Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2017-2018 Indiana Pacers and Everything NBA Thread


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Adding IT and possibly Tatum plus maybe picks? Not sure everything in the deal yet. 

 

Kyrie to Boston.

 

IT, Crowder, the 2018 Nets pick and Ante Zizic to the Cavs.

 

One thing for sure......this tells me Boston was hesitant about a long term deal next offseason with IT and his lingering hip issues.

 

This is just so bizarre as hell. WOW. Kyrie is a Celtic. Kobe is his mentor and he is probably like "Okay I was in L.A. now you get Boston." lmao 

 

This is insane.

 

You could next year have Lebron on the Lakers face Kyrie on the Celtics.......IN THE FINALS.:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only problem is this puts huge pressure on the Celtics now to beat Cleveland in the postseason. Ouch.

 

But at the same time it makes a fun rivalry develop.

 

Still just find this so bizarre. I have to think the Celtics really did want to dump IT having doubts with his size and injuries for a long term deal he wanted next offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this season it is not bad at all for Cleveland since they have such limited cap space and IT/Crowder combined only make like what 13 to 14 million? Crowder has an easy deal for some time. 

 

Next offseason is when it gets dicey since Lebron will need to get paid and so will IT. IT has already hinted he wants big money.

 

Maybe they both bolt after this year.......

 

With Kyrie, the old GM claims Boston was on his list too and I am sure Kyrie will be happy since he apparently hates Lebron and he gets to play for Boston which is closer to being like his idol Kobe who played for L.A. with market/fanbase size.

 

 

But wow what a difference in the Celtics lineup this year too. Adding in Hayward/Kyrie........WOW.  Big influx of talent added into Boston and now Brad Stevens has to make it all work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IndyScribe said:

Not Tatum. The trade details have already been released. Cavs don't really get strong enough to beat the Warriors. 

How does Isiah play with LeBron.....

....I didn't see this coming.

 

The problems isn't that Thomas, LBJ and Love wont be good..

,.the problem is that they really bulked up Boston..their main competitor in the East

 

Is Boston now 'Kyrie's team' ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

 

Is Boston now 'Kyrie's team' ?

 

Kyrie, Hayward, Horford etc.......But we know who is getting the ball in crunch time now and it's clearly Kyrie.

 

For Kyrie he should be thrilled, he wanted out of Cleveland and he gets to go to a large market and to a contending team with a great head coach and if he has it in him he can even stick it to Lebron.

 

Boston fans might have a tough time grasping this since IT was a fan favorite, but Kyrie also has 2 to 3 years left on his deal so they can relax there. While with IT he wanted max money next offseason.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the ideal trade for the Cavs, imo. Lebron is likely gone after this season. They get a pick and a young player along with a couple of veterans to keep them in the hunt.

 

I don't think they were likely to put together a team better than the Warriors but one injury/suspension can change a series. They made the Celtics better but I would still have a hard time betting against Lebron. (Warriors being the exception)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ar7 said:

This is the ideal trade for the Cavs, imo. Lebron is likely gone after this season. They get a pick and a young player along with a couple of veterans to keep them in the hunt.

 

I don't think they were likely to put together a team better than the Warriors but one injury/suspension can change a series. They made the Celtics better but I would still have a hard time betting against Lebron. (Warriors being the exception)

Yeah I think the Cavs won this trade but slightly. Like I said earlier it's pretty even but if IT can still healthy, it's a good deal for the Cavs. Kyrie wanted out of Cleveland anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even trade for next year but the future?  Celtics won.  IT+LeBron will both be gone next year, Love will be traded, the Cavs will have a top pick if the Nets stink but they'll be starting over.  Celtics will have Irving, Hayward,Jaylen Brown/Jason Tatum Horford as their core.  They also have the Lakers top pick next year and may not be done wheeling and dealing.  If they get a rim protector(even like a Robin Lopez) they are better prepared for the long run.  Irving's the superior player.  It's crazy to think Boston made the eastern conference finals last year and only have 4 players back from that team this upcoming year.  That takes some guts!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BullsColtsFan1 said:

Even trade for next year but the future?  Celtics won.  IT+LeBron will both be gone next year, Love will be traded, the Cavs will have a top pick if the Nets stink but they'll be starting over.  Celtics will have Irving, Hayward,Jaylen Brown/Jason Tatum Horford as their core.  They also have the Lakers top pick next year and may not be done wheeling and dealing.  If they get a rim protector(even like a Robin Lopez) they are better prepared for the long run.  Irving's the superior player.  It's crazy to think Boston made the eastern conference finals last year and only have 4 players back from that team this upcoming year.  That takes some guts!

