iuswingman

He plays 12 to 13 games a year and probably isn't going against every DL on the opposing team so more than likely he wouldn't have knowledge on the vast majority of prospects. The task should be left to the scouts, whose only job is to find/rate/rank players.

Maybe Giants will take a QB and then Bills will trade for #4 and take a QB so that the first 4 picks are all QBs

so pretty much get the best LBers you can for the defense.

1) Browns - QB 2) Giants - QB 3) Jets - QB 4) Browns - Non-QB (probably Barkley) 5) Denver - Non-QB (probably Nelson) 6) Colts I would guess one of Nelson, Chubb or Barkley will be available when we pick (assuming those are the top 3 choices).

and then brady deflated it.

Should have contacted Miss Cleo prior to posting

Not anymore. Bills now have pick #12

Manning did have off games too.

We all know Francis is the favorite nephew jj

if barkley goes 1 or 2 then i would wager we could get quite a bit to trade down to a qb needy team

they sure have the Reich stuff

Release the Kraken

is it mid-march when we might start hearing about free agent signings?? https://operations.nfl.com/football-ops/league-governance/2018-important-nfl-dates/

While Brady throws deflated balls, Luck is over here throwing weighted balls. difference between boys and real men.

I think it was more that none of the 3 have experience at the position for which they were hired (rather than just 1 or 2 of the 3). On the flip side, if you hire someone with experience at the position in this business, then it usually means they were fired because otherwise they would still be with the other team. So is it better to get a known commodity that didn't make it with his previous team or an unknown commodity that will need to learn on the fly. Both have risks.