Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2023 Week#3: Colts @ Ravens, Sunday, September 24, 2023, 1:00 PM EDT


NFLfan

Colts @ Ravens  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins?

    • Colts
      7
    • Ravens
      10
    • Game ends in a tie
      0
  2. 2. How many sacks will the Colts defense have?

    • None
      0
    • 1 to 2
      8
    • 3 to 4
      9
    • more than 4
      0
  3. 3. How many touchdowns will Minshew have (throwing and rushing)?

    • None
      0
    • 1
      4
    • 2
      12
    • 3
      1
    • 4 or more
      0

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 09/24/2023 at 05:05 PM

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, chickenMan said:

There are always loopholes

Because after you did it once the refs would probably flag you next time for delay of game on D. Considering they saw what Steichen was doing, they let Harbaugh counter him fo be fair, but if Harbaugh started doing that every play, the refs would stop it

They can only operate within the confines of the rules. Doesn’t appear there’s anything stopping teams from doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Coltsman1788 said:

Colts get too cute for school sometimes. Just kick the darn field goal right there. No need to overthink this stuff. 

They made the Ravens burn a TO, which was the goal. They tried it a second time to see if Harbaugh would fall for it again. They were always planning on kicking it

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chickenMan said:

They made the Ravens burn a TO, which was the goal. They tried it a second time to see if Harbaugh would fall for it again. They were always planning on kicking it

They were also intending to get a delay of game penalty to move the kick back. Much easier to make from that distance because it’s more of a straight shot instead of an angle. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

They can only operate within the confines of the rules. Doesn’t appear there’s anything stopping teams from doing that.

Like I said, the refs can and almost certainly would tell both teams to knock it off and play the game, but by rule that whole scenario could repeat itself ad infinitum if the refs let it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, krunk said:

That D Line said "We Coming!"

Grover lining heads up over the C made their backup C really nervous.

 

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Weather isn’t nearly as bad as I thought it was going to be today.

Nah. It hit us yesterday and moved through pretty quickly. A lot of rain, but it moved quick enough it didn't get too bad.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shive said:

Grover lining heads up over the C made their backup C really nervous.

 

Nah. It hit us yesterday and moved through pretty quickly. A lot of rain, but it moved quick enough it didn't get too bad.

That’s good to hear. Even a remnant tropical system can be dangerous!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IMHO , its all about perspective   If you treat Pierce as WR1, you will be disappointed   If you treat Pierce as a solid contributor, you will be pleased   - The man can block, maybe the best blocking WR on this team - The man has speed - The man can rotate in with our other WRs   I do believe that AD Mitchell will take over as a starting outside WR   The reality is, 17 games is a LONG season,    Pittman and AD Mitchell will be "fresher" for the end of the game as they are rotated in and out   The odds say that there will be injuries, and we could see Pierce be a starter on either side   I for one, WANT to keep Pierce thru his rookie deal (We will see after that)      
    • Zach Moss is no RB1.  If he showed signs he was the Bills wouldn’t have traded him for Hines who also is no RB1.  Moss is a RB 2.  A good one too.  Fortunately for him a season playing behind the Colts OL worked out favorably for him. Moss became available because we have an RB1 and the Bengals jumped at the chance to fill a hole in their lineup and Moss can do that like he did for the Colts when Taylor wasn’t available.  He is not a back teams have to worry about like they have to do for Taylor.  Every team needs an RB1.  He was the Bills RB1 for a short time and shipped off to the Colts for Hines.  And they drafted him.  He certainly belongs on a NFL roster.  I wish he stayed to back up Taylor.  But money and opportunity always talks as it should.  I worry about our RB position if something happens to Taylor for a long period.  I think we should be looking for a proven player who would be that true backup you can rely on behind Taylor.  Right now that backup position is a position that concerns me.   The other being starting FS.
    • Pierce detractors always give me a good chuckle.
    • Yup.  That’s another one that would peak my interest.  Hard to see it happening though.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...