Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Harvey and Rayford


Nesjan3

Recommended Posts

Do we have a spot for both? With the 4 mlbs, Mathis/Werner, Walden/Sidbury? Maybe no sidbury but 9 linebackers? Hmmm...

man you are very right, damn! I was so excited about the way they both played I didn't even think of that. I havnt seen Sidbury do anything, is he inactive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All over the field the whole second half, didn't seem like the browns had an answer, looks like these two should be locked in as backups

Rayford should make the team, going to be tough for Harvey.

We have to remember that except for the first drive of the second half, they were playing against reserves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Harnish was headed for the PS anyway so Harvey has to beat out one of the ILBs.

 

 

 

Yes.. Harnish will have zero to do with the LB that gets cut. I would think Harvey makes it and no way you in your right mind can cut Rayford. The guy has played lights out . So i guess that leaves Sidbury as the odd man out. At least he will probably have no problem finding another home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will keep 5 OLB's Mathis,Walden,Werner,Rayford,and Sidbury. Sidbury will make the team because of the money we paid him.

 

Sidbury is a Cap Hit of $65,000 I believe if he is not on the opening game roster and costs ($780,000) about $300,000 more than Harvey for the season. Sure liked Harvey in the Blitz. Is he becoming intuitive as a run stopper too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Sidbury makes less than a million

 

 

I don't think the money will come into play here at all. I'm seeing a base salary of $715,000 ( Sidbury) and a signing bonus of $65,000. Says nothing about the base of 715K being guaranteed , thus the cap hit for cutting him would be the signing bonus amount of 65K. 

 

So the money factor in who gets cut is actually the other way around. 

 

Rayford cap hit is 405K 

Harvey cap hit is  480 K 

 

So add the 65K to Rayford's base of 405 and you get a savings of 715 K - 470 =  $245,000 if Raford makes the team and Sidbury doesn't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the money will come into play here at all. I'm seeing a base salary of $715,000 ( Sidbury) and a signing bonus of $65,000. Says nothing about the base of 715K being guaranteed , thus the cap hit for cutting him would be the signing bonus amount of 65K.

So the money factor in who gets cut is actually the other way around.

Rayford cap hit is 405K

Harvey cap hit is 480 K

So add the 65K to Rayford's base of 405 and you get a savings of 715 K - 470 = $245,000 if Raford makes the team and Sidbury doesn't

Nerd!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the money will come into play here at all. I'm seeing a base salary of $715,000 ( Sidbury) and a signing bonus of $65,000. Says nothing about the base of 715K being guaranteed , thus the cap hit for cutting him would be the signing bonus amount of 65K. 

 

So the money factor in who gets cut is actually the other way around. 

 

Rayford cap hit is 405K 

Harvey cap hit is  480 K 

 

So add the 65K to Rayford's base of 405 and you get a savings of 715 K - 470 =  $245,000 if Raford makes the team and Sidbury doesn't

 

This.

 

So long as Sidbury's contract isn't guaranteed, I don't think his contract will be a factor come cut day. Rayford has clearly been better. Sidbury has been practically invisible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will keep 5 OLB's Mathis,Walden,Werner,Rayford,and Sidbury. Sidbury will make the team because of the money we paid him.

 

No he won't.   Because we didn't pay him barely anything.

 

I think he got couch cushion money for a signing bonus, and his salary (which is non-guarenteed)  is roughly $750k,  more chump change.

 

So,  we can cut him and it will cost the Colts literally almost nothing.      That was the beauty of the deal...   potential upside, with almost zero downside.       The only way he makes the team is if he shows the talent.    Money will not be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

So long as Sidbury's contract isn't guaranteed, I don't think his contract will be a factor come cut day. Rayford has clearly been better. Sidbury has been practically invisible.

Sudbury only played the first preseason game and I thought he made some good plays in that game. If his injury is a concern then I could see him being cut for that reason. Otherwise I wouldn't be surprised if he and rayford make the team and we simply carry 5 olbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sudbury only played the first preseason game and I thought he made some good plays in that game. If his injury is a concern then I could see him being cut for that reason. Otherwise I wouldn't be surprised if he and rayford make the team and we simply carry 5 olbs

 

I read somewhere today that he was hurt in the Giants game, so that explains why I haven't noticed him. And now we've IR'd him, so that's settled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we'll see 10 linebackers on the final roster.    And, I don't think we'll see 10 DB's either....

 

As for the LB's....

