Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jules

I would prefer to play to win vs. Houston

47 posts in this topic

Unless someone is hurt I would prefer to play to win. With Pagano coming back I don't want to see this team roll over for Houston at home where we have been at our best. The emotion will be too high, in fact maybe the team was looking ahead to his return today IMO.

 

We also have a shot to knock Houston to the third seed and give Denver homefield.

 

 

Plus, this is not a well oiled machine in Indy like in years past. We have A LOT of work to do win or lose vs. Houston. We are too young and raw. We know we are not a SB winning team so why rest for a long run? Just have fun and play....

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to play to win IMO. After the pathetic performance today in every facet of the game, they need to work on everything and get as much practice as possible. If they just tank next week and rest players, they are going to be making a huge mistake. We are not good enough to just take a week off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would we not play to win? Unless we are the #1 seed, I don't see why any team would rest their starters. Even if a key player goes down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure, but I really hope so. Our offense looked out of sync all game today. They need as much work as possible. Plus, I want to keep that streak alive of beating Houston at home. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know who might not be able to play but darnit I want to play vs. Houston. This is good experience and a playoff atmosphere.

 

 

Chuck!!!!!!!!

 

Honestly I think we need him back badly, we need a boost. Today was painful even for an optimist like me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why would we not play to win? Unless we are the #1 seed, I don't see why any team would rest their starters. Even if a key player goes down.

It's an opportunity to rest players - WHO NEED TO REST! Not guys who don't need the break, like a previous nameless regime.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a new era...hopefully that resting mentality is a relic of the Manning era.  This team still needs alot of work and they have a Coach to win for.  Colts need to go balls out until the end...no other way to play it given all they've been through this year. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's an opportunity to rest players - WHO NEED TO REST! Not guys who don't need the break, like a previous nameless regime.

 

I am sorry, too much bad karma with the previous regime that rested players.

 

I honestly don't think resting players helps.

 

When was the last time a team that rested their starters the last week won the super bowl?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I might be wrong but Pagano never struck me as "a resting healthy starters" type of guy. From the moment he walked in here he seemed to want us to go all out in everything.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flip a coin.

When Luck is getting dumped by Watt all day, they'll be running a risk, for no tangible gain.

The Texans are going to play because of today, so maybe the Colts swing back?

Take your pick.

I'm pretty sure the Colts play to win. I'm not sure it's a great idea though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I might be wrong but Pagano never struck me as "a resting healthy starters" type of guy. From the moment he walked in here he seemed to want us to go all out in everything.

Right. That's what I was trying to say. You don't rest healthy guys. But if a guy needs the rest, it's better to give him time for the playoffs.

Except for about five players, we're not missing much when going next man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Play to win and play to gain more experience and chemistry. Rest injured players only unless the game is really lopsided. But I am always in favor to playing to win, that's what competitive sports is all about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flip a coin.

When Luck is getting dumped by Watt all day, they'll be running a risk, for no tangible gain.

The Texans are going to play because of today, so maybe the Colts swing back?

Take your pick.

I'm pretty sure the Colts play to win. I'm not sure it's a great idea though.

 

 

I am sure Watt will have his moments. It's a given.

 

I just think this team has too much work to do and this is a good playoff type atmosphere for them. I think sometimes people forget we are still building for the future not just now. If we had Peyton it would be now or else.

 

I am not directing this all at you in particular just in general.....

 

I also think the place will be nuts. This team clinched a playoff spot in a rebuild season and it's the Texans.

 

Besides, the fans who root for Peyton on the side in Denver will want to see Denver get homefield I am sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it is nearly as simple as some make it out to be.

1) I know people like to bash Polian but the whole resting thing is not unique to the Colts. Other teams do it routinely as well. Plus can anyone definitively say the reason for poor playoff performances was restig players?

2) There are only 45 active players on game day on a 53 man roster. There will be people who need to play.

3) The out of synch thing people manetion about the Colts today so therefore they need to play next week. Could not a very reasonable argument be that they could use a week off the get back to basics.

