Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

unitaswestand

Seth Olsen

44 posts in this topic

I wish the guy well, but he isn't an NFL caliber player. I have never seen an offensive lineman get dominated so much as he does when he is in the game. Klug owned him today. He is going to get Luck killed. I would have to think Anderson or a Wooden Indian statue would be more effective.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wish we would have used one of these guys, instead of olsen, i don't much care for mcglynn either.

1. anderson

2. hicks - i know we don't have him anymore

3. brandon washington - rams practice squad

could they be any worse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was pretty good in the running game. WHen it came to pass protection, he didn't look good. Keep in mind he's a backup. The Colts will have to endure at least 4 more bad games (pass blocking wise) from our interior O-line.

They'll find some guys in the offseason.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bring back Trai Essex...he wasn't too bad, and better than Olsen for sure!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never thought I'd hear "bring back Essex". Wow! Joe Reitz bonked his head in the Detroit game. I'm not sure, but I think he got a concussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Olsen struggled a great deal today. It was also his first game back from IR, forced into action early. He's not as bad as people want to make him out to be, though. He brings a more physical presence than Reitz or Link at the LG spot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Olsen struggled a great deal today. It was also his first game back from IR, forced into action early. He's not as bad as people want to make him out to be, though. He brings a more physical presence than Reitz or Link at the LG spot.

Sorry, but thats comical. Olsen doesn't deserve to play in the NFL. There is nothing about his game that is more physical than Reitz or Link or anybody else for that matter. Olsen wasn't just bad because it was his 1st game back, he was terrible earlier in the season too. He has to be one of the worst(if not the absolute worst) O-lineman in the game. There are no excuses for him.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty telling that the first thing I said when they showed our starting oline was 'GD why isn't Linkenbach starting?'

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olsen did struggle early. But late in 4th quarter he was opening big holes for Ballard.

Did anyone notice how the pass protection improved once Shipley and Linkenbach went in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olsen did struggle early. But late in 4th quarter he was opening big holes for Ballard.

Did anyone notice how the pass protection improved once Shipley and Linkenbach went in?

I wonder to myself every game why Arians won't make Shipley the starter. Just better than Satele

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Link isn't supposed to be key component to any solid o-line, yet he's better than most of the starters. Luck is doing this own his own.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Justice wasn't actually worse than Olsen today in pass protection.

Once Link and AQ came in, things were actually a lot smoother, even Olsen played better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Justice wasn't actually worse than Olsen today in pass protection.

Once Link and AQ came in, things were actually a lot smoother, even Olsen played better.

Yeah I dont think ive ever been happy to see Linkenbach on the field until today when he replaced Justice.

I think im coming around about Shipley getting a chance at C too.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I dont think ive ever been happy to see Linkenbach on the field until today when he replaced Justice.

I think im coming around about Shipley getting a chance at C too.

Yeah, I immediately felt better when Link came in. And he was doing very well for Justice because Justice was looking like Tony Mandarich at RT.

AQ definitely should get considered for starting Center because Satele was getting blown up all game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder to myself every game why Arians won't make Shipley the starter. Just better than Satele

thank you! 100% agree
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I immediately felt better when Link came in. And he was doing very well for Justice because Justice was looking like Tony Mandarich at RT.

AQ definitely should get considered for starting Center because Satele was getting blown up all game.

In all fairness, Mandarich was very good on the Colts. Had he not had to retire because of a shoulder injury, I think he could have bee a Pro Bowl guard. I remember watching a game between the Colts and Packers and Mandarich was playing right tackle. He completed negated Reggie White, reversing what happen to him before going against White.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olsen did struggle early. But late in 4th quarter he was opening big holes for Ballard.

Did anyone notice how the pass protection improved once Shipley and Linkenbach went in?

Yes and it's been that way every time Shipley has came in. We have run the ball better at least with him in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all fairness, Mandarich was very good on the Colts. Had he not had to retire because of a shoulder injury, I think he could have bee a Pro Bowl guard. I remember watching a game between the Colts and Packers and Mandarich was playing right tackle. He completed negated Reggie White, reversing what happen to him before going against White.

