Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts fans who don't live in Indy. Re: NFL Sunday Ticket


Recommended Posts

On 6/9/2023 at 8:22 AM, cdgacoltsfan said:

If you have YouTube ( not YouTube tv) you can search and watch footage of the 1970 Unitas led Colts . I've watched the Colts vs Jets, Dolphins and first ever AFC Championship game vs the Raiders. The AFCCG was in old Memorial Stadium and played on a basically all dirt field.

If you have YouTube ( not YouTube tv) you can search and watch footage of the 1970 Unitas led Colts . I've watched the Colts vs Jets, Dolphins and first ever AFC Championship game vs the Raiders. The AFCCG was in old Memorial Stadium and played on a basically all dirt field.

Yes, have watched lot on old Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2023 at 6:20 PM, teganslaw said:

I'm OK with NFL+ premium, which was $79 for a year subscription at the time. Colts games are on local TV and I can watch every game minutes after they've ended. Even if I already know the score, I like to see how the game developed. I never considered NFL Sunday Ticket. 

 I do the same but I listen to the game live, then watch the replay (it takes a little while to get the condensed game but the full replay - sans commercials, is available right after game ends).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, w87r said:

4k is only $4.99 a month for next 12 months right now, then goes up to $9.99 after that. Went ahead and popped that extra $5 on there.

 

Not sure if it matters but I don't think the Sunday Ticket streams are in 4K. I bought the standalone Sunday Ticket package for the season to see how it goes but I was reading, and it doesn't sound like they will offer the games in 4K, which is unfortunate. Curious to see how it will look. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Unitas2Berry said:

Define old. Well, let’s just say my hair/beard changed color many yrs ago. Yes, I guess I am an old guy. At least the mirror tells me that.

 

Old would be seeing Unitas to Berry when it actually happened. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cjrulli said:

 

Not sure if it matters but I don't think the Sunday Ticket streams are in 4K. I bought the standalone Sunday Ticket package for the season to see how it goes but I was reading, and it doesn't sound like they will offer the games in 4K, which is unfortunate. Curious to see how it will look. 

Idk about Sunday Ticket, I do know you can have unlimited streams for it under the same wi-fi.

 

YouTube TV though you can only have 3 streams unless you get the 4k. Then it is unlimited as well. Seemed like a good $5 to spend.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had it since the beginning and I don't care what it costs and I'll pay whatever the price is for the upcoming season regardless of who carries it. I care about one team and only one team in the NFL and that is the team I will watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Some people think I am old when I bring up games I went to when Dickerson was here in 1987, I have nothing on the Unitas to Berry folks chuckling homer simpson GIF

 

Doesn't seem like 60 years ago when I watched those games. I didn't get to see the Colts all that much as I grew up in central NY. As to you watching Dickerson , you're just a kid. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, King Colt said:

I have had it since the beginning and I don't care what it costs and I'll pay whatever the price is for the upcoming season regardless of who carries it. I care about one team and only one team in the NFL and that is the team I will watch.

Luckily I live in Indianapolis, 10 minutes from LOS. I get every game free. I have lived here all my life being the Indianapolis area so since 1984 I have rarely missed a game. Been to around 50 or so games, mostly in the Peyton era. LOS is a nicer stadium, but I liked the RCA dome better, that place was a mad house and people partied liked crazy back in those days in and outside of the dome. In 2006 we had a true HFA when we won it all.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at tvyoutube.com just now it seems you sign on for their service at $64.99 for the first three months then it rises to $72.99 per month. This is for their basic plan and you must have it to get NFL TICKET. Now you add NFL TICKET for $349. Add these charges up and you pay $1,071 for the year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, King Colt said:

Looking at tvyoutube.com just now it seems you sign on for their service at $64.99 for the first three months then it rises to $72.99 per month. This is for their basic plan and you must have it to get NFL TICKET. Now you add NFL TICKET for $349. Add these charges up and you pay $1,071 for the year.

I ditched Hulu, which was $70+, so I will be saving a little for first 3 months.

 

 

They just had a promo of $100 off Sunday Ticket.