4) There are guys who simply are beat up and could use a day off. Satele, Justice, Conner, Freeman, Redding, etc.

5) The Colts had an early bye week this year. They have not had a break since week 4 and could probably use the time off.

6) If it is judged they are better served by giving those who need a week off, then you absolutely do it. It is an entirely reasonable decision.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am sure Watt will have his moments. It's a given.

 

I just think this team has too much work to do and this is a good playoff type atmosphere for them. I think sometimes people forget we are still building for the future not just now. If we had Peyton it would be now or else.

 

I am not directing this all at you in particular just in general.....

 

I also think the place will be nuts. This team clinched a playoff spot in a rebuild season and it's the Texans.

 

Besides, the fans who root for Peyton on the side in Denver will want to see Denver get homefield I am sure.

(I mean this nicely)

I don't care at all about the Broncos as it relates to what the Colts do. The new found Denver fans can hope all day.

This team does have work to do. I don't think they're getting any of it done next Sunday. I think Luck's decline has to do with him getting hit all the time.

It would be very wise to sit him.

Bmore looks like the most likely match up. That's a winnable playoff game. That's the only thing of interest to me. Prepare for that. If we see the Texans again later, then great.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's an opportunity to rest players - WHO NEED TO REST! Not guys who don't need the break, like a previous nameless regime.

 

 

Exactly!!! I dont want us to play to give the Broncos a No.1 seed or the Pats a No.2 seed, I could care two hoots about that, and this is coming from someone who likes Peyton. :)

 

I do not want Watt or the others tee off on Luck, our O-line, and take any unnecessary chances if that is how the game turns out. We remember how chippy the Texans played last game and how they took personal foul shots on our players plus abused our O-line. If our O-line is not doing well, I would see if they improve for about a half. If not, I would yank the primary starters. If any of our starters need the rest, especially the fresh legs on D that are banged up or a vet wideout like Wayne, I would give them the rest, to be honest. On offense, this would be a good game to insert a few plays for our potential playoff game, and see if we need to scrap them or not.

 

One half for offensive starters keeps them in rhythm, IMO. Defensive legs normally need more rest, especially D-line and pass rushers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(I mean this nicely)

I don't care at all about the Broncos as it relates to what the Colts do. The new found Denver fans can hope all day.

This team does have work to do. I don't think they're getting any of it done next Sunday. I think Luck's decline has to do with him getting hit all the time.

It would be very wise to sit him.

Bmore looks like the most likely match up. That's a winnable playoff game. That's the only thing of interest to me. Prepare for that. If we see the Texans again later, then great.

 

Very wisely said. I agree whole heartedly. No Andrew Luck or an injured Andrew Luck, we stand no chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly!!! I dont want us to play to give the Broncos a No.1 seed or the Pats a No.2 seed, I could care two hoots about that, and this is coming from someone who likes Peyton. :)

 

I do not want Watt or the others tee off on Luck, our O-line, and take any unnecessary chances if that is how the game turns out. We remember how chippy the Texans played last game and how they took personal foul shots on our players plus abused our O-line. If our O-line is not doing well, I would see if they improve for about a half. If not, I would yank the primary starters. If any of our starters need the rest, especially the fresh legs on D that are banged up or a vet wideout like Wayne, I would give them the rest, to be honest. On offense, this would be a good game to insert a few plays for our potential playoff game, and see if we need to scrap them or not.

 

One half for offensive starters keeps them in rhythm, IMO. Defensive legs normally need more rest, especially D-line and pass rushers.

 

Honestly I don't care about Denver/NE either and their fates BUT I would like to beat Houston and keep our streak going vs. them in Indy.

 

Also, it just feels wrong to me for Chuck to come back and pull starters. I will go with what the team decides but I just cannot fathom this team not giving it their all with his return game. This season is for him.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very wisely said. I agree whole heartedly. No Andrew Luck or an injured Andrew Luck, we stand no chance.

