Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

NFL Preview Rams vs Colts plus injury reports


Restinpeacesweetchloe

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

They obviously go at it pretty hard in practice for Rainmann and Kelly to go out on the last practice.  Coaches might need to rethink if that is a wise thing to do.  I thought they just had walk throughs on Friday.  Guess not. I’m sure AR had a red jersey on.  Kelly on the other hand gets to go at it hard.  That doesn’t make sense to me.  Especially if the injury is a concussion.  He’s a veteran.  It’s not like he needs a ton of practice.  Many veterans get days off.  Lineman’s heads collide all the time.  Why risk him?  Makes no sense to me.  His injury could have been prevented.  His relapse is on the coach’s imo.


FWIW:

 

During the course of the season, all teams are allowed just 11 full pad, hard practices.  18 weeks, 11 practices.   To be clear, that’s 11 practices, period,  and NOT 11 hard weeks of practices.    So it’s not clear to me how Raimann ended up with his concussion.   
 

It’s possible that number of 11 might be slightly off +/-.   But not by much.  That’s been the number for roughly 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


FWIW:

 

During the course of the season, all teams are allowed just 11 full pad, hard practices.  18 weeks, 11 practices.   To be clear, that’s 11 practices, period,  and NOT 11 hard weeks of practices.    So it’s not clear to me how Raimann ended up with his concussion.   
 

It’s possible that number of 11 might be slightly off +/-.   But not by much.  That’s been the number for roughly 10 years.

Thanks.  I did not know that.  I guess we will never know if any of this week’s practices were hard practices.  For Raimann to incur one makes me think they probably had at least one but who knows.  The risk is there every time you have one.  The Kelly relapse after two practices has me somewhat concerned.  If they had a hard practice this week I would not have had him participate.  Veteran rest day for him for me.  Again we will probably never know.  None of us expected this today that’s for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Daytona said:

Bigger story here is R. Kelly.  I think he's done after this year.  He will either retire, or get released.  Seven + games missed over last 1.25 seasons is pretty bad, and he'll just be more likely to get them going forward.  If they keep him, it should be for substantially less .... 

 

Who are the FA OC next year?  Any great interior OL that are Jr/Sr in college??

West Virginia University has an outstanding center. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


FWIW:

 

During the course of the season, all teams are allowed just 11 full pad, hard practices.  18 weeks, 11 practices.   To be clear, that’s 11 practices, period,  and NOT 11 hard weeks of practices.    So it’s not clear to me how Raimann ended up with his concussion.   
 

It’s possible that number of 11 might be slightly off +/-.   But not by much.  That’s been the number for roughly 10 years.

Heard some good points today that sometimes concussions don’t show up right away and it’s possible it could of been from last week. Apparently after yesterdays practice he complained about symptoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Blake Freeland I believe played a lot of tackle in college at least.


He started 41 games at tackle.  25 at LT and 16 at RT.    But….   He’s played ZERO snaps of regular football the first three weeks.   He’s only played 7-8 snaps on Special teams.   FG’s and Xtra points.   That’s it.   
 

Far far from ideal….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


He started 41 games at tackle.  25 at LT and 16 at RT.    But….   He’s played ZERO snaps of regular football the first three weeks.   He’s only played 7-8 snaps on Special teams.   FG’s and Xtra points.   That’s it.   
 

Far far from ideal….

I would rather have a inexperienced tackle who actually played tackle then a guard playing tackle. That’s more games then Rainmann had at tackle in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AKB said:

So it is likely we will get our first look at some of the oline depth, 

 

Hopefully Freeland has a good game, or we are gonna lose bad. 

 

gonna need our tight ends this game too. 

ballard said it is not about one player and he is confident about his backups or he would not have them on the roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The announcer said in last weeks game, that they didn't want Wesley French to have to take on the extra responsibility, of making the offensive line protection calls, so they had Minshew do that (at which he failed miserably).

So who gets that job Sunday vs the Rams?

...Richardson? ...French? ...Someone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

The announcer said in last weeks game, that they didn't want Wesley French to have to take on the extra responsibility, of making the offensive line protection calls, so they had Minshew do that (at which he failed miserably).

So who gets that job Sunday vs the Rams?

...Richardson? ...French? ...Someone else?

hopefully it was a point of emphasis this week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I would rather have a inexperienced tackle who actually played tackle then a guard playing tackle. That’s more games then Rainmann had at tackle in college.


Yes, it’s more games than Raimann had in college.   But you should not compare the two otherwise.   Raimann was brought along much faster by the Colts.   
 

