Nobody Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I don't need the "this wouldn't happen" comments, I'm personally against this.Would you accept this trade?The Dallas Cowboys Trade- OLB DeMarcus Ware, FB Lawrence VickersThe Indianapolis Colts Trade- 2013 1st round pick (24th overall), 2014 2nd round pick that becomes 1st with 10 sacks (basically guaranteed 1st), 2013 7th round pick, and LB Pat Angerer.I personally think we can't afford to give up a first in the amazing draft class of 2014, and this leaves us with almost no picks this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 No, i would not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Not a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_ Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 For Aldon Smith or Von Miller, I'd consider it..but no, not for a 30 year old Ware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustin Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 What's his contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoKeR Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Nope he's too old for a 1st round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelCityColt Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 From this title I initially thought this was going to be about trading certain types of download! Bit too steep of a price to pay really, I'd rather get Spencer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
braveheartcolt Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ah, but with Mathis on one side, and Demarcus on the other, we could have 'Ware and Tear"...be worth every penny.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Sullivan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I don't need the "this wouldn't happen" comments, I'm personally against this. Would you accept this trade? The Dallas Cowboys Trade- OLB DeMarcus Ware, FB Lawrence Vickers The Indianapolis Colts Trade- 2013 1st round pick (24th overall), 2014 2nd round pick that becomes 1st with 10 sacks (basically guaranteed 1st), 2013 7th round pick, and LB Pat Angerer. I personally think we can't afford to give up a first in the amazing draft class of 2014, and this leaves us with almost no picks this year.Where did you hear this scenario? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewColtsFan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 No way! No Freaking way am I ***EVER*** giving up a 7th round draft pick! You crossed the line my friend! The first? Fine. The 2nd that could become a 1st? Fine. But a 7?!? Are you crazy?!? It's a world gone mad I tell you! A world gone MAD!!!!!! (Sorry, bad night's sleep. Still very tired. I do strange things when I'm tired...) p.s. -- if Ware was a little younger, I'd be tempted. But I think he's got enough miles on him that I'd be shy giving up two #1's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoColts8818 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Since we are already with out our second rounder I don't like giving up our first as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Luck We Trust Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I don't need the "this wouldn't happen" comments, I'm personally against this.Would you accept this trade?The Dallas Cowboys Trade- OLB DeMarcus Ware, FB Lawrence VickersThe Indianapolis Colts Trade- 2013 1st round pick (24th overall), 2014 2nd round pick that becomes 1st with 10 sacks (basically guaranteed 1st), 2013 7th round pick, and LB Pat Angerer.I personally think we can't afford to give up a first in the amazing draft class of 2014, and this leaves us with almost no picks this year.with ware being 30 years old, i would not do this. its to much to give up for him. maybe this years 3rd rounder and next years 3rd and possibly 6th or 7th rounder. but not a first or second rounder. would agree with it in a way if he was maybe like 25 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throwing BBZ Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Like Mathis, Ware will be condiderably on the DOWN HILL when we need a good pass rusher in the AFC title game in 2015-2016. So kind of a Waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malakai432 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Even though I like Ware I think we need to use out draft picks to build a young long run sustainable team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash7 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 We are a team that's still building the Monster. In order to do this, we need to add pieces collectively. In this scenario, we are gaining 2 people, Ware and Vicekrs, but we would be giving up: 1. Angerer2. Our first round pick-20133. Our second round pick next year - (possibly another first) 20144. Our seventh round pick -2013 We would be giving up far more than what we'd receive in return. We are not just a player away from being great. We need many contributers before we can change our mindset away from "building." