Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Falcons post game reaction (Merge)


hambone35

Recommended Posts

On 12/24/2023 at 3:06 PM, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If Pitt and smith don’t play Sunday colts are going to lose.

Any player you take in the first is going to be a game changer. Plus there is going to be a lot of quarterbacks go in the top ten.

The Raiders are not a good team either.  I don’t buy there last 2 wins.  Not saying we win but no reason to think we lose.  With that said Vegas has themselves plus 3 which is an even worse look for a home game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DougDew said:

What is funny, and many here probably don't see it. is how Arthur Smith uses his RBs compared to how the Colts coaches use JT.

 

Tyler Allgeier burned us on a 25 yard TD run from an outside pitch play.  I've never seen ATL run that play with Allgeier....ever.....its usually Robinson.  

 

They actually called a to-the-boundary pitch play for their inside runner RB...and it went for 25 yards, untouched TD.  I've never seen Frank or Shane call that kind of a pitch to JT, or, have the sense that JT could remotely turn the corner as effectively as even Allgeier.   And then there is Bijan, who is probably the best open field runner in the NFL...but people don't know that yet.

 

JT...run to the pile, and hope their is a crease by the time he gets there.  (Then blame failure on the Oline)

 

 Moss is a tougher runner if you are only going to run at the pile. We came up with a lower game plan offensively.

 We were 27th in yardage allowed WITH all of the turnovers we had created.

Is it a big surprise they would pile up some yardage if we didn't turn them over?

 How many plays did we see Zaire diving at them as they ran by and Thomas never close to anyone to make a play? 

 Speed is really improving with experience.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Not odd. I let the fans think this is a well constructed roster.  When they lose, it really shows the deficiencies.  Like they always say. U learn more about your team from a loss than after a win. 

So you don't enjoy wins,  and only come to complain after losses.   Thanks for admitting it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DougDew said:

What is funny, and many here probably don't see it. is how Arthur Smith uses his RBs compared to how the Colts coaches use JT.

 

Tyler Allgeier burned us on a 25 yard TD run from an outside pitch play.  I've never seen ATL run that play with Allgeier....ever.....its usually Robinson.  

 

They actually called a to-the-boundary pitch play for their inside runner RB...and it went for 25 yards, untouched TD.  I've never seen Frank or Shane call that kind of a pitch to JT, or, have the sense that JT could remotely turn the corner as effectively as even Allgeier.   And then there is Bijan, who is probably the best open field runner in the NFL...but people don't know that yet.

 

JT...run to the pile, and hope their is a crease by the time he gets there.  (Then blame failure on the Oline)

I saw Frank dial up an HB pass to Taylor, ONCE, and it got like 15 yards.  Then never, saw, it, again... I've also seen some. trap plays with Nelson pulling, even this year,  but didn't see it against the Falcons.  Lastly,  you are absolutely right,  I can't remember a run to the outside in a long time. Very disappointing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ArmchairQB said:

The Raiders are not a good team either.  I don’t buy there last 2 wins.  Not saying we win but no reason to think we lose.  With that said Vegas has themselves plus 3 which is an even worse look for a home game. 


I think you’re selling the raiders short.  Especially now with Pierce as their new head coach.   

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ArmchairQB said:

The Raiders are not a good team either.  I don’t buy there last 2 wins.  Not saying we win but no reason to think we lose.  With that said Vegas has themselves plus 3 which is an even worse look for a home game. 

They have been much better since they fired McDaniels.  Don’t get me wrong if the Colts want to be a playoff team they need to be able to beat the Raiders at home but the Raiders aren’t a team just playing out the string to end the year.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, compuls1v3 said:

Right,  but that's where elite RBs look outside.  I've seen him do it before,  but he didn't do it against the Falcons.

Because the plays being called were all behind Nelson and Kelly, which is who they like to run behind.  When he saw the hole was closed he’d start to look to bounce it and he was getting tackled.  I don’t know why the Colts didn’t call more outside runs after they worked so well vs the Steelers.  I know I was personally calling for them to run outside all game.  Running into the middle of the Falcons is running right at what the Falcons do best as a team.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

To me it was more than the line. It was pretty clear his vision was not good.

