Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Ohio Colt

Thinking ahead.... Saints RB Mark Ingram

68 posts in this topic

I really like Ballard... think he deserves his share of time and carries and everything. But I would like for us to make a run in the offseason at RB Mark Ingram. He is not being utilized properly in New Orleans. I think a trade for him makes a lot of sense. Would probably cost us a middling pick, New Orleans will be looking to reclaim as many picks as possible. I think the kid could flourish in Indy and we won't find a back as good as him in the 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds....

Would you take a chance on Ingram?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Ballard... think he deserves his share of time and carries and everything. But I would like for us to make a run in the offseason at RB Mark Ingram. He is not being utilized properly in New Orleans. I think a trade for him makes a lot of sense. Would probably cost us a middling pick, New Orleans will be looking to reclaim as many picks as possible. I think the kid could flourish in Indy and we won't find a back as good as him in the 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds....

Would you take a chance on Ingram?

To be honest, I'm fine with our RBs. I would rather concentrate on other parts of O-line, Luck needs better protection. But I don't have much football IQ, so I may be wrong.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OLine, DLine, SS, CBs, a non-smurf WR... all much bigger priorities than RB. Besides, Ingram has never proven to be more than a rotational guy in the NFL.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we would not have many picks at all then..... I think our RB's are probably fine, not amazing, but serviceable.... upgrade the Guard positions, maybe RT and see what our ground game can do.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Ballard... think he deserves his share of time and carries and everything. But I would like for us to make a run in the offseason at RB Mark Ingram. He is not being utilized properly in New Orleans. I think a trade for him makes a lot of sense. Would probably cost us a middling pick, New Orleans will be looking to reclaim as many picks as possible. I think the kid could flourish in Indy and we won't find a back as good as him in the 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds....

Would you take a chance on Ingram?

of course I would and here is why, Ingram would also prove my point that its not Brown or Ballard or Carter or any other running back we have had since the start of pre season thats the reason why we cant run the ball, the reason is the 5 guys up front, I wouldn't even refer to them as O Linemen at this point because quite frankly it would be an insult to some real O Linemen, Maybe they could be deemed Offensive but Linemen? I think giving 5 muscle men a training camp and preseason to learn the system could do better or as good for cheaper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the emergence of Ballard, another RB is not needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why Get Him Will He Struggles In New Orleans With A Good O-Line ? To our o-line.... I Rather Get Some O-Line mens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When did this Ballard emergence take place? I think I missed it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally believe in drafting #1 RBs and on making moves for rotation guys or specialists. I don't like spending money on RBs. Keep'em young and move'em on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Ballard... think he deserves his share of time and carries and everything. But I would like for us to make a run in the offseason at RB Mark Ingram. He is not being utilized properly in New Orleans. I think a trade for him makes a lot of sense. Would probably cost us a middling pick, New Orleans will be looking to reclaim as many picks as possible. I think the kid could flourish in Indy and we won't find a back as good as him in the 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds....

Would you take a chance on Ingram?

Dear God...

To answer your question - no. There is ZERO chance this would happen.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't need great or about average back just a guy who do there job get the tuff yards an can make a play here an there an doesn't fumble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

of course I would and here is why, Ingram would also prove my point that its not Brown or Ballard or Carter or any other running back we have had since the start of pre season thats the reason why we cant run the ball, the reason is the 5 guys up front, I wouldn't even refer to them as O Linemen at this point because quite frankly it would be an insult to some real O Linemen, Maybe they could be deemed Offensive but Linemen? I think giving 5 muscle men a training camp and preseason to learn the system could do better or as good for cheaper

So you would - in your own words - waste a mid-round pick just to prove a point to the fans?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you would - in your own words - waste a mid-round pick just to prove a point to the fans?

I was being sarcastic, I woudnt trade for any running back, we have a perfectly good starter in Brown once we get an NFL caliber O Line. I wouldn't even draft one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are good @ QB, RB, TE, WR, and LB.

There are other places we should be concerned with.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We remind me of the 2011 Lions... You realize run game is a problem when you need it late to close out a game and move the chains and you struggle to do so even though you have a Cadillac passing game all game long

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a mid round pick on a running back?

OP said he'd give up a 3-5th-rounder for Mark Ingram.

