Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

More great (not!) injury news


ColtsBlueFL

Recommended Posts

This is ridiculous lol the amount of injuries this team has sustained is extraordinary

 

It really is crazy look at starters on offense we have lost. No other team has been hit as hard with starters on offense as us. The Falcons did lose their top WR and the Rams lost their QB but other than that it makes it easy to see why the Colts are struggling so much offsensively.  Yes the other WRs need to stepup but no other team has lost their starting WR and starting TE not to mention their top RBs. Even as bad as we have been playing it amazing we have been able to keep a winning record.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_NFL_team_rosters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  1. Kevin Bowen @KBowenColts 1m
  2. Pagano said Greg Toler is trending in the right direction. Hoping to be on the field with the trainers on Wednesday. 
  3.  
  4.  

    Chuck Pagano says Vontae Davis looks like he will be okay. Same with LaVon Brazill.

 

Oh great!  Rogers sits out another one as we watch TY, Bey, Brazill and DAVID REED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vontae hasn't played all to well since he dissed Peyton the week we beat them. Has anyone else noticed that?

Only Mathis and Luck (in spots) have looked decent since we beat Denver (and Reggie Wayne got hurt).  It's a team fail for 4 games in the first half, and also in the second of two of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pats have one more win than the Colts. 

The Pats are a much better team than the Colts right now. By week 16 they'll have several more wins than us if the current trend continues. I've said it several times today--our record is not a good indicator of how this team is playing right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pats are a much better team than the Colts right now. By week 16 they'll have several more wins than us if the current trend continues. I've said it several times today--our record is not a good indicator of how this team is playing right now

Oh, right now.  Well right now the Pats are not as injured as the Colts. And it's not like the Pats are playing great football at the moment.  They got gashed for 250+ yards on the ground last night and got equal help from the refs and the weather. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thing we are playing another AFC rival this weekend and not an actual real team like the rest of those in the league outside our division.

 

I meant AFC South rival not just AFC rival. Cause you know we are like district 12 in the Hunger Games or something. We just happen to have the best QB in the South which isn't saying much since right now we are starting to develop a pro bowl team on IR from our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, right now.  Well right now the Pats are not as injured as the Colts. And it's not like the Pats are playing great football at the moment.  They got gashed for 250+ yards on the ground last night and got equal help from the refs and the weather. 

Yep, and it looked 100x better than the team the Colts fielded yesterday. That's how bad we're playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100x better?  If you say so.  You are wrong but there is nothing I can do about that.

It's a drastic exaggeration. They looked better in every phase of the game. I found myself envious of their offensive tempo and production.

 

As for being wrong, I wasn't aware opinions could be wrong or right. Thanks for that lesson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a drastic exaggeration. They looked better in every phase of the game. I found myself envious of their offensive tempo and production.

 

As for being wrong, I wasn't aware opinions could be wrong or right. Thanks for that lesson. 

Why could opinions not be wrong?  Opinions can only be as right or wrong as the facts upon which they are based.  If your starting point is something like, "Yep and they are 100x better..." then that is wrong, as you admitted in your first sentence of this post.

 

Then you say they looked better in every phase of the game.  The ST were horrible last night, where the Colts ST is the lone bright spot from yesterday.  The Pats O looked as bad in the first half as the Colts did.  The pass defense for the Pats was good but their run defense was much worse than the Colts.

 

Also it's funny you were envious of their offensive production because they score 31 points in a half.  yet the week before the Colts scored 24 points in a half were you envious of their production then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade him? He just handed him a nice extension.
    • Yes, thanks, you’re right. When the Panthers traded to get the 1 is when Ballard said he didn’t have all the information to make the trade. That’s strange to me.  “Didn’t want to make a blind decision without all the information,” Ballard told reporters Monday. “I know for people, they might not understand that. But I think history kind of tells you that when you do that, you better know what you’re getting. And we weren’t quite ready to do that at that time. And then we feel like there’s enough depth in the draft that we were gonna be okay.”   This was in late March. Ballard had a chance to get the 1 and use it to take Stroud not Young. I think it’s strange he said he didn’t move up to 1 because it would have been a “blind decision.” Why would it be a blind decision in March? Why wouldn’t you know what you’re getting? You’re getting whoever you want if you get the 1. It didn’t happen, but Ballard could have recognized that Stroud was going to be superior, could have made the trade and could have drafted him. Ballard admits it never occurred to him to attempt the trade because it would be a “blind decision.” 
    • I cringed after seeing the way his leg bent underneath him to the point of him sitting down on it. Buckner is one tough dude and to see him needing help to get off the field is when I knew he was going to be out for a while.
    • He probably felt confident Bowers would still be on the board at 15 once he made it past NYJ at 11.  He could've been trading up with other teams to move up to get Brock Bowers, but unfortunately, the Raiders had their eyes set on him and took him at 13.
    • Not now...   Let the year play out. Maybe at the end of the season... 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...