Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Update: Tracking Colts releases at cutdown


CR91

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

Let's be honest, if both A Rich and Flacco get injured, it doesn't really matter who the 3rd qb is as the season will likely be over.......

I’m sure the 49ers said the same thing about Purdy…

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

So awesome! Congrats to him and the family! Hard work has paid off, and from what I saw at camp he was doing well!

 

Just remember that teams play a lot of games right now.  They may keep a guy because they want to put him on the PS after a week when rosters are settled in.  And they're worried he may be poached if they waived him today.  Happens all the time.

 

I'm pretty sure the 53 we have on the roster right now won't be the same as on opening day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

None of us knows what happened on the practice field or in meetings. But during games, Bean was very good.

 

I think Bean makes it to the practice squad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ADnum1 said:

 

...I read on this board that Flacco doesn't like to help rookie QBs

 

and at the time, when we first signed Joe Flacco...

many here insisted, the primary reason the Colts brought Flacco in, was to serve as a "mentor" for young Anthony Richardson.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1959Colts said:

 

and at the time, when we first signed Joe Flacco...

many here insisted, the primary reason the Colts brought Flacco in, was to serve as a "mentor" for young Anthony Richardson.

One poster, known for being wrong made that claim. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen Dallas Flowers play nickel before in a previous year. Might be what they are thinking if Kenny goes down. Still with us cutting 2 rookie DBs it's possible a waiver claim or two will be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lifetime Colt said:

Destin the Savant might want to know the CB's he is referring to are not rookies anymore.

Destin does say in the article

 

"...Instead of prioritizing their young promising talent: Micah Abraham (CB), Jaylin Simpson (CB/S), and Jonah Laulu the Colts elected to give initial roster spots to players like Taven Bryan (DT), Darrell Baker Jr. (CB) and Rodney Thomas II (S)"

 

Abraham and Simpson are rookie CB that Ballard risked by cutting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BeanDiasucci said:

Ballard seems determined to prove he was right about last year's group of DBs.

 

 

Can someone walk me through the logic on this one?? The Colts played rookie DBs last year, and everyone complained about it. This year, the Colts (so far) didn't keep rookie DBs, and it's proof that they didn't learn anything from last year? 

 

I'm struggling to understand this argument. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

Can someone walk me through the logic on this one?? The Colts played rookie DBs last year, and everyone complained about it. This year, the Colts (so far) didn't keep rookie DBs, and it's proof that they didn't learn anything from last year? 

 

I'm struggling to understand this argument. 

Yeah, the biggest thing I got from the piece was, that Ballard lost Darius Rush, by cutting him, in hopes he would slip through to our PS. but I think we would all agree, so far, Rush has shown little since leaving the colts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta be honest again. I didn't see a whole lot out of Abraham other than the strip fumble. Coverage wise I didn't see it and he made a few mistakes out there. Simpson was really quiet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catloaf said:

Why do I feel like our team is basically identical to last year, except for two rookies and a hope and prayer our QB stays healthy and can pass accurately?

 

It's basically identical to last year, except for Latu and Mitchell, and some other auxiliary changes. You're not wrong on that at all.

 

The Colts made it a priority to re-sign their own FAs in March, and it was very displeasing to a lot of people here. They signaled at the time that they thought the roster was good enough to compete, and that the main change they were looking forward to was the QB being able to play. Add in the two rookies, like you said, who are potential upgrades at important positions, and the team is pretty much locked in.

 

Right now, we're complaining about the 5-6 guys who get to bounce around between the active roster and the practice squad all season, while probably not being active on game day unless there's an emergency.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Can someone walk me through the logic on this one?? The Colts played rookie DBs last year, and everyone complained about it. This year, the Colts (so far) didn't keep rookie DBs, and it's proof that they didn't learn anything from last year? 

 

I'm struggling to understand this argument. 

I think the thought is last years rookies played less than stellar and a guy like Abraham for instance had a pretty good camp and preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Catloaf said:

Why do I feel like our team is basically identical to last year, except for two rookies and a hope and prayer our QB stays healthy and can pass accurately?

Right. Latu hopefully gives us the pure pass rusher this team has been missing for a long time.

But mainly the difference will come down to Richardson over Minshew

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 If you look his primary job is as a Titans reporter.