See now you sound like Dungy in the past. "Well at least Peyton didn't get hurt." :)

 

I am not too worried about it. If a guy is hurting rest him but honestly I don't see why this is even a real question here. This is not a veteran well oiled machine. I just cannot get on the resting wagon as much this year....I just can't. Makes no sense.

 

We need to regain our emotional edge too IMO.  We seem more mentally flat lately to me.

 

 

It would be so fun to knock Houston from #1 to #3!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly I don't care about Denver/NE either and their fates BUT I would like to beat Houston and keep our streak going vs. them in Indy.

 

Also, it just feels wrong to me for Chuck to come back and pull starters. I will go with what the team decides but I just cannot fathom this team not giving it their all with his return game. This season is for him.......

 

 

We have already accomplished the regular season part of what we wanted to accomplish for Chuck Pagano.

 

We need to focus on accomplishing something in the post season for Pagano. Again, like you said, Pagano and the coaching staff will make the decisions, and whatever they do, I am sure their focus is for the long term well being of the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
See now you sound like Dungy in the past. "Well at least Peyton didn't get hurt." :)

 

I am not too worried about it. If a guy is hurting rest him but honestly I don't see why this is even a real question here. This is not a veteran well oiled machine. I just cannot get on the resting wagon as much this year....I just can't. Makes no sense.

 

We need to regain our emotional edge too IMO.  We seem more mentally flat lately to me.

 

 

It would be so fun to knock Houston from #1 to #3!!!!!!!!!

 

Makes a lot of sense to focus on the long term without compromising the short term heavily. See how the game goes for a half with the offense. If the game is close, keep the starters in. If it is out of hand, and you are already resting a few banged up players, do what is right for the next game in hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be so fun to knock Houston from #1 to #3!!!!!!!!!

 

That is absolutely the wrong mindset to play the game with. We are not an underachieving team trying to play spoiler by any means. We dont need to play like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have already accomplished the regular season part of what we wanted to accomplish for Chuck Pagano.

 

We need to focus on accomplishing something in the post season for Pagano. Again, like you said, Pagano and the coaching staff will make the decisions, and whatever they do, I am sure their focus is for the long term well being of the team.

I agree it's up to them but I also just think this team might be too young and raw to get into the mentality of losing games due to health reasons.

 

In the past I felt this team became too soft for it's own good.

 

I honestly know it sounds terrible but I am not even sure I care if we put our guys at risk for injuries vs. Houston. This is a house money season and part of me wants to just keep playing like it is no matter the outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We may as well play the game. Last game at home, and hey, why not knock Houston in the mouth and keep our home streak alive.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Makes a lot of sense to focus on the long term without compromising the short term heavily. See how the game goes for a half with the offense. If the game is close, keep the starters in. If it is out of hand, and you are already resting a few banged up players, do what is right for the next game in hand.

I agree it might depend on how the game goes.

 

When we played in Houston we were in the game in the 4th. If the game is close and we are in one piece just keep going for the win.

 

Of course the backup QB drop off might not be as bad as in years past either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is absolutely the wrong mindset to play the game with. We are not an underachieving team trying to play spoiler by any means. We dont need to play like that.

I don't believe it is. Houston is our division rival and the team we need to knock off for next season. I want to send them a message too if possible.

 

Besides, I think the league would prefer Houston drops to 3 but I have my own conspiracy theories on this. :) We'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't believe it is. Houston is our division rival and the team we need to knock off for next season. I want to send them a message too if possible.

 

Besides, I think the league would prefer Houston drops to 3 but I have my own conspiracy theories on this. :) We'll see.

 

Yeah, it is possible the league wants a Peyton vs Brady duel for AFCCG ratings, I can buy that. :)

 

On the flip side, I can also buy the conspiracy theory that some Peyton haters/dislikers deep down know that Brady is good for 1 road game win but not 2 road game wins as a No.3 seed or lower, based on history. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it is possible the league wants a Peyton vs Brady duel for AFCCG ratings, I can buy that. :)

 

On the flip side, I can also buy the conspiracy theory that some Peyton haters/dislikers deep down know that Brady is good for 1 road game win but not 2 road game wins as a No.3 seed or lower, based on history. :)

 

Naw I don't know if they care about them in the title game together. They just would prefer one of them get to the SB. :)

 

I honestly think one of them might go one and done. :) Depends on who plays who if they are 1 and 2 though and what arises later.

