Predict Rogers stats vs Arizona

[Rob Lowe]

I'm curious as to how everyone thinks Da'Rick will perform in his 1st game (assuming he plays of course)

3 receptions, 33 yards.

[Everyone]

Since you asked me specifically I think (not really) he has 25 receptions 379 yards 4 TD's, which I said in this topic http://forums.colts.com/topic/23184-what-can-we-expect-from-rogers-vs-cardinals/#entry643110

Realistically though, 3 receptions 42 yards maybe, if he plays that is.

Fyi I voted 14 lol

[SolomonThomasFanAccount]

lol 14tds against the cards

[pgt_rob]

2 catches, 17 yards, 0 TD's.

[BlueCollarColts]

I had to go with 14

[Valpo2004]

14 TD's are you crazy???!!!!!

 

I mean the way he's talked about here he'd have to put up at least 20 minimum.

 

In all seriousness I don't expect him to make a single catch.  Have they even said he'd be playing?  He may be inactive.

[WastedColt]

I'm guessing that he stays inactive for now

[Valpo2004]

He could be active considering we only have 5 WR's on the roster.  

 

Part of me is wondering if we didn't sign Justice Cunningham because the coaches want to start splitting Fleener out wide more.  

[AllYouNeedIsLuck]

40 catches 1020 yards 14 TD's 

[Old Colt]

I'm curious as to how everyone thinks Da'Rick will perform in his 1st game (assuming he plays of course)

3 receptions, 33 yards.

0 targets, 10 catches........   he steals the ball from TY and others to  get his catches......  for all the Rogers fanatics here, he better lead us to the Super Bowl

[jameszeigler834]

Back to reality I say about 5 REC for 60 yards 1 TD.

[BrentMc11]

I would be happy with 4 catches....BTW he WILL be activated since Griff Whalen was released.  I say four catches...1 for a long gain, 2 for 3rd down conversions....and 1 for 'nuttin honey....'

 

[basketballsteve]

He'll watch again cause he'll be inactive. Gordy, Toler, Howell, all active to give us full complement of dbs vs palmer. Sorry to the fan boys here.

[SilentHill]

I picked 14, but that is just in the 1st quarter.

[BrentMc11]

He'll watch again cause he'll be inactive. Gordy, Toler, Howell, all active to give us full complement of dbs vs palmer. Sorry to the fan boys here.

I would cut Gordy....he is awful.  He may be the worst cover corner I have seen, and Cassius 'My back yearns for you ball' Vaughn is not far behind him....

 

You could very well be correct on extra DBs though.  Just had to write...when I even saw Gordy's name.....

[basketballsteve]

I would cut Gordy....he is awful.  He may be the worst cover corner I have seen, and Cassius 'My back yearns for you ball' Vaughn is not far behind him....

 

You could very well be correct on extra DBs though.  Just had to write...when I even saw Gordy's name.....

I agree Gordy is terrible but it's not that I agree with the strategy that Gordy is a better active than Rogers it's the pattern that has emerged witht the inactives in other weeks that makes me say that. As for Cassius he's more physical and a better tackler than josh even if he's no better at covering.

[Warhawk]

4 catches, 57 yards, 1 TD (a 26 yard TD on busted coverage where the safety makes the wrong read).

[Kenny]

I got to say Stephen started this very same conversation and he got flack for it despite it being a legitimate conversational point. Yet here is like the 3rd one of the same threads started since his that has gotten zero flack, but a little sarcasm. How about a moderator merge of all this crap?

[BrentMc11]

I agree Gordy is terrible but it's not that I agree with the strategy that Gordy is a better active than Rogers it's the pattern that has emerged witht the inactives in other weeks that makes me say that. As for Cassius he's more physical and a better tackler than josh even if he's no better at covering.

Spot on!  You say it best right here.

[BrentMc11]

I got to say Stephen started this very same conversation and he got flack for it despite it being a legitimate conversational point. Yet here is like the 3rd one of the same threads started since his that has gotten zero flack, but a little sarcasm. How about a moderator merge of all this crap?

What?  Seriously.  I am NEEEEVVVER sarcastic  Where is our buddy House when ya need him:)

 

[USAFHoosier]

If he plays 3-4 catches for 40 yards would the bottom line to show he can help the offense, in my book.  Thats about the best production from a WR not named Reggie or TY this season.

[ColtsLegacy]

I feel like some of our fans are pulling against Rogers solely because they are tired of all the love he gets even though he hasn't shown anything yet.

I have no idea what to expect, I do expect him to be active, with Griff being cut, and hopefully he gets a good look. With how our WRs have performed we need to try and find a spark and shuffle the deck a bit.

[coltsfanatic24]

If DHB is limited and he gets enough snaps Rogers should have 6 rec 100 yards and 1TD.

[House]

If DHB is limited and he gets enough snaps Rogers should have 6 rec 100 yards and 1TD.

Not sure if serious.

[coltsfanatic24]

Not sure if serious.

Why wouldn't I be? This game will more then likely be  high scoring  and Powers will be on him most of the game.

[House]

Why wouldn't I be? This game will more then likely be high scoring and Powers will be on him most of the game.

Because if there was that level of production sitting on our practice squad. He would have been called up ages ago.

[Holden89]

Wouldn't be surprised if he never sees the field.

[Rob Lowe]

You guys do realize that he had maturity issues right? Good coaches would t just throw a guy like that on the field without proving himself and making him earn his opportunity. You guys really need to give our coaches more credit

[John Dee]

"assuming he plays of course"

 

This is the silliest poll I have ever read.

I'm curious as to how everyone thinks Da'Rick will perform in his 1st game (assuming he plays of course)

3 receptions, 33 yards.

[Rob Lowe]

Thanks for the input

[ColtsLegacy]

Wouldn't be surprised if he never sees the field.

I'm sure he can see the field, he's not blind like DHB apparently is . . . Zing!

[TYtheMan13]

I'm thinking (if he's even active, fingers crossed) 4 targets, 3 rec  28 yards....the one miss is a inaccurate pass or pass deflection.

[krunk]

I dont know what his stats will be as far as this game goes because I'm not even totally clear on if he will play(although I have a great feeling we will get to see him this time), but I'm hoping down the line he can develop into something similar to Marcus Colston as a go to guy on crucial downs.  Of course I'll take whatever else beyond that.

[GoColts8818]

0 catches for 0 yards with 100000000000 angry posts about how he wasn't used.

All seriousness no idea.

[Holden89]

I'm sure he can see the field, he's not blind like DHB apparently is . . . Zing!

Ha! I laughed. Well done

[Andy]

0 catches, 0 yards, 0 TDs, 0 plays. 

[MTC]

Signing autographs.

[Poster X]

3 for 297 yards, and 3 td's. All 99 yard catches... because I'm a wizard.

[Rob Lowe]

3 for 297 yards, and 3 td's. All 99 yard catches... because I'm a wizard.

You're probably right

[NagelHausForge]

Is there a way for the moderator to lock or prevent any more of these posts about Ro(d)gers?  If the threat title had Da'Rick or Ro(d)gers, or any combination of the two it should be declined.

 

I think he will score 1 TD but it will be for the other team...

 

Actually I think it'll be 0 TDs, 0 receptions, 1 special teams tackle