Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2016 Colts Forum Mock Draft 2.0


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 426
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

@stitches and the Chicago Bears are on the clock with the #11 pick

 

Updated draft board:

1-1 Los Angeles Rams: Carson Wentz, QB, North Dakota State
1-2 Cleveland Browns: Jared Goff, QB, California
1-3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (trade): Jalen Ramsey, CB, Florida State
1-4 Dallas Cowboys: DeForest Buckner, DE, Oregon
1-5 Jacksonville Jaguars: Laremy Tunsil, OT, Ole Miss
1-6 Baltimore Ravens: Joey Bosa, DL, Ohio State
1-7 San Francisco 49ers: Myles Jack, OLB, UCLA
1-8 Philadelphia Eagles: Ezekiel Elliot, RB, Ohio State
1-9 San Diego Chargers (trade): Eli Apple, CB, Ohio State
1-10 New Orleans Saints (trade): Vernon Hargreaves, CB, Florida
1-11 Chicago Bears
1-12 New York Giants (trade):
1-13 Miami Dolphins
1-14 Oakland Raiders
1-15 Tennessee Titans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 21isSuperman said:

The original intention was to keep it to just draft picks, but I think it would be more fun if we allowed players to be traded as well.  I'm all for it if everyone else is

Ok. I will check back to see what you decide.  Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

@21isSuperman Are we allowed to trade active players (reasonable trades,  of course)? 

 

2 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

The original intention was to keep it to just draft picks, but I think it would be more fun if we allowed players to be traded as well.  I'm all for it if everyone else is

 

@tweezy32  @Superman @Yehoodi @stitches @jvan1973 @nerukamo @WarGhost21 @QwizBoy @CheezyColt @Exodus @chad72 @MTC @bap03Colts @OffensivelyPC @danlhart87 @NFLfan @Footballlax31 @The Brazilian Ninja @Traines @NorthernBlue @twfish

 

Any objections to trading players?  As with trades, 3 veto/objection votes means we won't do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

Im fine with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 21isSuperman said:

 

Im not fine with it this late in the draft because it affects positions of need for a team and the team behind it that anticipated a player being there prior to the trade would have to scamper for a last minute trade that they may have had time to plan had it been prior to the draft starting.

 

I'd have to say trading draft picks can be done during the draft while trading active players is best done before the draft starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Im not fine with it this late in the draft because it affects positions of need for a team and the team behind it that anticipated a player being there prior to the trade would have to scamper for a last minute trade that they may have had time to plan had it been prior to the draft starting.

 

I'd have to say trading draft picks can be done during the draft while trading active players is best done before the draft starts.

Draft day trades of players happens quite often

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 21isSuperman said:

I have no issue with this. I think it adds a very interesting dynamics 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Giants have a new head coach who was their offensive coordinator in years past.  In addition, Eli is 35 and we need to surround him with more talent.  We re-signed JPP and brought in Olivier Vernon to add some defensive talent.  In addition, we signed Janoris Jenkins and Snacks Harrison to bolster our defense even more.  We love what we have in ODB/OBJ, but we don't think we can rely on Victor Cruz as our #2 receiver after Randle left.  As such, with the 12th pick in the draft, the Giants select Laquon Treadwell, WR, Ole Miss

 

@Superman and the Dolphins are on the clock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

There is a trade to announce.

 

@NFLfan and the Vikings receive: 2nd round pick

@jvan1973 and the Cowboys receive: Adrian Peterson

 

Both GMs please confirm this trade

 

Personally, I love it since it's a big name switching places.  However, as with all trades, this is subject to the veto rule.

 

Confirmed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

There is a trade to announce.

 

@NFLfan and the Vikings receive: 2nd round pick

@jvan1973 and the Cowboys receive: Adrian Peterson

 

Both GMs please confirm this trade

 

Personally, I love it since it's a big name switching places.  However, as with all trades, this is subject to the veto rule.

 

2nd round pick for a 31 year old RB? ehh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

There is a trade to announce.

 

@NFLfan and the Vikings receive: 2nd round pick

@jvan1973 and the Cowboys receive: Adrian Peterson

 

Both GMs please confirm this trade

 

Personally, I love it since it's a big name switching places.  However, as with all trades, this is subject to the veto rule.

I confirm.    The Vikings also agree to take half of ADs remaining salary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

Draft day trades of players happens quite often

 

Not even close to the volume of draft day pick trades, IMO. The big reason is working out salaries of established players. Patriots don't wake up on draft day and decide to trade Chandler Jones and so on...

 

Unless someone one pulks an Eli like stunt on draft day, most teams have already worked out trades for established players. Most trades are for drafted players if players are involved.

