Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

My keys to beating the Chiefs


CR91

Recommended Posts

1.Limit their big plays

 

If Im the colts, I am not letting Tyreek Hill beat us. I am putting Desir or Wilson on him everywhere he goes with safety help over the top. Push Tyreek against the sideline and keep him in the zone of the safety. We need to hit Tyreek every time he trys to catch a pass and hit him hard. 

 

2. Mahomes's Inexperience

 

Everyone is talking up Mahomes like hes the next greatest and failing to mention the reality. The guy is basically a rookie playing in his first playoff game. That is a different animal. The pressure and the atmosphere of the moment is real. First time QBs win in the playoffs if they have a top defense to cover their mistakes and that is not the case here. All the pressure is gonna be on him to win this game and we need to take advantage of that.

 

3.Make Mahomes Uncomfortable

 

We all know what Mahomes likes to do and that is take the deep shot and make a big play. That is not gonna work in a tampa 2. You can't go deep and throw into the deep zones. I am telling you right now, Mahomes will take a shot and Hooker will pick him off. I promise you that will happen. Mahomes is not a dink and dunk QB. Hes not patient enough to play that game and eventually he will pull the trigger and it will backfire.

 

4.Control the Clock

 

We need long sustaining drives that last 7-10 mins. Even if it only results in a FG, thats fine. We can not allow this team to have too many possessions. We need to keep this a low scoring game and not play their up tempo game and get into a shoot out. 

 

5.Make Them Play Power Football

 

I think its safe to say that since the Chiefs released Kareem Hunt, their running game has been average at best which is forcing them to rely on Mahomes's arm even more. They want to hit seam busters over the middle to Kelce. They want long bombs to Hill. They want Magic. That is not how you win in January and we are the poster child for that. We need to make them play a power football game which their not comfortable with. We need to set the tone early and hit them in the mouth.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

1.Limit their big plays

 

If Im the colts, I am not letting Tyreek Hill beat us. I am putting Desir or Wilson on him everywhere he goes with safety help over the top. Push Tyreek against the sideline and keep him in the zone of the safety. We need to hit Tyreek every time he trys to catch a pass and hit him hard. 

 

This is the catch 22 they have us in. If we commit that much attention to Hill it’s going to open up Kelce. We struggle to defend TEs. The amount of yards we have given up to TEs in the last 10 games is significant. And none of those TEs we’ve faced have been near Kelce’s level.

 

If we try to cover both that way Mahomes is capable of hitting someone else. 

 

In all honesty I think Kelce is much more dangerous to us in this game than Hill is. We’ve been able to hang with some really good WRs. 

 

We we haven’t had much success stopping any TEs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

 

This is the catch 22 they have us in. If we commit that much attention to Hill it’s going to open up Kelce. We struggle to defend TEs. The amount of yards we have given up to TEs in the last 10 games is significant. And none of those TEs we’ve faced have been near Kelce’s level.

 

If we try to cover both that way Mahomes is capable of hitting someone else. 

 

In all honesty I think Kelce is much more dangerous to us in this game than Hill is. We’ve been able to hang with some really good WRs. 

 

We we haven’t had much success stopping any TEs. 

 

Thats fine. Let them hit Kelce. I rather 10 yard completions to Kelce then 80 yard tds to hill. Wouldn't surprise me to see Geathers and Walker on Kelce every play and have Leonard play the middle to spy on Mahomes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Thats fine. Let them hit Kelce. I rather 10 yard completions to Kelce then 80 yard tds to hill.

 

8 10 yard passes to Kelce and a TD is the same result. 

 

And it tires our defense out significantly more. 

 

Which makes us even more likely to see that 80 yards TD to Hill later in the game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John Waylon said:

 

8 10 yard passes to Kelce and a TD is the same result. 

 

And it tires our defense out significantly more. 

 

Which makes us even more likely to see that 80 yards TD to Hill later in the game. 

 

Which is why I said put Geathers and Walker on him and have Leonard play the middle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this game is simpler than people are making it out to be. Yes, we have to stop Hill and Kelce, but it’s going to come down to two things for both teams: 

 

Red Zone Efficiency(TD’s over FG’s)

Turnover Margin 

 

 

If we win the turnover margin and force them into a couple of FG’s we win this game. If Luck throws a boneheaded pick or two, we’re in big trouble. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts1324 said:

I think this game is simpler than people are making it out to be. Yes, we have to stop Hill and Kelce, but it’s going to come down to two things for both teams: 

 

Red Zone Efficiency(TD’s over FG’s)

Turnover Margin 

 

 

If we win the turnover margin and force them into a couple of FG’s we win this game. If Luck throws a boneheaded pick or two, we’re in big trouble. 

