Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

can luck top mannings 7 td performance against raiders?


Stephen

Recommended Posts

This topic isn't silly. I'm just asking if anyone thinks he can throw seven tds. Now if I asked do you think he could throw 50 in a game that would be silly.

obviously he can.  anyone CAN.  Terrell Pryor CAN throw 7 TDs also.... it is a very silly thread Stephen.  As I have said to you before, you really should just stop making threads.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

comopared to 7 homeruns in 1 game, 7 TD's is much more doable with good execution

 

???  Not a good comp.   Now if you said 5 (equivalent to plate appearances) drives, 6 plays (equivalent to max balls + Strikes and next pitch) per drive, ....

 

See? no matter-

 

it_just _doesn't_work... I know you can do better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously he can.  anyone CAN.  Terrell Pryor CAN throw 7 TDs also.... it is a very silly thread Stephen.  As I have said to you before, you really should just stop making threads.  

 

No he can't cmon now Pryor can throw 7 TD's? He can't even do that in practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously he can.  anyone CAN.  Terrell Pryor CAN throw 7 TDs also.... it is a very silly thread Stephen.  As I have said to you before, you really should just stop making threads.  

 

 

Maybe it's a question of how to get the most attention ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic isn't silly. I'm just asking if anyone thinks he can throw seven tds. Now if I asked do you think he could throw 50 in a game that would be silly.

Actually, you asked if he could throw more than 7, if I know what "top" means.

 

So, yes, the topic is pretty silly.  You were asking if Luck can do something Sunday which has never been done in the history of the NFL.  So, the answer is yes, he could.  It is possible, though so extremely unlikely as to be, well, silly to even think about.  That's why you got so many "who cares" responses.

 

Seems more important to most fans here to just get the expected W without any significant injury so we can move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow!    You're on fire today.   Post after post that are classically you.  Only you have these views.   That’s why these posts are so easy to remember for years.   I’m struggling to find anything to agree with.   Not that you’d care what my opinion is.  I just couldn’t help but finally respond today.   Sorry. 
    • Great interview!!   Both the Colts 1st round and 2nd round picks fell right in to their laps!!   Preparation + luck are equal parts of the equation!!
    • 84th percentile against man, 83d percentile against press... 
    • I think you're working from some assumptions that I don't agree with. First, it seems like you believe "the system" produces 32 relatively equal draft boards, and it's pretty obvious that's not the case. Second, it seems like you believe that if a team picks a player in the 4th round, that means they must have had a 4th round grade on him, otherwise they would have drafted him earlier.   It's possible that a team feels more strongly about a player than other teams. They could have Player X as their 30th player, and Player Y as their 35th player. The team is on the clock at #40, both players are still on the board, the team takes Player X. A few picks go by, Player Y is still on the board, they start trying to move up from wherever they sit in the next round, but a trade isn't coming together. They wind up staying put, and are able to draft Player Y -- their 35th ranked prospect -- at #75 or whatever. They had a high 2nd round grade on him, and got him in the middle of the third. Maybe they'd felt like they got lucky because things went their way. But drafting him in the third round doesn't mean they only viewed him as a third round prospect; what would make that scenario possible is the fact that every team works from their own board, and there are major variances from team to team. 
    • I doubt that. The reason is because not a single WR was selected the rest of the 2nd round, as borne out by how that 2nd round went. So any other GM still chose not to draft a single WR in round 2after the AD pick (either felt they didn't need one or had already gotten one), so your statement is not supported by how things played out. Whether it was Ballard at 52 or Ballard at 56 that he traded down to, he would have still found AD as value and pulled the trigger, is my contention. All GM boards are not created equal, so you can't broad brush there.
  • Members

    • chad72

      chad72 18,306

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 17,315

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DattMavis

      DattMavis 361

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 952

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 1,347

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boogmanningluck

      boogmanningluck 74

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Catloaf

      Catloaf 408

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,256

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 973

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...