Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

its offical/Ricky Jean Francois Signs Big Deal with Colts (confirmed)(merge)


Tyler Shaw

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They signed him to a 4 year 22 million dollar deal.

 

Too much if you ask me. The guy isn't a sure fire starter and wasn't super impressive in SF.

 

Thoughts?

How do you get, wasn't super impressive in SF??? I heard he was a huge part of that defense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think about 5 million a year is too much. I mean, Walden is making 4M a year. He was very good in SF.

 

Just because they overpaid for Walden means they have to overpay for RJF.

 

He wasn't very good in SF, he didn't even see the field that often. He was behind Justin Smith and Ray Mcdonald most of the time.

I don't hate the guy, I actually like him, but an average of 5.5M is too much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's barely over 5 mil for crying out loud. This forum is getting comical with the feeding frenzy of whiny complaintents. One person says something bad and here come the sharks. This is a good signing and will help our D. I can't wait till next season when all these guys pan out and all the whiners are here acting like they knew it all along. Good grief!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you get, wasn't super impressive in SF??? I heard he was a huge part of that defense.

 

Ricky Jean Francois was a huge part of the 49ers defense? Patrick Willis and Aldon Smith are huge parts of that defense.

 

RJF is not. He was just a rotational guy for their D-line. Nothing super impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious to see how much cap space the Colts have left. Probably in the mid to late teens now. 

 

Hopefully this is the last relatively big signing for the Colts. They need to save some money now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money doled out to players will end up being directly proportional to the amount of playing time the coach and GM expect them to have. For all practical purposes, we could be replacing Moala in the line up. Moala is re-signed for just a 1 yr. deal and this locks up RJF for the future should we cut ties to Moala.

 

A lot of these contracts could mean several things:

 

Walden in, Angerer and Conner out next year???

 

RJF in, Moala out???

 

So, while we may sit here and think these signings reflect just the short term, they probably are thinking 2-3 years from now while doing these signings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one definite positive is that he's played in all 16 games for the past 3 years.  the contract does seem a bit excessive but it all depends on how it's structured.

 

That is very true. Hopefully not too much is guaranteed, and gets incentives for good play.

 

If it's structured properly, then it's not a bad deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have liked all the signings i jsut question some of the terms of some contracts... 4 years for Walden and this contract seems a bit exccessive if you ask me since he wsnt really the starter in SF.

 

nevertheless this is another good sign. will help the D big time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money doled out to players will end up being directly proportional to the amount of playing time the coach and GM expect them to have. For all practical purposes, we could be replacing Moala in the line up. Moala is re-signed for just a 1 yr. deal and this locks up RJF for the future should we cut ties to Moala.

 

A lot of these contracts could mean several things:

 

Walden in, Angerer and Conner out next year???

 

RJF in, Moala out???

 

So, while we may think these signings reflect just the short term, they probably are thinking 2-3 years from now while doing these signings.

 

Huh?

 

Walden is an OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh relax. Got your drift the first time. Dline & Linebackers matter most in this defense. And we are lacking talent at DE & DT. This was a very good pickup.

 

I'm not knocking the guy. I think he has the potential to help this defense out. Was it really worth giving a contract that puts in the top 8 for biggest on the team? I don't think so. 

 

We're not even sure if he's starting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money doled out to players will end up being directly proportional to the amount of playing time the coach and GM expect them to have. For all practical purposes, we could be replacing Moala in the line up. Moala is re-signed for just a 1 yr. deal and this locks up RJF for the future should we cut ties to Moala.

 

A lot of these contracts could mean several things:

 

Walden in, Angerer and Conner out next year???

 

RJF in, Moala out???

 

So, while we may think these signings reflect just the short term, they probably are thinking 2-3 years from now while doing these signings.

 

Interesting you should say that...I was actually wondering myself if perhaps they might try Walden out as an ILB since his biggest strength appears to be playing the run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting you should say that...I was actually wondering myself if perhaps they might try Walden out as an ILB since his biggest strength appears to be playing the run.  

 

2 ILBs and 2 OLBs in a 3-4 and if Jerry Hughes shows us something, I can see Walden being moved inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not that their replacements are not good.   It's the depth behind the replacements.     Also. There isn't a 3T on this team better than Buckner.  To say so is nonsense
    • There comes a point where your depth isn’t that good when you lose this many players. We aren’t talking about losing one guy or two. If Paye can’t go we are talking about half of our starters and depth. Just because you replace them doesn’t mean they are any good.
    • A high ankle sprain, even if considered mild, is a different animal than the typical 'rolled' ankle sprain, and takes at least twice as long (or more) for recovery.   Though we don't know for certain yet, this is in the realm of possibility. Besides, it may be the same ankle where he's had prior history in 2022 as well as surgery in early 2023. Taking this into consideration, a multi-week absence could be an outcome for him in the short term. An improperly healed high ankle sprain has long term ramifications to consider, as well.
    • Yes, and I'm sure the Colts will field a full rotation of D lineman, with a few having to play more snaps than before,  The replacements will be as good as the linemen that won't play....Defo, Lewis, and Paye.  That's my opinion.  
    • I thought Flacco did pretty dang good. It was nice seeing passes not go over our receivers heads. AR played pretty well in the short time he was in there but I still didn’t see anything that would tell us he’s fixed his accuracy on short/intermediate throws. That being said AR is the starter unless he plays his way out or gets injured again.
  • Members

    • chad72

      chad72 18,763

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 712

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ponyboy

      ponyboy 127

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Restinpeacesweetchloe

      Restinpeacesweetchloe 44,751

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsva

      coltsva 2,475

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 20,325

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 1,031

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Matabix

      Matabix 490

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Boss7894

      Boss7894 192

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...