The first few weeks of 2022, Raimann played 12-15 snaps.   Then it went to 15-18 snaps for a few weeks.   He didn’t play for a week or two due to injury or other circumstances.   Then he played full time and was spectacularly bad!   Some here forget that.   They remember that Raimann was very good around week 11 but before that, his play was was extraordinarily bad.   
 

Credit to Raimann that he came as far and and fast as he did.   But the Colts have not done the same with Freeland.   So I think we’d get the terrible play that Raimann  gave for roughly 10 weeks, but I wouldn’t count on getting the incredible jump that Raimann displayed the final 7 weeks.   Different players, very different circumstances.

 

Sorry, I know that answer won’t be popular.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:


Yes, it’s more games than Raimann had in college.   But you should not compare the two otherwise.   Raimann was brought along much faster by the Colts.   
 

The first few weeks of 2022, Raimann played 12-15 snaps.   Then it went to 15-18 snaps for a few weeks.   He didn’t play for a week or two due to injury or other circumstances.   Then he played full time and was spectacularly bad!   Some here forget that.   They remember that Raimann was very good around week 11 but before that, his play was was extraordinarily bad.   
 

Credit to Raimann that he came as far and and fast as he did.   But the Colts have not done the same with Freeland.   So I think we’d get the terrible play that Raimann  gave for roughly 10 weeks, but I wouldn’t count on getting the incredible jump that Raimann displayed the final 7 weeks.   Different players, very different circumstances.

 

Sorry, I know that answer won’t be popular.  

All I am saying is he is much more prepared then Rainmann was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AKB said:

I think Freeland will be a pleasant surprise. at least here's hoping

I hope he does but tackles tend to struggle early in their careers.  Look at Raimann last year.  Most of the time they just aren’t physically strong enough yet and have to adjust to the speed of NFL edge players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, richard pallo said:

Thanks.  I did not know that.  I guess we will never know if any of this week’s practices were hard practices.  For Raimann to incur one makes me think they probably had at least one but who knows.  The risk is there every time you have one.  The Kelly relapse after two practices has me somewhat concerned.  If they had a hard practice this week I would not have had him participate.  Veteran rest day for him for me.  Again we will probably never know.  None of us expected this today that’s for sure.

Seems like Kelly is leading the league for centers getting a concussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:


He started 41 games at tackle.  25 at LT and 16 at RT.    But….   He’s played ZERO snaps of regular football the first three weeks.   He’s only played 7-8 snaps on Special teams.   FG’s and Xtra points.   That’s it.   
 

Far far from ideal….

Why woulf he play regular snaps if our LT and RT have been healthy, if that is the position he's slated for?  I would think he plays LT this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, compuls1v3 said:

Why woulf he play regular snaps if our LT and RT have been healthy, if that is the position he's slated for?  I would think he plays LT this week.


I was only trying to note the difference in the approach the Colts have taken with Raimann and Freeland.  
 

Last year, the Colts had a plan to accelerate Raimann’s learning curve.   12-15 plays his first few games, 15-18 snaps the next few and so on,  then they threw him in as the starter.   
 

The Colts haven’t taken the same approach this year with Freeland.   I know, different coaching staff, etc.   I’m only noting that Freeland has not played a single snap of regular downs, just Xtra points and FGs.   He’s now being thrown into the deep end right away.   That’s a hard way to learn for a 4th round draft pick.  
 

I like Freeland.   Happy we drafted him.  But there’s a reason he lasted to pick 110 when his body and college experience would suggest he’d get drafted earlier.  In short, he’s got flaws in his game and they’re likely going to be exploited tomorrow.  Freeland could have a tough day.  
 

As always, I hope I’m wrong with my concerns.   But I fear I’m right.  
 

(Hope I answered your question?)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


I was only trying to note the difference in the approach the Colts have taken with Raimann and Freeland.  
 

Last year, the Colts had a plan to accelerate Raimann’s learning curve.   12-15 plays his first few games, 15-18 snaps the next few and so on,  then they threw him in as the starter.   
 

The Colts haven’t taken the same approach this year with Freeland.   I know, different coaching staff, etc.   I’m only noting that Freeland has not played a single snap of regular downs, just Xtra points and FGs.   He’s now being thrown into the deep end right away.   That’s a hard way to learn for a 4th round draft pick.  
 

I like Freeland.   Happy we drafted him.  But there’s a reason he lasted to pick 110 when his body and college experience would suggest he’d get drafted earlier.  In short, he’s got flaws in his game and they’re likely going to be exploited tomorrow.  Freeland could have a tough day.  
 

