Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Julius Thomas vs Gronk


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

Which TE is better in your opinion? These two are arguably the two best in the game. I'd go with Gronk myself, hes insanely good.

Thomas isn't even top 3. It's Gronk, then Graham, and then Gates and Witten. Then you have Julius with guys like Bennett and Olsen. If Peyton wasn't throwing JT the ball, you wouldn't hear his name much.

Gronk is a future hall of famer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gronk is in his own league...He is better in every phase. He is a better blocker, route runner, and overall he dominates linebackers...he punishes Defensive backs/linebackers. 

 

JT is more like Graham. Really good route runners that make plays in place of WR's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thomas isn't even top 3. It's Gronk, then Graham, and then Gates and Witten. Then you have Julius with guys like Bennett and Olsen. If Peyton wasn't throwing JT the ball, you wouldn't hear his name much.

Gronk is a future hall of famer.

Witten? Have you looked at his numbers over the last 3 years? 13 TDs in three years? Gates has a good year going this season but only had 18 TDs over three years. Graham has 36 TDs in the last three years. Thomas has 21 TDs in 2 1/2 years. There is no doubt the Gronk can be in the HOF if he can stay healthy. None of the TEs could do what they do without the QB play so why is JT different? Brady feeds Gronk more than Manning feeds Thomas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Witten? Have you looked at his numbers over the last 3 years? 13 TDs in three years? Gates has a good year going this season but only had 18 TDs over three years. Graham has 36 TDs in the last three years. Thomas has 21 TDs in 2 1/2 years. There is no doubt the Gronk can be in the HOF if he can stay healthy. None of the TEs could do what they do without the QB play so why is JT different? Brady feeds Gronk more than Manning feeds Thomas.

If I had to take a tight end to play a game next week, I'm taking Witten and Gates before JT and it isn't even close...Witten is still a beast at getting separation.  He is physical, and playing physical against him doesn't work.  He's also outstanding in blocking.  Gates makes ridiculous circus catches with ease and can still get it done even with two guys covering him.  Julius is just another guy.  I don't see anything special in him.  Put any average tight end in his place, and Peyton still would have gotten him almost identical production.

 

There were people saying JT was the best tight end Peyton's ever played with, earlier in the season.  They were nuts.  Dallas Clark could run circles around JT.  Clark had excellent hands, ran great routes, and wasn't afraid to make the hard, contested catch.

 

And Gronk could perform at his same elite level without Brady.  Gronk is arguably the best Tight End in the history of the league.  Watch this guy play, he is making insane catches every week, or trucking over two defenders on the way into the endzone.  You throw a ten yard pass to Gronk and he'll take it 30 yards into the end zone, with the remains of his would-be-tacklers sprawled on the ground.  Gronk has that blend you never see - he's physical, has great reach, and has enough speed where only cornerbacks can catch him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had to take a tight end to play a game next week, I'm taking Witten and Gates before JT and it isn't even close...Witten is still a beast at getting separation.  He is physical, and playing physical against him doesn't work.  He's also outstanding in blocking.  Gates makes ridiculous circus catches with ease and can still get it done even with two guys covering him.  Julius is just another guy.  I don't see anything special in him.  Put any average tight end in his place, and Peyton still would have gotten him almost identical production.

 

There were people saying JT was the best tight end Peyton's ever played with, earlier in the season.  They were nuts.  Dallas Clark could run circles around JT.  Clark had excellent hands, ran great routes, and wasn't afraid to make the hard, contested catch.

 

And Gronk could perform at his same elite level without Brady.  Gronk is arguably the best Tight End in the history of the league.  Watch this guy play, he is making insane catches every week, or trucking over two defenders on the way into the endzone.  You throw a ten yard pass to Gronk and he'll take it 30 yards into the end zone, with the remains of his would-be-tacklers sprawled on the ground.  Gronk has that blend you never see - he's physical, has great reach, and has enough speed where only cornerbacks can catch him.

I agree with Gronk being the best but the rest is just your opinion. The stats and numbers don't back it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gronk. . . I think Thomas may be in part a product of Manning.  No doubt he's the best TE that Manning has played with as much as I hate to say that being a Dallas Clark fan.  

 

But he just doesn't shed off tacklers after the catch like Gronk can.  

 

Thomas is probably top 5, but I don't think he's #1 or #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gronk is the best tight end in the league.  There were debates between Gronk and Graham at the start of the year, but I don't think there's any doubt that it's Gronk.  What can Gronk not do?  He blocks, he runs good routes, he has good hands, he scores TDs, the guy does it all.  I've long maintained that Julius is overrated because of his QB and everyone knows Graham can't block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has never been any question who the best TE is. He is a freak of nature ala Megatron....if he is on the field (healthy) he is virtually unstopable...especially if he is allowed to push off at the top of his break like WRs are allowed to do....its suppose to be an emphasis but its not getting called anywhere...it's so hard to be a defender now days. Last night though we got to see a throw back performance however...a lot of hand fighting and face guarding...be interesting if the NFL allows that to continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You are missing out a rather LARGE piece of the puzzle in your factoring here. We had last season's win numbers with GARDNER FREAKING MINSHEW at QB practically the whole season. Love the guy and what he did for us last season, but he isn't exactly a world beater at the QB position. AR brings such a different dynamic to this offense and teamm, Shane is going to be chomping at the bit to get started this season. The sample size we saw from AR last season was small, but it was definitely encouraging - especially considering we were all expecting him to be much more raw and inaccuarte. He basically red-shirted last year, learning the NFL game and in Steichen's ear the whole time, while learning the playbook inside out.  Our team has fundamentally stayed the same as last season, which damn near won the AFC South with Gardner at QB for the love of god. Now we add AR to that mix, as well as some very interesting additions in Mitchell and Latu who could have very meaningful impacts. The fact that we are so under the radar is almost laughable - AFC South isnt going to know what hit it. 
    • Great points!  I would assume the Irsay’s would conduct the interviews. If Steichen is given more control he would as well or the new GM could decide his fate like Ballard did with Pagano. Several ways it can go and we are a few years away from it even happening so who really knows. I’m hoping none of it matters and the team becomes a true contender and this discussion is merely killing time. 
    • I would say "hire the best who's available for the job". If all the good / great GM candidates are gone, you're stuck hiring someone like Grigson (or maybe someone from this forum).   I often wonder, who's the best candidate to hire for an impossible job? Someone who can make the impossible, possible?
    • I agree.  Hire who’s best for the job.  But that doesn’t mean the guy who is easiest is automatically the wrong choice.  Easiest can also mean best.   It depends on your perspective.  
    • I’m in, can’t believe how fast this year is going. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...