Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts vs Raiders post game thread


GoColts8818

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Defjamz26 said:

Gus Bradley has to go. He is spotting the team free points with the way he plays the secondary. His defense also seems to struggle with check downs for whatever reason. He’s holding the team back. We won’t win 9 games with a healthy AR next season if he’s still the DC.

 

Whoa there ponyboy. The secondary today was Brents, Jones, Clemons, Cross, and Harrison. Way too much inexperience to do anything else then play a soft zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This win belongs to Shane.

We still had our defects.  We couldn't put pressure on the QB.  We still couldn't tackle well.  We still had lapses in coverage.  We still had issues getting separation.  And Minshew... was Minshew.

We didn't have the better players today.  But we still managed to win.

Shane called great plays that got us points.  Shane made good game management decisions that kept us two scores ahead -- just out of reach.  Shane managed the clock well.

This win belongs to Shane.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

This win belongs to Shane.

We still had our defects.  We couldn't put pressure on the QB.  We still couldn't tackle well.  We still had lapses in coverage.  We still had issues getting separation.  And Minshew... was Minshew.

We didn't have the better players today.  But we still managed to win.

Shane called great plays that got us points.  Shane made good game management decisions that kept us two scores ahead -- just out of reach.  Shane managed the clock well.

This win belongs to Shane.

He called a terrible game imo. To each his own.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As clean as both teams played, the badly botched block punt attempt/personal foul probably kept the game closer than it should have been. Oh well, the Raiders had played very well the past couple weeks so any win over them is a good one. Minshew is limited but we would have a losing record with most backup qb’s.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Colts will have to make stroud stay patient and not allow big plays and hopefully they will be ok.

gus cant play soft against stroud if he does imo stroud with make our d look like high schoolers

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

and they didn't face any top flight qbs all year.

 

Who are the top flight QBs? Serious question. Lamar Jackson may win the MVP and the Colts beat the Ravens with Lamar Jackson.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Smonroe said:


Stroud will be the best QB we’ve faces since Lamar (or that girl who plays for Jacksonville).  Hope Kenny is back.

 

Also have to give them a ton of credit.  They were considered the worst team in the league by the talking heads at the start of the season.  

that is what a good gm can do , nick caserio turned that team from the bottom to competing for the win division in just two seasons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

and they didn't face any top flight qbs all year. 

This is simply wrong.  They beat the probable league MVP and best team in their conference if not the league on the road with a backup QB.  They also beat the probable rookie of the year on the road with a backup QB playing 3/4 of the game and they will have to do it one more time if they want to make the playoffs.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

I think just the opposite...Tannehill and others will be playing for their future..Vrabel is a good coach.

titans had a bad gm who let their elite players go to other teams, imo talent level stops and starts with the gm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got back from the casino. From what I saw over there, the protection was solid on Maxx Crosby. The offense was well-balanced and Taylor looked good. Even though Pittman wasn't great on offense, it opened up room for Pierce and Downs to make a couple plays. The Raiders offense threw on us and we couldn't cover Adams, but I'm happy with the win overall.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

This is simply wrong.  They beat the probable league MVP and best team in their conference if not the league on the road with a backup QB.  They also beat the probable rookie of the year on the road with a backup QB playing 3/4 of the game and they will have to do it one more time if they want to make the playoffs.  

Baltimore was beginning of the season and totally different team now. Stroud, the same.  If u think this is a legit recird, then good on u. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

They clinched  playoff birth in what was supposed to be a down year.

 

Serms Thomas got benched at safety quite a bit for Harrison. Will know more when I see snap counts.

Yep, and Puka had yet another 100 yard game. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Baltimore was beginning of the season and totally different team now. Stroud, the same.  If u think this is a legit recird, then good on u. 

 

Yes, it is a legit record. Teams can only play and beat whoever is on their schedule.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Baltimore was beginning of the season and totally different team now. Stroud, the same.  If u think this is a legit recird, then good on u. 

I do because I am not trying to spin everything to be negative like you do.  Fact of the matter is you said they played no top end QBs this year and you were wrong, they played at least two and beat both of them on the road even if doesn’t suit your agenda.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, richard pallo said:

He called a terrible game imo. To each his own.


I wouldn’t say terrible, but I would like to see changes to get the running game going. That is where all the money has been spent, or are the colts admitting they made major mistakes with those contracts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, azcolt said:

As clean as both teams played, the badly botched block punt attempt/personal foul probably kept the game closer than it should have been. Oh well, the Raiders had played very well the past couple weeks so any win over them is a good one. Minshew is limited but we would have a losing record with most backup qb’s.


nobody was complaining when blocked punts won a game for the colts. How quick fans forget. 
 