You seemed to agree, due to the fact that you wanted to prove that it doesn't have anything to do with our running backs, but rather our O-line. While I completely agree with your analysis, I just fail to see the logic in spending any picks on something that would just "prove a point".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP said he'd give up a 3-5th-rounder for Mark Ingram.

You seemed to agree, due to the fact that you wanted to prove that it doesn't have anything to do with our running backs, but rather our O-line. While I completely agree with your analysis, I just fail to see the logic in spending any picks on something that would just "prove a point".

It was sarcasm about getting Ingram or any other running back for picks or anything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are good @ QB, RB, TE, WR, and LB.

There are other places we should be concerned with.

How are we good at WR? We are 7th in total dropped passes with 20. That's not "good" at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are we good at WR? We are 7th in total dropped passes with 20. That's not "good" at all.

Not sure we're good at OLB either... when Frathis are both in the game, we're OK (and I've very pleasantly surprised to say that), but what percentage of snaps have we seen both in there? They aren't getting any younger, and Hughes doesn't look like the future to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are we good at WR? We are 7th in total dropped passes with 20. That's not "good" at all.

I would say that our WRs are young, and should improve on their dropsies... but Sunday reminded me of Jerome "hands like a brick wall" Pathon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about Ingram, but I'd like to have Eddie Lacy when he comes out of Alabama. To me he's better than Ingram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we do need a tall wide receiver but not early

I would look at

Jordan Matthews in the 5th 6'3" 200lbs

Marcus Davis- 6'4" 232lbs in the 5th

Emory Blake- 6'2" 193lbs 5th

Conner Vernon 6'2" 195lbs 5th

Keenan Davis 6'2" 215lbs 6th

Quinton Patton 6'2" 195lbs 6th

Alec Lemon 6'2" 202lbs 6th

Dan Buckner 6'4" 215lbs 6th

But I wouldnt go higher then that for a WR given our O Line problems assuming we get comp picks in that round or trade somewhere along the line

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line for me... before we can determine what we have in RBs, we need to see an OLine that can run block consistently... and I've been saying as much since Tarik Glenn prematurely retired. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE Grigson, please address OLine in a serious way this next offseason. I wouldn't be heartbroken if more than half the current line is replaced. I sincerely appreciate what these guys are accomplishing this year, but in my mind, it is the single biggest hole on the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We remind me of the 2011 Lions... You realize run game is a problem when you need it late to close out a game and move the chains and you struggle to do so even though you have a Cadillac passing game all game long

So what game have they failed to close out? Seems to me they did exactly that in the 3 game winning streak.

The notion that the Colts would give up a draft pick to get a RB is comical.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When did this Ballard emergence take place? I think I missed it

It appears you might have missed the emergence of the running game as a whole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously? What has Ingram done to warrant anyone going out of their way to get him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears you might have missed the emergence of the running game as a whole.

so a 19 yard run when our blue sea finally parted on the final play of the game is missing our running game? do you really call up to that point 41 yards by Ballard a running game? what would you call Donald Browns 80 yard performance on 14 attempts vs the Titans then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears you might have missed the emergence of the running game as a whole.

I think he is in denial. Ballard literally put the Titan's and Dolphins game away with a touch down and a fantastic 3rd down run. Arians did not call the first play for DB, he called it for Ballard and in the Dolphins game, DB was injured.....as usual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he is in denial. Ballard literally put the Titan's and Dolphins game away with a touch down and a fantastic 3rd down run. Arians did not call the first play for DB, he called it for Ballard and in the Dolphins game, DB was injured.....as usual.

How is 41 yards until the very last play of the game in denial? enlighten me since I seem to be utterly lost to your logic
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This line had Seth Olson & Link play major minutes among 4 new players in a new offense with D Brown and 2 inexperienced young RB`s.

What a bunch of &^%$# complaining about the O-Line.

As a group Sunday, they had a solid day against a D that has played very well.

Very good running days the prior two games.

They deserve a Chance to come together. Could you give them another week or two ^&%$#!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have good RBs....they will truly flourish with upgrades to the interior OL...so Warmack or Barrett Jones in the first round....I can see us trading for a second round pick because Grigs is deal maker...we get a DE or SS with that pick and yeah we get a non smurf receiver after that....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so a 19 yard run when our blue sea finally parted on the final play of the game is missing our running game? do you really call up to that point 41 yards by Ballard a running game? what would you call Donald Browns 80 yard performance on 14 attempts vs the Titans then?