Well I was referring more to the early part of the career at RT for the Packers.

But I would rather have Tony Mandarich right now.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously trying to figure out how this guy (fresh off IR) gets the starting nod over Shipley and Linkenbach, but when our starter (Reitz) came back from an injury, he had to wait 2 weeks before Linkenbach got hurt to reclaim his starting spot?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously trying to figure out how this guy (fresh off IR) gets the starting nod over Shipley and Linkenbach, but when our starter (Reitz) came back from an injury, he had to wait 2 weeks before Linkenbach got hurt to reclaim his starting spot?

Has to have some serious dirt on someone high up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously trying to figure out how this guy (fresh off IR) gets the starting nod over Shipley and Linkenbach, but when our starter (Reitz) came back from an injury, he had to wait 2 weeks before Linkenbach got hurt to reclaim his starting spot?

Very puzzling indeed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, I think Olsen has to be one of the worst lineman in the league. He got his butt handed to him all day. This team is clearly better with Shipley at center, its not even close, and I would start LInkenbach at guard over Olsen or Mcglynn. When all are healthy our O-line should be Castanzo-Reitz-Shipley- Linkenbach-Justice. Olsen, Satele and Mcglynn are terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody said Olsen was the answer at LG. But people watch a couple of plays where a lineman gets beat and that sums up their opinion. If you watch the body of work of our offensive line this year, Olsen has not been problem people think he is. Link at RT, Satele, Justice today, and McGlynn have all given up their fair share of sacks and hits on Luck, and people are a revolving door on who they want to hate each week. Shipley has been impressive and Link didn't do bad at LG. It was when we had a consistent 3 to 4 game starting lineup for our offensive line that we played the best. Things got shook up pretty bad today and people want to blame one player, but it is often a combination of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see Satele or Shipley get a shot at Guard cuz the situation cant get any worse the way it is now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wish we would have used one of these guys, instead of olsen, i don't much care for mcglynn either.

1. anderson

2. hicks - i know we don't have him anymore

3. brandon washington - rams practice squad

could they be any worse?

I am sure if they thought they were better they would be playing them over Olsen. Just because we don't like Olsen doesn't mean anyone else is automatically better sometimes they aren't. Remember last year people used that logic in wanting us to go to Painter over Collins how did that work out?

There is a reason why Washington is on a practice squad and not anyone'e active roster not just ours and Anderson is a late round rookie pick who has had zero time in the offense, no OTAs, no camp, and no pre-season. You want to see something worse than Olsen? Throw a rookie out there that doesn't know what he's doing yet out there.

That doesn't mean I think Olsen is good just for the record I just don't subscribe to the theory that just because someone is bad that automatically means someone else is better. I would say I don't understand why they were playing him over Link (and yes I know Link ended up coming in later in the game for Justice) who has proven he can play guard in this system however again I am sure there is a reason. Maybe they knew they would need him at tackle later in the game I don't know.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olsen is a holdover from our ZONE blocking scheme(also drafted by Denver for there Zone scheme) in the previous regime(depth forced to play nothing more nothing less), Thats what he is better at and he is not a freakin Guard in a Man Blocking scheme at 305lbs. Hicks would (in theory) have been better in the scheme at Guard given time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure if they thought they were better they would be playing them over Olsen. Just because we don't like Olsen doesn't mean anyone else is automatically better sometimes they aren't. Remember last year people used that logic in wanting us to go to Painter over Collins how did that work out?

There is a reason why Washington is on a practice squad and not anyone'e active roster not just ours and Anderson is a late round rookie pick who has had zero time in the offense, no OTAs, no camp, and no pre-season. You want to see something worse than Olsen? Throw a rookie out there that doesn't know what he's doing yet out there.

