Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

It’s time to move on from Shaq!


ColtsUrUs

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, colts89 said:

He had a bad game for sure. He's got this year to prove that he isn't capped in regards to his recovery. If he is, then the Colts probably move on from him this off-season.

This, we will see how he goes over the course of the season, if he is still playing as he is now by the end of the season, we will move on. I will hold out hope that by the end of the season we will see some improvement. 

Otherwise, we move on. It makes sense to wait and see.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ColtsUrUs said:

It’s hard watching him play lately. He’s out of position on most plays. He’s thinking too much and not just playing. 

It's been that time for a year or so.....  I hate it, cause Leonard was so much fun to watch.  In Indy, when we get special players not named Manning or Miller, there's a law of nature stating they have to flame out quick.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s scheme and injuries. I think he’s fully healthy ( he wouldn’t be out there if he wasn’t), but the injuries and physical toll from playing that position have piled up. Shaq peaked in terms of production like 2 years ago. Would be hard to move on from him because of the contract and injury history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ColtsUrUs said:

It’s hard watching him play lately. He’s out of position on most plays. He’s thinking too much and not just playing. 

His dead cap hit is $8M in 2024 and $4M in 2025 if they flat-out released him, which I don't see happening. Next year will be year-3 of the 5-year contract, and given the cap investment, I think the Colts will wait until 2025 to make any moves.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I brought this up not too long ago and it proved to be a touchy subject. I personally was giving him four games to readjust and now think it’s acceptable to expect seeing flashes of his old self.  I know if he was going to return to form it would take time but someone of his talent level should start showing us something the next few games and build from that. If not, him being cut in the offseason wouldn’t be a surprise bc he is the highest paid player on the team. Whether some agree or not, that comes with expectations.  So as usual, I will wait and see what happens these next few games. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

It’s scheme and injuries. I think he’s fully healthy ( he wouldn’t be out there if he wasn’t), but the injuries and physical toll from playing that position have piled up. Shaq peaked in terms of production like 2 years ago. Would be hard to move on from him because of the contract and injury history.

but if he continues to play the way he's been playing... They must to move on, regardless of his contract. A team needs to have its best players on the field. You just cant continue to play a guy because he makes more money. I believe, if Grant Stuard had been given all of Shaq's snaps we would have seen much more production from him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

but if he continues to play the way he's been playing... They must to move on, regardless of his contract. A team needs to have its best players on the field. You just cant continue to play a guy because he makes more money. I believe, if Grant Stuard had been given all of Shaq's snaps we would have seen much more production from him.

Ballard wouldn’t cut him though. That’s not how Ballard rolls. I’m not saying I disagree that he shouldn’t be getting paid top tier money to be the 3rd best LB on the team, but Ballard won’t just outright cut one of the locker room leaders.

 

Ballard has shown to be really good at drafting and developing LBs, so he wouldn’t be hard to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Ballard wouldn’t cut him though. That’s not how Ballard rolls. I’m not saying I disagree that he shouldn’t be getting paid top tier money to be the 3rd best LB on the team, but Ballard won’t just outright cut one of the locker room leaders.

 

Ballard has shown to be really good at drafting and developing LBs, so he wouldn’t be hard to replace.

I get how Leonard has that locker room leadership quality, but it just don't make sense, to keep playing a guy who's a liability out there. At some point you got to put your best players on the field. Perhaps Ballard can avoid cutting Leonard, and keep him on the team? So he can stand on the sidelines for inspiration, like last year?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, csmopar said:

It’s been a month

Sept 10 first game if you wanna be technical, but I meant we're literally one day into October and he's getting killed by fans already.

 

The race for I TOLD YOU SO BRO is in full affect around here... Lol.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IinD said:

Sept 10 first game if you wanna be technical, but I meant we're literally one day into October and he's getting killed by fans already.

 

The race for I TOLD YOU SO BRO is in full affect around here... Lol.

 

 

It’s 4 games. That’s typically considered a month in the NFL world. 
 

And it’s not about being right or wrong or first. But the fact is, he doesn’t look even close to the player he once was. Sad as it is and I do feel for the guy cause I’m sure his heart definitely is still in it even if his body isn’t. But at some point, we will have to part ways with him if this level of play continues 

1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He is coming off injury and missing a year. I said about a month ago in here that would take him 8 or 9 weeks to get back to Maniac. Have patience. 