In his last 18 games, JT has one 100-yard performance. He’s gone 12 straight without hitting 100. For whatever reason, he’s not a game-changing back anymore. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the rpo is hurting the running game and the pass protection. Why run it with a qb that isn’t a threat to run? I think that threat is the only way it works. I have been saying all year, the line and backs are the strong part of the offense, not the very average qb and receiving group. A top coach in any sport plays to their players strengths, not have players play to his strengths. It will take a year or two to get players to fit his offense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:


All I’m saying is the Raiders are a better team with Pierce as their new HC.   He has them playing hard and smart and that’s all you can ask.   

They were 3-3 coming into today since Pierce took over.  The three wins were against Giants, Jets and Chargers.  One of the losses was a shutout loss at home to the Vikings.   Today was a good performance against a suddenly reeling divisional opponent.  Anything is better than McDaniels Im sure we all can agree.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

So you don't enjoy wins,  and only come to complain after losses.   Thanks for admitting it

That’s not at all what he said.

 

Thats like saying you openly attack other posters for having the temerity to criticize players/coaches.

 

Theres a lot of vitriol targeted only at certain posters here. It’s gross and it should stop. You don’t have to respond to them. You can just simply not respond. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

It's so nice to see that his new contract has paid dividends for the Colts. Like I said, the Colts should have waited.

I don't have a big problem with the size of the contract.  The offense need's any kind of play maker, so mildly over paying for 3 years is what desperate GMs/owners should probably do.  

 

I have a problems with the idea that he is a difference maker....that the Colts are a lot better offense when he is in the game (I'm not sure we are worse).  In some respects, I'd prefer even Allgeier.  At least Allgeier would get tough yards in a 4 minute clock kill, and provide something when the blocking isn't perfect.

23 hours ago, Solid84 said:

I think it’s important to ask if this is just what JT does or what he’s being told to do. 

A little of both.  I think they ask him to do what he is good at, and don't ask him to do what he can't do very well.   I mean, it only takes one crease and things to fall right for an 80 yard TD.  So you try it a lot no matter how many two yard stuffs you get.  

 

Even if RB was being instructed to run into the pile, any decent RB with 3 years of college experience and 4 years of NFL experience should want to get yards where ever they see the opportunity, and not just blindly follow orders every play.  There is something wrong with his ability to run outside.  Gotta be, after 4 years of the same thing with two different play callers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

So you don't enjoy wins,  and only come to complain after losses.   Thanks for admitting it

Nope. I am just the voice of reason in pointing out the flaws in the way this team had been constructed. They can win against bad teams, and people can get all warm and fuzzy. This team needs a GM who builds a team with football players and not athletes. Not what they may turn out to be in the NFL but what they have done in college.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Still not sold on Rainmann. He struggles with power rusher. Did you guys notice how they stuck big Campbell on him when Campbell is typically a interior guy.

I did notice. Everyone is slamming Freeland here, and yes he did struggle... yet Raimann got pushed around as well, and then comes out afterwards, as having an excellent game by PFF, where it seems, he is usually highly rated, on a weekly basis.

I watched live, and will use NFL+ to watch the replay of the game... but I thought Raimann looked bad.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

I did notice. Everyone is slamming Freeland here, and yes he did struggle... yet Raimann got pushed around as well, and then comes out afterwards, as having an excellent game by PFF, where it seems, he is usually highly rated, on a weekly basis.

I watched live, and will use NFL+ to watch the replay of the game... but I thought Raimann looked bad.

Having that 1st pick in the 20’s it’s going to have to be something for colts to think about if there is a tackle there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Having that 1st pick in the 20’s it’s going to have to be something for colts to think about if there is a tackle there. 

No they are not Raimann has had a great season.  He has the highest grade of a Colts lineman on PFF and graded well Sunday.  Most of the pressure was not coming from his side.  I am not buying people’s judgment of lineman play who said multiple times this year they didn’t see a drop off from Kelly to French this year.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

No they are not Raimann has had a great season.  He has the highest grade of a Colts lineman on PFF and graded well Sunday.  Most of the pressure was not coming from his side.  I am not buying people’s judgment of lineman play who said multiple times this year they didn’t see a drop off from Kelly to French this year.  

