Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts signing Kendall Langford


corgi

Recommended Posts

Stupid move now that I've seen the details. I guess this means he's starting, and that we want to be mediocre. I'd obviously rather have Redding at 2/6 than Langford at 4/17. If we don't get Knighton we fail in free agency.  We need to sign Knighton then draft D-Line in the 1st. And just because Grigson is the GM doesn't make him right all the time. I mean some people think every move he makes is genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 260
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Love the hate Fairley gets he is 20 times more talented then Langford and is younger but everyone is happy to have Langford over Fairley haha haha lmao ok :facepalm:

 

Like I said man. Some people just blindly follow. They think every move Grigs makes is genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look. I'm not "that guy" but seriously. If we do go into the season with Chapman and Langford starting, Grigs needs to be fired. I'm still going to have faith that he'll bring in Knighton. Its pretty simple really. Sign Knighton and have a solid D-Line, or not sign him and have a mediocre D-Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said man. Some people just blindly follow. They think every move Grigs makes is genius.

I get what your saying, but alot of people on here don't seem to factor in the fact that these free agents (quite often for the first time in there careers) have a choice as to where to go/what scheme they want to be in, ect.  This is also still the first 24 hours of free agency, we shouldn't expect a complete team at this point, IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think people realize the last time Langford was in a 3-4 scheme he was a GOOD player. Better than Redding and RJF. He is an upgrade to anything we have, and he isn't overpaid imo, its about what I expected. 

 

He was an above average pass rusher 4 years ago playing on the line with two other all-pro caliber lineman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, so a bad signing. And overpaid. If we're going by your definition of him.

RJF was overpaid but not a bad signing. Langford is cheaper and an upgrade in my opinion. Upgrade and cheaper, that's my definition since you were struggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time Langford was a productive pass rusher, he was in a 3-4 in Miami. This is a good fit, and he knows it. He says it was one of the deciding factors for him, and partly why he chose us over Detroit.

I'm a truck driver- just loaded in Denver. People there are upset, they believed they would get Langford. I asked who the Broncos signed. They said: no one- Indy's taking them all!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look. I'm not "that guy" but seriously. If we do go into the season with Chapman and Langford starting, Grigs needs to be fired. I'm still going to have faith that he'll bring in Knighton. Its pretty simple really. Sign Knighton and have a solid D-Line, or not sign him and have a mediocre D-Line.

What's the beef with Chapman?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't worried about getting out of it, just that your giving a mediocre player $5M in a year you're supposed to be going "all in" on winning a title.

Exactly. There comes a point when being smart with your guaranteed money doesn't look genius when you consider that his cap hit will still prevent us from signing other/better players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DougDew, I have disagreed with you on many things.  However, I will give credit when it is due, this is the most cogent post I remember you making, excellent.
    • You know football season is back when this forum is in meltdown mode in May... Lol
    • Yeah, I don't think their QB problem is completely solved, but going from Pickett/Trubisky for Wilson/Fields, for less money and basically some pick swaps? That's great work. Even if Wilson is cooked and Fields is a mess, there's way more upside with Fields alone, not to mention a potential baseline level of competence that Wilson might provide if he's not completely done.   Even if Wilson is pretty good, I think they'll want to get Fields on the field for meaningful snaps, just to see what they might have before he hits free agency. He's too talented to let him ride the bench all season.
    • Hopefully Pitt is ok.   Loving the vibe and energy from everyone. I truly believe it's going to be a special season 
    • I'm pretty sure there's nothing that can be added in reference to anything medical.     Offsets could be part of what's being negotiated.    More than that, I think the sticking point in this range of the draft is overall guaranteed money. From the top of the second round to the middle, the difference in overall guarantees has been slightly growing in recent years, as early second round guys are getting more guaranteed.    For example, in 2021, the #33 pick was Tyson Campbell, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1&2 salary, and part of his Year 3 salary. The #52 pick that year was Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1&2 salary. In 2023, the #33 pick was Will Levis, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1-3 salary, and part of his Year 4 salary. The #52 pick was Zach Charbonnet, and his guarantees were the same as the guy in 2021 -- signing bonus +Year 1&2 salary. So there's been a lift at the top of the second round, but it has not extended to the middle of the round. Yet.   (A slight monkey wrench last year is that the Dolphins lost their first round pick for tampering, so the #33 pick in 2023 was actually the second pick of the second round, not the first pick of the second round. That would have been #32, Joey Porter Jr, who also got guaranteed money into Year 4.)   Plus, as more gets guaranteed in this range, the offset discussion becomes more important. No one cares about offsets when only Year 1 is guaranteed. As those guarantees go into Year 3 or 4, now we need to talk about offset language. Especially since fourth year players are not subject to waivers.   So I think the middle of the second round is where there's a big sticking point right now. In 2011, this was more seen at the end of the first round (which is why Anthony Castonzo's negotiations went a few days into training camp). It keeps moving back gradually, but this explains why only 11/32 second round picks are signed so far. As the dominoes fall, everyone kind of finds their level, and then the next year's class tries to push the guarantees a little bit further. By the end of the decade, the entire second round might be getting the first three years fully guaranteed, with no offset language.   By the way, there are 20 unsigned first rounders (including eight of the top ten), and 21 unsigned second rounders (including the five players who went right before AD Mitchell, and the eight players who went right after him). So everyone should buckle up, because there's a lot of work to be done league-wide, and for the most part it has nothing to do with the individual players involved.   (Sorry this went so long, I started getting carried away.)
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...