 

That is any team. Not just the chiefs. Obviously you want to score tds and create turnovers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we play a zone based scheme meaning we concede certain parts of the field also as a bi product ...

 

“I knw what i’m giving you, it’s just a matter of when i decide to deviate. What are you gonna do about it”

 

Truthfully believe we’ll control the tempo en this game due to the chiefs defensive woes. 

 

That Wk17 raiders game is alarming

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

we play a zone based scheme meaning we concede certain parts of the field also as a bi product ...

 

“I knw what i’m giving you, it’s just a matter of when i decide to deviate. What are you gonna do about it”

 

Truthfully believe we’ll control the tempo en this game due to the chiefs defensive woes. 

 

That Wk17 raiders game is alarming

 

I wouldn't put too much stock in that game. Carr was terrible, but Martin ran for 100 yards.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CR91 said:

 

I wouldn't put too much stock in that game. Carr was terrible, but Martin ran for 100 yards.

 

im saying it’s alarming from the chiefs perspective. the raiders really had whatever they wanted against the chiefs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

we play a zone based scheme meaning we concede certain parts of the field also as a bi product ...

 

“I knw what i’m giving you, it’s just a matter of when i decide to deviate. What are you gonna do about it”

 

Truthfully believe we’ll control the tempo en this game due to the chiefs defensive woes. 

 

That Wk17 raiders game is alarming

Yep and the by product is a lot of completions and yards to tight ends because of taking away deep ball. Kelce might have 10 rec. 100 yds. but that will eat clock and can be lived with. Man it's going to be a fun game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ManningGM said:

See ball. Get ball. Take ball into endzone.

 

Thank you for that great analysis Mr. Doctor Professor Patrick

 

 

e_cmyWv0_400x400.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

5.Make Them Play Power Football

 

I think its safe to say that since the Chiefs released Kareem Hunt, their running game has been average at best which is forcing them to rely on Mahomes's arm even more. They want to hit seam busters over the middle to Kelce. They want long bombs to Hill. They want Magic. That is not how you win in January and we are the poster child for that. We need to make them play a power football game which their not comfortable with. We need to set the tone early and hit them in the mouth.

 

This isn't really safe to say. In 11 games with Hunt, they were averaging 4.8 yds/carry, rushing for 116 yds/game and scoring .9 rushing TDs/game.

 

In 5 games without Hunt, they have been averaging 4.8 yds/carry, rushing for 116 yds/game and 1.2 rushing TDs/game.

 

The production on the ground has been basically identical. And keep in mind that two of those five games without Hunt included the stout defenses of BAL and LAC.

 

Mahomes has actually been producing less since Hunt got injured as well. He has attempted more passes per game...but that's mainly because his efficiency has gone down a bit.

 

Not to mention that Damien Williams is definitely a weapon in the passing game like Hunt was.

 

The Colts run defense is stout. But I wouldn't say that KC is uncomfortable playing that type of football. Until Mahomes showed up, Reid basically ran the offense out of the backfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John Waylon said:

 

This is the catch 22 they have us in. If we commit that much attention to Hill it’s going to open up Kelce. We struggle to defend TEs. The amount of yards we have given up to TEs in the last 10 games is significant. And none of those TEs we’ve faced have been near Kelce’s level.

 

If we try to cover both that way Mahomes is capable of hitting someone else. 

 

In all honesty I think Kelce is much more dangerous to us in this game than Hill is. We’ve been able to hang with some really good WRs. 

 

We we haven’t had much success stopping any TEs. 

Not every tight end we have played in the last 10 games have killed us sometimes we have got beat for a big gain or two but its not like it has happened every week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Wilson on Hill seems scares me. I don't think the Colts are going to be doing a lot of man coverage in this game.

I'm no expert in these things.  Wouldn't you just roll Hooker to the side Hill is on?

 

If I'm not mistaken I thought I saw Leonard lining up against the TE last week a couple of times?

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

This isn't really safe to say. In 11 games with Hunt, they were averaging 4.8 yds/carry, rushing for 116 yds/game and scoring .9 rushing TDs/game.

 

In 5 games without Hunt, they have been averaging 4.8 yds/carry, rushing for 116 yds/game and 1.2 rushing TDs/game.

 

The production on the ground has been basically identical. And keep in mind that two of those five games without Hunt included the stout defenses of BAL and LAC.

 

Mahomes has actually been producing less since Hunt got injured as well. He has attempted more passes per game...but that's mainly because his efficiency has gone down a bit.