I see a lot of 2nd and 3rd string qb’s playing well, a lot of them better than gm! I think this is due to most college teams going to passing offenses and producing qb’s and wr’s  that are able to step in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, husker61 said:


I wouldn’t say terrible, but I would like to see changes to get the running game going. That is where all the money has been spent, or are the colts admitting they made major mistakes with those contracts.

The running games is not effective due to his insistence on running between the tackles most of time.  Taylor and the other running back were very effective running outside but we very rarely went there.  It has nothing to do with what we’re paying running backs.  It’s their utilization.  That’s on Shane.  Too predictable imo.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Baltimore was beginning of the season and totally different team now. Stroud, the same.  If u think this is a legit recird, then good on u. 

Good god, are you related to Grigson?? Ballard hater extraordinaire! Come out to play only when the glass is half empty!My champagne glass is full baby! Happy New Year. Go Colt’s, we have exceeded expectations by a mile. This year has proven the old Adage, Any Given Sunday!! Weak schedule, 9-7, take that to the Bank.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

The running games is not effective due to his insistence on running between the tackles most of time.  Taylor and the other running back were very effective running outside but we very rarely went there.  It has nothing to do with what we’re paying running backs.  It’s their utilization.  That’s on Shane.  Too predictable imo.  

Yet Shane started running outside in the second half today.  Does he get no credit for that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

Yet Shane started running outside in the second half today.  Does he get no credit for that?

Of course but he went away from it.  Didn’t do it enough when it was working imo.  Taylor’s touchdown was a run to the outside I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

In his post game press conference Steichen said there were no new injuries to report.  Thank you very much.

 

Wait until tomorrow when EJ Speed winds up in protocol...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

Gus Bradley has to go. He is spotting the team free points with the way he plays the secondary. His defense also seems to struggle with check downs for whatever reason. He’s holding the team back. We won’t win 9 games with a healthy AR next season if he’s still the DC.

 

I'm no Bradley fan and I'll always have issues with how he calls the defense. I thought his gameplan today was kind of refreshing. Maybe his blitzes looked more effective because the QB is a rookie and was caught off guard, but he did a better job of mixing things up today.

 

Compared to last week's gameplan, when Bradley and Steichen confirmed that they played it conservative to protect the secondary. This week, we had two additional starters out, yet the gameplan was more aggressive from the beginning. Days like today make me scratch my head, because if Bradley was this versatile every week -- and let's be clear, he was only about 20% more versatile today than he usually is, it's not like he's suddenly Dick LeBeau -- I'd be less concerned with him being the DC.

 

That said, some of the coverages were annoying. It seemed like the Raiders had an open receiver right in the middle of the field on every passing down. I'd rather clamp down the middle and make the QB try a more difficult throw to the outside. And we absolutely have to tackle better.

 

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

He came back.

 

Doesn't mean he won't be in protocol tomorrow. I'm mostly joking, but it wouldn't surprise me.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Baltimore was beginning of the season and totally different team now. Stroud, the same.  If u think this is a legit recird, then good on u. 

 

This team was expected to win 6 games this year. They just got their ninth win today, and are now knocking on the door to the playoffs. 

 

Does any of this bring you any pleasure or joy? 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, richard pallo said:

Of course but he went away from it.  Didn’t do it enough when it was working imo.  Taylor’s touchdown was a run to the outside I believe.

He went back to in the third and fourth quarters and used it to pretty much run out the clock.

46 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

This team was expected to win 6 games this year. They just got their ninth win today, and are now knocking on the door to the playoffs. 

 

Does any of this bring you any pleasure or joy? 

Nope just telling us how things that the rest of us view as good really aren’t that good.  There is a word for posters like that…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Wow don’t count on smith next week.

 

 

I’d bet he plays.  They have a week to get him right.  Not uncommon for olineman who are hurt and play to really feel it right after the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

This team was expected to win 6 games this year. They just got their ninth win today, and are now knocking on the door to the playoffs. 

 

Does any of this bring you any pleasure or joy? 

For him it doesn't, sad really. I have to be honest, been a fan since 1984 and this season ranks way up there as one of my favorites. 

 

1. 2006 = because we won the SB and beat the best = Tom and BB to get to the SB. Peyton sealed his legacy with the comeback win vs the Pats. Then he closed by beating the Bears where many fans here in Indy are Bears fans. 

 

2. 1995 = because nobody expected us to do anything that season, and we went to the AFC Title Game as a WildCard with Harbaugh. The win at KC in the Divisional Round (1995) was priceless.

