Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

what the heck happened to our defense?


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

1 thing that's being overlooked is how poorly our LB's claimed their coverage assignments. 

 

I feel our coaches let us down more than anything when it came to blocking assignments on offense. The playcalling was asking for too much time for routes to develop. 

 

Yep D'Qwell give up many 3rd and long letting the TE catch and run for the first down, and i saw a couple of plays where they LB blitzed and the DLine stand up to cover and i was like what the heck is Redding doing on cover, i think Werner still needs to work on coverage he can't cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It means they aren't as good as everyone thought they were and that things always level out. Did you really think they were the best third down team in the NFL? Did you think they were a good sack team? The other shoe just dropped.

 

Umm, yeah, they were the best third down team in the league. That's a stat, not a judgment. Still are, I believe.

 

Good sack team? Well yeah, again, that's a stat. The numbers are what they are.

 

I never thought the defense was the absolute best in the league, that we'd throttle everyone we played and never give up a third down again. The defense always had vulnerabilities (every defense does, really). I don't know how that means they were/are "frauds." That's not what that word means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll throw in my 2cents.. Do you think the loss of Roberts mother had anything to do with it? I'm not sure if he was on the side lines. As the team has always preached is family.. Maybe they too were affected? Still was a bad game but that happens!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 i think Werner still needs to work on coverage he can't cover.

Boy ...he got fooled hard on that late game 4th&1 conversion for a TD, didn't he? Miller wraped around real sneaky like and Wener was completely lost. To his credit, that was an excellent call with superb execution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I have an observation. After spending many years in the Military in a leadership role, around Sailors and Marines, SEALS, etc. the one conclusion I have come to is that the difference between high performance teams like the SEALS and RECON and high performance defenses in the NFL is the identity/mental factor. Military teams have an identity that they totally buy into 100% of the time. The Colts defense isn't that way and here's why. 

 

Being "humble" is great in theory. Being a GOD fearing man, I get why that's necessary to speak to. But, in a professional sport such as football, being humble can be misconstrued. If you dominate one game and suck the next, its because you haven't totally bought in to the mentality it takes to BE dominant...at ALL times, game in and game out. Every astute observer knows its a mental thing. The dominant defenses of the past bought in to the belief that they were dominant ALL the time and they didn't apologize for that, or ask for humility. I never heard SEALS or RECON saying, "hey, we're the best at what we do, but we should remain humble".  This sends a subconscious message that 'hey, we actually aren't as good as we think, we just had ONE great game, so we should remain humble and not really buy into the idea that we ARE great'. That duality cant coexist in the mind. The underlying notion is that the dominance was really a surprise, instead of whats expected ALL of the time.This makes for hesitant responses when confronted with challenge.  And any split second mental hesitation can get you killed. There is no other rational explanation as to why the Steelers completely dominated us up front on both sides of the ball unless its mental. They weren't any bigger or stronger than the Bengal offensive line. They just bought into the notion that they were better then our lineman and they were not going to be denied or beaten with no reservations about it.

 

You never hear teams like the Patriots or Steelers or any other perennially powerful teams ever apologize or downgrade a dominant performance. They don't place a humility stamp on it because they know better. Yes, they may be considered arrogant or whatever, but you have to respect the fact that they bring it most of the time. They expect that to happen every time they take the field. That's what the great Military teams, the SEALS and Marines do year in and year out. Until our defensive mindset takes that turn, we'll see more up and down performances like the last two weeks from now on.  The coaches need to teach greatness into the mindset of the players and once a great performance happens, they should say, "that's who we are", not "well, we're starting to get to be what we want, but we aren't really there yet". The defensive team, from the players to the coaches should understand, "HELL yeah, THAT'S  the defensive team we ARE and that's the team that's going to show up EVERY week. Nobody is going to win them all since yes, this IS the NFL, but you'd see more outstanding performances more often than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Chuck said they needed to stay humble and work hard.  Judging by this performance, perhaps that didn't happen. 

 

You need years - a large body of work - to have true confidence, like that of the Steelers and Ravens of the past.  Otherwise, it's just false bravado everyone can see through anyway.  A 3 game stretch won't do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was no pass rush and the blitzes were late, Jackson being on the field on 3rd downs hurt as well because he can't cover.  Big Ben had too much time in the pocket, hard for any CB to cover for 5 seconds. We were just out coached. Tomlin, Haley, and Lebeau showed the rest of the league the blueprint on how to beat the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy ...he got fooled hard on that late game 4th&1 conversion for a TD, didn't he? Miller wraped around real sneaky like and Wener was completely lost. To his credit, that was an excellent call with superb execution. 

He also dropped to cover and cos he has no experience on cover A. Brown caught a ball within 1yrd from Wener, actually all the LB played awful no pressure no coverage no game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm, yeah, they were the best third down team in the league. That's a stat, not a judgment. Still are, I believe.

 

Good sack team? Well yeah, again, that's a stat. The numbers are what they are.

