Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

If you hate the Dorsett pick, you might not understand chess.


Recommended Posts

I really am not sold, that when we picked, any of the remaining defensive players were definite difference makers.

 

You are right at least for a first round pick I did not see anyone who can come in on defense and make a difference from day 1, I believe the colts will get a good 2nd round and 3rd round pick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just how is Luck going to get them the ball if Malcolm Brown, Hightower, Collins, Ninkovich, Chandler Jones, et al., are rushing a mediocre o-line?

Didn't Luck get hit a ton last season?

 

Yes but did not everyone griped that he held the ball way to long trying to go for the home run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to see the passion in the fans, and I respect those who feel real strongly that we need to add as much defense as possible.  But I really think people are over-stating the holes on the D.  Particularly the line.  Last year Jones and Redding had ongoing injury problems, and all of our NT-types were just getting their first taste of major playing time.  Langford, a healthy Jones, and another year's development for Kerr, Chapman, and Hughes should help a lot, without even adding a DL in the draft (which I think we will do).  I agree with Grigson when he says that be have a pretty balanced team right now.  I don't see any critical weaknesses that must be addressed yesterday, which is why Grigson can afford to take the BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are 100% correct. The Patriots are not afraid of anyone we could ever field on offense because their team is better built and coached.

You know, in another thread you alluded to becoming a Pats fan. You seem pretty enamored with them, maybe give it a shot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Says the Browns fan, whose team gave a center $8m/year, then drafted a center at #19.

 

And then the derisiveness toward a "5'10" WR", when Antonio Brown rips the Browns apart twice a year...

 

 

Sweet deflection. You talking trash to me doesn't make this pick any less stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the gripes that Colts fans have has to do with how we've played against the Patriots and how we've lost to them the same way 4 straight times, allowing at least 40+ points in each game, and getting steamrolled in the process.


 


2012:  Colts 24 - Patriots 49  Luck: 27 of 50 for 334 Yards


2013:  Colts 22 - Patriots 43  Luck: 20 of 41 for 331 Yards


2014:  Colts 20 - Patriots 42  Luck: 23 of 39 for 303 Yards


2014:  Colts 7   - Patriots 45  Luck: 12 of 33 for 126 Yards


 


As you can see, The Patriots have averaged over 40 points per game against the Colts. Luck has also thrown for over 300 yards in 3 of 4 outings against NE. Our offense really struggled in the AFCCG. It has been primarily the defense that hasn't been able to contain NE's offense. 


 


We are fine on offense and really struggle on defense. This has been the case for over a decade now. I think, as fans, we were hoping to finally have a different approach regardless of the BPA draft philosophy. 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet deflection. You talking trash to me doesn't make this pick any less stupid. 

 

It's not a deflection at all, nor is it trash talk. It's a reinforcement of the BPA strategy, and it highlights how dumb it is to be critical of drafting a 5'10" receiver, as if they have no value. You ought to know better, considering the way your team drafted and considering the best player in your division is a 5'10" receiver. The Browns took Erving because they thought he's a really good player, not because they need a center. And I just cannot fathom a Browns fan speaking poorly about a receiver because he's 5'10". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point, you just have to ask yourself, what the heck is going on here. A wide receiver? What?!

 

What happened to "power run"? Grigson just scrapping that plan already?

 

I immediately thought of this forum when I saw they took a 5'10 WR. The only thing dumber would have been them taking a QB in the first. 

Thanks for thinking of us in our time of need....

 

As is so often the case, when you put others first it make you feel warm and good inside.  I hope you feel better now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just how is Luck going to get them the ball if Malcolm Brown, Hightower, Collins, Ninkovich, Chandler Jones, et al., are rushing a mediocre o-line?

