Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ingram or Jones


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

 

Almost but not quite. He probably meant Chandler Jones and Melvin Ingram. In this case I'd rather have Jones. 

Yeah. I feel like Ingram is not as much of a pure pash rusher as Jones, but Ingram may be the better tackler. We need pass rush, so I would go with Jones as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

 

Almost but not quite. He probably meant Chandler Jones and Melvin Ingram. In this case I'd rather have Jones. 

Yeah. I feel like Ingram is not as much of a pure pash rusher as Jones, but Ingram may be the better tackler. We need pass rush, so I would go with Jones as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chandler Jones has had some off field issues like his brother Art.  That makes me a little nervous and the Patriots did move on from him but that's not out of the ordinary for them.  From a pure pass rush you would probably lean Jones but Ingram is really good and might be a better fit with our defense.  Playing on the west coast he doesn't get much publicity as a former Patriot who we have seen more of.  If the two hit FA I think I would prefer Ingram. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't watched any Browns games but how has Jones looked since arriving to the Browns after the trade? Was Jones more of a product of the Pats system or is he looking equally as good as a Brown? I wonder if having his brother here has any affect on him signing here as a brother duo (although I would say Art will and should be cut) ?

 

I have no idea who Ingram is at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jdubu said:

I haven't watched any Browns games but how has Jones looked since arriving to the Browns after the trade? Was Jones more of a product of the Pats system or is he looking equally as good as a Brown? I wonder if having his brother here has any affect on him signing here as a brother duo (although I would say Art will and should be cut) ?

 

I have no idea who Ingram is at all.

Jones plays for the Cardinals Ingram for the Chargers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jdubu said:

I haven't watched any Browns games but how has Jones looked since arriving to the Browns after the trade? Was Jones more of a product of the Pats system or is he looking equally as good as a Brown? I wonder if having his brother here has any affect on him signing here as a brother duo (although I would say Art will and should be cut) ?

 

I have no idea who Ingram is at all.

 

 

You're confusing C Jones with J Collins ...I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldunclemark said:

who are we talking about, dw?

 

 

Sorry .. it was Melvin Ingram and Chandler Jones. Neither AZ or SD is flush with cap room.. AZ only showing 4 mill for 2017. But I'm not sure what happens if Fitz or Carson Palmer don't return...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

Jones plays for the Cardinals Ingram for the Chargers,

Ahhh, I was thinking of Jamie Collins.  Thanks I don't see the Cards giving this guy up after giving Cooper and a second round for him (this after I googled him further lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the Melvin kid, I would assume we have a better shot at obtaining him in FA than with Jones. So what do you all think about a Jamie Collins in this mix of FA, would he be a game changing addition or was he more of the pats system product?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dw49 said:

If both hit the FA market , one of them will be a Colt.

 

My preference would be Chandler Jones.

 

But I have no idea why you'd be so confident that one of them will be a Colt.

 

We have not shown any interest under this administration that they're willing to spend huge money on a free agent.     

 

They're willing to buy medium priced guys and inexpensive guys,  but not expensive guys.

 

So, I think any expensive guy is a real long shot.      

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

My preference would be Chandler Jones.

 

But I have no idea why you'd be so confident that one of them will be a Colt.

 

We have not shown any interest under this administration that they're willing to spend huge money on a free agent.     

 

They're willing to buy medium priced guys and inexpensive guys,  but not expensive guys.

 

So, I think any expensive guy is a real long shot.      

 

 

I believe the Art Jones and Gosler Cherilus contracts were considered huge at the time for their positions.  I don't think we would be afraid to spend especially since Andrew is locked up.  I am actually expecting us to pay for an ER. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

My preference would be Chandler Jones.

 

But I have no idea why you'd be so confident that one of them will be a Colt.

 

We have not shown any interest under this administration that they're willing to spend huge money on a free agent.     

 

They're willing to buy medium priced guys and inexpensive guys,  but not expensive guys.

 

So, I think any expensive guy is a real long shot.      

 

 

 

 

I think just for the reason you mention , the Colts will take a shot with a better type FA. The above IMO has been pretty ineffective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

I believe the Art Jones and Gosler Cherilus contracts were considered huge at the time for their positions.  I don't think we would be afraid to spend especially since Andrew is locked up.  I am actually expecting us to pay for an ER. 

  

Cherlius no doubt fits the bill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, richard pallo said:

I believe the Art Jones and Gosler Cherilus contracts were considered huge at the time for their positions.  I don't think we would be afraid to spend especially since Andrew is locked up.  I am actually expecting us to pay for an ER. 

 

Art Jones,  no.    His 6.5 Mill per year is a mid-priced salary.    But you're right about Cherilus,  the Colts made him the highest paid right tackle at the time.