Perhaps. But I would have thought that we’d see glimpses of the old Darius by now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

It’s 4 games. That’s typically considered a month in the NFL world. 
 

And it’s not about being right or wrong or first. But the fact is, he doesn’t look even close to the player he once was. Sad as it is and I do feel for the guy cause I’m sure his heart definitely is still in it even if his body isn’t. But at some point, we will have to part ways with him if this level of play continues 

Perhaps. But I would have thought that we’d see glimpses of the old Darius by now. 

Yeah he isn’t improving. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

I get how Leonard has that locker room leadership quality, but it just don't make sense, to keep playing a guy who's a liability out there. At some point you got to put your best players on the field. Perhaps Ballard can avoid cutting Leonard, and keep him on the team? So he can stand on the sidelines for inspiration, like last year?

I wouldn’t say he’s a liability, he’s just not an asset like he used to be. A guy like Baker was a liability when he was starting at corner. Leonard just isn’t playing up to his contract and that’s as concerning. If anything Stuard should get more snaps so we can see what we have there.

 

1 minute ago, csmopar said:

And it’s not about being right or wrong or first. But the fact is, he doesn’t look even close to the player he once was. Sad as it is and I do feel for the guy cause I’m sure his heart definitely is still in it even if his body isn’t. But at some point, we will have to part ways with him if this level of play continues 

I’ll back you on that too because it’s so easy to just automatically assume a player who missed a ton of time is still “getting back to form”, but sometimes that’s not the case. That was the same thing people kept saying about Malik Hooker. Dwayne Allen is another guy that people said that about. Julian Blackmon, Parris Campbell, etc… the list goes on. Maybe he’s just not that good and peaked 2 years ago 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, csmopar said:

It’s 4 games. That’s typically considered a month in the NFL world. 
 

And it’s not about being right or wrong or first. But the fact is, he doesn’t look even close to the player he once was. Sad as it is and I do feel for the guy cause I’m sure his heart definitely is still in it even if his body isn’t. But at some point, we will have to part ways with him if this level of play continues 

Perhaps. But I would have thought that we’d see glimpses of the old Darius by now. 

C'mon now 4 games is all you need to see? 

 

I mean I get it but we aren't winning anything this year so I'm fine with him working his way back from a big injury.

 

I'm not saying I know he's great and he's back, simply how about half a year, maybe three quarters to see if he gets back to himself.

 

I totally get moving on after the season I just hate the talk about he's toast already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

I wouldn’t say he’s a liability, he’s just not an asset like he used to be. A guy like Baker was a liability when he was starting at corner. Leonard just isn’t playing up to his contract and that’s as concerning. If anything Stuard should get more snaps so we can see what we have there.

 

I’ll back you on that too because it’s so easy to just automatically assume a player who missed a ton of time is still “getting back to form”, but sometimes that’s not the case. That was the same thing people kept saying about Malik Hooker. Dwayne Allen is another guy that people said that about. Julian Blackmon, Parris Campbell, etc… the list goes on. Maybe he’s just not that good and peaked 2 years ago 🤷‍♂️

It’s not that he isn’t good. This is probably a injury that wasn’t able to be fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

It’s not that he isn’t good. This is probably an injury that wasn’t able to be fixed.

At and it’s stacked upon other injuries. If I’m not mistaken he’s had 2 concussions, an ankle injury that requires surgery, and the back injury that’s been going on for awhile. No pun intended but this last injury/surgery, is probably the straw that broke the camel’s back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the fan inside me wants him to remain a Colt icon, but the reality and doubt inside me say he will never be the same. A lot of the Colt players we have come to idolize and love end up moving on from the team in some fashion. We saw it with Luck, Castonzo, maybe Taylor soon, Hines, Mack, Doyle, Hilton

 

in reality, Leonard probably never be the same. I did see him almost rip a ball out today when someone was on their way down in a tackle, but he doesn't look as fast as he once was, is out quite a few plays, and often looks easy to move with a high frame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

I wouldn’t say he’s a liability, he’s just not an asset like he used to be. A guy like Baker was a liability when he was starting at corner. Leonard just isn’t playing up to his contract and that’s as concerning. If anything Stuard should get more snaps so we can see what we have there.

