Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Peyton's Contract Discussion MEGA MERGE


BleedBlue4life

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

wow everyone was saying he could have gotten around $25M a year, but he's down to $18. He gave up 35 MILLION DOLLARS over 5 years to help the Colts. We better use that money wisely to surround Peyton with talent on both sides of the ball in his final years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ross Tucker is a hater.. This is what he tweeted earlier..

Not buying the "Peyton took less for teammates" spin. $23M/yr first 3 years, doubt he plays for $10.5M last 2 years, & K. Hayden got cut.

Kinda surprised actually that this wasn't more divided. shoulda been more like 20-21 mil for the first 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just wondering. Why is it that Manning has to get the biggest contract ever? I feel that if he truly wanted a wining team he would take like 5 or 6 mill a year. He has already had his big payday. I would think he would be wanting to win a couple more super bowls. So take less so we can sign players to help us win!!!!!!!

It's hardly the biggest contract ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now this from Peyton Manning, which is doing the right thing -

Manning conveyed that directive Thursday during a meeting with owner Jim Irsay and vice chairman Bill Polian, who is negotiating Manning’s contract with agent Tom Condon.

“While I appreciate Jim Irsay offering to make me the highest-paid player,’’ Manning told The Indianapolis Star, “I told him I’d rather he save that money and keep whoever it is . . . Joe Addai, Charlie Johnson, whoever that may be.

“I’m willing to take less than they’ve offered if they are going to take that money to keep players we need to keep and go get other players. All I want is for them to have the cap and the cash to keep the players they want to keep and to sign other players.’’

Manning also instructed Irsay, Polian and Condon to get the contract done. Now.

“Today, tomorrow, definitely by Sunday,’’ he said.

Manning took issue with the speculation he’s asking to maximize his contract opportunity.

“The numbers that are being floated out there, the rumors of what I’m asking for … that’s not from me,’’ he said. “I’ve never said one word about the contract. I told (Irsay and Polian) them my cap numbers can be as low as they want them to be in being creative with the salary cap.’’

Seems everyone including Irsay and Manning understand the issue/times at hand.....except for you and some others here. Don't twist my points. I've clearly stated what my view is. As far as others not playing up to their contracts.....I've been a huge proponent of dumping Sanders, Hart, etc. The front office is now getting those decsions right and I couldn't be happier. I've also gone on record saying there are two players currently on the team that are overpaid. They are: Kelvin Hayden and Ryan Diem. To reiterate posts from the past, Hayden isn't going anywhere because of his guarantee/bonus pay situation but in 2012 and 2013 when he's scheduled to make elite money I believe the story will be different. My stance on Diem was that it would be interesting to see if the Colts were going to stay the course with their usual decision making or move away from that. Specifically, as long as he contributes will he have an opportunity to play out his contract & I believed that would happen but was still curious what route the team would go. As it turns out, Polian just said Diem had to reduce his salary or be cut. But even that doesn't change my opinion on the player & I'm stoked we're getting tougher on how value is viewed. In a lot of ways Diem is landmark in the new era both economically speaking and under the new Polian. I very much like the new direction in Indy.

I guess we've kind of put this to bed already, but I'll just say I don't think there's that big a difference from $18 million a year to $20 million a year, not as it pertains to our ability to pay other players.

What wound up happening is that somehow we've manipulated his cap numbers in a way to get the best of both worlds: a below average cap hit in year one (which was absolutely necessary this season), and a low cap hit toward the end of the deal, so that we're not paying a 39 year old quarterback $25 million a season. This is what I've been hoping would happen, but I didn't expect the low cap hit in year one, which is only $2 million less than the average.

You're projecting others' viewpoints on to me. I simply said that if you want the best quarterback in the NFL, you're going to have to pay him like he's the best (or one of the best). As of right now, he has the highest average salary in the league (tied with Brady), and he's a year longer than Brady. And that's fine, because with him, we're a contender, and without him, we're rebuilding.

I'm glad the deal is done, I love the structure, and I think we'll have the flexibility as the cap goes up, or else we can push money around if necessary. Would have been great if he'd signed for five years, $60 million, but that was never realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob Parker on ESPN AFC South blog just made me mad!!! REALLY MAD.

http://espn.go.com/blog/afcsouth/post/_/id/25853/video-will-colts-regret-manning-deal

In this video he says Colts will regret signing Manning to such a large contract due to his 'serious' neck injury and on PUP list. "flip of the coin, trying to take care of your best guy and hoping for the best. This is not a smart financial decision. You don't know what your going to get from him [Manning]. They will be a 6-10 year."

WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!

This guy has no idea about Manning, 6-10? Are you crazy??? We addressed our OL issues in the draft, and Peyton is smart enough to know not to get smeared by anyone, let alone a big hit.

"He will not be healthy enough, and he will struggle. This team is on a downward spiral."

Put your money where your mouth is. Skip had it right in this video, everyone in our division would have to do a lot better than last year, only team I am slightly concerned about is the Texans. Jags and Titans have rookie QBs, and if your think Hasselbeck or Garrard can out-gun Manning, you are crazy.

SB is at home, and I think we make one heck of a push for it. Manning wants another ring, Indy wants to see us win. Heck, I'll be the first one at Lucas Oil Stadium, don't you worry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think you read that in the right context. It was in response to:     I'm genuinely asking what happens if Shrader plays like a franchise kicker/hits a game winner and Gay says he's ready in the next few weeks (even though he's still recovering). What are our options in that situation if we aren't ready to chance it with him coming back and letting Shrader possibly get pulled to another team? Are we willing to let Shrader go (I'm not saying he is a franchise kicker, just throwing a scenario out there) for a guy that many on here say is overpaid, that is north of 30 and recovering from surgery? If Shrader plays big while Gay is out, it's a predicament they are going to have to think on, in my opinion.    I'm not at all saying anyone is going to force Gay. I'm on the other end of it. What if Gay is trying to force us to let him play while a rookie is balling out in his position? And just for arguments sake... We had Matt Gay on our practice squad in 2020 when he was pulled to the Rams and played big for them. How many potential franchise kickers are we willing to let get pulled off practice squads or waivers while we watch ours struggle through injuries? Seems to be a trend.
    • Oh. I know. But he has to step in to be a starter now.     I think I would prefer Willis over Siemian. Siemian is not good. I believe Tannehill, Ridder, and maybe Winston are better.     I agree. It will not be easy. The NFC North teams have brutal schedules. Green Bay has the Colts, Tennessee and then the Vikings. Not too difficult. The Vikings have the 49ers, Texans, then GB the next three weeks after tomorrow.
    • Syracuse got zero votes last week and took down Ga Tech who was at 22. McCord is putting up Madden numbers after two games with 750 yards and 8 tds. Oronde Gasden Jr may be the best TE in the nation if not def on a short list. Their D played much better then last week and now have some more winnable games (Though UNLV may be the best Group of 5 team in the nation).
    • While I'm not a professional athlete and I'm old as hades this hernia is nothing to take lightly.  I had surgery to repair a 6 inch hernia 4 weeks ago.  It was very painful and it takes at least 8 weeks before I can lift anything over 10 lbs.  I found out that males are more prone to have hernias because of how our bodies develop before birth.  Just some information.   
    • There is a strong incentive to play off more than what seems wise to us, but the idea is to do our best to eliminate long plays.  Then if it comes to the red zone we win and hold them to field goals.  We need 4+ sacks.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...