Reading is fundamental. I am not singling out any back in particular but simply stating that the running game has made significant progress in the last few weeks. All backs have been very good and have been a huge reason why they are on a 3 game win streak.

But since you brought it up - yes Ballard's end of game run was impressive as heck. The entire stadium knew what they were going to do & who would get the ball. Miami's only chance is to stop that run and yet they failed. And saying the Red Sea parted is comical. He did not freaking run those 19 yards without being touched. It was a darn tough run.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was sarcasm about getting Ingram or any other running back for picks or anything

Fair enough - my bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This line had Seth Olson & Link play major minutes among 4 new players in a new offense with D Brown and 2 inexperienced young RB`s.

What a bunch of &^%$# complaining about the O-Line.

As a group Sunday, they had a solid day against a D that has played very well.

Very good running days the prior two games.

They deserve a Chance to come together. Could you give them another week or two ^&%$#!

Fair enough. I'd suggest that I'm pleased with what they've accomplished, but am not prepared to say there isn't a lot of room for improvement.

Its kind of like winter camping wrapped in a patchwork quilt vs. a high tech, lightweight sleeping bag. The quilt may keep you warmish, but it isn't the best tool for the job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Ballard... think he deserves his share of time and carries and everything. But I would like for us to make a run in the offseason at RB Mark Ingram. He is not being utilized properly in New Orleans. I think a trade for him makes a lot of sense. Would probably cost us a middling pick, New Orleans will be looking to reclaim as many picks as possible. I think the kid could flourish in Indy and we won't find a back as good as him in the 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds....

Would you take a chance on Ingram?

Not a trade I'm interested in and I like Ingram.

But the Saints over paid for him, and they're not going to just give him away.... and we don't have many draft picks as it is....

Just not got a good match, at least for right now. Maybe if he continues to under-produce in New Orleans we can * him up as a Free Agent in a year or two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a 4th or later, sure, but I think we'd need to get rid of Brown in return. If we want to be a more physical running team the way the coaches have said I think Ingram suits that better than Brown.

Ballard, Ingram, and Carter would really wear a defense down over a game, IMO. Pound the rock, and batter those LB's down over the course of the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that our WRs are young, and should improve on their dropsies... but Sunday reminded me of Jerome "hands like a brick wall" Pathon...

Yes, they will improve. Everyone seems to forget that Garcon was Mr. Dropsies at first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Ballard... think he deserves his share of time and carries and everything. But I would like for us to make a run in the offseason at RB Mark Ingram. He is not being utilized properly in New Orleans. I think a trade for him makes a lot of sense. Would probably cost us a middling pick, New Orleans will be looking to reclaim as many picks as possible. I think the kid could flourish in Indy and we won't find a back as good as him in the 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds....

Would you take a chance on Ingram?