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ok, NO SIGNING OLD PEOPLE! This is a Young Team. If they're over the age of....... let's say 28, we shouldn't get them. Ware is a good player don't get me wrong, but that Arm injury & age? No thanks. I'd take Von Miller though but I doubt Denver is willing to even make that cross their mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_ Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ok, NO SIGNING OLD PEOPLE! This is a Young Team. If they're over the age of....... let's say 28, we shouldn't get them. Ware is a good player don't get me wrong, but that Arm injury & age? No thanks. I'd take Von Miller though but I doubt Denver is willing to even make that cross their mind Ok I wouldn't trade for any player over 28 or so but I would NOT put restrictions on signing players over that age as FA's. If we have a need and aren't able to fill it with a talented young player, then an older vet player could be a stop-gap for a year or 2 until we can get that younger player....such as when we brought in Redding. No way would I have wanted to pass on having Redding for a few years just because he's over 28. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bavanlan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ok, NO SIGNING OLD PEOPLE! This is a Young Team. If they're over the age of....... let's say 28, we shouldn't get them. Ware is a good player don't get me wrong, but that Arm injury & age? No thanks. I'd take Von Miller though but I doubt Denver is willing to even make that cross their mind So Larry Fitzgerald, Haloti Ngata, and MJD wouldn't be worth a 7th round pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLILLINGTON10 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 simply no thanks. too much "wear"on him to be worth all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuildtheMonster1285 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Not a chance would I give up a first round pick for ware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrincetonTiger Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Not at all 2 1st Rounders for an soon to be over the hill OLB and a FB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 So Larry Fitzgerald, Haloti Ngata, and MJD wouldn't be worth a 7th round pick?Ask yourself, would their Organizations agree to a 7th round? 2 of those 3 you named ARE THE ENTIRE OFFENSE for their Teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bavanlan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ask yourself, would their Organizations agree to a 7th round? 2 of those 3 you named ARE THE ENTIRE OFFENSE for their Teams You're deflecting from the point though. You said that we shouldn't get anyone over 28, which means they have no value to you. Whether or not the other organization would actually do it is irrelevant. What is relevant is if you'd make the trade for a 7th round pick because if you would, then 1) it means that they do have value to you and 2) it becomes an issue of how much you'd give up, which is exactly the point of this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoColts8818 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ok, NO SIGNING OLD PEOPLE! This is a Young Team. If they're over the age of....... let's say 28, we shouldn't get them. Ware is a good player don't get me wrong, but that Arm injury & age? No thanks. I'd take Von Miller though but I doubt Denver is willing to even make that cross their mindSo we should have let Wayne walk and not signed Cory Redding last year then? Look if we just load up on young players in about four years we are going to be in the same boat the Ravens are in right now. Having to let all our good young players go who are just coming into their prime to make room for Luck's second contract. There is nothing wrong with picking up a vet or two who can help you for two to three years and then drafting his replacement in the up coming drafts to help try to avoid being in the same spot the Ravens are in right now. The Colts need to pick up the best players who can help them win for the right price which will probably be mostly younger players with some vets sprinkled in here or there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 So we should have let Wayne walk and not signed Cory Redding last year then?Look if we just load up on young players in about four years we are going to be in the same boat the Ravens are in right now. Having to let all our good young players go who are just coming into their prime to make room for Luck's second contract. There is nothing wrong with picking up a vet or two who can help you for two to three years and then drafting his replacement in the up coming drafts to help try to avoid being in the same spot the Ravens are in right now. The Colts need to pick up the best players who can help them win for the right price which will probably be mostly younger players with some vets sprinkled in here or there.I'm not saying there's anything wrong with signing older players in general. But if there is a Younger player available who is equally as good or even better, why sign the older guy? Ware is not someone I'd want. I'd take Anthony Spencer or Paul Kruger (who a lot of people are high on) instead. That just makes more sense to me. Ware had that arm injury. Yes I do think he deserves a better team to play for where he has help, but that arm injury plays a big role in his pass rushing abilities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 You're deflecting from the point though.You said that we shouldn't get anyone over 28, which means they have no value to you. Whether or not the other organization would actually do it is irrelevant.What is relevant is if you'd make the trade for a 7th round pick because if you would, then 1) it means that they do have value to you and 2) it becomes an issue of how much you'd give up, which