 

I never thought the defense was the absolute best in the league, that we'd throttle everyone we played and never give up a third down again. The defense always had vulnerabilities (every defense does, really). I don't know how that means they were/are "frauds." That's not what that word means.

 

 

I know the stats but they won't finish there. You know exactly what I meant. Is HOAX a better word?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our biggest weakness was exploited and we knew going into this season that our pass rush was going to struggle without Mathis.  We have nobody that could replace Mathis' production and Werner is not ready to be a consistent pass rusher.  Pittsburgh's offensive line man handled us out there and when you cannot get after the QB you are going to get ripped to shreds.  Even if Davis was out there we would have still got ripped.  DBs cannot guard these WRs forever and Brown's second TD was an example.  

 

Our DB did a good job covering him, but because he had almost six seconds to sit back there Brown was able to improvise and get open for an easy touchdown.  

 

We are not as bad as we were last night, but I do not think we are as great as we thought we were during our win streak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blitzing was ineffective all afternoon and left large holes in the middle. It was clear early on that front seven was not going to penetrate the Steeler offensive line. And still we threw blitz after blitz at them. So ineffeffective was the blitz that Ben calmly stood back in the pocket and delivered the ball with ease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vontae Davis happened.

When our secondary can't cover the receivers, our long developing blitz schemes no longer work.

Their part I don't understand, is why we put Butler on the outside and Gordy in the slot. This makes zero sense. Gordy should've been outside and Butler left in the slot.

I would've rather just seen Purifoy come in for Davis and left everyone else in the same spot.

So your saying put the 3rd cb on the 3rd wr. And put the 4th cb on the 2nd wr? How does that make sense.. lets put the worse cb on the better wr.. thatll work
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I like Werner, the guy has proven to be little more than average. Will he continue to progress? Perhaps. I say yes, but we can't afford to lose more time in the absense of a real threat at pass rusher. We need guys that shake blocks. This isn't happening on a consistent enough basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 thing that's being overlooked is how poorly our LB's claimed their coverage assignments.

I feel our coaches let us down more than anything when it came to blocking assignments on offense. The playcalling was asking for too much time for routes to develop.

Whoever was supposed to cover Heath Miller was a huge failure. He was open all game long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of hte better QBs in the league had a career night.  I mean, our defense wasn't playing well and we didn't get much pass rush.  But worse defenses have done better against even Peyton Manning.  You just can't defend 80% completion rate for 500 some yards and 6-0 TDs/INTs.  When a guy (and his offense for that matter) is just THAT in the zone, you're not going to win.  Like, they kicked us in the teeth on a night that wasn't our best night.  Yeah, we could hvae played better, but even if we did, would it really have mattered?  They aren't 20-some points better than us, it was just their night.  It happens.  Just forget it and move on to the next guy.  We'll be fine.

"Yeah, we could hvae played better, but even if we did, would it really have mattered" ummm,is that a trick question?Yes.Most of the time playing good is better than playing badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I have an observation. After spending many years in the Military in a leadership role, around Sailors and Marines, SEALS, etc. the one conclusion I have come to is that the difference between high performance teams like the SEALS and RECON and high performance defenses in the NFL is the identity/mental factor. Military teams have an identity that they totally buy into 100% of the time. The Colts defense isn't that way and here's why. 

 

Being "humble" is great in theory. Being a GOD fearing man, I get why that's necessary to speak to. But, in a professional sport such as football, being humble can be misconstrued. If you dominate one game and suck the next, its because you haven't totally bought in to the mentality it takes to BE dominant...at ALL times, game in and game out. Every astute observer knows its a mental thing. The dominant defenses of the past bought in to the belief that they were dominant ALL the time and they didn't apologize for that, or ask for humility. I never heard SEALS or RECON saying, "hey, we're the best at what we do, but we should remain humble".  This sends a subconscious message that 'hey, we actually aren't as good as we think, we just had ONE great game, so we should remain humble and not really buy into the idea that we ARE great'. That duality cant coexist in the mind. The underlying notion is that the dominance was really a surprise, instead of whats expected ALL of the time.This makes for hesitant responses when confronted with challenge.  And any split second mental hesitation can get you killed. There is no other rational explanation as to why the Steelers completely dominated us up front on both sides of the ball unless its mental. They weren't any bigger or stronger than the Bengal offensive line. They just bought into the notion that they were better then our lineman and they were not going to be denied or beaten with no reservations about it.

 

You never hear teams like the Patriots or Steelers or any other perennially powerful teams ever apologize or downgrade a dominant performance. They don't place a humility stamp on it because they know better. Yes, they may be considered arrogant or whatever, but you have to respect the fact that they bring it most of the time. They expect that to happen every time they take the field. That's what the great Military teams, the SEALS and Marines do year in and year out. Until our defensive mindset takes that turn, we'll see more up and down performances like the last two weeks from now on.  The coaches need to teach greatness into the mindset of the players and once a great performance happens, they should say, "that's who we are", not "well, we're starting to get to be what we want, but we aren't really there yet". The defensive team, from the players to the coaches should understand, "HELL yeah, THAT'S  the defensive team we ARE and that's the team that's going to show up EVERY week. Nobody is going to win them all since yes, this IS the NFL, but you'd see more outstanding performances more often than not.