 

Is it fun? Yes it is. Is it realistic? I barely think so. But I'll go with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Not even close to the volume of draft day pick trades, IMO. The big reason is working out salaries of established players. Patriots don't wake up on draft day and decide to trade Chandler Jones and so on...

 

Unless someone one pulks an Eli like stunt on draft day, most teams have already worked out trades for established players. Most trades are for drafted players if players are involved.

 

Is it fun? Yes it is. Is it realistic? I barely think so. But I'll go with it.

Of course not.    But draft day trades including players happens 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated draft:

1-1 Los Angeles Rams: Carson Wentz, QB, North Dakota State
1-2 Cleveland Browns: Jared Goff, QB, California
1-3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (trade): Jalen Ramsey, CB, Florida State
1-4 Dallas Cowboys: DeForest Buckner, DE, Oregon
1-5 Jacksonville Jaguars: Laremy Tunsil, OT, Ole Miss
1-6 Baltimore Ravens: Joey Bosa, DL, Ohio State
1-7 San Francisco 49ers: Myles Jack, OLB, UCLA
1-8 Philadelphia Eagles: Ezekiel Elliot, RB, Ohio State
1-9 San Diego Chargers (trade): Eli Apple, CB, Ohio State
1-10 New Orleans Saints (trade): Vernon Hargreaves, CB, Florida
1-11 Chicago Bears - Ronnie Stanley, OT, Notre Dame
1-12 New York Giants (trade): Laquon Treadwell, WR, Ole Miss
1-13 Miami Dolphins
1-14 Oakland Raiders
1-15 Tennessee Titans

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Does a reporter bear any responsibility about what he includes in his pieces? Sourced or not? Is everything a source tell you printable? Is everything worth printing? BTW I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I just wonder if there are any ethical considerations a reporter might have when reporting on this type of touchy subject, especially when some of those anonymous scouts might have vested interest in a player getting drafted higher or lower than currently projected? 
    • Again….   McGinn didn’t do the damage to Mitchell.  The scouts did.     And there are columnists like McGinn at every major paper.  Their job is to gather info and report it, whether it’s popular or not.    Let me turn this around.  Hypothetically, a few years from now if Mitchell doesn’t pan out and he’s moody and difficult to deal with and he’s a bust, then the scouts will have been proven correct.  And people here will say McGinn’s column was spot on.   Another person who should’ve handled his business better is Mitchell himself.  He’s been living with this since he was roughly 16.   And scouts said he interviewed badly with them.   Even Mitchell admits it.     I don’t think this is as black and white as it seems to you.      To be clear…. I love Mitchell.  Glad we drafted him.  I’ve said several times that Ballard defending him draft night was smart and scored points with the kid.  Now he comes out and says that exact thing.  He appreciates that Ballard defended him so hard and he wants to pay the Colts and Ballard back by being the best player he can be.   
    • I’d say those teams that lost had worse defenses compared to the winners. That’s not to say that their defenses were bad, they just weren’t as clutch in the big moment.    To me, defense matters a whole lot when you need a stop or a momentum change.    Look at all of the star studded power offense teams of the last decade who were incapable of winning it all. 
    • Oops that’s my mistake. Yeah I completely missed that. My apologies.   But yeah he’s one I would keep an eye on for us next year. Him and Will Johnson. It’s a little early to be talking about what the Colts would do in the draft, but I would put money on this being the year Ballard takes a DB high. I could also see him go D-Line again. I love college football and watch as much of it as I can, but I’ll be paying attention to a lot of the guys you listed at those positions. Last season I watched a lot of the teams that had the elite receivers (Washington, Texas, LSU, FSU, etc…).   I’m also getting ready to fire my draft podcasts I listen to back up and look at summer scouting. I’ll come back for some discussions as I get info as I always enjoy talking prospects with you.
    • The issue some may have is the kind of journalism where Bob McGinn created an article that affected a young man's career based solely upon anonymous sources.   I'm confident you will reply back referring to your experience as a journalist with some version of 'without anonymous sources, there would be no journalism'. I value reading your insight about how sports are covered and I don't disagree that anonymous sources can be important. Its fair for anonymous sources to give background about things they are not comfortable saying out loud.   However, I'll add that perhaps its also fair for Bob McGinn to use his anonymous sources to help him find the story and craft the story, but if nobody will put their name on it then Bob McGinn needs to dig deeper before he launches infotainment into the world. He can't take back the damage he did to AD Mitchell.    
  • Members

    • Jackie Daytona

      Jackie Daytona 3,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 88

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robin

      Robin 187

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BeanDiasucci

      BeanDiasucci 751

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,968

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • All Outta Luck

      All Outta Luck 4

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,518

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 133

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...