Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

We need Greg Hardy


Recommended Posts

Grigson says you can never have enough pass rushers, but.. Mathis, Cole, Newsome (need reps to develop), Werner sound sufficient. Wouldn't mind drafting a OLB in the later rounds (ala Newsome), but I think we should on the defensive line and safety spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then Michael Johnson wouldn't be a good fit for us neither then?

Not really. Hardy would be the better fit as an OLB, IMO. Could also slide inside to d tackle occasionally in sub packages too.

Just the more pressing need is D-line, especially if they can generate pressure there as well as been stout against the run. Interior pressure is how you beat elite QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They aren't going to pay for Hardy.  Too expensive and not a huge need at this point.  We've added DL help and pass rush help.  They have to start looking for some secondary depth if anything.  Davis, Toler, Butler, and Adams are good but there has to be some depth behind them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind Wilfork, but Cole will be 33.  Mathis is 34.  Long term, I'd rather sign Hardy and find a fat boy in the draft.  Of course, if they wanted him, I'm guessing they wouldn't have spent big on Cole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's started contract negotions with an unnamed team---per rotoworld

Yeah, if that doesn't sound like colts I don't know who does. They try to be a secret and ninja like now.

What position would he play? Honestly I'd like to have Wilfork. It even Starks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if that doesn't sound like colts I don't know who does. They try to be a secret and ninja like now.

What position would he play? Honestly I'd like to have Wilfork. It even Starks

word is that it's the Raiders.....but yeah I'd go for Wilfork, Starks, or Red Bryant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

word is that it's the Raiders.....but yeah I'd go for Wilfork, Starks, or Red Bryant

I heard that he was in talks with Raiders. Never in my mind would I ever think they'd want to be unamed though lol. They're always plastered all over rumors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that he was in talks with Raiders. Never in my mind would I ever think they'd want to be unamed though lol. They're always plastered all over rumors

isn't that the truth....but now I saw tweeted on espn.com that it's not the Raiders....so who knows know lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

word is that it's the Raiders.....but yeah I'd go for Wilfork, Starks, or Red Bryant

 

 

I heard that he was in talks with Raiders. Never in my mind would I ever think they'd want to be unamed though lol. They're always plastered all over rumors

 

Update: #Raiders Have Had No Contract Talks With Greg Hardy, Despite Reports http://t.co/EgJaXcqU02

— NFLTradeRumors.co (@nfltrade_rumors)

March 13, 2015
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pls be the Colts. Pass rush would be OP.

Not going to lie, have this weird feeling it's the Colts. Just seems like how they do things now. On the DL, hush hush. I think even a couple players mentioned that.

I could be wrong though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade him? He just handed him a nice extension.
    • Yes, thanks, you’re right. When the Panthers traded to get the 1 is when Ballard said he didn’t have all the information to make the trade. That’s strange to me.  “Didn’t want to make a blind decision without all the information,” Ballard told reporters Monday. “I know for people, they might not understand that. But I think history kind of tells you that when you do that, you better know what you’re getting. And we weren’t quite ready to do that at that time. And then we feel like there’s enough depth in the draft that we were gonna be okay.”   This was in late March. Ballard had a chance to get the 1 and use it to take Stroud not Young. I think it’s strange he said he didn’t move up to 1 because it would have been a “blind decision.” Why would it be a blind decision in March? Why wouldn’t you know what you’re getting? You’re getting whoever you want if you get the 1. It didn’t happen, but Ballard could have recognized that Stroud was going to be superior, could have made the trade and could have drafted him. Ballard admits it never occurred to him to attempt the trade because it would be a “blind decision.” 
    • I cringed after seeing the way his leg bent underneath him to the point of him sitting down on it. Buckner is one tough dude and to see him needing help to get off the field is when I knew he was going to be out for a while.
    • He probably felt confident Bowers would still be on the board at 15 once he made it past NYJ at 11.  He could've been trading up with other teams to move up to get Brock Bowers, but unfortunately, the Raiders had their eyes set on him and took him at 13.
    • Not now...   Let the year play out. Maybe at the end of the season... 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...