our offense, but the advantage is still goes to Luck, because he isn't facing anything new.

What is Luck going to say....

 

Luck: "Hey McGlynn, Willis is going to blitz.  I can tell, I practiced against their D-coordinator a few years ago."

McGlynn:  "OK, I got him"

 

The result of the play is McGlynn with a broken ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure why so many people believe the Colts are going to lose.

 

Vic Fangio used to be our DC when Mora was the head coach and now he is the 49ers DC. Many may remember that Mora was fired because he refused to fire Fangio, 

 

Fangio was the DC at Stanford in 2010 and followed Harbaugh to the NFL. 

 

Luck practiced against Fangio's defense the entire 2010 season and he has a photographic memory. I do not think Stanford changed the defense in 2011 when Derek Mason took over either. We are going to light that secondary up all day long.

 

This is why I believe we are going to score often. Luck might throw for over 400 yards and 5 TD's.

 

There is an epic fail in logic here. 

 

The game might be a good one or maybe even a blowout, but that will have very little to do with anything written in your thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure why so many people believe the Colts are going to lose.

 

Vic Fangio used to be our DC when Mora was the head coach and now he is the 49ers DC. Many may remember that Mora was fired because he refused to fire Fangio, 

 

Fangio was the DC at Stanford in 2010 and followed Harbaugh to the NFL. 

 

Luck practiced against Fangio's defense the entire 2010 season and he has a photographic memory. I do not think Stanford changed the defense in 2011 when Derek Mason took over either. We are going to light that secondary up all day long.

 

This is why I believe we are going to score often. Luck might throw for over 400 yards and 5 TD's.

And Harbaugh clearly knows the Pep Hamilton-Stanford offense..

And SF's defense is clearly more talented than than our offense..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's Harbaugh going to tell his team? That Luck is a good player? Sure they will know some of our offense, but the advantage is still goes to Luck, because he isn't facing anything new.

so wait...we have an advtange cause Luck nows their D, but we dont have a disadvantage cause Harbaugh nows our O?

 

im confused people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wah wah wah...

I really hope all of you who are basically saying we stand no chance won't watch the game on Sunday.. I mean what's the point since you already know we are going to lose.

It would save us from your cry baby threads if we do lose, and you're back tracking "ohhhh I actually had a feeling we were going to win" posts if we do win.

No appreciation for the sport, straight up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's Harbaugh going to tell his team? That Luck is a good player? Sure they will know some of our offense, but the advantage is still goes to Luck, because he isn't facing anything new.

 

He's facing probably the best all around defense he's ever faced in his entire life.  That in itself is enough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure why so many people believe the Colts are going to lose.

 

Vic Fangio used to be our DC when Mora was the head coach and now he is the 49ers DC. Many may remember that Mora was fired because he refused to fire Fangio, 

 

Fangio was the DC at Stanford in 2010 and followed Harbaugh to the NFL. 

 

Luck practiced against Fangio's defense the entire 2010 season and he has a photographic memory. I do not think Stanford changed the defense in 2011 when Derek Mason took over either. We are going to light that secondary up all day long.

 

This is why I believe we are going to score often. Luck might throw for over 400 yards and 5 TD's.

 

Talent wins in the NFL, especially when it's well coached. The Niners have a very talented and well coached defense. It's great that Luck is familiar with some of the schemes, but there's a two year book on the Niners defense on film. I really believe there's only a minimal advantage to Luck being somewhat familiar with it, if that.

 

On the other hand, Harbaugh is Luck's old coach, and Hamilton's old boss. If anyone has an advantage because of familiarity, it's the Niners.

 

Again, talent wins in the NFL, so I think this is all moot anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talent wins in the NFL, especially when it's well coached. The Niners have a very talented and well coached defense. It's great that Luck is familiar with some of the schemes, but there's a two year book on the Niners defense on film. I really believe there's only a minimal advantage to Luck being somewhat familiar with it, if that.

 

On the other hand, Harbaugh is Luck's old coach, and Hamilton's old boss. If anyone has an advantage because of familiarity, it's the Niners.

 

Again, talent wins in the NFL, so I think this is all moot anyways.

 

If Peyton played a cover 2 defense this week then what do you believe the outcome would be? 

 

Defenses have the advantage against young quarterbacks because they have not seen a lot of defenses. This is not the case with Luck, as he has seen this defense up and close. The advantage is ours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Peyton played a cover 2 defense this week then what do you believe the outcome would be? 

 

Defenses have the advantage against young quarterbacks because they have not seen a lot of defenses. This is not the case with Luck, as he has seen this defense up and close. The advantage is ours. 

 

Cover 2 is simple. If Luck played against a Cover 2, it would be in his favor. Same with any quarterback, especially a young one.

