Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Weather Forecast for Saturday's Game Does a 360


dw49

Recommended Posts

Click on Saturday.  It says storm total 3 to 6 inches.  Friday night to Saturday,  I presume.

 

As long as it stops by noon, as predicted, it shouldn't matter.  Heated field - field should be covered.  You'll just have snow piled up on the sidelines, as I believe they did the last time we won in KC.

 

If it hits later or is worse than currently predicted, you have a completely different game.

 

Might alter travel plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t see that on accuweather. I saw less then one inch. I also saw something that it was going  to be dry for both AFC games.

 

3 minutes ago, #12. said:

Click on Saturday.  It says storm total 3 to 6 inches.  Friday night to Saturday,  I presume 

 

As long as it stops by noon, as predicted, it shouldn't matter.  Heated field - field should be covered.  You'll just have snow piled up on the sidelines, as I believe they did the last time we won in KC.

 

If it hits later or is worse than currently predicted, you have a completely different game.

 

Might alter travel plans.

 

 

#12.. are you sure that's not centimeters they are talking about ? If so that would be around 2.5 inches 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi y'all. Operational Meteorologist chiming in here.

 

Current National Weather Service forecast calls for 1-3 inches Friday night. Temperatures will be above freezing Saturday, so precipitation looks to be rain, with the chance hanging out pretty much the entire game.

 

Gameplan: Give Mack 40 carries, and Hines 15. Run, run, and run the ball some more RIGHT behind Kelly and Q.

Lets go Colts!!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, #12. said:

https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article224220475.html

 

3-5 inches with a chance of snow lingering throughout Saturday afternoon and through Saturday night.  Even worse in the central part of the state, which could create problems for traveling Colt fans.

This is pretty * big. Let's hope it stays that way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2019 at 5:44 PM, HarryTheCat said:

Sunday will be a bad day for the guy who does the Chiefs' laundry, however. Lots of mud and grass stains on the backs of their D-Line and LB jerseys, and some nasty stains on the inside of the uniform pants.

Hopefully they will have a whole year to get those stains out! :funny:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GusFring said:

I feel cheated with the bad weather. Cold was fine, but rain or snow and the game will be horrible to watch

I think it’s supposed to be over by gametime. I see where your coming from. I think if we lose we will feel we got cheated that conditions were not good. If we win we will laugh because the chiefs couldn’t do what they wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think if we lose we will feel we got cheated that conditions were not good.

 

?

 

Wouldn't bad weather conditions benefit the team that runs the ball and stops the run better than the other team?  (The Colts)  And be a hindrance to the team more reliant on the deep passing game?  (The Chiefs)

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

?

 

Wouldn't bad weather conditions benefit the team that runs the ball and stops the run better than the other team?  (The Colts)  And be a hindrance to the team more reliant on the deep passing game?  (The Chiefs)

My point was not knowing the result we can’t reallt predict how we will feel with the weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

My point was not knowing the result we can’t reallt predict how we will feel with the weather.

 

I'm still not sure I follow.

 

Of course I want a Colts win, no matter what the weather is like.

 

But if I had a choice, I'd love a snow-game.  That's real playoff football!  (Plus, it would be to the Colts advantage, or more precisely to the Chiefs disadvantage)  :thmup:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

I'm still not sure I follow.

 

Of course I want a Colts win, no matter what the weather is like.

 

But if I had a choice, I'd love a snow-game.  That's real playoff football!  (Plus, it would be to the Colts advantage, or more precisely to the Chiefs disadvantage)  :thmup:

If we lose a snow and cold game we will feel cheated because we might not of been able to give our best effort.

 

If we win  cold snow game we will be jumping for joy because it probably effected the chiefs high flying offense. 

 

A cold snow game doesn’t necessarily mean the colts will have the advantage. We can think that but until the game is played we don’t know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

If we lose a snow and cold game we will feel cheated because we might not of been able to give our best effort.

 

I guess I can see that.

 

The Colts might have won the Bills game last year if it hadn't been in a blizzard with a foot of snow on the ground.  And a Colts win is more important than enjoying a good snow-game.

 

But I love snow-games.  There's something magical about football in the snow.  :scoregood:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ebron has played in some cold and snow games when he was with the lions. He said he loves them. Leonard was dancing in the cold and snow yesterday. So seeing those two guys it doesn’t seem that it will effect them to much. But I still don’t completly trust this team in the cold and snow.

