College Football

All things College Football

111 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 874 views
  1. Breaking Colts news delivered to your inbox
    • 0 replies
    • 962 views
    • 0 replies
    • 458 views
    • 0 replies
    • 502 views
    • 1 reply
    • 995 views
    • 15 replies
    • 1,073 views
    • 5 replies
    • 482 views
    • 0 replies
    • 694 views
    • 1 reply
    • 496 views
    • 3 replies
    • 775 views
    • 8 replies
    • 676 views
    • 17 replies
    • 599 views
    • 4 replies
    • 433 views
    • 1 reply
    • 482 views
    • 4 replies
    • 523 views
    • 3 replies
    • 1,068 views
    • 0 replies
    • 929 views
    • 64 replies
    • 1,468 views
    • 2 replies
    • 430 views
    • 1 reply
    • 453 views
    • 7 replies
    • 612 views
    • 4 replies
    • 355 views
    • 8 replies
    • 517 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1,605 views
    • 1 reply
    • 506 views
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

    • JOIN THE WAITING LIST

      2017 Colts Season Tickets will go on-sale to the general public beginning Wednesday, May 3rd at 10:00am. MORE INFO HERE
  • Welcome New Members

  • Posts

    •   Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something here,  but what does this mean?     I'm cutting and pasting......     PFF Offensive Line Rankings- Colts Ranked 25th Overall- The most interesting bit of information from this was that they felt Castonzo had a really strong year, and that our original starting 5 were far superior to ANY combination we used when we had to account for injuries.   If that implies that our OL toward the beginning of the season graded out better than our OL the last 7 games of the season did when the C/RG/RT was Kelly, Haeg and Clark,  then I'm afraid I'm going to have to call nonsense on that viewpoint.    The OL was much better down the stretch...    and the stats including both far fewer sacks of Andrew Luck and a solid running game for Gore backs that up.   So,  what am I not understanding?     Have I misunderstood something?    Can someone throw me a bone here?   What's going on?     Clearly, I'm not understanding their meaning....    
    • I think we steal Foster at 15 if he's there. The kid was a top 5 talent and the best prospect at ILB since Kuechly just a few weeks ago. There's been a lot that's if things happen but the tape has not changed.    I think we go Reddick and maybe even Harris at 15. Conley is solid but not special. 
    •   You dont think that Haeg or Good could fix those issues?
    •   I don't doubt that all of those things are true.    But I think some NFL staffs are going to see most of those issues as very correctable.     They can be coached up.   But here's what can't be coached up.    Nearly 6'4" and 220+ pounds.    4.4 speed and about 43 inches in the vertical and nearly 11 feet in the broad jump.     And I think he did well at the various shuttles.    Those numbers are freaky.    They're likely the best at the combine.     So,  while I think most teams will likely agree with your assessment,   I think some teams (less than 8 or 25%)  will see first round physical qualities and see a late 1st round pick....   somewhere between 25-32...   Odds are he gets picked in the first half of the 2nd round...   somewhere before 50.     I just wouldn't be shocked if somehow he sneaks in to the late 1st....  
    • I know but he's not going In the second now He's going to fall a round or 2 unless he did something totally crazy. We have three 4th round picks My bad not a clear post 
  • Topics

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.