 

OLB:

-- Mathis

-- Walden

-- Werner

-- Rayford

 

 

ILB:

-- Freeman

-- Angerer

-- Sheppard

-- Connor

-- Harvey

 

That's 9.    I think the question is do we really want to carry 5 Inside linebackers and only 4 outside linebackers.     My hunch is "no."    But I don't know who else on the outside we'd keep?    Hickman and Sidbury are both already hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we'll see 10 linebackers on the final roster.    And, I don't think we'll see 10 DB's either....

 

As for the LB's....

 

OLB:

-- Mathis

-- Walden

-- Werner

-- Hickman

-- Rayford

 

 

ILB:

-- Freeman

-- Angerer

-- Sheppard

-- Connor

 

That's 9.    I suspect Harvey (especially since he's an Inside LB) is the odd man out.

 

I regret to inform you that Hickman is on IR. This would be my linebacker lineup also, if he was still healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I regret to inform you that Hickman is on IR. This would be my linebacker lineup also, if he was still healthy.

 

Yeah....   after I posted I double checked and saw that too.   My regrets too.    I've adjusted my final 9....  I just don't know if I buy the idea of 4 OLB's and 5 ILB's??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah....   after I posted I double checked and saw that too.   My regrets too.    I've adjusted my final 9....  I just don't know if I buy the idea of 4 OLB's and 5 ILB's??

 

I see Harvey as a kind of hybrid backer, so I think it's a similar lineup to having Hickman in there, though I think Hickman is better. But whoever that 9th linebacker is will be a special teams contributor, primarily, which Harvey is good at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Harvey as a kind of hybrid backer, so I think it's a similar lineup to having Hickman in there, though I think Hickman is better. But whoever that 9th linebacker is will be a special teams contributor, primarily, which Harvey is good at.

 

 

Agree and I don't see any problem with carrying 9 LB's rather than 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Notices of posts on this thread kept popping up. I knew there was no way the conversation was still about TB and the roast…. so I literally just hopped in here to see where the conversation veered off to. Wow, what a tangent!  Might be one of the best I’ve seen on the forum 
    • We’ve had many long time posters who’ve gone MIA…    I’d like to imagine he retired from many years of teaching and is enjoying the quiet life on a beach somewhere.    @southwest1 always posted interesting topics as well that I miss reading. 
    • Does anybody know what happened to or became of Princeton? I used to enjoy his "everything will be alright" comment.
    • Wilt dominated Bill Russell when they played, what Boston fans don't comprehend for some reason is, the Celtics had all the best players on their team other than players like West, Baylor, and Robertson. Outside of that the league had a bunch of MEH players back then except on Boston. Boston had Cousy, Havlicek, Sam Jones, Tom Heinsohn, and KC Jones besides Russell. Russell could get away with playing a bad game on occasion because Havlicek or Sam Jones or even Heinsohn could go for 25 and they would still win. Cousy wasn't a great shooter but was a great Assist guy and would just run that team like a great QB does.   Bill Simmons has Bill Russell as the 2nd greatest player ever, that is what ruins his list and I agree with a lot of his rankings. Loved his book and love his knowledge on ranking players but his Russell ranking is simply because he is from Boston. No way in hell is Bill Russell the 2nd greatest player of all-time. He had too many offensive deficiencies to be that. To me Larry Bird was the better player compared to Bill Russell.    Simmons top 10 updated: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Bill Russell 3. LeBron James 4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 5. Magic Johnson 6. Larry Bird 7. Wilt Chamberlain  8. Tim Duncan 9. Kobe Bryant  10. Jerry West   Mine is: 1. Michael Jordan (we agree)   2. Magic Johnson   3. LeBron James (we agree)   4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (we agree)   5. Kobe Bryant   6. Larry Bird (we agree)   7. Wilt Chamberlain (we agree)   8. Steph Curry - Bill has Curry 15th.   9. Shaq O'Neal - Bill has Shaq 13th.   10. Bill Russell - yes, he makes my top 10, great defensive player, great rebounder, a good scorer but not a dominant scorer and a winner. His 11 championships can be viewed in a lot of different ways compared to how players won theirs in the 80's-up until now. 11 is 11 though so a top 10 list without him would not like right.   He had West and Duncan in his top 10 - I don't. I have Shaq and Curry instead. To me Shaq was more dominant at his peak than Duncan was, and Curry changed the game with his 3-point shooting. Shaq is the only player in NBA history other than Michael Jordan to win 3 straight Finals MVP's (2000-2002), he has to be top 10. I never thought I would see a better shooter than Reggie Miller, then Steph entered the building. Steph also does have 4 championships, a Finals MVP, and 2 League MVP's + he has the most 3 pointers made in NBA history.
  • Members

    • Pat Curtis

      Pat Curtis 95

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 341

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Matabix

      Matabix 476

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,797

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 17,357

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 959

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,033

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,915

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,774

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...