 

I get that Luck knowing some of the looks and whatnot is an advantage for him, to an extent. I just don't think it's about the scheme and knowing the looks at this point. I think it's about the talent. And the Niners defense is very, very talented.

 

Not saying we can't win, or Luck isn't going to play well. Just saying that the talent level on that defense is more important than any advantage we might think Luck has because of being familiar with it. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's facing probably the best all around defense he's ever faced in his entire life.  That in itself is enough.  

 

San Fran defense is not exactly setting the world on fire right now. They are 24th against the run and 10th against the pass. When a team is not doing well against the run and is on paper, good against the pass, then we know all to well what that really means. It means that teams are running on them for a reason. They have given up 4 passing touchdowns and 3 rushing touchdowns in 2 games. 

 

The stat that sticks out more than anything is how they have given up 42 first downs (15 against the run and 21 against the pass). This should sound familiar, because it is very close to what the Colts have given up, and we know that we have had our own issues. But we are a young team that is in the early stages of gelling as a cohesive unit. The 49ers defense has been intact for a while now. I believe we will exploit them on the ground and through the air. 

 

Where the 49ers have done well is on third down defense, but that stat can be misleading because we don't know the down and distance average. I would think the down and distance on third downs for the 49ers defense has been long, because they have given up more first downs than we have. On the other hand, our offense is THIRD in the entire league at converting third downs. Something is going to give Sunday, and my money is on Andrew Luck converting third downs and winning this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cover 2 is simple. If Luck played against a Cover 2, it would be in his favor. Same with any quarterback, especially a young one.

 

I get that Luck knowing some of the looks and whatnot is an advantage for him, to an extent. I just don't think it's about the scheme and knowing the looks at this point. I think it's about the talent. And the Niners defense is very, very talented.

 

Not saying we can't win, or Luck isn't going to play well. Just saying that the talent level on that defense is more important than any advantage we might think Luck has because of being familiar with it. IMO

 

 

That worked out real well for Alex Smith as a rookie, didn't it?

 

Who is the third best team at converting third downs this season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ignoring anything to do with accuracy, level of play, etc., just based on his injury history through 8 games, it's highly unlikely he will be our QB in a few years.  It's a catch 22 with him.  If you don't utilize his legs, it will be very difficult to win with him.  If you do utilize his legs, it will be very difficult to keep him on the field.  I've come to the conclusion that his size is not necessarily a benefit.  The collisions are harder.  He goes to the ground harder.  You don't see some of the gentle drops and rolls you see with Lamar Jackson.     The fact that he's also tied to a front office that might be counting their days doesn't help either.  
    • Id say avoid drafting or taking players from your team that you’re a fan of. I’m an avid fantasy guy and also a sports bettor. I literally will avoid taking any Colts players In fantasy and also during the week in fantasy football I avoid taking the props of the players I’m playing against. I never want to wish bad on anyone so for that very reason I avoid those guys. For me personally it has helped tremendously, I can still enjoy the game without bias. 
    • I will just say this about the comparisons between Luck and AR.  And even Manning.   First, as far as overall talent?  I think AR has more talent than Andrew.  And I say that as the biggest Luck fan that there is.  I loved that guy.  But he always reminded me of a Manning wannabe.  Someone who had more pure talent.  Who was very smart.  But I never ever got the feeling that he wanted to win and put in the hours that Manning did.  And I think that was proven when he retired so early.  Manning was like an AI robot who studied 23 hours a day.  Just a huge will to win.    But what Luck had was pain tolerance, drive and overall ability due to his teaching since he was a kid...and his will to do what is right for the team.    IMO that was 100% MORE than AR's is right now.  Not even close.    If only you could clone a combo between Manning and his smarts, Luck and his pain tolerance, and AR and his pure athletic ability.    I am sorry but unless AR is the unluckiest person in the history of the NFL, NO ONE gets hurt this much.  He is a wreck.  Heck I remember in his first pre season game last year he ran out of bounds and started to limp.  Literally his very first hit ever.  Right then I said to myself "uh oh".  And then he has not finished what......4 of his all time starts?  Out of 8?  I mean....that is not normal QB behavior.  He seems to get hurt on almost every hit he takes.    Make that make sense.    It is very VERY odd to say the least.   I want AR to do well because he seems like a good guy and he has all the talent in the world  But after this last game and his words after? For lack of a better word I don't think he has any ability at all to do 2 things.     One....protect himself.   Two.....take a hit and feel pain without it being the end of the world.  He seems to have no pain tolerance whatsoever.  Which is fine.  Just don't be an NFL Qb as a result. 
    • I'm not creating anything.  Till AR can stay on the field it's Flacco that has to be tough. 
    • I understand that but till AR shows he can stay on the field, Flacco has to be the man. It's that simple. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...