Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Stop Blaming Pagano


a06cc

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 245
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just now, a06cc said:

Did Pagano today tell the offensive line to not pick up the blitzes? Did he tell Tj Green to have a melt down in the second half? 

Show me the last time one of Pagano's teams actually played a full 60 minutes of football....... I'll wait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, a06cc said:

Did Pagano today tell the offensive line to not pick up the blitzes? Did he tell Tj Green to have a melt down in the second half? 

Amen. It was a player loss, Pagano did what he could as a coach during this game to give us the best chance. Challenge was worth it, could've gone either way. Looked like he never reached the 25 but it is what it is. At the end he had to try to give the players to make the best chance to make a play, but they couldn't, and we aren't talking about that. Mingo missed a sack on the same play Brown put the Steelers in field goal range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, a06cc said:

And last week when Sheard came through with that sack.

Swing and a miss

4 minutes ago, a06cc said:

Can’t play because of the players not holding up on their end. He coached a good game today 

Obviously you need that football for dummies book they used in the Waterboy movie. Last week was NOT playing 60 minutes of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csmopar said:

Swing and a miss

Obviously you need that football for dummies book they used in the Waterboy movie. Last week was NOT playing 60 minutes of football.

Yes it was. How wasn’t it? We finished the game this a sack. Doesn’t matter what the final score was. We won the game. I think you need to read that book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pagano is a terrible in-game coach . His lack of game awareness and bad decisions , adjustments have cost them dearly in the past . But in his defense the team is playing hard and they haven't quit. Even the most ardent Chuck hater has to give him that credit . Not easy to do when the whole team knows you are a lame duck . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, a06cc said:

Yes it was. How wasn’t it? We finished the game this a sack. Doesn’t matter what the final score was. We won the game. I think you need to read that book.

Letting a backup QB torch your defense and getting down to what, the 3 yard line and getting a lucky sack isn't playing 60 minutes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  I find it interesting that Eagles fans wanted Pederson gone after they lost to the Chiefs. Now, he should be coach of the year, according to the same fans.

  IF Ballard fires Pagano, so be it. But don’t be shocked if he takes injuries and inexperience into consideration and extends him for a year.

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, coltsfeva said:

  I find it interesting that Eagles fans wanted Pederson gone after they lost to the Chiefs. Now, he should be coach of the year, according to the same fans.

  IF Ballard fires Pagano, so be it. But don’t be shocked if he takes injuries and inexperience into consideration and extends him for a year.

   

With the Colts nothing should be suprising. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, coltsfeva said:

  I find it interesting that Eagles fans wanted Pederson gone after they lost to the Chiefs. Now, he should be coach of the year, according to the same fans.

  IF Ballard fires Pagano, so be it. But don’t be shocked if he takes injuries and inexperience into consideration and extends him for a year.

   

Nicely put

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Letting a backup QB torch your defense and getting down to what, the 3 yard line and getting a lucky sack isn't playing 60 minutes

We have a backup QB as well. Correct me if I’m wrong but the end result were the Colts with a win against HOU. If that’s not playing 60 minutes and finishing a game I don’t know what you would call it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, a06cc said:

No it’s not at all. Their grown men

Yes it is, and your an * of thinking it not Pagano leadership. "They are grown men" argument is stupid. Every time this team makes stupid penalties, miss assignments, runs the wrong route. Reflect on the leadership of Pagano of getting them ready for the game. When TJ Green made that stupid penalty on jumping on to the pile, what did chuck Pagano do, did he yell at him, did he look upset, did he grab him by his face mask and yell at him. No, he did not. Pagano does what he always does. Pull the guy to the side hold his hand and tell what he did wrong and then pat him on the butt like it was a good game. What happens when the offense come off the field after a failed 3rd down the conversation. Their he is clapping his hand and saying a good job and giving them a good job smack. Is this guy was a military leader heck the lower enlisted would run circle around this character. There is no repercussion when anything negative happens. None what so ever.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I really don't blame Chuck for today. I thought he had us prepared well today. Colts played a great game for the most part, when you play Pitt you cant make critical mistakes though. Doyle letting the ball go through his hands was the 1 critical mistake, that isn't Chuck's fault. That play resulted in 8 points for Pitt.

So true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I defended Pagano up until this season.  I looked for reasons to defend him continually, as I genuinely like him, but I can't think of any defenses at this point. 

 

Ultimately, it is his job for how the players on the field do.  The OC/DC/ST coordinators answer to him.  The players answer to him.  Of course, he cannot control everything the players and coordinators do but he answers to the GM and owner for the results. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ATL did not get Turner.  They eventually trade up in the second for an obscure 3T DT.    I read that The GM and HC wanted Latu, but the owner stepped in for Penix because he wanted a succession plan.  Read into that what you want.  Also, I guess since ATL seemed to want to trade up to 10 for Latu, its seems somebody wanted him pretty highly.   That's why there are also thoughts...don't get excited...that Ballard got a bit lucky with latu being there at 15.  Basically, the GMs had the 1st round pegged pretty well, then in swoops Blanc and reshuffles the playing deck for everyone.  LVR was mad too, because they wanted Penix at 13.  So if things would have gone to script....who knows who Ballard would have picked since Latu probably would not have been there.
    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...