 

Not to mention that Damien Williams is definitely a weapon in the passing game like Hunt was.

 

The Colts run defense is stout. But I wouldn't say that KC is uncomfortable playing that type of football. Until Mahomes showed up, Reid basically ran the offense out of the backfield.

 

If they can run the ball with Williams, bring it. Colts have shut down way better backs and better running teams. Hunt is way more of a threat in the backfield then Williams.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Wilson on Hill seems scares me. I don't think the Colts are going to be doing a lot of man coverage in this game.

 

The idea is to get physical with Hill and bracket cover with the safety over the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

"In playoff football, you win up 

front!" - Frank Reich 2019

 

Or you have a QB complete 73% of his passes for 971 yds, 6 TDs and a 115.7 QBR.

 

Like Morgan Freeman says in Shawshank Redemption, "that...and a big ******* poster"

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

I'm no expert in these things.  Wouldn't you just roll Hooker to the side Hill is on?

 

If I'm not mistaken I thought I saw Leonard lining up against the TE last week a couple of times?

 

Of course...I just don't think Wilson is keeping up with Hill on slants and crossing routes. Hill is very good at beating press coverage with quickness. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

You can't go deep and throw into the deep zones. I am telling you right now, Mahomes will take a shot and Hooker will pick him off. I promise you that will happen.

 

LOLOLOL, I made this EXACT same prediction like yesterday in one of the other threads! Great minds think alike ;) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Or you have a QB complete 73% of his passes for 971 yds, 6 TDs and a 115.7 QBR.

 

Like Morgan Freeman says in Shawshank Redemption, "that...and a big ******* poster"

Again, winning up front includes QB

pressure...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Of course...I just don't think Wilson is keeping up with Hill on slants and crossing routes. Hill is very good at beating press coverage with quickness. 

 

 

I would much rather have Hill beat me inside than on a sideline route.  Yeah, he's dangerous after the catch, but we'll have to live with it.  I think we can smother him after catch.

 

We need containment on Mahomes, though.  Keep him in the pocket with pressure up front and we'll be fine.  We don't necessarily have to sack him, but just speed up his progression/sdelivery.  He's more dangerous out of the pocket than in it.  If we do this then that eliminates the deep threat and our secondary should be able to shine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

The idea is to get physical with Hill and bracket cover with the safety over the top.

 

Press coverage on Hill? I think Wilson would be lucky to get his hands on him half of the time...cause Hill is so quick. And if you put Wilson up to the line and bracket over the top...you leave a lot of space to allow Kelce to eat. 

 

If anyone is playing man against Hill...I think it will be Kenny Moore playing off to negate the intermediate and (hopefully) big plays. Moore is faster than any other CB and has the burst to make up the gap if they try to throw short.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Press coverage on Hill? I think Wilson would be lucky to get his hands on him half of the time...cause Hill is so quick. And if you put Wilson up to the line and bracket over the top...you leave a lot of space to allow Kelce to eat. 

 

If anyone is playing man against Hill...I think it will be Kenny Moore playing off to negate the intermediate and (hopefully) big plays. Moore is faster than any other CB and has the burst to make up the gap if they try to throw short.  

 

Wilson is longer which is the point. Pats did the same thing to Hilton.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually, @csmopar had half the answer right. The perfect situation was to trade Hilton for a good draft pick, keep Fountain on the 53, and then activate Pittman to the 53 man roster. That would of been perfect to sell Hilton before he declines and get Pittman and Fountain on the 53. After that, when Campbell comes up, he can take the Hilton role over and you have a extra solid draft pick for next year.
    • No one.  Unfortunately I think the writing is on the wall for Fountain.  Sure put him on the PS if you want but I don't think he has a long term future with us.  Don't forget Johnson was just brought up from the PS himself.  When Campbell comes back who goes?  Let's face it our WR corps is young and unproven with the exception of TY. He is the only reliable proven go to WR we have.   If we win Sunday I wouldn't be surprised if we trade for a veteran WR.  I think it's our weakest position group and if we want to make the playoffs it will be tougher to do with our current group.  
    • What would it take to get Harry?
    • For the first time in a long time, the defense looks good. I don't think they're a top five defense, let's see what they look like after the next few games. 
    • I agree some what. Lets throw out the offensive side of the ball, because there have been setbacks that were not in within Ballard's control.  I speak of Luck's departure and injuries at the wr position. Have u been happy with the progress on the defensive side of the ball? He picked the scheme, the coordinator and they are all Ballard's players in terms of drafting and free agent pick ups. I am very concerned by the lack of growth and progress of this defence.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...