Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Vs. Patriots Sunday Night Football Game Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know right . Can't stand that arrogant man ..

Don't get me wrong - he's a great coach. Look at the teams he fields every year. Almost always a well rounded unit.

 

That being said, the guy himself acts like a well-rounded "unit." He's a classless toad. Great at his job, but a miserable man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Colts team is a 9-7 team. 

 

Over 8 minutes left and they throw in the towel with a numbskull decision to go for it. Why not go for it on the last drive when it was 4th and 2 in the redzone? 

 

 

Emotional coaching decision, frustration .....bad bad rotten call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the Colts go on a winning streak against their weak remaining schedule remember this game and the one against Pittsburgh as reasons for any future lack of excitement regarding our prospects going forward in the playoffs. We are a one and done caliber team this year.

 

2006. Miracles can happen. Our run D was atrocious beyond all measure for the regular season (like usual) then showed up for a 4 game stretch.

 

Sadly, we don't have a Bob Sanders coming back so I wouldn't bank on it happening this year. Anything is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh...the Patriots are just the better overall team. If they avoid injuries they will be going to the SB.

The Colts and the Donks are not going to stop them...I can't see who will.

 

Agreed, I picked the colts to win but that was the homer in me talking. Gun to my head and I would have picked the patriots. They are just flat out better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
    • I suppose Murphy being the next Donald is possible, but I wouldn’t think it’s likely.     As for Smith playing right tackle, I believe I was simply echoing Ballard’s initial viewpoint.  That Smith’s short arms made him an unlikely RT.  And that he had to be talked into it by Morocco Brown and Ed Dodds.   I don’t think I was stating MY personal view.    As for skillset vs measurements.  I think it’s been an issue for all of us because Ballard has such specific requirements for each position.  So we factor that into our judgements. 
    • Bold prediction?    I will predict either Kwity or Pierce will be traded sometime during the draft.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...