Luck12-to-Hilton13

REPORT: Seahawks willing to TRADE Richard Sherman

35 posts in this topic

Probably not for what they will want IMHO.  Now if it was say just a 3rd or 4th rounder, then perhaps.  But I doubt they will just let him walk for that low of a pick.  I would assume at least one 1st rounder would have to be offered?  I'm not sure how well he fits our scheme either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We seem to have a need at CB high on our draft board, from what I've read. Sherman is also age 28, which fits Ballard's apparent trend of recent signing's (excluding Butler), so it wouldn't be completely unusual for the Colts to pursue him. It would take probably a 1st rounder though, but if we're using that on a CB anyways, for an age 28 player, maybe it wouldn't be too crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Highly doubt it lol plus there'd have to be something wrong for them to trade thier best corner 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Sherman was also hurt for several weeks to end the year last season.

 

Also no way this happens with us, I highly doubt Ballard would go there......like really doubt it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to ask why they are open to trading for him. It's either 1) he's not as good as perceived or 2) they see the CB talent in this draft and know they can replace him with a 1st round pick from a trade.

So if they want a first round pick for him I would pass and potentially use that pick on a CB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll trade Dwayne Allen straight up for Richard Sherman.

 

Oh wait.........

 

 

(sorry I promise sometime this offseason I stop with the Allen jokes)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are not in win now mode, so we are probably not adding salary.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would he fit our man to man scheme? We don't really have any outstanding safety's that will help him out like Seattle does.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:

Would he fit our man to man scheme? We don't really have any outstanding safety's that will help him out like Seattle does.

That's a good point.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Luck12-to-Hilton13 said:

That's a good point.

 

He's a good player though but I would just be worried how he would fit in our defense. I'm pretty sure we take a corner in the lower rounds of the draft. We're kinda wide open there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a second rounder, yes. Like Superman pointed out, he does not have much guaranteed money left on his contract and I believe he can give us 2 years easily. Besides, it is not like we play man-to-man all the time. Even Vontae Davis gets safety help (however good or bad it might be) sometimes and there is plenty of zone that we play, mixing up Cover 2 and Cover 3 at times, IMO.

 

Some of you guys act like he is a bum without good safety help which he is not. The bigger issue, more than his money and skills, would be whether he fits in the Midwest profile of laying low, which he hands down WILL NOT. :)  However, for a soft team like ours lacking attitude on D, he might be good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't Sherman excel at zone defense while we use a man to man philosophy with our corners?

 

I don't think he'd fit into our defense all that well.

 

I'd much rather go to the draft.  

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, chad72 said:

For a second rounder, yes. Like Superman pointed out, he does not have much guaranteed money left on his contract and I believe he can give us 2 years easily. Besides, it is not like we play man-to-man all the time. Even Vontae Davis gets safety help (however good or bad it might be) sometimes and there is plenty of zone that we play, mixing up Cover 2 and Cover 3 at times, IMO.

 

Some of you guys act like he is a bum without good safety help which he is not. The bigger issue, more than his money and skills, would be whether he fits in the Midwest profile of laying low, which he hands down WILL NOT. :)  However, for a soft team like ours lacking attitude on D, he might be good.

The David Parry profile of laying low?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he leaves Seattle, he loses out on getting ignored for pass interference calls at home in their stadium. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

Doesn't Sherman excel at zone defense while we use a man to man philosophy with our corners?

 

I don't think he'd fit into our defense all that well.

 

I'd much rather go to the draft.  

 

Seahawks play mostly pattern matching cover 3. Sherman's role is closer to man to man corner than typical zone corner.

 

I'd rather go to the draft but not because I'd have doubts about Shermans abilities outside of Seattle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Synthetic said:

If he leaves Seattle, he loses out on getting ignored for pass interference calls at home in their stadium. 

 

That actually sounds funny but it's true. Seattle gets BIG TIME CALLS in Seattle. And we saw it vs. Atlanta last year in Seattle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I would trade our No.1 for Richard Sherman in a minute


Dude.......come on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jules said:


Dude.......come on.

Richard Sherman?./.....lets get real.

....Top corner...in his prime.....no brainer

 

Its like asking would I trade my No.1 for JJ Watt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

id give our second for sherman, i dont see why the seahawks would take it though

 

i would not give our first for him at this time, i would want to wait until draft day and see what the board looks like

 

we could get a good corner with that pick ourselves

 

plus sherman mostly plays zone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Richard Sherman?./.....lets get real.

....Top corner...in his prime.....no brainer

 

Its like asking would I trade my No.1 for JJ Watt

I am actually surprised the Texans dont entertain offers on Watt.  He has back issues and he may never be the same.  They could get some value out of him. A 1 and a 3 or something like that.  And they were pretty good without him.  