Didn't Luck get hit a ton last season?

we have one game scheduled against the patriots next year, focusing solely on that would be stupid.  also the line is already better and will probably get another upgrade or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many people griping about the Pat fans laughing at us because their team will be able to continue to run all over ours. It seems to be that if Grigson and BB are playing chess, then Grigson just made a move that should scare the heck out of Pat fans. If the Pats had our receiving corps and we had their CBs, you'd all be freakin' out right now! Honestly, if we have T.Y. and Dorsett on the field at the same time with some of our other mismatches (AJ, Fleener, Moncrief), how in Sam Hill are they gonna cover them all? Not to mention that we have what is likey to be the NFL's best QB this year. I'd say the Pats are in "check", and they don't have a lot of counter-moves they can make.

only problem is they can still rush for over a million yards again and gronk will still kill us over the middle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah right!!! If Luck is running for his life and we can't run the ball still, how is Luck going to find his "plethora" of weapons we have drafted for him?

Same way Peyton couldn't find Harrison, Wayne, Stokely and Clark when Diem was getting delayed blitzes from Bruschi/McGinnest, Lilja was getting blitzed by Joey Porter, and same way Peyton was on the sidelines with the other team having 7 and 8 minute drives against his DL.

building the exact same way as Polian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to note is....I have not seen anyone really complain about the player named Phillip Dorsett.

We just question the 1st round selection when there were some defensive beasts to be had. I think Dorsett is a great kid and will be great for the city of Indianapolis.

Same here....my question is the value Belichick saw in Brown at #32 that Grigson did not see at #29. His "and it wasn't close" BPA comment regarding Dorsett is what I question....not necessarily Dorsett's talent.

Oh well....I suppose we're doomed to Dorsett>Brown threads, and vice versa, for the next 5-6 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to note is....I have not seen anyone really complain about the player named Phillip Dorsett.

We just question the 1st round selection when there were some defensive beasts to be had. I think Dorsett is a great kid and will be great for the city of Indianapolis.

Very well said Brent!! That is exactly how I feel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could totally see Grigs going RB and RT in rounds 2 and 3 then using the rest of the draft and supplemental to find a starting SS and depth at defense (secondary especially).  I thought we ran the ball pretty well last year as long as Richardson wasn't carrying the ball.  Our passing game started to spiral downward when Wayne tore his tri and all we had left at wr that was worth anything were TY and Moncrief.  We fixed that problem with Dorsett and Jonhson.  It was Boom carrying the ball the 2nd half of season (Bengals practice squad guy I think).  I imagine we can do much better with Gore, Boom, and either Coleman, Duke, or Abdullah.

 

All we need now is a quality RT which we may already have in Mewhort if Gosder underwhelms again..  I could see our starting line being 

 

Costanzo, Mewhort, Holmes, Thomas, Cherilius

 

We have a ton of guards right now - Mewhort, Thomas, Heenan, Herremans, Thornton.  I would rather give Mewhort a shot at RT and move Cherilius to backup.  Leaving a starting line of.

 

Costanzo, Herremans, Holmes, Thomas, Mewhort.  

 

I see no reason, if we go offense in rounds 2 and 3, why we won't finish as the number one offense in the league.  If our defense doesn't improve and we finish 11th again (not bad), our average offense/defense score will be 6.  I'm good with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the draft it is also about value and we selected a second round grade and ignored someone like Malcolm Brown who was rated 19/20th on most draft boards.

We should have taken Brown and then did what the Giants just did in moving up to get Landon Collins. We missed on the softball lob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here....my question is the value Belichick saw in Brown at #32 that Grigson did not see at #29. His "and it wasn't close" BPA comment regarding Dorsett is what I question....not necessarily Dorsett's talent.

Oh well....I suppose we're doomed to Dorsett>Brown threads, and vice versa, for the next 5-6 years.

Exactly.  It seems we had a respectable day 2....time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys that are trashing Grigs, are overreacting and stressing out way too much. We are fans, not G.M.'s or talent scouts. We don't know squat, compared to these guy's in our front office. I don't necessarily agree with everything they do, but you doomsdayer's are nuts. Calm down, and have some fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the player just not the pick. With how bad this defense was last year, you had to go defense in the 1st round. Dorsett won't be able to stop the run or sack Brady. Collins, Gregory, and Brown would have been better value. Those were blue chip 1st round talent and Grigson passed on them for a luxury WR. The Patriots and Seahawks build their defenses and draft them early. Grigson is doing the complete opposite. I'd grade Dorsett as a player an A, but the pick a C because WR was not a need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the player just not the pick. With how bad this defense was last year, you had to go defense in the 1st round. Dorsett won't be able to stop the run or sack Brady. Collins, Gregory, and Brown would have been better value. Those were blue chip 1st round talent and Grigson passed on them for a luxury WR. The Patriots and Seahawks build their defenses and draft them early. Grigson is doing the complete opposite. I'd grade Dorsett as a player an A, but the pick a C because WR was not a need.