 

Think I broke Sunday Ticket during the promo down to around $13 a week(18 weeks). For unlimited streams, mighty good deal.

 

 

Saying that, you can get Sunday Ticket stand alone package. It $449 now, was $349 during promo that ended last week.

 

$25 a week(18 weeks)without promo on the stand alone package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, King Colt said:

Looking at tvyoutube.com just now it seems you sign on for their service at $64.99 for the first three months then it rises to $72.99 per month. This is for their basic plan and you must have it to get NFL TICKET. Now you add NFL TICKET for $349. Add these charges up and you pay $1,071 for the year.

It's all about the money now days. I have U-Verse with hi speed internet and have all the sports channels and movie channels = all the Showtimes, HBO's, and Cinemax's. I pay $120 a month/4 different TV's but have everything. If I did away with the movie channels that would chop it down to $80 a month. I probably will soon because I don't watch much TV but it is cool to get home from work in the morning and to be able to find a good movie on just by flipping through the channels. 80X12 would put me at $960 a year. I don't need NFL ticket because of where I live so I stick with U-Verse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember back when I was a kid, probably 10 or so when cable first came out. There was only 1 HBO, 1 Showtime, 1 Cinemax, and 1 ESPN channel. MTV was huge back then too. That was in 1980/81 Happy The Simpsons GIF- I thought that and the Commadore 64 was the best inventions ever made. Off topic but there were 2 games for the 64 that I played 24/7 = Stats Football and Star Rank Boxing. Stats football, you were the coach and called plays on whatever team you chose. I had discs of NFL teams from 1985-1989 back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to an article on msn.com, the estimated cost for NFL Sunday Ticket on YouTube TV is around $300 per season. This is a standalone service that can be added to an existing $65 monthly plan or purchased separately. The deal between YouTube TV and the NFL is worth roughly $2 billion per year. The service will be available starting September 10, 2023.

 

Add this to what posts are on here I don't know what to believe,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/7/2023 at 5:43 AM, stitches said:

What does this Sunday ticket include? Do you get all 22 film?

All out-of-market games every week of the regular season Example, if you live in Houston you watch the Texans on the local channel while you can watch all of the other games on YouTube TV channels without subscribing for their regular package if you chose not to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2023 at 4:42 PM, King Colt said:

Looking at tvyoutube.com just now it seems you sign on for their service at $64.99 for the first three months then it rises to $72.99 per month. This is for their basic plan and you must have it to get NFL TICKET. Now you add NFL TICKET for $349. Add these charges up and you pay $1,071 for the year.

Well, Direct TV was around $100 per month ( it varied with them ...always had to call them to dispute  constant increases and discrepancies) plus $350 for the ticket. Total $1550 per year. I will say once in awhile you could call and threaten to cancel and they would give you the ticket for nothing to keep you as a customer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

Well, Direct TV was around $100 per month ( it varied with them ...always had to call them to dispute  constant increases and discrepancies) plus $350 for the ticket. Total $1550 per year. I will say once in awhile you could call and threaten to cancel and they would give you the ticket for nothing to keep you as a customer.

My post was wrong because yesterday I saw a source saying you can order NFL Ticket only without adding the You Tube for $70/mo. It costs one hundred more but you don't pay the $70/mo. Also you can get $50 off through most of September by signing up before they close the offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, King Colt said:

My post was wrong because yesterday I saw a source saying you can order NFL Ticket only without adding the You Tube for $70/mo. It costs one hundred more but you don't pay the $70/mo. Also you can get $50 off through most of September by signing up before they close the offer.

Yep. I  canceled Direct TV and ordered the ticket for $350 a few weeks ago. Maybe now if it's raining, I can watch the games. Picture would freeze during rain storms when I had Direct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

Yep. I  canceled Direct TV and ordered the ticket for $350 a few weeks ago. Maybe now if it's raining, I can watch the games. Picture would freeze during rain storms when I had Direct.