 

BUT.....

 

Even doing that his deal was something like 6.9 mill per year.      And overall,   that's a middle class salary.

 

Andre Johnson got 7 Mill per. 

 

But I don't believe we've signed any free agent under Grigson for more than that.

 

He doesn't believe in that.      And given that most expensive free agents DO NOT work out long-term,  I'm OK with that.       Most expensive free agents prove to be money badly invested.

 

We'll see what Grigson does come Mid-March.....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dw49 said:

  

Cherlius no doubt fits the bill. 

 

Cheriflus fits the bill only on a basis that we made him the highest paid right tackle at the time.

 

But,  his salary was roughly $6.9 Mill per year and overall that's a Mid-Price salary.     

 

I think the highest paid free agent was Andre Johnson at $7 Mill per.      And that's still not an expensive salary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Colt Overseas said:

Ingram is a better fit at 3-4 olb. I like him actually, he along with Walden would give a solid to the run D. 

 

But Jones is the better pass rusher.

 

I think we should look in the draft for a pass rusher anyway. I would like to see us sign an ILB or a CB like Gilmore or Johnson (if we could).

Hasn't Ingram like greatly underachieved in San Diego?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Cheriflus fits the bill only on a basis that we made him the highest paid right tackle at the time.

 

But,  his salary was roughly $6.9 Mill per year and overall that's a Mid-Price salary.     

 

I think the highest paid free agent was Andre Johnson at $7 Mill per.      And that's still not an expensive salary.

 

 

He signed in 2013 when the cap was a bit lower. I would consider it an expensive singing considering he played RT. But I get your point and no doubt Grigson has stayed away from really big FA deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Perry? People are really undervaluing him. He's starting to tap into his potential and might just be the best of the 3 on their next contracts. But yeah. One of those 3 need to be Colts after the NLY starts. What does Perry have 10 sacks? That's splitting snaps, and he's missed some games. He needs to be our top target IMO. I think he could give us 10-12 sacks every year for the next 4-5 years. Maybe even a 15 sack year or 2. Then we need that freak on the other side of him. We need Tim Williams. Tim Williams, Nick Perry, Erik Walden, and one of Daeshon Hall or Devonte Fields would be solid assuming Hall/Fields is there in the 3rd. There's a lot of good EDGE rushers in this class. We can get a stud in the 1st AND the 3rd if we see talent, draft talent lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jones is slightly better than Ingram at rushing the passer.

Ingram is slightly better than Jones in coverage

Ingram is flat out better than Jones at stopping the run.

 

I'd take Ingram over Jones.  Either one would be a significant upgrade over what we have now.  But, what I really want is both wearing the horse shoe.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't really care where a player is picked, because if he's starting he's likely been deemed to be the best we have. That in itself CAN of course be pretty unfortunate and that's where it starts to be a Ballard problem.   To the OP: Cross, Speed and Franklin have all been questioned because of their questionable coverage abilities - especially Speed and Franklin. What gets brought up in the OP completely misses the point. Speed and Franklin have also been called out because too many of their tackles seem be be made 5+ yards downfield. I don't see anything disproving that here either.
    • Its come to my attention that some members just can't take anybody second-guessing the Colts.   I probably fit in the nonsupport of Ballard group, but I've never targeted the players mentioned because I thought they were decent picks at the spot they were taken.  If you average out the draft spot of those players, I'd say they average to about pick 90...mid to late 3rd round.   My target was the lack of attention in picking impact players with first round picks, identifying them in college.  One All Pro in 8 drafts, plus capital from trade downs.  And that one All Pro is/was a G.  Doesn't seem like our recent pick #4 is headed there either, but its very early.
    • No one really said anything about Rainman. People were screaming for him to start over Pryor after week 2.   Jones had 1 good game with 2 INTs but he’s still a liability in man, and tends to always give up 1-2 big catches a game and a penalty. He’s fine as a number 3 corner.   Lot of people also wanted Cross, just at SS instead of FS which is why he has had success. I’ve always thought he was better than Thomas.   Fries has been a surprise and this is easily the best we’ve seen from Pierce. Ryan and Minshew definitely limited him.
    • Watching this makes me wonder what's going on with his mechanics lately. 
    • I think AR will get better with time (he’s so young and new ) but his short yardage accuracy is atrocious.  It’s so bad that during the last two games AR threw the ball over the receivers head out of bounds and my gf said “ good Job at least he threw it out of bounds to not get intercepted” and I said , “ babe that wasn’t on purpose he literally is that inaccurate” lol.  When you throw it so far over your receivers head that it looks like you threw it out of bounds on purpose, you know there is some stuff for your qb to work on. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...