Colts vs Bengals pre-season finale postgame reaction
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
It feels like you're taking multiple and competing positions. One the one hand, #4 is a hard swing and desperate, on the other hand, they should have traded up to #1 and taken Stroud. No matter what, taking a QB in the top ten is a serious risk, and you need to hit a home run (or at least a bases clearing double). I don't know why you're so obsessed with this idea that all teams are trying to do is clone Mahomes... every team wants a franchise QB, period. Teams in the 20s don't generally spend a first rounder on a QB, and when they do, they get mocked. It's really the Packers in that category alone, and it seems to have worked for them. And what do you know, they drafted a guy who actually was compared to Mahomes -- high level traits, raw, not a lot of experience. I don't understand your angle on this. The Colts appear to have seriously considered their options at QB in 2023, and they put together a plan that they thought would give them a good chance to have success with the guy they intended to pick. I don't know how you see that as anything but 'well-measured.' They could have stayed at #4 and taken the safer, more conventional guy in Will Levis. Or they really could have swung for the fences, traded up to #1, and then we'd have no question about who they really felt was the best prospect. Either way, unless you think they were just sitting there on draft day with their fingers crossed, hoping that Stroud would fall to #4, it seems pretty obvious that they thought their strategy out carefully, planned for it, and are trying to see it through. And again, at this point, it doesn't make much sense to talk about the results of their plan, not when we have so little to talk about. Even if the plan doesn't work, I don't think it will be accurate to suggest it wasn't well-measured.
-
By Indianapolis-Colts-Fan · Posted
yeah, it does happen every year, and then they win a few and lose a few, and then wind up 9-8 and miss the playoffs. -
Here we go again , lowering the standard because the team stinks again even though Ballard himself claimed this team should be competing for the division and playoffs with that young QB. So you guys listen to Ballard when he tells you that players are great but dont listen to him when he tells you we have a team that should compete for the playoffs and division? ..................Unreal.
-
If JT is NOT a "pass catching Rb now" what does that say about our pass cacthing wr's who all had less yards than JT, except AP? Say this out loud people. SS benched our leading rb in rushing yards, and really only offensive threat, and 2nd leading receiver in yards in the most critical time of the game for the backup RB's. Again, if the national media gets a hold of this or cared, they would blast SS to hell for it because it was a RIDICULOUS stategy!
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now