That doesn't mean I think Olsen is good just for the record I just don't subscribe to the theory that just because someone is bad that automatically means someone else is better. I would say I don't understand why they were playing him over Link (and yes I know Link ended up coming in later in the game for Justice) who has proven he can play guard in this system however again I am sure there is a reason. Maybe they knew they would need him at tackle later in the game I don't know.

This is a really, really good post. Just wanted to put that on the record here.

'Liking' it is one thing... Loving it is another! And I love this post... Nicely done, GoColts, really well done!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody said Olsen was the answer at LG. But people watch a couple of plays where a lineman gets beat and that sums up their opinion. If you watch the body of work of our offensive line this year, Olsen has not been problem people think he is. Link at RT, Satele, Justice today, and McGlynn have all given up their fair share of sacks and hits on Luck, and people are a revolving door on who they want to hate each week. Shipley has been impressive and Link didn't do bad at LG. It was when we had a consistent 3 to 4 game starting lineup for our offensive line that we played the best. Things got shook up pretty bad today and people want to blame one player, but it is often a combination of things.

Wow, Tell your brother, Seth.....that he's terrible and no amount of having you here defending him is gonna change that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, Tell your brother, Seth.....that he's terrible and no amount of having you here defending him is gonna change that.

Good argument. I'm sure your opinion is built on rock solid information like that 'one play' you recalled. Maybe. In that 'one game'. :loco:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olsen got beat twice or maybe three times on pass plays yesterday. He did not play great by any means.

However Winston Justice was completely overwhelmed by Derrick Morgan throughout the game.

I have never seen such a total mismatch.

Just like in the first meeting with Tennessee, Justice was terribly ineffective against Morgan.

Finally Justice was replaced due to an injury. Or Luck may very well have been hurt.

Then the O-line played much better and the Colts ended up coming back and winning the game.

Had Justice remained in... I doubt we win.

This was Olsen's first game in weeks. Justice has played the whole year.

Why do we always have a bash Seth Olsen thread? But not a bash Winston Justice thread?

And can we please just forget about Tre Essex?!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good argument. I'm sure your opinion is built on rock solid information like that 'one play' you recalled. Maybe. In that 'one game'. :loco:

Not at all, My argument is obvious terrible play going back to earlier this season. Don't get offended Seth's brother, there are obvious other problems on the line too. Seth is not the only problem, but he is without doubt the weakest link on an already weak line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all, My argument is obvious terrible play going back to earlier this season. Don't get offended Seth's brother, there are obvious other problems on the line too. Seth is not the only problem, but he is without doubt the weakest link on an already weak line.

I'm sure your argument is well thought out, and you're entitled to it. Your wonderful quip about being Seth's brother is proof of your logic and thoughtful process in posting. Sheesh.

1959Colts, you are right on the money. There were plenty of mistakes all around yesterday and Justice had his fair share. The Titans blitzed two on our left side on one play, and Castanzo failed to pick up either one. He about got Luck killed on that play, choosing to crash down instead of pick up a blitzer. Satele failed to come off a double team to pick up another defender, and that resulted in a big hit on Luck. There were just a lot of mistakes made, but we got a lot of them fixed in the second half. It also helped that our run game got going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. The O line (and the running game) got better in 2nd half.

Keep in mind... The second half featured Shipley (over Satele) and Linkenbach (over Justice)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. The O line (and the running game) got better in 2nd half.

Keep in mind... The second half featured Shipley (over Satele) and Linkenbach (over Justice)