 

Everyone wants to play NE if we win this game. I would rather play the chargers where the weather will be gorgeous and the stadium might be half colt fans.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to remember a BIG rain storm was expected for our "playoff" game in Tennessee.  It never materialized until ,arguably, it benefitted us (late).

  If things turn out well this time weather-wise,  then i'm convinced this team is on a "higher" purposed quest.

 

My vote is to run the ball down their throat in the snow and our guys can get a tan next week in LA (hopefully).

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

I seem to remember a BIG rain storm was expected for our "playoff" game in Tennessee.  It never materialized until ,arguably, it benefitted us (late).

  If things turn out well this time weather-wise,  then i'm convinced this team is on a "higher" purposed quest.

 

My vote is to run the ball down their throat in the snow and our guys can get a tan next week in LA (hopefully).

  

Turn out well as in snow heavily?

 

and yes AMEN! Let’s run ourselves right on over to Los Angeles :goodluck:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎1‎/‎8‎/‎2019 at 12:13 AM, Mr.Debonair said:

With Mahomes arm, I dont know that it matters that much. 

No, but with 0 degrees and 100% chance of snow, it hinders the Chiefs primary weapon, which is passing. With us having the better run game, no offense to Damien Williams, and the lack of the Chiefs run D, it will significantly help us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, #12. said:

Looks like it's still snowing at 4:00 PM to me.  If this is right, it will be snowing right up through kickoff.

usa_039.jpg

from what I am seeing it looks to be snowing before anyone even wakes up in the morning on through to the end of the game. Now how much sticks is another story, but it could mean a lot of snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of it would be cleared off.  They'll have the field covered, but they have to take the tarp off for a few hours before the game for warmups, so whatever hits in that time period would be on the field.  They do have a heated field, but I'm not sure how much effect that will have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

?

 

Wouldn't bad weather conditions benefit the team that runs the ball and stops the run better than the other team?  (The Colts)  And be a hindrance to the team more reliant on the deep passing game?  (The Chiefs)

I'm not sure poor field conditions would benefit the Colts.  

On a good field, I think the Colts running game is easily going to do well against the Chiefs.  I'm afraid poor conditions may level the playing field a bit.  

 

I had myself convinced that the Colts could take KC down.   Now we may have to deal with a bit of an X factor.

 

But I have always loved weather games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2019 at 4:29 PM, #12. said:

Click on Saturday.  It says storm total 3 to 6 inches.  Friday night to Saturday,  I presume.

 

As long as it stops by noon, as predicted, it shouldn't matter.  Heated field - field should be covered.  You'll just have snow piled up on the sidelines, as I believe they did the last time we won in KC.

 

If it hits later or is worse than currently predicted, you have a completely different game.

 

Might alter travel plans.

 

Yep, field will definitely be covered, & I just found out about the heated field today. The Chiefs are basically a dome team, who knew?

 

https://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/article121635667.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

I just checked, it looks like snow throughout the night and day. 

 

A lot of our guys played in the Buffalo game last year. This won't be that, of course, but if we're the more physical team -- and I think we are -- the weather is to our advantage.

I think that Buffalo game might serve as advantage for those that played in it last year tomorrow.  

 

I remember Saturday talking about doing cold ball drills before the Ravens game in 06 because there was a chance of rain in that game and how he hated it but also saying how it paid off for them in the Super Bowl when it did rain.

 

If you recall the Bears struggled with the elements early putting the ball on the ground twice.  The Colts had some issues with it but not as many and looked like they were more prepared for the weather, which according to Saturday they were.  

 

We might see something like that tomorrow.  I honestly don’t know KC’s history of snow games but snow games are hard to prepare for unless you have played in them.  Clearly the Colts played in the mother of all snow game last year and while this won’t be like that guys can probably draw on that experience.  

 

Still, if weather is a fact this game will come down to protecting the ball and establishing control up front.  On paper the Colts should be able to do that but  KC’s lines aren’t bad.  I think bigger question will be how can Patrick handle the nerves of his first playoff game and can he protect the ball in less than idle conditions.  He’s had issues with fumbles this year.  If the Colts can make him put the ball on the ground or pick it off and turn it into points that will really help their chances.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The defense plays better when Paye is out there. Like him or not. The defense as a whole just plays better when he’s on the field. 
    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...