Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Sign Jabaal Sheard (Merged)


PeterBowman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, Colts1324 said:

Yeah. Does this mean that corner and ILB are the two positions we are looking at in the draft most? 

 

I think every defensive position is on the table to draft, and all defensive positions are on the table In every round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GoDeep said:

We have a LB core now!

Not too bad.  In the context of the past two signings along with, hopefully, a pass rusher in the first, even Mingo makes some sense.  Unlike with Grigson, you can sense some sort of plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, neug3246 said:

Rap sheet seemed shocked on what we gave sheard 3 yrs 25.5 mil with 12.5 million guaranteed

 

 

When you are as bad rushing the passer as we are; you have to throw everything at the board and hope something sticks.

 

We are not done. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if our first two picks were still outside linebackers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

That's quite a bit of money for someone who only had 5 sacks last year

 

It is but there's just so much money chasing the talent this year. If you want to sign a top 30 guy , you need to overpay . 12 million $ guards were a pipe dream 10 hours ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the whole issue is providing a bit of cover for ARs performance, or at least the passing games' performance.  An assumption that JT busts off a 20 yard chunk play that the passing game can't produce (or GB having to account for that possibility), and its somehow Shane's fault for seeing that opportunity and not having JT in there.   IMO, when a team is not getting chunk plays it needs, its not a RB issue, its a QB issue.    That's why some of the intensity of this argument is really just to deflect blame away from AR and try and place it one step higher.  JMO.
    • I don't know what being on board with the extension means, its not very revealing.  I'm not commenting on Shane's like for JT,  I think he's just fine with JT as his RB.   I just mean that from a team politics point of view, the new HC can't make his first major decision saying he doesn't want to extend the team's only star.  So I'm not surprised he said that he was on board with it.  Again, no sarcasm in that from me because he probably is fine with JT, I'm just looking at it from how it would look if the coach said anything else other than being on board.
    • imo shane tends to over manage at times, just let them play basic football
    • RIP didn’t he get a FO job as well?
  • Members

    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,900

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,986

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,359

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DavePSL

      DavePSL 119

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JABTHREE

      JABTHREE 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • OLD FAN MAN

      OLD FAN MAN 1,377

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rockywoj

      rockywoj 1,831

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 104

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,439

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 333

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...