 

He just doesn't make any plays. When you do see Leonard he is never at the bottom of the pile, but rather, he comes jogging into the camera view, standing there after the whistle blows. I was watching him a few times and noticed how he can't shed a block to save his life. Yeah he picks up a few tackles every week, but never a big hit, or tackle for loss, etc.

It would be great if they would give Stuard a few reps. In the preseason he really impressed me. Quite a few times, I remember, he would come flying like a rocket in to make a nice solo open field tackle. No doubt in my mind GS would be an upgrade over Shaq at this point

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluebombers87 said:

I don’t think we’re at the cutting convo just yet. I think keep him limited or out to give him every opportunity.

 

We know who is agent is so some additional prudence wouldn’t hurt just in case.

Haha, good point regarding his agent 😂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

Ballard wouldn’t cut him though. That’s not how Ballard rolls. I’m not saying I disagree that he shouldn’t be getting paid top tier money to be the 3rd best LB on the team, but Ballard won’t just outright cut one of the locker room leaders.

 

Ballard has shown to be really good at drafting and developing LBs, so he wouldn’t be hard to replace.

You may be right about Ballard not cutting him, but if he doesn't improve all season, it doesn't make sense to keep him just because he's a locker room leader.  Your highest paid guy needs to be more than just a locker room leader.  I know you agree with this, but just saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kymd82222 said:

You may be right about Ballard not cutting him, but if he doesn't improve all season, it doesn't make sense to keep him just because he's a locker room leader.  Your highest paid guy needs to be more than just a locker room leader.  I know you agree with this, but just saying. 

Franklin has taken that leader role. I think Shaq looks kind of emotionless on the sideline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jackie Daytona said:

It's been that time for a year or so.....  I hate it, cause Leonard was so much fun to watch.  In Indy, when we get special players not named Manning or Miller, there's a law of nature stating they have to flame out quick.

James, Wayne, Harrison, Clark, Diem, Saturday, Freeney, Mathis.. calm down :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if there will be settlements to the people that have ordered the NFL package for many years   Im in it for 20 years.......  
    • Don’t worry. This is pretty common for the 2024 Reds. They always win the first game of the series in convincing fashion, and then the bats get cold for the rest of the other 2-3 games. 
    • I gotta say you make arguments that you’d never accept from your students because they’re so superficial.      So saying Ballard has been mediocre to bad is tissue paper thin.  Why hasn’t Irsay fired this mediocre to bad GM?  Because he signed off on what Ballard did each year in real time, not after the fact.   Irsay knows Ballard has an eye for talent.  And as Ballard freely admitted in January, the Colts haven’t had more success because he failed to get the QB right.  These aren’t excuses, but it IS badly needed context — which you’d realize if you weren’t always looking for new ways to hate on CB.      As to what you and Moose “supposedly said”  there’s a simple way to verify.  Go to the Day 2 draft thread of Friday April 26.  It was between 3a and 4 my time when I saw it.  I believe it was recent.  Just add 2-3 hours depending on your time zone and you can see your conversation with Moose.   What was so astonishing, what makes me “prattle on” as you put it is how you two ever thought you were right?!?   Given your career choice you jumped to conclusions I’d like to think you’d never accept from your students.   Why you thought Ballard didn’t know more?  Why you thought you two knew better?   Ballard not only knows more, he knows dramatically more.  As I said in another post, he shared the tip of the iceberg.  He doesn’t share the part of the iceberg that you can’t see.  The 90 percent.  The absence of curiosity is stunning given your occupation.    Now, at the bottom of your post you brought up a new line of attack on me and I have no idea what you’re talking about?   I’m not an optimist?   Since when?  Based on what?   In my 12 years here, only 1-2 posters have ever made that claim.   So what are you talking about?     Finally….   You can stop calling me Sir.  It’s normally said with respect.  You don’t respect me at all.   I’ve extended olive branches publicly and privately, and both have been rejected.  Your choice.  So calling me sir is intended as an insult.   It’s old and boring.   Move on.   I don’t know why you “enjoy engaging with me”.   You take a beating.  But if that’s what you’re in to, be my guest.    Sorry this went so long….       
    • He loves you, you just don't know it (sarcasm) 
    • Cubs actually won one - beat the Giants finally.
  • Members

    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 57

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,813

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEColtsLover36

      DEColtsLover36 2,117

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...