JMO

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Richard Sherman?./.....lets get real.

....Top corner...in his prime.....no brainer

 

Its like asking would I trade my No.1 for JJ Watt

He is a zone corner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Not totally....He can cover m-t-m...we've all seen it

They don't do it often

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

They don't do it often

I agree...but Ithink he could adjust to being on 'an island'

   He was hurt late last year....and his attitude is  well.....volatile.....

.....but what's our pick...#15?    I'd take that trade if Seattle really wants to move him;

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe he is the best corner in the league and his man coverage ability is underrated. He has been used to shadow opponents' number one and has been great in that role, he's just better as a cover 3 left cornerback. That said, I wouldn't want to give up a first for him. I would for a second, but I doubt Seattle would take anything less than a first. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, The Peytonator said:

I believe he is the best corner in the league and his man coverage ability is underrated. He has been used to shadow opponents' number one and has been great in that role, he's just better as a cover 3 left cornerback. That said, I wouldn't want to give up a first for him. I would for a second, but I doubt Seattle would take anything less than a first. 

why wouldnt you give up the 15th pick ion the draft for a 'lets just say above average' starting cornerback in his prime?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

why wouldnt you give up the 15th pick ion the draft for a 'lets just say above average' starting cornerback in his prime?

 

 

I think that's sarcasm, but he's definitely better than above average. He may be in his prime but how long does that prime last? He'll be turning 29 in a few days and corners tend to start falling off a bit around 30. He has a cap hit of $13 million for the next two years, then when he's 30 he'll still cost a lot of money to keep. It's just too much of a risk for me. It may be cliche, but I want to build through the draft. Trading for him would not be what puts us on top so I wouldn't be willing to offer more than a second. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Jules said:

 

That actually sounds funny but it's true. Seattle gets BIG TIME CALLS in Seattle. And we saw it vs. Atlanta last year in Seattle.

 

 

And the Buffalo game too where Sherman tried to kill the field goal kicker and no call. 

 

 

This past year, Seattle was heavily penalized repeatedly against the Saints on the road in the Superdome. They lost that game and Sherman complained about the refs. They also had similar calls against Green Bay. When Seattle is at home, they can get away with murder. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Colt-in-Jax said:

Swap of #1 picks with MAYBE a 5th thrown in. It's not just the talent it's the big contract to.

The contract isn't that big.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No thanks.

 

Not worth the loss of draft picks, the big contract (11/12m per the next 2 years), the headache of having him in the locker room, his media coverage, the constant PI calls he'd get for the assault and battery on wideouts that he somehow gets away with in Seattle.

 

The CB class is loaded. We don't need a high priced, grabby 29yo CB.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • JSYK We dont have 31 million to spend 
    • I agree. As long as that that person is answering it like an opinion and everyone realizes it's an opinion, then everything is solid. It gets when people are telling opinions as facts that it starts to head south. You see plenty of both, but it's usually just a lot of debating from my point of view. Some good points of view, and some bad ones, but as long as we all acknowledge these point of views as opinions when they are, then I see nothing wrong with it. I think it just gets out of control when there are rumors, mostly during FA and the draft, and people take it out of context at times, myself included.
    •   Well.....   There's good conversation and then there's.....      NOT so good conversation.   And this website has plenty of both.     I'd love to have more of the good kind and less of the NOT so good kind.   Deciding now that a poster here --- any poster here --- knows what Chris Ballard thinks of a player is ridiculous because none of us knows anything.    Ballard may love the guy.    He may like the guy.    He may not like him.   But nobody knows.      So, stating as fact that Ballard doesn't like someone is a dog that just won't hunt.....  
    • Things went our way tonight all around. Pacers win, Hawks and Bucks lose. Now there is a 3 way tie for 5th. It will be interesting to see how we finish.   Bad night with injuries for this team though. We already knew GR3 hurt his calf in practice and then Stuckey and Al Jefferson go down tonight. I actually want to see more Brooks/Ellis/Miles and more Christmas so hopefully they can pick up momentum if we can make the playoffs.
    • I wouldn't call it a flaw at all. In fact, it's the main premise that a sports forum is built around. Trying to put pieces of the puzzle together on certain things and predicting the future. That's how conversation is started a lot of the time in particular and it keeps people engaged. Without people jumping to conclusions with little evidence, it'd just be people reporting facts on twitter and chat on gameday, which wouldn't be a lot of fun by itself.
  • Members

    • Coltfreak

      Coltfreak 483

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjrichard

      cjrichard 38

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Samu-Rye

      Samu-Rye 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 631

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • -JJ-

      -JJ- 1,034

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • akcolt

      akcolt 1,835

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 1,410

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 205

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts52761

      colts52761 65

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Imrryr

      Imrryr 79

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.