 

I actually did not expect Houston to really lose this badly today either.....

 

 

As you know though, I never was a huge fan of resting guys who are healthy. I really was against it last year for the Packers too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unless someone is hurt I would prefer to play to win. With Pagano coming back I don't want to see this team roll over for Houston at home where we have been at our best. The emotion will be too high, in fact maybe the team was looking ahead to his return today IMO.

 

We also have a shot to knock Houston to the third seed and give Denver homefield.

 

 

Plus, this is not a well oiled machine in Indy like in years past. We have A LOT of work to do win or lose vs. Houston. We are too young and raw. We know we are not a SB winning team so why rest for a long run? Just have fun and play....

 

Actually if NE beats Miami with Houston losing they get 1st seed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually if NE beats Miami with Houston losing they get 1st seed. 

 

Not if Denver beats the Chiefs to go 13-3 and the Pats have 4 losses already. Pats can at best get to No.2 then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually if NE beats Miami with Houston losing they get 1st seed. 

NE only gets homefield if they win, Houston loses AND Denver loses to the Chiefs. Denver has another win right now over NE.

 

With that being said my hate for the Texans seems to have steadily increased this year. I remember in 2007 when we rested happily vs. the Titans in the final game. Oh yay!

 

I just can't get on board with resting healthy guys. I keep saying what are we resting for this year anyway? The Super Bowl or bust run? lmao

 

Just go all out and have fun the rest of the year. If someone is hurt they can sit.

 

I don't want to be the Polian era part 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NE only gets homefield if they win, Houston loses AND Denver loses to the Chiefs. Denver has another win right now over NE.

 

With that being said my hate for the Texans seems to have steadily increased this year. I remember in 2007 when we rested happily vs. the Titans in the final game. Oh yay!

 

I just can't get on board with resting healthy guys. I keep saying what are we resting for this year anyway? The Super Bowl or bust run? lmao

 

Just go all out and have fun the rest of the year. If someone is hurt they can sit.

 

I don't want to be the Polian era part 2.

Oh yes. SF stopped that possiblilty.

I agree. Go H bent over leather:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We also have a shot to knock Houston to the third seed and give Denver homefield.

 

 

Any reason as to why you'd want Denver to have homefield over us?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any reason as to why you'd want Denver to have homefield over us?

 

That was supposed to be an added incentive for the Colts fans who also root for the Broncos second but who also like the idea of Indy resting. :) I don't think it worked in this thread. ;)

 

In reality if a guy is hurt I am okay with resting but I never was a huge fan of resting healthy guys. And young guys too. Maybe 2009 just ruined me, I don't know. Also I firmly believe to this day that resting hurt GB last year too. And I just don't think we are good enough to just rest yet.

 

Look on the plus side Vance. If you fell to third maybe you can follow in the 2006 Colts foot steps.

 

Obviously though the Texans have a lot more to play for next Sunday so it will be tough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're Crazy if you think we're RESTING ANYONE on the homecoming of Pagano. That stadium is gonna ERUPT on Sunday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're Crazy if you think we're RESTING ANYONE on the homecoming of Pagano. That stadium is gonna ERUPT on Sunday

