Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts sign Trey Griffey at WR -- son of Ken Griffey Jr.


ReMeDy

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, ReMeDy said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

 

2-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

Completely different situation.  You can't even compare the two.  As you said, Grigson inherited a 2-14 team whereas Ballard is taking over an 8-8 team.  Who knows how Ballard would have done with a complete rebuild and who knows how Grigson would be doing this offseason with the Colts?  Can't compare the two

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

 

Unfortunately we plateaued after a record 9 game turnaround because subsequent drafts failed to register any substantial difference makers until last season when it was painfully obvious we needed to draft offensive lineman across the board.  The last couple of disappointing seasons were just a culmination of decisions made during our plateau.  

 

I do expect a rebound this season as Luck's line will have more chemistry and the D will be at a minimum competent.  10-11 wins is not out of the question if we can protect the lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's athletic, he has good size, played on a good program for a good coaching staff, and despite his low production, he has some flashes on tape. It doesn't hurt that he's Griffey's son, but forget about that, he's a decent UDFA prospect who the staff can take a good look at during camp season. No different than anyone else.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Superman said:

He's athletic, he has good size, played on a good program for a good coaching staff, and despite his low production, he has some flashes on tape. It doesn't hurt that he's Griffey's son, but forget about that, he's a decent UDFA prospect who the staff can take a good look at during camp season. No different than anyone else.  

 

I think I heard that he had some issues with a coach early in his career and didn't get the opportunities that he may have deserved.  He's supposedly a very level headed kid who doesn't expect any special treatment because of his family name. 

 

He never lit the world on fire at AZ, but he has the size and good enough speed.  He and Bug are going to give our #3-6 WRs a run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

Omg shut up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zalazar Elijahh said:

Omg shut up

 

14 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

You Shut up!!!

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

If you don't agree with people then by all means post why you don't and challenge their viewpoint... telling someone to shut up doesn't really fit this. Attack the post not the poster please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

If you don't agree with people then by all means post why you don't and challenge their viewpoint... telling someone to shut up doesn't really fit this. Attack the post not the poster please.

Okay fine well how about instead of just bringing up the season record why don't you look at how many 4th quarter comebacks luck had in his rookie and sophomore year. ANd how many records he broke when he was healthy. Every year Andrew luck got hit so much that it was absurd. Andrew luck coming out was so gifted and elevated the team so much but our old gm put together a team that got Andrew injured in multiple places. I'm sorry if I'm being annoying but I obviously don't like our old gm and just wish we could move on from him once and for all because I'm very happy with our new guy and just want him to have the support he wants in his own coaches and scouting departments. But if you don't agree then fine. Sorry about saying shut up though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎5‎/‎2‎/‎2017 at 0:18 PM, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

He has a chance his first draft is a lot better than Grigson's first draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2017 at 0:18 PM, LJpalmbeacher said:

 

I'm not a Griggs fan But Griggs turned a 3-13 team with a rookie qb into 3 straight 11-5 records and 3 straight playoff appearnces with multiple playoff wins.

Do you think Ballard will surpass or even equal that in his rookie season as GM?

Yes:hat:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ATL did not get Turner.  They eventually trade up in the second for an obscure 3T DT.    I read that The GM and HC wanted Latu, but the owner stepped in for Penix because he wanted a succession plan.  Read into that what you want.  Also, I guess since ATL seemed to want to trade up to 10 for Latu, its seems somebody wanted him pretty highly.   That's why there are also thoughts...don't get excited...that Ballard got a bit lucky with latu being there at 15.  Basically, the GMs had the 1st round pegged pretty well, then in swoops Blanc and reshuffles the playing deck for everyone.  LVR was mad too, because they wanted Penix at 13.  So if things would have gone to script....who knows who Ballard would have picked since Latu probably would not have been there.
    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...