Agreed. smart tv is much better, no outages

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I miss the days of the big Satellite dishes in the 1990's would get all the game on wild feed just has to start looking about 30 minutes before kickoff. Often times when they would go to commercial you heard announcers talk freely not realizing a few fortunate viewers heard every word 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2023 at 2:43 AM, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

$350 is pricey for the out of towners but it does give a fan to watch his team and give enjoyment (or grief,lol) and that's what life is all  about....enjoyment and watch your team if you choose to. 

 

But as packages go, the NFL ticket doesn't compare to a MLB's enjoyment for less money..

In the NFL your viewing window is a early game & and a late game on Sundays. In MLB, it's all day, everyday thruout  the season.

 

Anyway, for those that choose to subscribe, ENJOY.

Less than the price for one game live, generally speaking!
 

Further to my authorized streamer in Canada, DZN, it works with a VPN when I am out of country (ie. my place in Mexico).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2023 at 4:05 PM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I remember back when I was a kid, probably 10 or so when cable first came out. There was only 1 HBO, 1 Showtime, 1 Cinemax, and 1 ESPN channel. MTV was huge back then too. That was in 1980/81 Happy The Simpsons GIF- I thought that and the Commadore 64 was the best inventions ever made. Off topic but there were 2 games for the 64 that I played 24/7 = Stats Football and Star Rank Boxing. Stats football, you were the coach and called plays on whatever team you chose. I had discs of NFL teams from 1985-1989 back then.

1980/1981, grade 12, the year I graduated high school. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

80's was such a great decade for sports, music, shows, movies, and technology/cable TV. No internet or cell phone yet - during the late 80's we had an idea that was even coming but other than that the 80's ruled. 

 

I'm going to have to disagree about music.  The 80s had dreadful music, maybe the worst decade in the last 70 years!

 

I know it's subjective, but I'll take the 70s, 60s, 90s, 50s, and the 21 century over the 80s, LOL!  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Smonroe said:

 

I'm going to have to disagree about music.  The 80s had dreadful music, maybe the worst decade in the last 70 years!

 

I know it's subjective, but I'll take the 70s, 60s, 90s, 50s, and the 21 century over the 80s, LOL!  

 

 

The rise of New Wave Alt music and punk music.  80s were superb!  90s grunge and pop punk, were also terrific!

 

So says this old punk, only 2 months away from turning … 60!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rockywoj said:

The rise of New Wave Alt music and punk music.  80s were superb!  90s grunge and pop punk, were also terrific!

 

So says this old punk, only 2 months away from turning … 60!


We’ll have to agree to disagree.  But as an old rocker, I’ll tip one for you in a couple months young man!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Smonroe said:


We’ll have to agree to disagree.  But as an old rocker, I’ll tip one for you in a couple months young man!

 

 

Ah, so you’re partial to the 70s.  My first real band affair was with Pink Floyd, who remains amongst my favs, despite Roger Waters apparent decline into lunacy. lol

 

Cheers!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rockywoj said:

Ah, so you’re partial to the 70s.  My first real band affair was with Pink Floyd, who remains amongst my favs, despite Roger Waters apparent decline into lunacy. lol

 

Cheers!


Saw Floyd at Kent State, I think it was in 74. Waters must have indulged too much. Been a Bruce fan since the 70s.  But I like almost all music.  
 

Colts related - the genius Prince gave the greatest SB halftime show ever.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten Sunday ticket for years. Usually have one tv with the Colts on it and one that I have on redzone most the time, but also follow fantasy players or games I'm more interested in. Works well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ATL did not get Turner.  They eventually trade up in the second for an obscure 3T DT.    I read that The GM and HC wanted Latu, but the owner stepped in for Penix because he wanted a succession plan.  Read into that what you want.  Also, I guess since ATL seemed to want to trade up to 10 for Latu, its seems somebody wanted him pretty highly.   That's why there are also thoughts...don't get excited...that Ballard got a bit lucky with latu being there at 15.  Basically, the GMs had the 1st round pegged pretty well, then in swoops Blanc and reshuffles the playing deck for everyone.  LVR was mad too, because they wanted Penix at 13.  So if things would have gone to script....who knows who Ballard would have picked since Latu probably would not have been there.
    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...