This is what I'm thinking. We didn't go from "CHUCKSTRONG" "BUILD THE MONSTER" "WIN & WE"RE IN" to

rest healthy, young players before most of their very first post season football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, maybe half of the top 15 (or so) interior defensive lineman are 6'1 or less and about 300 lbs or less and arm lenght of around 32 inches (Donald, Atkins, Casey, Daniels, Jarrett/Kyle Williams). Only Donald was a day one 1 pick or drafted in the first two rounds. Casey went in the 3rd round. No one else was picked in the top 100. I don't think there is an other position were so many top players share similar trait and most of them were picked late in the draft.   Are teams that afraid of having a small team that they automatically give worse grade for smaller defensive lineman? If Aaron Donald, for example, had Geno Atkins besides him instead of Michael Brockers, would that line be as effective as one would expect just from the player talent level upgrade from Brockers to Atkins or even worse? I mean, Brockers is a good player but Atkins is on another level. And individually these players are great but would they work as well together on the same line? Not sure if it's as much about the size itself as these players can use it to their advantage in quickness and leverage but maybe two dlineman with short arms would create some issues?   Just wondering why so many of them have fallen late in the draft. I understand that some teams want bigger, physical players (like BB, Parcells etc) but what about those teams that had already gotten steals later in the draft with small interior lineman would jump at the chance to select a player who had great tape and showed similar traits as their best defensive player. Like Grady Jarrett in 2015. Both the Bengals and Titans drafted a dlinemen in the 4th, Jarrett went with first pick in the 5th round Bengals pick was actually two picks before Jarrett was taken.   Though the Bengals did take Billings last year and he might be next to Atkins but he was another 4th round pick. And Titans did draft Mike Martin to be their nose tackle a year after taking Casey but he didn't pan out. And I maybe haven't looked at closely enough at bust/success rate for smaller defensive lineman so these guys could be sort of outliers and teams just missed on these guys for other reasons.    
    • Also for retrospect on this list: Dan Marino--Mark Clayton & Jim Kelly--Andre Reed were snubbed.  Can you think of others that should be on here in place of someone else?
    • http://newarena.com/nfl/ranked-the-top-24-qb-wr-duos-of-all-time/7/?amxt=fbdesktop2   11. Peyton Manning/Reggie Wayne: Indianapolis Colts   In the post Marvin Harrison era, Wayne took the torch as being Manning’s go-to target. During his 14-year career with the Colts, Wayne had eight seasons with at least 1,000 yards receiving. He also managed to haul in 82 touchdowns during this time period. Manning’s resume has been chronicled ad nauseam. He is the all-time leader in passing yards (71,940), and is consistently mentioned as one of the best to ever throw a football in the history of the sport.   2. Peyton Manning/Marvin Harrison: Indianapolis Colts   The respective skill-sets of Manning and Harrison worked perfectly with one another. Manning’s unbelievable timing on throws was predicated greatly by Harrison’s ability to separate in coverage. One of the best technical receivers in league history, Harrison’s route-running capabilities led him to become an 8-time Pro Bowler and a 3-time First-team All-Pro. He also led the league in receiving yards twice with Manning under center. 114 of Manning’s 539 touchdowns throws went to Harrison. This statistic is simply mind-boggling — and further validates a top-three standing.   ( Jerry Rice also got mentioned 2 times.  #3 with Steve Young, and #1 with Joe Montana.)
    • A passing league now. You could say the same of probably 10 other WRs in the league right now. Marv did it in a very different league.    Not taking away from it, he's a Pro Bowl player.
    • This is why you need a well rounded team.  No matter how good 1,2, or 5 players play, it takes an entire team to win games.  Every aspect of the team thrives or wither off the success AND failures of other aspects.
  • Welcome New Members

    •   Sorry to keep harping on the Irish thing, but did you know the horseshoe has seven points on it?  (The Colts horseshoe, anyway.  Actual shoes for horses depend on the farrier).   Seven is considered a lucky number...  Lucky.  Luck.  I'm telling you, you picked the right team to root for.   7    
    •   Don't hold Boston against the Irish.  It's not our fault.    We love our green, which makes Indiana a tearmann.   I love it that you chose to root for an underdog instead of the Pats.  I don't think it's coincidence that you became a fan around the time Luck got drafted to the Colts.  That's providence.     Horseshoe?  Luck?  Four-leaf clover?  Come on.  Hoosier Hospitality has roots in Irish fun-lovery.  If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!  May the luck of the Irish be with you!  
  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.