He has shown he has a weakness. One I am not sure he can overcome.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2023 at 10:24 PM, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

When you have a franchise QB there is a lot more room for error. Then when you have a creator like Richardson when things do break down you’re never out of the play.  

you keep mentioning "franchise QB". The Colts have not had a franchise QB since Andrew luck. AR will be a rookie again next year. Do you realize he was labeled a "project" when drafted. He only started 10 games in college. He should not have been drafted in any round at all. It would be awfully nice if it works out but, one should not hold their breath.

Seeing how much time was waisted on Qb's since Luck left, specifically Brisset, I can see the current situation going right up to the 2028 season before they throw in the towel.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Because the plays being called were all behind Nelson and Kelly, which is who they like to run behind.  When he saw the hole was closed he’d start to look to bounce it and he was getting tackled.  I don’t know why the Colts didn’t call more outside runs after they worked so well vs the Steelers.  I know I was personally calling for them to run outside all game.  Running into the middle of the Falcons is running right at what the Falcons do best as a team.

This is a good explanation of what was going on. My question is, If you're successful running outside one week. why can't you try again until you can't? What ever happened to the stretch play used for edgerrin James? The Colts seem to run the most predictable offense in the league. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

This is a good explanation of what was going on. My question is, If you're successful running outside one week. why can't you try again until you can't? What ever happened to the stretch play used for edgerrin James? The Colts seem to run the most predictable offense in the league. 

Same question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

This is a good explanation of what was going on. My question is, If you're successful running outside one week. why can't you try again until you can't? What ever happened to the stretch play used for edgerrin James? The Colts seem to run the most predictable offense in the league. 


I don’t think that’s part of the coaches rpo offense, and you don’t have a running qb

or one that is a deep passing threat. So teams clog the middle and the safety’s play closer to the line, making short passes and running the ball tougher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

you keep mentioning "franchise QB". The Colts have not had a franchise QB since Andrew luck. AR will be a rookie again next year. Do you realize he was labeled a "project" when drafted. He only started 10 games in college. He should not have been drafted in any round at all. It would be awfully nice if it works out but, one should not hold their breath.

Seeing how much time was waisted on Qb's since Luck left, specifically Brisset, I can see the current situation going right up to the 2028 season before they throw in the towel.

 

 

They didnt really waste time on Brissett.  He was their backup when their starter retired on the eve of the NFL season.  They had no choice but to start him.  As soon as they had a chance they returned him to his backup role and signed Rivers to start.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not signed, there is nothing else to talk about and I am bored.  
    • Yes, I know. The Stanford teams  when Hogan was the starting QB were full of top recruits on offense and defense. It was so much fun being a fan then. I'm not as big a fan of Stanford as you are. Being on the East Coast makes it hard to follow them as much as I used to.   Overall, I am becoming less and less interested in sports. For over 20 years, I used to listen to sports radio whenever I had free time.  I used to follow tennis, golf, baseball, college basketball, a little NBA and NHL as well as NFL and college football. I once went to 20+ baseball games in a year.  The only sport I still follow religiously now is NFL football. I try to follow my favorite baseball team, the Mets, but not enough. I attribute my loss of interest to there being too much change and movement of players, coaches, teams, conferences, etc. Stanford is now part of the ACC! My goodness! (Shaking my head) I don't like all these changes in conferences.   I was a big fan of Ted Leyland, Stanford's former athletic director many years ago. It saddened me when Leyland left Stanford to go to the University of Pacific which was his alma mater. I see he retired. He hired Buddy Teevens who died last year. Back in those days, I followed Stanford football a lot more closely. They were not great years but I loved rooting for players who also excelled in the classroom.   TL;DR 😉
    • Oh I think they are ready. They are right in the thick of it. Well educated and smart women. They are more in tune with the Indianapolis Colts than all of the new ownership in the league is with their respective franchises. I'm not concerned in the least with these ladies taking over moving forward. I think it's a great thing and speaks to the stability that the organization is preaching and looking to build. 
    • I'm out this year. I'm going to be focusing on my bestballs and daily fantasy. I already have $400 invested and am making a concentrated effort this year to win some money.
    • I got the email but I’ll put it here too, I’m in.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...