Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Keys to beating the Redskins


bap1331

Recommended Posts

I do not underestimate the Redskins. Their defense is good if the offense can get going or they get tired. Colt McCoy is proved himself with the Cowboys.

 

The only problem i see on offense is keeping Andrew Luck safe. Last week proved alot about how much we miss Bradshaw. He was a great blocker. What about Havili? Is there anyway we can put him on set to help block him?

 

Defensively you never know what is going to happen because we dont know which one is going to show up...

 

Regardless of whether or not RG3 played on Sunday, Colt McCoy was going to see playing time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Protect Andrew Luck

2. Protect Andrew Luck

3. Protect Andrew Luck

4. Run the Ball

5. For the love of Mathis, someone get a pass rush going!

6. Hate to say it but we may need Laron this game to help with Morris. Tough kid to bring down

7. Don't let D. Jax beat us deep!

8. Bench Nicks

9. Start Shipley

10. Balanced Offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Protect Andrew Luck

2. Protect Andrew Luck

3. Protect Andrew Luck

4. Run the Ball

5. For the love of Mathis, someone get a pass rush going!

6. Hate to say it but we may need Laron this game to help with Morris. Tough kid to bring down

7. Don't let D. Jax beat us deep!

8. Bench Nicks

9. Start Shipley

10. Balanced Offense

 

I see Vontae covering him. I would love to see him shut DJax down!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not underestimate the Redskins. Their defense is good if the offense can get going or they get tired. Colt McCoy is proved himself with the Cowboys.

 

 

One good game proves nothing...people did that with Sanchez and he sure has disappointed since then.

 

Colts should have an easy game here on their plate. Washington has won only 3 games...2 weeks ago they were blown out by Tampa Bay of all teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One good game proves nothing...people did that with Sanchez and he sure has disappointed since then.

 

Colts should have an easy game here on their plate. Washington has won only 3 games...2 weeks ago they were blown out by Tampa Bay of all teams.

 

And one bad game proves nothing.

 

Last week they almost upset the 49ers in San Francisco.....

 

It cuts both ways....

 

Except for the train wreck at quarterback,  Washington has a decent team capable of pulling off the upset.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keys to winning the game?

Scooby Snacks.

RRRight on RRRhagy!

 

 

 

Definitely need the defense to stop, well, I'm thinking both the run and the pass would be nice.  It also would be nice if the OL could give Andrew enough time to find his receivers and throw it to him.  BUT the ultimate key to beating the Redskins is scoring more points than them.  

 

I am pretty sure if we could beat them if we do that, so my answer is C:  Score more points than them.

 

Did I win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be an interesting game to watch - and maybe to learn from. From the Colt's POV, what is the difference between winning and losing? If you think it is the difference between an individual's play, or two, I would disagree with you. Winning is an attitude resulting from the confidence in the strategy and tactics in playing the game. IOW, the game is often won before the players take the field. It would be very dangerous to underestimate the Redskins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like it overall, but I don't think there's a snowballs chance in hell we're drafting Kinchens after his atrocious Combine. With a RAS of 2.27 he's not even a blip on Ballard's radar lol.
    • Sorry late to the party line chat on Page 57 of 94   Skyy Moore, deleted that draft class and notes but Moore seemed to have some potential but wasn't sold on him.  Viewed Moore as an average receiver not much more.  I wouldn't trade for him.   If you were looking to trade for any WR, I would suggest targeting the Packer's Dontayvion Wicks.    As for some of these other comments that I have read up and not going to ready through 30 pages.  Colts spent 200M on most of their own (top NFL) players,    Recent news I saw is that the Colts haven't had any communication talks about trading for Sneed.  How true that is or not to be seen.  Seems the Colts have done a lot spending 200M on their own and doubt we have much cap space left to sign a big-name player like Sneed.  Still haven't seen latest cap space figures since our latest signing.     The Colts build through the draft and those expectations will not change this season.  Again, our organization was lucky enough to sign some of our best positional players.  Sadly, not everyone can get resigned and do expect Blackmon to move on.  Latest rumor is Blackmon signs with the Bills. 
    • The problem is Ballard drafts traitsy raw guys more often than not, so by the time AR is ready we likely won't know if the guys he drafted are IT. That issue then gets compounded by Ballard not using FA to bring in guys who work NOW. THEN if the guys he drafts miss, we'll be waiting another 2-4 years on the next batch... see the problem?   That's fair I guess, but Armstead and Huff were signed for ~$17m/year.   Huff was the 2nd most efficient pass rusher IN THE LEAGUE in 2023 behind only Micah Parson - that's better than Myles Garrett, TJ Watt, Nick Bosa you name 'em. For $17m that's worth taking a shot at, because even if he only produces at a good level he'd still likely be a Jonathan Greenard who signed for $19m. IF he works out though he'd be the bargain of the decade.   Armstead has already played with Buckner and he would be a big upgrade over Grover Stewart for $4m more per year than what we signed Grover for.
    • Great post, thanks.  One of your best.    I think your roster bonus argument crushes my signing bonus argument.   100 percent flattens it.   Like a Quinton Nelson pancake!   I don’t see a counter argument.     Many thanks.          
    • I’d like to focus on one paragraph.   The one about AR working out.   You connect AR working out, which will take 2-4 more years to confirm with “the roster as it is now.”    Thats a flaw.   When we know about AR working out, whether it’s 26, or 27,  that will be connected to the roster that he has THEN, not the roster he has NOW.   See the disconnect?  The roster should be better to support AR.   And I wouldn’t call guys like Luvu or Stone, both guys I like, as shiny toys.  They’re solid players I think we’d all like.  The Sony toys are the four big name plays you listed.  Those guys are just too expensive.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...