spot on! Same here there isn't anything wrong with Dorsett he's a great player
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have one elite player on defense and that's Davis. That's just not good enough. The Patriots and Seahawks have 4 or 5 each. The defense is not good at all against elite teams we just play in a easy division. The Steerlers and Patriots two teams that we'll likely see in the playoffs set records against this defense. There were so many great defensive prospects left, Dorsett was a luxury pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the over under on the the number of pressures, hits and sacks that Malcom Brown, the player Grigs should have taken, will have when we next play the Pats?

 

If I had to bet today, I'd lay money that Malcom Brown doesn't even dress when we play the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you make that bet?

 

Not even dress?      You must be down on him as a player........

 

I'm not down on him. I don't think he's as good as others do; comparing him to Wilfork is a huge mistake, IMO. I think he was the third or fourth best DT/NT prospect on the board at the time. Even if we were locked into taking a DL at #29, for me, it wouldn't have been him. 

 

Separate from that, the Pats have a history of not playing rookie DL right away. We play them in Week 6. He might not be up to speed. They have some DL already in their rotation. Also, he's not a very good pass rusher, and our offense is going to throw the ball, no doubt. We'll see. I could be dead wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not down on him. I don't think he's as good as others do; comparing him to Wilfork is a huge mistake, IMO. I think he was the third or fourth best DT/NT prospect on the board at the time. Even if we were locked into taking a DL at #29, for me, it wouldn't have been him. 

 

Separate from that, the Pats have a history of not playing rookie DL right away. We play them in Week 6. He might not be up to speed. They have some DL already in their rotation. Also, he's not a very good pass rusher, and our offense is going to throw the ball, no doubt. We'll see. I could be dead wrong.

 

For whatever it's worth,  and I can't even remember who said this the last two days....

 

But I heard someone (expert) says that Brown is NOT the replacement for Wilfork.    He's NOT a NT.

 

He's a DE or DT,  but NOT a NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For whatever it's worth,  and I can't even remember who said this the last two days....

 

But I heard someone (expert) says that Brown is NOT the replacement for Wilfork.    He's NOT a NT.

 

He's a DE or DT,  but NOT a NT.

Bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For whatever it's worth,  and I can't even remember who said this the last two days....

 

But I heard someone (expert) says that Brown is NOT the replacement for Wilfork.    He's NOT a NT.

 

He's a DE or DT,  but NOT a NT.

 

I agree. Yet, plenty of people are mentioning him as the Wilfork replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many people griping about the Pat fans laughing at us because their team will be able to continue to run all over ours.  It seems to be that if Grigson and BB are playing chess, then Grigson just made a move that should scare the heck out of Pat fans.  If the Pats had our receiving corps and we had their CBs, you'd all be freakin' out right now!  Honestly, if we have T.Y. and Dorsett on the field at the same time with some of our other mismatches (AJ, Fleener, Moncrief), how in Sam Hill are they gonna cover them all?  Not to mention that we have what is likey to be the NFL's best QB this year.  I'd say the Pats are in "check", and they don't have a lot of counter-moves they can make. 

Perhaps Belichick is playing chess to our checkers. In the 4th round Belichick chose 2 road-grading run blockers to improve their running game: Tre Jackson and Shaq Mason. It seems he is doubling down on his run offense.Did he do this afterr seeing that in free agency and the first two days of the draft we didn't fix our run stopping defense?