 I've read more than enough to understand he likes twisting our *.

HaHa, didn't know that, thank you for clarifying. Seems some here take his speculative tweets as Gospel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Patrick Miller said:

Well, I see they waived bean. That’s a mistake in my opinion.

Keep in mind that Bean was the #1 pick in the UFL (I think that’s what they’re calling it) draft.  So, he has to decide if he wants to play or be on a PS…

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Can someone walk me through the logic on this one?? The Colts played rookie DBs last year, and everyone complained about it. This year, the Colts (so far) didn't keep rookie DBs, and it's proof that they didn't learn anything from last year? 

 

I'm struggling to understand this argument. 

You must learn to "Trust the process"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

I think the thought is last years rookies played less than stellar and a guy like Abraham for instance had a pretty good camp and preseason.

 

Last year's rookies played less than stellar, so let's pin the hopes for this year's defense on a new set of 5th, 6th, and 7th rounders? 

 

I would have loved for Simpson to beat out Thomas, Abraham to beat out Baker (although they probably weren't directly competing at CB, more likely a STs competition there), and Laulu to beat out Bryan. And I think there's a good chance that all three of them wind up back with the team at some point. I don't think any of these guys -- not the ones who were retained, nor the ones who were waived -- are meant to be foundational pieces of the team. It would be nice if someone stepped up and looked like a future star, but I don't think that happened. Abraham, for instance, had one noteworthy play in preseason, and it had almost nothing to do with his ability to play corner.

 

I also don't get the link to Darius Rush. They waived him and kept Jaylon Jones, another rookie that the team felt won the spot. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

Just remember that teams play a lot of games right now.  They may keep a guy because they want to put him on the PS after a week when rosters are settled in.  And they're worried he may be poached if they waived him today.  Happens all the time.

 

I'm pretty sure the 53 we have on the roster right now won't be the same as on opening day.

You're absolutely right. The NFL is volatile. 

 

So for now, knowing that things can change in an instant, I'm going to be happy for him and his family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Last year's rookies played less than stellar, so let's pin the hopes for this year's defense on a new set of 5th, 6th, and 7th rounders? 

 

I would have loved for Simpson to beat out Thomas, Abraham to beat out Baker (although they probably weren't directly competing at CB, more likely a STs competition there), and Laulu to beat out Bryan. And I think there's a good chance that all three of them wind up back with the team at some point. I don't think any of these guys -- not the ones who were retained, nor the ones who were waived -- are meant to be foundational pieces of the team. It would be nice if someone stepped up and looked like a future star, but I don't think that happened. Abraham, for instance, had one noteworthy play in preseason, and it had almost nothing to do with his ability to play corner.

 

I also don't get the link to Darius Rush. They waived him and kept Jaylon Jones, another rookie that the team felt won the spot. 

To be clear, I don't have a horse in this race. Just stating what I think was the thought with the comment.

 

I didn't expect nor want Abraham over any of our young guys, but I'm disappointed we kept Baker and Denbow. Neither have proven anything that warrents that confidence where as I feel Abraham especially had a good camp/preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Catloaf said:

Why do I feel like our team is basically identical to last year, except for two rookies and a hope and prayer our QB stays healthy and can pass accurately?

 

 

 Perhaps your a little thick?

 Rookies WR Mitchell and Gould

 Pinter back healthy and playing well and Rookie Bartolini  no more  C French

 Rookie Gonclaves G Rucker look promising  could be starting next season

 Oh yes Latu

 ANYONE should know of the jump expected from year one and two

 Brents, Jones, Baker they are not the same because of experience 

  And you have a new starting S in Cross. 

 At DT Adewhatever looks good and added Davis.

  The 2nd year in Steichen's system, and more experienced defense.

    It's a new year, a different team with more talent and experience. And yes better Quarterbacking to be expected.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Solid84 said:

To be clear, I don't have a horse in this race. Just stating what I think was the thought with the comment.

 

I didn't expect nor want Abraham over any of our young guys, but I'm disappointed we kept Baker and Denbow. Neither have proven anything that warrents that confidence where as I feel Abraham especially had a good camp/preseason.

 

Fair enough. 