The fact that the Celtics didn't give up Tatum or Brown gives them the win. Celtics have a legit chance

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luck is Good said:

The fact that the Celtics didn't give up Tatum or Brown gives them the win. Celtics have a legit chance

We'll see how they click but I think they have a chance next year even.  Beyond next year they'll have a really good chance pending where LeBron ends up.  I think the trade was even as far as next year goes but beyond that, the Celtics won. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jules said:

Cavs fans sound higher on Crowder then IT.

Because he plays defense and can take some burden off Lebron on that end of the floor.....problem is IT is a defensive nightmare....worst defensive player in the league...even worse than Steph....you can't hid the kid....he will get ABUSED in Cleveland....in Boston they tried to hid him like Warriors do Steph...they had enough defensive studs like Avery Bradley, Smart, and Rozier to cover up for him...and their defensive scheme....Cleveland has nothing...nobody plays defense on that team except a 37 yr old Richard Jefferson and occasionally Iman Shumpert who is offensively useless. Plus IT might have issues playing off the ball considering Lebron handles it so much...we saw Kyrie get better at shooting the 3 and playing off the ball...it will be a big adjustment to work IT in that way....plus IT isn't healthy...so lots of question marks for the Cavs I feel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I like what the Cavs did here because they got the Nets pick in the Draft next season which may even be a #1 pick. IT and Kyrie are pretty even players. Kyrie may be slightly better because he has more size but IT is a beast as well. Crowder is a Good Role Player so the Cavs did solid here.

I think the proof will be in the pudding. I don't think the Nets pick will be top 5....likely 6-10 imo....Nets have improved their roster this offseason significantly over last years....and the East sucks lol. I think Kyrie is a much better player than IT....better on both ends actually. Plus he is younger and healthy...unlike Thomas's hip issues. I do think it comes down to how the Cavs use this pick....do they go out and try to get a player to help right now by trading it??? Do they hang on to it and rebuild with it when IT and Lebron leave this offseason? I'd imagine they would have tons of caps space plus could get a good pick. Boston I think got much better this offseason. I think they could have made some better moves but Heyward will play off Kyrie wonderfully!! They got much better shooting and skill wise. It really comes down to if Brown and Tatum develop....they opened up playing room for both and Smart should have a chance to take that next step. I think Stevens will be thrilled. The big chip will be that draft pick in how this all turns out...but I think Cleveland was smart...Lebron can't say they aren't trying now...and yet they have a chip to use this offseason if he leaves to start the rebuild. Heck they can even trade Kevin Love too and maybe have two top 10 picks to jump start things. Its a win win I think....question really is should Celtics have made their big move for Kyrie...or should they had use the picks and assets for PG or Jimmy Butler and kept IT...it will be interesting to see how it works out. I personally have my doubts that IT would have been a long term solution so I think Kyrie is the better fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BullsColtsFan1 said:

We'll see how they click but I think they have a chance next year even.  Beyond next year they'll have a really good chance pending where LeBron ends up.  I think the trade was even as far as next year goes but beyond that, the Celtics won. 

Celtics could very well win next season. LeBron's swan song in Cleveland will be a conference finals loss

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Luck is Good said:

Celtics could very well win next season. LeBron's swan song in Cleveland will be a conference finals loss

I agree.  The Celtics are going to be an exciting team.  If Washington can pick up one more player, they will be a threat in the East as well, I like both teams.  I will be curious where LeBron ends up next year. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

 

haha How awkward would that locker room be?