 

3. 2012 = went from 2-14 to 11-5 and a Playoff appearance with Andrew Luck and his comebacks. Made the playoffs and not 1 person on ESPN and NFL Network had us winning more than 5 games before the season. 

 

4. This season (2023) is in the running because, CBS Sports radio, ESPN, NFL Network, our local media, and most of the posters in here had us winning 3 or 4 games before the season. Here we are 9-7, blood and guts in with the best of them. How anyone can't enjoy that, they live a sad life, JMO. Our before season odds of making the playoffs this season were like 5%. Some outlets had us rated at #32 = worst team in team in the league.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If you have the athletic there is a lot in there. He was in real pain.

I don’t doubt it.  If the Colts had to play tomorrow I’d bet he wouldn’t play but give him a week of treatment and the fact the season is on the line I’d bet he does everything to be out there.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Scott Pennock made his rundown of the draft, it is excellent!  And @Yoshinator gave me props for comments I made before the draft.  (Thanks, dude!)  So, I feel compelled to give my own review of this year's draft.   Round 1 / Pick 15 -- Laiatu Latu, DE, UCLA [MY GUYS Player] Colts had about 7 players targeted for their pick at 15, and by the time we got to the pick, 6 of them were still on the board.  We had our choice of anyone.  This draft is not deep at DE.  I expected us to take a WR or a CB.  Instead, we take the best DE in the draft.  Latu is the double-digit sack artist that we haven't had since Mathis.  We're talking guys like Trey Hendrickson, Maxx Crosby, Montez Sweat.  If it wasn't for his injury, he would be a top-5 pick.  It was a steal.  The pick comes with a downside.  He's a day one starter.  And we already have two starters.  Each with accomplishments.  It's a problem of riches.  It's a good problem to have, true.  But it's a problem.  But there's also a background reason.  Ebukam has 2 years left on his contract.  This year is Kwity's final year of his rookie deal, and there's no guarantee we do his 5th year option.  One of the enduring principles of drafting is that you are hopefully not drafting for your needs this year.  You are drafting for what the team looks like a couple years from now.  Latu is what the DL looks like a couple years from now.   Round 2 / Pick 52 -- Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas [MY GUYS Player] For those fans (like me) who desperately wanted us to draft an offensive weapon in the first round, we got one in the second round.  Make no mistake -- Adonai Mitchell is a First Round Talent.  He has rare combination of length, speed, quickness.  He's been in five post season games, and scored a touchdown in every one.  He has rare ability to separate at the top of the route.  This guy is a day one starter.  Seriously.  What made him slip was his reputation of poor dedication when the play isn't designed to go his way.  His poor interviews at the combine.  He's got diabetes, and when he's out of whack, it adversely affects his mood.  And consequently, his performance.  Reggie Wayne has his work cut out for him.  And I envision his talk with Mitchell to resemble Proximo's talk with Maximus:  "You're good, Spaniard, but you're not that good.  You could be magnificent."  Funny, but true.  My own advice for "Lord" Mitchell is that of Tyrion Lannister:  "Never forget what you are.  The rest of the world will not.  Wear it like armor.  And it can never be made to hurt you."  So he has diabetes.  And?  I say, immediately approach the Snickers people and volunteer to do a commercial spot for them.  "Hey, AD, you need a Snickers?  Why?  Because you play like a jerk when you don't have one!  Better?  Better!"  Heck, yeah.   Round 3 / Pick 79 -- Matt Goncalves, OL, Pitt To tell the truth, I was looking for us to address our DB needs with this pick.  I wasn't expecting an offensive lineman.  I initially wanted to be disappointed.  The more I read about this guy, the more encouraged I got.  I still can't help but look back at those terrible 2021 and 2022 seasons, when we made terrible attempts to address our offensive line through washed up veteran free agents who couldn't play anymore.  Some of them couldn't play to begin with.  I liked the Blake Freeland pick.  And I'm liking Goncalves, too.  More for who he is than what he is.  Just listen to his live phone call with Chris Ballard when he got picked.  That's the kind of energy you want in the huddle, on the field, in the locker room.  This is a Good Guy.  He's still got work to do.  He's got very short arms (nothing he can do about that) but he also had terribly few reps on the bench press.  He can do something about that.  Get in there, get to work, and compete for playing time.   Round 4 / Pick 117 -- Tanor Bortollini, OC, Wisconsin What?  When are we going to pick one of the DB's I had flagged for our team?  Here's a thing:  Bortollini broke Jason Kelce's combine record for the 3-cone shuttle.  He ran a 4,95 40.  