 

Did hiis queen just take our bishop that was putting him in check to give him check mate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to see the passion in the fans, and I respect those who feel real strongly that we need to add as much defense as possible.  But I really think people are over-stating the holes on the D.  Particularly the line.  Last year Jones and Redding had ongoing injury problems, and all of our NT-types were just getting their first taste of major playing time.  Langford, a healthy Jones, and another year's development for Kerr, Chapman, and Hughes should help a lot, without even adding a DL in the draft (which I think we will do).  I agree with Grigson when he says that be have a pretty balanced team right now.  I don't see any critical weaknesses that must be addressed yesterday, which is why Grigson can afford to take the BPA.

Great point Archer.  My guess is Kerr and Quarles...and Hughes have been in the gym.  Jones is healthy....Langford will help against the run.  Fisher taught him well.  Is anybody here that cannot wait until training camp?   :coltslogo:  :coltslogo:  :coltslogo:  :colts:  :colts:  :colts:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Belichick is playing chess to our checkers. In the 4th round Belichick chose 2 road-grading run blockers to improve their running game: Tre Jackson and Shaq Mason. It seems he is doubling down on his run offense.Did he do this afterr seeing that in free agency and the first two days of the draft we didn't fix our run stopping defense?

 

Did hiis queen just take our bishop that was putting him in check to give him check mate?

 

Really regretting the snap decision to include the chess theme, especially considering my marginal chess game.  However, I did notice that same thing about the running OL in the Pats' middle rounds.  That may indeed be a chess move to take advantage of our lack of action on a run-stuffing DL.  In reality, I don't see the Dorsett pick as a chess move by Grigson, but rather as the BPA, as management has maintained.  But it will create very tough match-up problems for the Pats in particular and every opponent in general.  Everyone can scheme to cover Hilton's speed, but few can effectively do so for Hilton and Dorsett simultaneously (assuming Dorsett is what we think he is).  As far as NE's move, I'm really not worried.  I'm in the minority, but I thought going in that the Colts' problems against the run have been ridiculously overstated as a critical weakness.  I expect increased contributions from Jones, Kerr, Chapman, and Hughes.  Plus, ironman Langford probably trumps an oft-injured Redding (though I really like Redding).  Add Irving and a healthy Freeman, as well as addition by subtraction Landry, and I expect massive improvement in run defense without drafting a soul.  Plus, and most don't want to hear this, but we had only around four games this year where we were unable to stop the run.  In general, we didn't do that bad in that area.  Look at the playoff game against Cincinnati's vaunted rushing attack.  They couldn't get anything going.  I don't think those NE and Pittsburgh games were as much personnel as they were game planning and strategy.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Belichick is playing chess to our checkers. In the 4th round Belichick chose 2 road-grading run blockers to improve their running game: Tre Jackson and Shaq Mason. It seems he is doubling down on his run offense.Did he do this afterr seeing that in free agency and the first two days of the draft we didn't fix our run stopping defense?

 

Did hiis queen just take our bishop that was putting him in check to give him check mate?

I'm guessing he did it because the patriots starting guards are both on the wrong side of 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Belichick is playing chess to our checkers. In the 4th round Belichick chose 2 road-grading run blockers to improve their running game: Tre Jackson and Shaq Mason. It seems he is doubling down on his run offense.Did he do this afterr seeing that in free agency and the first two days of the draft we didn't fix our run stopping defense?

 

Did hiis queen just take our bishop that was putting him in check to give him check mate?

I can guarantee you that the Patriots draft had absolutely nothing to do with who the Colts drafted or signed in free agency.

 

On the 2nd part.... .no.

 