 

I don't have any opinion on Denbow. He played six defensive snaps for us last season, I don't think he's anything other than STs, and I actually think we need another safety. I feel like we're one heavy at DL, and the Laulu vs Bryan conversation is moot because that 10th spot is going away anyway. I could easily be wrong about both of those things.

 

I was hopeful for Abraham, but I don't think he stood out in preseason. I don't know about camp. Baker actually looked like an NFL caliber player in preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Archer said:

Keep in mind that Bean was the #1 pick in the UFL (I think that’s what they’re calling it) draft.  So, he has to decide if he wants to play or be on a PS…

UFL isnt until Spring 2025 so he will play in the NFL unless he doent find a home then if not he can go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just registered to comment, and now the Colts are the team I follow most.  I am a lifelong Longhorn, and love Sam, which is what brought me here to begin with.  Bean made more plays and improvised well this summer, and I fully expected Sam to get cut.  I had a couple of ideas why it went the other way, not that I know how players are evaluated.  I can say Sam has tremendous leadership qualities and is a great field leader.  He is also extremely tough.......Bean could be also, but does not have the body to take a beating week in and out as QB...he was out one year against Texas, and was knocked out of the game the next year.

 

Maybe one factor was perceived long term durability, but what do I know....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

Fair enough. 

 

I don't have any opinion on Denbow. He played six defensive snaps for us last season, I don't think he's anything other than STs, and I actually think we need another safety. I feel like we're one heavy at DL, and the Laulu vs Bryan conversation is moot because that 10th spot is going away anyway. I could easily be wrong about both of those things.

 

I was hopeful for Abraham, but I don't think he stood out in preseason. I don't know about camp. Baker actually looked like an NFL caliber player in preseason.

Baker worries me because he looked all world last off and preseason too but he may have genuinely improved. Flowers looks so slow hope he gets his speed back. Expected Jones to beat him for the spot but what I saw was worrisome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Can someone walk me through the logic on this one?? The Colts played rookie DBs last year, and everyone complained about it. This year, the Colts (so far) didn't keep rookie DBs, and it's proof that they didn't learn anything from last year? 

 

I'm struggling to understand this argument. 

I have more an observation than an argument - that those young DBs weren't great last season and had some durability issues. Ballard indicated in his season ending press conference that it could be an area for roster additions, yet they haven't added anybody through the draft, free agency, or trades, even for improved depth. It may work out, but it seems risky and a little curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This really shows PFF's true value  in grading players and lines. Watching the 1st 2 games does anyone really walk away from the TV believing that this is an elite Oline? Be honest!!
    • I agree with this. I also don't blame fans for being impatient. Over their last 37 games - dating back to Carson Wentz's last two games - the Colts are 13-24 (.351). Trust is fading. This season's team can struggle at QB, but needs to show competence in other areas, IMHO. And fans need to see some growth, along with the struggles, from Richardson this and next season. 
    • Good to see someone else say it, I see a lot of blame put on the WRs but what's more realistic Michael Pittman suddenly became lazy and worse at route running after averaging 7 catches and 72 yards per game last year or the young inexperienced/inaccurate QB isn't getting the ball to them. Nothing against AR but I think the lack of passing is more on him then the WRs
    • I agree to  point, it depends upon what the demands are.  But Mannings should have the clout to influence, maybe not control, Arch's destiny (if he's going to be that good, we don't know that yet).  And in a way, I'm not sure the NFL FO would get in the way, as it would not want to see one of its potential stars....in terms of play and name legacy...get ruined by a bad organization and out of the NFL in a short time.  The NFL might jus decide to let the teams work it out, and not balk at one player upsetting the traditional draft process.   I think the chances of your prognostication happening are decent.  It will be interesting.
    • I think the  Peyton would not  want him going to Indy. You would have the never ending comparisons and I believe that was part of Eli not wanting to play for the Chargers. I could be wrong but I believe they wanted him in the NFC. The bigger point is also that if it came to be that  the Colts had the pick when Manning was available. That would also be an indication that the Colts would be a dumpster fire and they would probably want no part of it.  Based on wins, losses, lack of play off success, FO office drama. I bet the Colts has lost some of it's value. Sure it is still worth billions but no doubt the shine is no longer there
  • Members

    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,299

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,900

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 22,014

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,322

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,966

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 4,991

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,409

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 13,614

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,331

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 2,486

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...