Thanks Darry! "All In" was another quote that I remembered! I was at a workshop and John Mackey was the speaker and one of his quotes was, " Practice does not make perfect but perfect practice makes perfect". I have family members that were/are on the police SWAT team and they say train train train until you can't train then take a 5 minute break and start your training again. You've got to be one team, one mindset and complete the mission!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Yeah, we could hvae played better, but even if we did, would it really have mattered" ummm,is that a trick question?Yes.Most of the time playing good is better than playing badly.

Name a game where a QB played as good or better than Ben did yesterday and (EDIT:) lost.  The score might have been closer, but that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy ...he got fooled hard on that late game 4th&1 conversion for a TD, didn't he? Miller wraped around real sneaky like and Wener was completely lost. To his credit, that was an excellent call with superb execution.

Yeah he did but that was overall just a great play, who would've expected the pass. I thought they were just going to run it up the gut, and when you have two monster RBs that's what I thought was going to happen. Play took me by surprise big time, but then again I'm not an NFL player, haha....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Name a game where a QB played as good or better than Ben did yesterday and (EDIT:) lost.  The score might have been closer, but that's about it.

Never.You are correct.But thats not the point.Point is when you play GOOD ball on D,the other qb shouldnt have a game like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never.You are correct.But thats not the point.Point is when you play GOOD ball on D,the other qb shouldnt have a game like that.

We're saying the same thing with different words.  But fine, I don't really care how you phrase it.  It's the same result.  Either the QB plays so good that there's nothing you can do to stop it and it makes the defense look horrible or the defense plays so bad that the QB looks impossible to stop and has  a career game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we had injuries but jeez, 51 points?

The lack of a true pass rush was magnified when Vontae was taken out and our press coverage could no longer contain their WR's with Toler and Gordy back there. The reason our D was getting sacks the past few weeks was because Vontae was shutting down opposing teams WR1's and Toler could handle their 2nd and 3rd options. This gave our pass rush the time to get to the QB... The second Vontae was taken out of the equation (Erik Walden was out as well which just compounded things) it all went to hell....

If you give any QB, let alone Big Ben,the amount of time that he had against us and they will tear you apart, just like Big Ben in fact did....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your saying put the 3rd cb on the 3rd wr. And put the 4th cb on the 2nd wr? How does that make sense.. lets put the worse cb on the better wr.. thatll work

 

You should try actually watching the Colts play.  

 

 

Vontae stays on the left and Toler stays on the right regardless of who the team's #1, #2 WR's are.

 

When Vontae went out, we had brainiac move to shuffle everyone all over the field instead of just replacing Vontae. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we had injuries but jeez, 51 points?

 

 What happened with the best ILB combo in the League? ;)

 Was there a worse pair yesterday?? Stunk against the run and ____ against the pass.

  JMO but Pitt has the perfect O setup to play us and the Coaches on both sides of the ball to exploit our weaknesses.

  

   A reality/humility check that came at the right time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Once again, Latu just pops on the screen.  I know it’s just a drill, but compared to Ebukam…his movements and techniques are more fluid and crisp, and hes quicker.   https://youtube.com/shorts/k5W6CFq5ReQ?si=7DLSO-G0Gqt-5R6a
    • He's not signed, there is nothing else to talk about and I am bored.  
    • Yes, I know. The Stanford teams  when Hogan was the starting QB were full of top recruits on offense and defense. It was so much fun being a fan then. I'm not as big a fan of Stanford as you are. Being on the East Coast makes it hard to follow them as much as I used to.   Overall, I am becoming less and less interested in sports. For over 20 years, I used to listen to sports radio whenever I had free time.  I used to follow tennis, golf, baseball, college basketball, a little NBA and NHL as well as NFL and college football. I once went to 20+ baseball games in a year.  The only sport I still follow religiously now is NFL football. I try to follow my favorite baseball team, the Mets, but not enough. I attribute my loss of interest to there being too much change and movement of players, coaches, teams, conferences, etc. Stanford is now part of the ACC! My goodness! (Shaking my head) I don't like all these changes in conferences.   I was a big fan of Ted Leyland, Stanford's former athletic director many years ago. It saddened me when Leyland left Stanford to go to the University of Pacific which was his alma mater. I see he retired. He hired Buddy Teevens who died last year. Back in those days, I followed Stanford football a lot more closely. They were not great years but I loved rooting for players who also excelled in the classroom.   TL;DR 😉
    • Oh I think they are ready. They are right in the thick of it. Well educated and smart women. They are more in tune with the Indianapolis Colts than all of the new ownership in the league is with their respective franchises. I'm not concerned in the least with these ladies taking over moving forward. I think it's a great thing and speaks to the stability that the organization is preaching and looking to build. 
  • Members

    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,504

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 381

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...