is exactly the point of this thread.They would have value if they were worth it. Redding, Reggie, & Mathis are up there in age but you couldn't tell by watching them this season. All 3 had great years. But Ware is not someone I'd take. 3years ago, there'd be drool over my Androids keypad right now. But sorry, that arm injury definitely scares me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bavanlan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 They would have value if they were worth it. Redding, Reggie, & Mathis are up there in age but you couldn't tell by watching them this season. All 3 had great years. But Ware is not someone I'd take. 3years ago, there'd be drool over my Androids keypad right now. But sorry, that arm injury definitely scares me I wasn't talking just about Ware, I was talking about your blanket statement that you would avoid all 28+ year old players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I wasn't talking just about Ware, I was talking about your blanket statement that you would avoid all 28+ year old players.I would, but that's just my opinion. Everyone thinks differently. Some people may go after players over 28, I personally wouldn't. But that's just me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacolts56 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I'm not saying there's anything wrong with signing older players in general. But if there is a Younger player available who is equally as good or even better, why sign the older guy? Ware is not someone I'd want. I'd take Anthony Spencer or Paul Kruger (who a lot of people are high on) instead. That just makes more sense to me. Ware had that arm injury. Yes I do think he deserves a better team to play for where he has help, but that arm injury plays a big role in his pass rushing abilitiesRight there.....that's the main reason I wouldn't do that trade. Spencer and Kruger would cost zero draft picks, and even if we strike out trying to sign them in free agency next month....I'd rather draft an OLB this April than trade for Demarcus Ware at the OP's price. If we were to do something THAT big with players and draft picks for an insane pass rusher than I'd rather we wait until the 2014 draft and chase Jadavean Clowney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Right there.....that's the main reason I wouldn't do that trade.Spencer and Kruger would cost zero draft picks, and even if we strike out trying to sign them in free agency next month....I'd rather draft an OLB this April than trade for Demarcus Ware at the OP's price.If we were to do something THAT big with players and draft picks for an insane pass rusher than I'd rather we wait until the 2014 draft and chase Jadavean Clowney.Ok, next time try not to Bold Print that Big of Print.... thought my Phone jumped out at me Whew....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacolts56 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Ok, next time try not to Bold Print that Big of Print.... thought my Phone jumped out at me Whew.......Hahaha....sorry, I'll dial it down next time. The idea of letting go of several draft picks for a guy on the downside of his career got me riled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bavanlan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I would, but that's just my opinion. Everyone thinks differently. Some people may go after players over 28, I personally wouldn't. But that's just me So that's a no on Fitz, Ngata, and MJD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhawk Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Can we dial down the rampant speculation a tad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Hahaha....sorry, I'll dial it down next time. The idea of letting go of several draft picks for a guy on the downside of his career got me riled. I see that, but that's your way of expressing it. Just caught me off guard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 So that's a no on Fitz, Ngata, and MJD?Yep, that's a NO on all 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColtsLegacy Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I would, but that's just my opinion. Everyone thinks differently. Some people may go after players over 28, I personally wouldn't. But that's just me Yep, that's a NO on all 3 This explains why the Colts refused to interview you for the GM job last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 This explains why the Colts refused to interview you for the GM job last year.Yep, I guess so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldunclemark Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I think we decide to go young,,,,and, except for the O-line (where you protect the QB),,we need to stick to the plan.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Yep, that's a NO on all 3All three would make an immediate impact. I would take any of them for the right price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 All three would make an immediate impact. I would take any of them for the right price.Jones-Drew: Old & Banged UpFitzgerald: Yes would be great to have him & Reggie, but no.... I LOVE our WR's. I don't want TY & Co. taking a back seat. I want them to grow with Luck continuously. Ngata: Sure he would be GREAT on the Defense, but I doubt BAL will give him up & we could find someone younger & equally or more talented Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now