We look much better with him at center.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to start Shipley over Satele ASAP. Satele is terrible, he gets pushed back on every play...can't hold the line worth a %. In the offseason, we need to cut Reitz, Olsen, Satele, McGlynn, and Justice. Only OL worth keeping is Costanzo. Re-do the entire line...it's atrocious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, maybe half of the top 15 (or so) interior defensive lineman are 6'1 or less and about 300 lbs or less and arm lenght of around 32 inches (Donald, Atkins, Casey, Daniels, Jarrett/Kyle Williams). Only Donald was a day one 1 pick or drafted in the first two rounds. Casey went in the 3rd round. No one else was picked in the top 100. I don't think there is an other position were so many top players share similar trait and most of them were picked late in the draft.   Are teams that afraid of having a small team that they automatically give worse grade for smaller defensive lineman? If Aaron Donald, for example, had Geno Atkins besides him instead of Michael Brockers, would that line be as effective as one would expect just from the player talent level upgrade from Brockers to Atkins or even worse? I mean, Brockers is a good player but Atkins is on another level. And individually these players are great but would they work as well together on the same line? Not sure if it's as much about the size itself as these players can use it to their advantage in quickness and leverage but maybe two dlineman with short arms would create some issues?   Just wondering why so many of them have fallen late in the draft. I understand that some teams want bigger, physical players (like BB, Parcells etc) but what about those teams that had already gotten steals later in the draft with small interior lineman would jump at the chance to select a player who had great tape and showed similar traits as their best defensive player. Like Grady Jarrett in 2015. Both the Bengals and Titans drafted a dlinemen in the 4th, Jarrett went with first pick in the 5th round Bengals pick was actually two picks before Jarrett was taken.   Though the Bengals did take Billings last year and he might be next to Atkins but he was another 4th round pick. And Titans did draft Mike Martin to be their nose tackle a year after taking Casey but he didn't pan out. And I maybe haven't looked at closely enough at bust/success rate for smaller defensive lineman so these guys could be sort of outliers and teams just missed on these guys for other reasons.    
    • Also for retrospect on this list: Dan Marino--Mark Clayton & Jim Kelly--Andre Reed were snubbed.  Can you think of others that should be on here in place of someone else?
    • http://newarena.com/nfl/ranked-the-top-24-qb-wr-duos-of-all-time/7/?amxt=fbdesktop2   11. Peyton Manning/Reggie Wayne: Indianapolis Colts   In the post Marvin Harrison era, Wayne took the torch as being Manning’s go-to target. During his 14-year career with the Colts, Wayne had eight seasons with at least 1,000 yards receiving. He also managed to haul in 82 touchdowns during this time period. Manning’s resume has been chronicled ad nauseam. He is the all-time leader in passing yards (71,940), and is consistently mentioned as one of the best to ever throw a football in the history of the sport.   2. Peyton Manning/Marvin Harrison: Indianapolis Colts   The respective skill-sets of Manning and Harrison worked perfectly with one another. Manning’s unbelievable timing on throws was predicated greatly by Harrison’s ability to separate in coverage. One of the best technical receivers in league history, Harrison’s route-running capabilities led him to become an 8-time Pro Bowler and a 3-time First-team All-Pro. He also led the league in receiving yards twice with Manning under center. 114 of Manning’s 539 touchdowns throws went to Harrison. This statistic is simply mind-boggling — and further validates a top-three standing.   ( Jerry Rice also got mentioned 2 times.  #3 with Steve Young, and #1 with Joe Montana.)
    • A passing league now. You could say the same of probably 10 other WRs in the league right now. Marv did it in a very different league.    Not taking away from it, he's a Pro Bowl player.
    • This is why you need a well rounded team.  No matter how good 1,2, or 5 players play, it takes an entire team to win games.  Every aspect of the team thrives or wither off the success AND failures of other aspects.
  • Welcome New Members

    •   Sorry to keep harping on the Irish thing, but did you know the horseshoe has seven points on it?  (The Colts horseshoe, anyway.  Actual shoes for horses depend on the farrier).   Seven is considered a lucky number...  Lucky.  Luck.  I'm telling you, you picked the right team to root for.   7    
    •   Don't hold Boston against the Irish.  It's not our fault.    We love our green, which makes Indiana a tearmann.   I love it that you chose to root for an underdog instead of the Pats.  I don't think it's coincidence that you became a fan around the time Luck got drafted to the Colts.  That's providence.     Horseshoe?  Luck?  Four-leaf clover?  Come on.  Hoosier Hospitality has roots in Irish fun-lovery.  If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!  May the luck of the Irish be with you!  
  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.