No.....our backs are good...I think we've drafted well there....and we should spend our money on the O-line and the secondary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Colts' Scouts: What they liked about LeRaven Clark....
      Nice post.   The reason to play Clark inside as a rookie is that he's not ready to play OT on the NFL level.    Whatever he learned in college doesn't translate well to the NFL game.      That's why he fell to 82.     He needs coaching.   Lots and lots and lots of very good coaching.     Hoping Philbin is that guy.   At guard,  he's got help on both sides.    His flaws will be somewhat covered.    But at tackle, he's out on an island -- no man's land -- and he'd likely get eaten alive as a rookie.       If he plays a lot as a rookie and plays well,  I'll be the most surprised person here.     Now, I also be happy too. I'm always happy to be wrong when it means the Colts are helped.      But everything I've read says he's not going to be ready........      we'll soon find out.....  
    • Extremly early prediction...
      Like it!  Hopefully things will bounce our way this season. This could be the "core" of the Colts to come. Here's to quelling this peasant uprising in the South! (I really do believe the Afc South as a "whole" got better. Some teams more than others). Go Colts
    • Colts' Scouts: What they liked about LeRaven Clark....
      I think Clark was a solid pick. I saw him on Big Boards as high as 31 and as low as 106. Most boards I saw had him as a solid 2nd rounder. If you built an OT in a lab chances are you'd get a guy with Clark's measurables: Height: 6-foot-5 Weight: 315 pounds Arm Length: 36 1/8" Hand Size: 11 7/8" 40 Time: 5.16 seconds Vertical Jump: 30" (pro day) Broad Jump: 9'1" (pro day) Bench Press: 18 reps Obviously you'd want the bench reps closer to 28 than 18. The weight room should get him there. Those ridiculously long arms and big ol paws can't be developed.  He's an OT that is where he'd be for me from day 1. I don't see any reason to play him at G as some suggested.  Everything I have read says he has a high football IQ. I think he is ready to compete to start next season. Preseason will give us an idea of where he is out. I think his ceiling is a top LT.  If I played OL for the Colts I would    not feel like my starting spot was secure. That goes for guys like Mewhort and Castonzo too. While not likely the OL this time next year could be totally revamped.  Clark, Good, Kelly, Blythe, Haeg. It should be a positive for OL having guys that feel they have to give it evetthing each Sunday to keep their job. 
    • Colts' Scouts: What they liked about LeRaven Clark....
      If you want to argue that there was a player who was more "pro ready" for 2016 than Clark,   I absolutely would not disagree with you.   In fact,  that's what I argued the night we took him and then the next night and the whole weekend.   And I * off a lot of Colts fans by saying Clark was likely not going to help us much this year,  but would hopefully help us in 2017.    They did NOT want to read that.   So, on that limited argument,  we agree.   But on most everything else,  we disagree.     I don't know why you posted the profiles from NFL.com    Not sure how they helped you?    Clark's profile has a higher grade and projects him in the 1st or 2nd round.    Westerman's has a lower grade and a 2nd or 3rd round projection.   If Christian Westerman ever plays a day of offensive tackle in the NFL,  then the Bengals are playing under emergency conditions.      I'm not aware that he ever played a day of tackle in his life.   By the way,  the Bengals top two draft picks in 2015 were tackles.   Ogbuehi from Texas A&M and Fisher from Oregon went 1-2.    Those are their tackles of the future.     They have other tackles like Wentworth and others.   Westerman will play guard or center.      Remember,  he's 6-3 and 300.     Can you think of a single other OT in the NFL that was 6-3 and 300?      I don't think there's been one of those in quite some time.    He's an interior lineman all the way.      Remember,  one of my favorites from this draft.     But we took Haeg over him,  so if we liked him at all,   it was limited.     Clark went two full rounds ahead of him.   Clark's ceiling, his upside is simply ridiculous.    The question becomes,  can we coach him up enough to get him there.     For everyone's sake,   let's hope so.        
    • Position Depth Comfort Level
      Get technical. Anyone could be the back up punter. That don't mean anyone can kick it any distance. PM practices FGs right along side AV in camp and practices but I have never seen AV practice kicking punts with PM. If all you want to do is argue find someone else.
  • Welcome New Members

    • Member Introductions! (Say Hi!)
      Hello my Name is Robin. And i'm from Denmark. even though i've been member on this forum for a long time, and the old one as well. I would like to Introduce myself. I became a Colts fan in 2007, when I watched my first NFL game. My brother introduced me to NFL, the superbowl between Colts & Bears, And as we all know the Bears scored first, so I had to rude for the "underdogs".. and from that day on I was hooked. I've watched every game since, even the primetime games, that starts 2:30 in Denmark, it's a long day working with no sleep but damn its worth it. Can't wait for my next big Colts adventure, when I get to see them playing in London 
    • Member Introductions! (Say Hi!)
      I have been a fan since 1984 when I became an early teen and really started to understand the game. Colts moved to Indianapolis in 1984 and eventhough we stunk for a while, things obviously got better. We traded for Dickerson in 1987 and won the Division, then we had Harbaugh's magical season in 1995, the Peyton ERA where winning 12 games was a piece of cake + winning a SB in 2006, now the Andrew ERA where we have already had 3 11 win seasons and a deep Playoff run.
  • Members

    • dw49

      dw49 2,115

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JRnINDY

      JRnINDY 158

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shaggy1048

      shaggy1048 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jdubu

      Jdubu 148

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 1,505

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 818

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Krauses

      Krauses 34

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 103

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Combsey

      Combsey 64

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 2,416

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.