Real awkward. I remember when the Jazz traded Ostertag for Rony Seikaly in 1998 and then it got voided because dumb butt Rony hated Utah and wanted to stay in New Jersey of all places and they were 20-62 that season lmao. Jazz still made the Finals but lost to Chicago. Rony was a Good Center and had they had them, Jazz may have won it all. Ostertag was never the same and played lousy in the Finals.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he’s still in the team, there’s a reason.   Even if none of us knows what it is.   But I wouldn’t link Foles being on the team to the Colts NOT picking a QB in the draft.     Take a deep breath.   Have a little faith.  Get good sleep.   Better days ahead. 
    • Intentionally yes. But if you go with let's say Will Anderson if he is there and ride it out with the current Qb roster you may have a chance at getting to one next year.
    • So, I have been pretty open and transparent that for the Colts, what we will likely run, and how i think they will likely evaluate these guys, I would rank the big 4 (in terms of fit and what i would want to see): Stroud, Richardson, Levis, Young.   All that being said, the total angst for Levis is insane. I have come around to sell myself on him simply because I believe Stroud will be gone and if it comes down to Richardson and Levis I have a much easier time believing the Colts would draft Levis over Richardson.   I know that many, many analysts and fans and twitter warriors love the athleticism and the upside of Richardson. And I totally get it. But here is the thing: As much as Richardson's tools, upside and testing numbers are what is elevating him, people say what truly holds him back is the lack of experience, completion percentage/inaccuracy, etc. Here is something nobody really says:   What if the "only 13 games" thing on Richardson is actually helping him instead of hurting him?   If Richardson went back to school next year and had a terrible year (think what some people say of Levis' 2022 vs his 2021), Richardson would likely fall completely out of any first round consideration and any franchise QB talk. I would argue the fact that he doesn't have experience yet is helping his stock. People can still talk about "what he could be" since he hasn't fallen on his face yet.    This is the exact reason why I am actually OK with Levis.    Things could not have gone much worse for him last season and yet he is still absolutely considered a 1st round QB and in many circles still a top-10 pick.   I wonder where he would rank amongst prospects if he had that 2021 season this past year. If we were evaluating his 2021 and his upside shown in 2021 compared to the other 3 then i think he is seen in a much different light.    Also, Richardson may have some baseline of a floor w his rushing that is decent like the clip that @Restinpeacesweetchloe posted from Mina Kimes and RGIII backing Richardson. But here is the thing. Look at all of the criticism that was heaped on Lamar Jackson and Justin Fields and guys like them that people claimed were "RBs playing QB." And both of them were much more established throwing the ball coming out compared to Richardson.    Every year it is said to "ignore what you hear during draft season" because so much misinformation and shiftiness happens as agendas are pushed and as teams jockey to elevate guys they dont want and depress guys that they do want.    To me it is telling that Richardson's stock has catapulted sky high during the draft season when basically everyone knew he was going to test as an all-time elite combine specimen. Yet when the college season ended he was seen as a pick maybe in the teens or early 20s based on possible upside. Now everywhere has him top-5.    Levis was seen in that top-5 to top-10 range to start and is now falling.    Nothing has changed w their tape. Nothing has changed with injuries. These guys are the same guys they were months ago and yet the narrative is so different now. Just doesn't sit right with me.    It is the reason why i think we hear whispers that "teams and evaluators probably have Levis a lot higher than draft analysts, media and fans do".    At the end of the day, I am in agreement with a bunch of the fans in our forum that think "give me the guy with the greatest upside and the highest high and let's hope we help him reach that consistently". That is why most folks want Richardson (myself included). But I would be remiss to not say that Levis' considerable upside is just a tick below Richardson in my eyes.    If we end up drafting either Richardson or Levis I think both of them could have top-10 NFL QB upside if they can realize their potential. But for both of them that will be a big IF. 
    • Its a move that would get everyone fired plus if found out they would take away the pick
    • Me too. I dont see how it's a loser mentality when it sets you up to win for the next decade possibly. The loser mentality is drafting player out of desperation that can ultimately set the team back.
  • Members

    • CR91

      CR91 11,052

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 375

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • johnmatrix1991

      johnmatrix1991 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,394

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 3,346

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 6,707

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ManningGM

      ManningGM 469

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 6,610

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rockywoj

      rockywoj 1,379

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...