Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Enter To Win 2 Tickets to Steelers @ Colts Sun 09/29 | 1:00 PM EDT

Chiefs/colts Tampering? [Merge]

coltnorth

By coltnorth
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

schwamm Walk On

schwamm

Posted
Posted

Also, here is a brief description of "highlights from the NFL's anti-tampering policy":

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/5465/freshening-up-on-nfls-tampering-policy

Before anything else becomes an issue, JI and PM have to fail to come to terms. If that happens, then the allegations would have to be proved.

It also looks extremely vague on what the punishment would be. Swapping 5ths and losing a 7th for the Lions, but I hardly imagine that would serve as any guidline for tampering with probably the biggest free agency prize of all time. IF any tampering occured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ace_6900 Walk On

ace_6900

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know anything about this. I know the rule, you cannot talk about a player on another team. Romeo Crennel said he would take a look at Peyton or something like that. ESPN local radio broadcaters are talking like Goodell will fine Kansas City or possibly reward us a draft pick from his comments. Has anyone else heard anything like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
subvet Walk On

subvet

Posted
Posted

From ESPN:

On Saturday, Kansas City coach Romeo Crennel let it slip that the Chiefs would be interested in pursuing the four-time league MVP -- if the Colts let him leave as a free agent.

"I'm not supposed to talk about anybody else's players, and he's still a player with Indianapolis," Crennel said, referring to the league's tampering rules. "But with a talent like that, I would be crazy not to consider it if he were available. I'll leave it at that."

The NFL is considering tampering charges but with all the interest from all over it isn't likely anything will come of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UKCOLT17 Walk On

UKCOLT17

Posted
Posted

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8274140a/article/report-colts-likely-wont-take-action-against-chiefs-over-manning?module=HP11_headline_stack

they need to look into it

Crennel's remarks came shortly after a report surfaced that Chiefs general manager Scott Pioli had met with Manning's agent, Tom Condon, to talk about the quarterback twice,

though Pioli declined

to address the issue last week.

dont no if tru but if is need to do something if is

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wyld1 Walk On

Wyld1

Posted
Posted

http://www.nfl.com/n..._headline_stack

they need to look into it

Crennel's remarks came shortly after a report surfaced that Chiefs general manager Scott Pioli had met with Manning's agent, Tom Condon, to talk about the quarterback twice,

though Pioli declined

to address the issue last week.

dont no if tru but if is need to do something if is

Pioli meeting with Condon and if Manning was discussed is tampering...Crennel's remark is according to the rules but meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coltswarriors Walk On

Coltswarriors

Posted
Posted

That would be ridiculous if they were charged with tampering just based on what Crennel said. He was just paying Manning a compliment.

Agreed. If this is just based on what Crennel said then this is ridiculous.

BUT, if they do find out that Pioli contacted Condon/Manning then something should be done about it, because it is tampering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoKeR Walk On

JoKeR

Posted
Posted

If Pioli did meet with Condon twice... there needs to be a pretty harsh penalty IMO. Perhaps, in these tough times the footall gods decided to smile down on us and give us a gift at the expense of the Chiefs lol.

Is it legal to meet with PMs agent? But how do they prove that it was about him? I agree, Bowe and we forget everything... Hey Rodger Pioli was in town that day, enjoying shrimp at St Elmo's with Jim so I know for a fact he didn't meet with Condon. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCH Walk On

CCH

Posted
Posted

Is it legal to meet with PMs agent? But how do they prove that it was about him? I agree, Bowe and we forget everything... Hey Rodger Pioli was in town that day, enjoying shrimp at St Elmo's with Jim so I know for a fact he didn't meet with Condon. ;)

I'm pretty sure it's illegal to meet with Condon about Peyton, but if everyone denies everything it's going to be tough to prove they were talking about Peyton, because Condon is a lot of players agents too. But you can't meet with a players agent when that player is already under contract with another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
schwamm Walk On

schwamm

Posted
Posted

I'm pretty sure it's illegal to meet with Condon about Peyton, but if everyone denies everything it's going to be tough to prove they were talking about Peyton, because Condon is a lot of players agents too. But you can't meet with a players agent when that player is already under contract with another team.

