Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Bengals Game Day Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 829
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, rockywoj said:

Why not take a couple of shots at the end zone?  <face palm>

Exactly Rocky. Over 10 seconds with a timeout at the 10 yard line & we run the clock down and settle for 3.  Chuck is shell shocked.  Coaching scared as hell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:
Andrew Luck started feeling pain after throwing couple weeks ago so he's seeking further opinions to figure why still in pain

 

 

Since an orthopedist said when Luck was shot down from practice, that such reoccurring pain is common in case of shoulder surgeries, I'm not worried. Yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Luck is Good said:

Good lord. The guy may not be fixable. Thank you Pagano, Grigson and Irsay. All three are to blame

 

He played with it torn for a year plus.  He may never be pain free.  He'll probably just have to play with pain, but yes this organization has done everything it could to ruin him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

Exactly Rocky. Over 10 seconds with a timeout at th 10 yard line & we run the clock down and settle for 3.  Chuck is shell shocked.  Coaching scared as hell. 

I agree wholeheartedly!  To be fair, I was surprised that on that drive that they didn’t just run, run, down it to run out the clock, but still ...   lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RockThatBlue said:

We are leading at halftime. Time for another brilliant Pagano second half gameplan.

Well coaching in the first half was awful for both teams. My dad lives in a indiana suburb of cincy and both staffs are not great at adjustments. These coaches at times appear as mirror images. I think the fact we have stayed competitive in the first half proves we have talent and lack coaching. Good teams adjust quickly. Anybodies game. GO COLTS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, #12. said:

 

He played with it torn for a year plus.  He may never be pain free.  He'll probably just have to play with pain, but yes this organization has done everything it could to ruin him.

I might have missed something awhile back, but why didn't he get it fixed back then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, #12. said:

 

He played with it torn for a year plus.  He may never be pain free.  He'll probably just have to play with pain, but yes this organization has done everything it could to ruin him.

Pagano and Grigson should’ve been gone after the 2015 season. That’s the year all the injuries started happening. And it was clear to everyone that those two were doing nothing to help the situation. Well, everyone except Jim Irsay. So he’s to blame too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

The problem with changing the QB all the time is the chemistry

 

Understood.  Like I said, it is not a recipe for success.  It doesn't seem like the chemistry helps much, though.  I think the bigger problem with that strategy is finding enough QBs that are even decent to cycle through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, JCPatriot said:

 

Come on, man.  Do you have any idea how badly he would have been killed in the media, etc. if he declined a false start penalty?  I kind of see what you're saying, but there is no way he can do that.

Oh i know. Its impossible to decline a play before a snap. I was just saying defensively we would have been better off with less room to throw over the middle. If you have not noticed we struggle covering passing lanes across the middle, being short yard on 3rd down would have probably led to a better look for our D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NM_Colts said:

I might have missed something awhile back, but why didn't he get it fixed back then?

Because they wanted him to play in the meaningless season finale last year. A game that we won & ultimately may have led to us keeping Chuck for another year...  So we really lost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JCPatriot said:

 

Understood.  Like I said, it is not a recipe for success.  It doesn't seem like the chemistry helps much, though.  I think the bigger problem with that strategy is finding enough QBs that are even decent to cycle through.

When .i say chemistry I also mean cadence and such

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, life long said:

Oh i know. Its impossible to decline a play before a snap. I was just saying defensively we would have been better off with less room to throw over the middle. If you have not noticed we struggle covering passing lanes across the middle, being short yard on 3rd down would have probably led to a better look for our D.

 

No, I get what you're saying.  It's not as crazy as it sounds, but can you imagine the blowup that would have happened over that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get the logic behind it , but imo the WRONG player was in the field it shouldn’t have been Sermon, he isn’t that good of a pass catcher. It should have been Goodson. I do agree that having you BEST weapon on the field during times like that. But JT had been making some bad plays, the bad drop (more so on AR than JT but you gotta catch those) and the fumble. I just don’t under understand why Goodson wasn’t in if we are in a clear passing situation. Goodson is the better receiver out of the two.
    • Genuinely speaking did you actually think before typing this out? This was a terrible take ….NEXT!
    • The idea that project QBs work out on anything other than a rare occasion is something to consider.   We’ve gone through a revolving door of QBs since Luck retired (with a few that were project QBs). Can’t blame fans for wanting to see something other than mediocre to poor play.
    • It’s also possible that Shane is sending a message to JT: I’m not playing you in crucial situations if you don’t block. That’s a tough lesson to teach, especially in a game like last Sunday. But benching Taylor when he did makes more sense if there’s a message being sent than just wanting to give the backups a chance. 
    • The 33rd team just posted that Malik Willis was 3rd behind only Kyler Murray and Derek Carr for EPA per drop back. Again, the score abd box score do not tell the full story of this game. Willis moved the ball effortlessly though the air when he needed to. If they had really needed him to throw more, there’s no doubt in my mind he would’ve found success. The run defense is covering up just how awful this secondary is.
  • Members

    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 749

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stoney

      Stoney 125

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...