Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Titans @ Colts, October 31, 2021, 1:00 PM EDT


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

That Mo Cox pass was most definitely PI! If the db/S wraps his arm around the waist! 9xs out of 10 that is called! I guess this was the 10th time! Im at the game and they didn't show a good review of the Int/Lewis fumble! So I was too quick to judge if there was a TV replay of it, but from where I was standing, I didnt see Lewis lose the ball! These refs have been pretty one sided for Tenn it seems! Hope it changes asap! Seems like Ted Donahee is officiating this game! I swear, I saw him ref the sPacers/Nets game the other night when Durant threw the ball in the stands!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gregr507 said:

I was speaking more generally, every fan base is guilty of it. Wasn't trying to call anyone out in particular. Eaststreet is a good poster and so are you, please don't take it personally. We just disagree on the call, that's ok

Honest question; so what? If people want to be homers, on their own forum, let them. You don’t have to police them. Disagree, but don’t be surprised when fans on their own board disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

 The ebb and flow of an NFL game. At least Wentz looks confident. I'd back him if it's tight in the 4th right now.

Yup. Playing great. And has made some very smart plays. The pass to Mo was on too.

 

PS... I know he was talking to you, but he disagreed with me right before. And I'm kinda known as the anti-sunshine guy lol, so thought I'd throw it out there.. 

4 minutes ago, chad72 said:


Thanks to Tyquan Lewis. Again I’ll restrain myself from saying anything about him.

 

Dude made a great play, then blew out his knee... can't really hate.. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

Yea but the game is now more accurate to both teams skill sets. Still, would’ve been nice to have a blowout here.

Yeah was looking like a smooth game and of course we 'Colt' it up...

 

Let's hope we pull this off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluebombers87 said:

Honest question; so what? If people want to be homers, on their own forum, let them. You don’t have to police them. Disagree, but don’t be surprised when fans on their own board disagree.

I suppose that's true. But if you want to get worked up over something, it should be something legitimate. The refs have made plenty of bad calls to be upset about, I just don't think that play was one of them. Reading various forums I see homerism everywhere, from basically all teams. I just don't understand why it's so hard for people to be objective

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SteelCityColt said:

Kinda fitting the way the game is set up. Not quite lose and done but would be a big blow. 

 

Time for the Colts to decide who they want to be in the 2nd half. Let Wentz/Taylor loose as we might need to win a shoot out..

 

Just go ahead and assume Henry opens it up in the second half. Make them take time to do it and get a stop here and there. Let Wentz prove his value to this team. I like it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, gregr507 said:

 

I disagree. People need to try to be impartial. Not calling you out specifically, but being a homer isn't a good look. Be objective

 

Saying that someone is "being a homer" is not a good look and is certainly not objective.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gregr507 said:

I suppose that's true. But if you want to get worked up over something, it should be something legitimate. The refs have made plenty of bad calls to be upset about, I just don't think that play was one of them. Reading various forums I see homerism everywhere, from basically all teams. I just don't understand why it's so hard for people to be objective

Because fan is short for fanatic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

Because fan is short of fanatic.

lol fair enough, I wasn't trying to ruffle any feathers, just trying to support the fact that you can be a fan while still being objective is all. No hard feelings towards anyone and I hope you're all enjoying the game and having a nice sunday

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gregr507 said:

lol fair enough, I wasn't trying to ruffle any feathers, just trying to support the fact that you can be a fan while still being objective is all. No hard feelings towards anyone and I hope you're all enjoying the game and having a nice sunday

 

It's all good. Appreciate the follow up posting to clarify.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • NFLfan locked this topic
  • NFLfan unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Young and Stroud come off the board at 1 and 2. Young could be the next Drew Brees or he could be the next Murray. Stroud has all the tools, but why would he say that he admires Vick and Watson? Has he been oblivious to everything? As a GM, that would concern the hell out of me.    That leaves Levis, Hooker, and Richardson.    Hooker is the most polished of the 3, and I really like his pocket mobility. There are times when he doesn’t see the rush, but it’s a similar issue I noticed early with Aaron Rodgers, and he can overcame it. Hooker can be very accurate, but he lacks anticipation. Has a strong enough arm, and wheels. While it is not an exact carbon copy, I see a lot of Daniel Jones in Hooker. And he will have the same hurdles in the NFL. But the potential is there.    Levis has a huge upside. Strong arm and mobile enough. He is very cocky though. It might be hard to teach this guy how to leave his ego at the door of the quarterback room. Guys like this tend to have leadership issues. People can overcome this, but they normally don’t. If he can then his upside is similar to Josh Allen.    Richardson is very raw, and he is one of the most inaccurate quarterbacks I’ve ever seen mentioned as a top 5 pick. He is an athletic freak. One rule to always remember is, you are either born with accuracy or you’re not. This is not something people usually improve drastically with. I think he is going to struggle in the NFL, and it’s all going to linked to his ability to put the football in the right place.    If Levis is off the board, then I’m taking BPA or bouncing out of that 4th pick. And there would need to be some very good interviews with Levis, to convince me that he is the guy.    I would most likely either make a path to get Hooker, or arrange a deal for Lamar. And if all else fails, I’d be okay to ride with Minshew in 23. 
    • Tackle?      Raimann is the LT.  Smith is the RT.   I think the only way that changes is if either gets hurt.      The Colts will likely look for a swing tackle.  A solid backup.   But my guess is that will be in free agency. 
    • That would be a negatory big Ben. See no es comprende. Imposseble'  Or something like that.
    • Okay, Okay. Let’s say hypothetically the Ravens KNOW they won’t keep Lamar. Wait and see how the draft falls. If Arizona trades out and Will Anderson is available take him. And then see if we can entice them to give us Lamar for our 2nd and 4th or something and then our 1st and 3rd next year. We get a top flight pass rusher and a former MVP in his prime. *shrug*
    • Yeah for sure, you've acknowledged the risk. But I think your prospect preference makes you an outlier, especially if we're comparing to NFL decision makers, who are historically risk averse.   And I think a team with a middling QB has a better situation than a team with a totally non performing QB. Both teams still need to find a new QB, but the team with the mid guy can still run a competent offense and develop the rest of their roster.    And this is also why I want to really analyze the athletic QB thing in recent years. I agree that offenses have evolved and are doing a much better job of utilizing QB athleticism, and that makes it easier to develop a guy who is more raw as a passer. But I think maybe the necessity and overall value of a QB who can consistently make plays with his legs is starting to be overstated. Take Stroud, I think his level of athleticism is good enough to be a franchise QB. And I'm not the guy overreacting to the Georgia game; I'm not super impressed by how he ran in that game. Still have questions about how he'll handle poor OL play. I know if you're not dynamic with your legs, you must be excellent from the pocket, but I think you probably have to be excellent from the pocket anyway.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...