True, but how many players does Condon represent? How many of those are either on the Chiefs or are already free agents? Even if they did discuss Manning, do you imagine there will be any chance of it being proved? Who would have been stupid enough to record that conversation, or invite some fly to sit on the wall and document it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bayone Walk On

bayone

Posted
Posted

Read on Colts Authority about possible tampering charges againts the cheifs for talking to Mannings agent twice. Could lead to the Colts getting 2nd round pick?

Report: Colts likely won't take action against Chiefs - nfl.com

Crennel

made headlines this past Saturday

when he said the Chiefs would "be crazy not to consider" acquiring a quarterback as talented as

Peyton Manning

Crennel's remarks came shortly after a report surfaced that Chiefs general manager Scott Pioli had met with Manning's agent, Tom Condon, to talk about the quarterback twice,

though Pioli declined to address the issue last week.

The NFL declined to comment when contacted by NFL.com Monday.

The league can investigate tampering violations without a team filing charges, and violation of the rules can result in fines and forfeiting draft picks.

( I dont know if NFL proceeds & finds violations without colts filling charges , if we would get a pick if Chiefs found guilty )

The Chiefs

filed tampering charges last offseason against the Lions, which resulted in the Lions forfeiting their seventh-round selection in the 2011 NFL Draft and the teams swapping picks in the fifth round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ruksak Walk On

ruksak

Posted
Posted

The Chiefs

filed tampering charges last offseason against the Lions, which resulted in the Lions forfeiting their seventh-round selection in the 2011 NFL Draft and the teams swapping picks in the fifth round.

I don't get it? Why wouldn't the Colts file tampering charges when the Chiefs committed the same exact violation and got a great draft advantage because of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bayone Walk On

bayone

Posted
Posted

I don't get it? Why wouldn't the Colts file tampering charges when the Chiefs committed the same exact violation and got a great draft advantage because of it?

my friend your guess is as good as mine, I dont get alot of whats going on lately

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

in 1 link in the article u get this wording

45]

Told Colts not inclined to pursue tampering charges
at this point
re: Crennel comments on Peyton. League can pursue issue if it chooses.

so by saying at this point maybe in future will but why not ASAP so can maybe get settled before draft

or do Colts just have so much else going on they dont want to bother ??

as said Your guess is as good as mine , have a good day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • John Waylon
      Matt Gay has a new injury lmao

      By John Waylon · Posted

      You know who is also kicking better?   Chase McLaughlin.   
    • DavePSL
      Taking Taylor off the field

      By DavePSL · Posted

      Not trying to over simplify but it is pretty simple. SS calls plays that he believes will work against a certain defense and he has confidence his players will execute that play. The results right now are that his players are NOT capable of executing those plays on a consistent basis enough to win games. The only question moving forward is, do we have good enough players to start to execute more consistently or not and is SS making it as easy as possible for players to be consistent. It's not just a talent thing. It's a attitude and smart thing and then the level of talent. Most of the time, the best players are the smartest players with the right attitude. How talented they are is a bonus. My point, i question our teams attitude and football intelligence as much as I question their talent. Ex.....Stopping the run is as much attitude as it is talent. A big part of why JT is JT, is because of his intellegence.
    • John Hammonds
      The Good, Bad, Ugly after 2 NFL Weeks - College Draft Board Update Analysis

      By John Hammonds · Posted

      Thanks for the updates.  I made my "first pass" projected picks based on where the players are ranked on tankathon right now.  Obviously, subject to change!
    • Stephen
      Matt Gay has a new injury lmao

      By Stephen · Posted

      He hasn't  been that good other than the 1 game he won last year.
    • lollygagger8
      Too Soon to Panic

      By lollygagger8 · Posted

      The biggest problem is that the rest of the team is playing like trash around the rookie QB.    Of course the essentially rookie QB that has played 6 NFL games is going to be a rollercoaster.  He's known to have accuracy issues, and is for some reason being forced to be a pocket passer.    When the highest paid O-line in the league can't block, that's problem.  When the WR's can't catch passes that bounce off their hands, that's a problem.  When the highly invested in $$ D-Line (like 5 1st or 2nd rd players) can't block and LB's get consistenly washed, that's a problem.  When the highest paid kicker in the league can't kick and gets hurt constantly, that's a problem.  When the defensive scheme is to "bend not break" but the bends are to the tune of 100 yards a series, that's a problem.   Now's the time to strike in other areas while you have a QB on a rookie contract. Actually, this all should've been figured out already by the GM and all positions should've been rock solid by now. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...