He can play any position on the field.  And let's not fool ourselves.  No matter how much Ryan Kelly says he wants to continue playing, there comes a time in every player's career when the ball club is ready to move on before you are.  I like this player.  Seriously.  Him and his outrageous mullet.  No, he's not the position I wanted.  But I like him.   Round 5 / Pick 142 - Anthony Gould, WR, Oregon State Quite frankly, I was surprised we drafted another WR after taking Mitchell.  And another player who is a quick, undersized slot receiver.  We already have one in Downs.  What do we need another one for?  But after watching film on him, I can see what they see.  This guy is going to be our punt returner.  Geez, he looks small.  But he's listed at 5-11.  Still looks tiny.  I'm gonna enjoy watching him.  Clarence Verdin 2.0?  Anybody?   Round 5 / Pick 151 - Jaylon Carlies, LB/DB, Missouri [MY GUYS Player] Love the pick.  This is one of the guys I had on my own list.  I studied the new Vic Fangio "Cover 6" hybrid defense that everyone was beginning to use vs the modern 3-by-1 offensive formations.  And I came away from that experience certain that a new, different kind of player is going to be required in the modern game.  A guy who could play safety, nickel, and linebacker all at once.  Why?  Because of what genius coaches like Shane Steichen have been doing against it.  They line up in 3-by-1.  So the defense goes into Cover 6.  Then one of the 3 WR's goes in motion across the field to make a 2-by-2.  The defense reacts by switching over to Quarters coverage.  That motion receiver then quickly circles back around to the other side of the field.  And the defense needs to react back again.  How quickly can they do it?  How quickly can the players understand just which coverage they're doing?  Do they have the right personnel on the field to play either coverage?  Ah ha!!!  What is needed is a player that can stay on the field regardless of what coverage is being called.  Carlies is that player.   Round 5 / Pick 164 - Jaylin Simpson, DB, Auburn We finally address our issue at Free Safety.  Our starter at that position was a good story.  Ivy League player picked in the 7th round made good.  Works his way into the starting lineup.  Great story.  Problem was, Rodney Thomas really isn't that good.  He may be the best FS we have.  But that's not saying much.  Both Julian Blackmon and Nick Cross are Strong safeties.  True, they can both line up at FS.  But it doesn't mean they're all that suited for it.  Jaylin is a CB/FS hybrid that had 7 interceptions at Auburn.  He's a thin, wiry guy.  He's not going to help you tackle guys running at you.  But in today's 4-wide offenses?  Oh, yeah.  He can play.   Round 6 / Pick 201 - Micah Abraham, CB, Marshall I don't know much about Abraham.  My only attachment to this pick is that I have a close friend who was at college at Marshall when the tragedy happened to their football team.  Also, Chris Ballard has a thing for turning over every rock to find an unpolished gem off the beaten path.  We'll see how he works out.  What he does.  I would expect that his first stop (if he makes the team) will be special teams.   Round 7 / Pick 234 -- Jonah Laulu, DT, Oklahoma Again, I don't know much about him.  But I do know that we can now legitimately do a Polynesian haka with our defensive line.  My advice to him is the same speech that the Colts make to all rookies.  You're here now.  It doesn't matter where you were drafted.  It doesn't matter if you were drafted.  It's now up to you to show the coaches what you can do, and beat the guy in front of you.   My overall draft grade:  B+ I love the first two picks, and we have three guys from my MY GUYS list.  I wish we could have addressed DB earlier in the draft than where we did.  But I'm not going to complain.  Our needs coming into this offseason were at free safety, wide receiver, consistent pass rush, top end corner, and prime cover corner.  We not only addressed nearly all of them, but addressed them well.  If we splurged in the next two weeks and gave Justin Simmons a bunch of money to play FS for us, I'd drive over to west 56th street and kiss Chris Ballard myself.   I'm feeling good about this team, and about this season.  The new theme I have chosen for this year is "NO MORE EXCUSES".  Let's go do it.  
    • We have plenty of cash to make a move if we so choose 
    • I’m giving it a B+ as it sits, borderline A-. Injury histories on two of the top 4 picks plus the diet and alleged immaturity of our 2nd rounder is why I drop it from an A.    that said, I like what Chris Ballard and the colts did overall. Initially I was hoping for a WR at 15 but I can easily live with the pick of any of the top D players at 15.    getting AD at 52 is a potential steal for sure if the concerns over his type 1 and immaturity don’t actually affect him.    In the end, this may be Ballards best draft from top to bottom that he’s ever had. At least on paper. Let’s see if it translates.    
    • A+ post, thanks for your time....
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...