On the flip side, the Colts did not go into the draft trying to find a way to beat the Patriots, they went into the draft to select college players that they think can help the team now and in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny.   I would say that a GM's adequacy is directly related to the QB he's blessed or cursed with.  But there are exceptions.  Our previous GM was blessed with one of the best prospects to ever come out of college.  He had success for three years, but he was a mediocre GM at best.     Then there's John Lynch, who found ways to win without a top draft pick or even a highly paid veteran QB.  They're consistently in contention and one of the best teams in the league.  Double digit win totals all but 2 of his 7 seasons.   My biggest complaint with CB is that he didn't make a real attempt to draft a QB until AR.  All chips are in now.
    • If being a GM were easy, anyone could do it. Reality in life is like a hard teacher, she gives the test first, then the lessons come later.
    • Championing the Art of Mediocrity   In the realm of NFL management where big splashes and bold moves often steal the spotlight, Chris Ballard of the Indianapolis Colts stands as a beacon of mediocrity—oops, I mean, moderation and stability. Ballard has mastered the art of steering clear of both spectacular success and abject failure, opting instead for a comfortable middle ground where his team consistently hovers around average.   While other GMs chase after flashy signings and high-profile trades, Ballard prefers a more subtle approach. His teams are like the middle child of the NFL—neither the star of the family nor the problem child. Take, for instance, his draft picks: solid, dependable players who rarely make headlines but also rarely make Pro Bowls. It's a strategy that ensures the Colts remain perennially in the hunt for the playoffs without ever seriously threatening to win it all.   Critics may scoff at Ballard's reluctance to swing for the fences, pointing to the lack of marquee names on his roster or the absence of Lombardi Trophies in his trophy case. Yet, Ballard remains unfazed, steadfast in his belief that consistently finishing just outside the top tier is a commendable achievement in itself.   In a league where greatness is often measured by Super Bowl rings and MVP titles, Ballard's Colts serve as a refreshing reminder that there's honor in being consistently okay. While other teams chase after glory, Ballard quietly celebrates the virtues of stability and predictability—a strategy that ensures his team remains perpetually good enough to keep fans interested without ever giving them false hope of a championship.   So here's to you, Chris Ballard, our unsung hero of NFL mediocrity. May our Colts continue to embody the spirit of contentment in a league that sometimes seems obsessed with extremes. Your dedication to the middle ground is a testament to the fact that in a world of winners and losers, there's beauty in just being average.   Our Chris Ballard, the enigmatic mastermind behind the Indianapolis Colts' draft selections, continues to astound with his unconventional approach to player evaluation. Known for his ability to turn perceived draft flops into valuable lessons in resilience, Ballard has elevated the art of optimism in the face of adversity.   Take, for instance, his selection of Quincy Wilson, a cornerback whose career trajectory seemed to follow the path less traveled—straight to the sidelines. Wilson's ability to excel in the role of 'spectator extraordinaire' brought a new dimension to the Colts' bench, proving that even inactivity can be a form of contribution.   Then there's TJ Green, whose ability to redefine the term 'safety' by providing the opposing offense with a false sense of security is a testament to Ballard's commitment to strategic innovation. Green's unpredictable presence on the field undoubtedly kept quarterbacks on their toes, in excitement.    And who could forget Ben Banogu, a defensive end whose knack for demonstrating the art of camouflage by seamlessly blending into the turf has left spectators marveling at his commitment to environmental integration. Banogu's ability to remain inconspicuous during critical moments showcases Ballard's emphasis on adaptability and the importance of being one with your surroundings.   Ballard's genius lies not just in his ability to select players, but in his skillful navigation of the delicate dance between expectation and reality. His selections may not always align with conventional wisdom, but they consistently challenge perceptions and redefine what it means to be a draft bust.   As Ballard continues to forge ahead, his unorthodox approach serves as a beacon of hope for aspiring NFL general managers everywhere, including those perusing fan forums. Because if there's one thing Chris Ballard has taught us, it's that in the unpredictable world of professional football, even the most unexpected outcomes can be reframed as victories in disguise.   AKB
    • He started 14 games at SS in 2019 and started 8 games in 2018 for the Jags.  I meant to post this earlier in the thread.   https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HarrRo02.htm        
    • The additions of say Taylor, Raimann, and looking back to Leonard could be called important, savy drafting.  Our Colts have been waiting for awhile for a special, difference making player to surprisingly fall to US. Right when we really really needed it to happen, it sure looks like we got two of them. 🙏 for good health.  AR a surprise at 4, not at all.  But      
  • Members

    • AKB

      AKB 5,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 5,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,304

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,066

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 85

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • iuswingman

      iuswingman 253

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheRadiantAerynSun

      TheRadiantAerynSun 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 1,386

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bluephantom87

      bluephantom87 1,193

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 1,999

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...