As always, I hope I’m wrong with my concerns.   But I fear I’m right.  
 

(Hope I answered your question?)

 

Pryor sucked. Stating Rainmann was not their plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Pryor sucked. Stating Rainmann was not their plan. 


 

Sorry, but not true.  

The plan was revealed week one at Houston.    The staff planned to play Raimann in the first game and every game building up the snaps.   The fact that Pryor sucked only accelerated the plan.   But there WAS a plan.  The staff freely talked about it before and after games.   We talked about it here on this message board.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:


I was only trying to note the difference in the approach the Colts have taken with Raimann and Freeland.  
 

Last year, the Colts had a plan to accelerate Raimann’s learning curve.   12-15 plays his first few games, 15-18 snaps the next few and so on,  then they threw him in as the starter.   
 

The Colts haven’t taken the same approach this year with Freeland.   I know, different coaching staff, etc.   I’m only noting that Freeland has not played a single snap of regular downs, just Xtra points and FGs.   He’s now being thrown into the deep end right away.   That’s a hard way to learn for a 4th round draft pick.  
 

I like Freeland.   Happy we drafted him.  But there’s a reason he lasted to pick 110 when his body and college experience would suggest he’d get drafted earlier.  In short, he’s got flaws in his game and they’re likely going to be exploited tomorrow.  Freeland could have a tough day.  
 

As always, I hope I’m wrong with my concerns.   But I fear I’m right.  
 

(Hope I answered your question?)

 

That makes sense.  I didn't know what you were thinking, but the explanation makes sense!  Maybe he's not as game ready as we hoped!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


 

Sorry, but not true.  

The plan was revealed week one at Houston.    The staff planned to play Raimann in the first game and every game building up the snaps.   The fact that Pryor sucked only accelerated the plan.   But there WAS a plan.  The staff freely talked about it before and after games.   We talked about it here on this message board.   

i feel like the vibe was for him to eventually be our LT, and they started giving him snaps pretty early 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Id say avoid drafting or taking players from your team that you’re a fan of. I’m an avid fantasy guy and also a sports bettor. I literally will avoid taking any Colts players In fantasy and also during the week in fantasy football I avoid taking the props of the players I’m playing against. I never want to wish bad on anyone so for that very reason I avoid those guys. For me personally it has helped tremendously, I can still enjoy the game without bias. 
    • I will just say this about the comparisons between Luck and AR.  And even Manning.   First, as far as overall talent?  I think AR has more talent than Andrew.  And I say that as the biggest Luck fan that there is.  I loved that guy.  But he always reminded me of a Manning wannabe.  Someone who had more pure talent.  Who was very smart.  But I never ever got the feeling that he wanted to win and put in the hours that Manning did.  And I think that was proven when he retired so early.  Manning was like an AI robot who studied 23 hours a day.  Just a huge will to win.    But what Luck had was pain tolerance, drive and overall ability due to his teaching since he was a kid...and his will to do what is right for the team.    IMO that was 100% MORE than AR's is right now.  Not even close.    If only you could clone a combo between Manning and his smarts, Luck and his pain tolerance, and AR and his pure athletic ability.    I am sorry but unless AR is the unluckiest person in the history of the NFL, NO ONE gets hurt this much.  He is a wreck.  Heck I remember in his first pre season game last year he ran out of bounds and started to limp.  Literally his very first hit ever.  Right then I said to myself "uh oh".  And then he has not finished what......4 of his all time starts?  Out of 8?  I mean....that is not normal QB behavior.  He seems to get hurt on almost every hit he takes.    Make that make sense.    It is very VERY odd to say the least.   I want AR to do well because he seems like a good guy and he has all the talent in the world  But after this last game and his words after? For lack of a better word I don't think he has any ability at all to do 2 things.     One....protect himself.   Two.....take a hit and feel pain without it being the end of the world.  He seems to have no pain tolerance whatsoever.  Which is fine.  Just don't be an NFL Qb as a result. 
    • I'm not creating anything.  Till AR can stay on the field it's Flacco that has to be tough. 
    • I understand that but till AR shows he can stay on the field, Flacco has to be the man. It's that simple. 
    • Yeah because AR wasn’t 100%.  The Colts are clearly being protective of him after last year and frankly the Luck situation.  Irsay has said more than once they learned from the Luck mistakes and would be more cautious with AR.  You are trying to create QB controversy that doesn’t exist.
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 20,331

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • il vecchio

      il vecchio 134

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 786

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,216

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HOZER

      HOZER 4,654

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtAndOrioles

      ColtAndOrioles 60

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...