Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Demarcus Ware


John Waylon

Recommended Posts

PFT reports that the Cowboys are considering a switch to a 4-3 after firing ryan.If that were to happen, chances are Ware would be on the outs. If he were to be, do you think we should be interested?

 

Um, yes?

 

Edit: 

 

Though I still see no reason why Dallas would move him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFT reports that the Cowboys are considering a switch to a 4-3 after firing ryan.If that were to happen, chances are Ware would be on the outs. If he were to be, do you think we should be interested?

 

If they go 4-3 they would be instantly on Freeney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why they would get rid of Ware just because they are switching to a 4-3. He can play DE in a 4-3, he is basically just a pass rusher anyway so he would be quite effective as a 4-3 DE.

 

 

Yeah, I agree.  I don't get where people keep saying that such and such player is a 4-3 DE only and couldn't play OLB in a 3-4 and vice versa.  Both positions essentially require rushing the passer and setting the edge on running plays.  The biggest difference is that the 3-4 OLB may be required to drop into zone coverage a little more often than a 4-3 DE would but 4-3 DE's (and DT's for that matter) also drop into zone coverage on occasion.

 

I really don't see Dallas letting Ware go unless it comes down to a money/cap issue.  I highly doubt it would be a scheme issue.  That said, if the were to let him go then yeah, I think we should give him a good look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Freeney's a free agent.

 

 

 

I think the poster means we would be replacing Freeney with Ware. Other words we don't resign Freeney and we somehow acquire Ware. He has 3 years left on a 79 million $ deal with 40 mill guaranteed. So pretty unkiely a trade would work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was not a-WARE the Moo-Moo-boys were going to get rid of their best player on defense rotflmao  but if they did.....I would want him Wareing a Colts state of the art Demarcus Ware number 94 jersey  :Wooo: .....of course a weary(pronounced warey) Mario Harvey would have to ware another Colt jersey or ware civilian clothes before waring another NFL jersey. :slaphead:   I am wared out....gonna take a nap :sleepy: .......this is Nap-town ya know....if ya weren't a-Ware. :lecture:  :smack:  :wall:  :blah: (I know right? :)) :coltslogo:  :coltslogo:  :coltslogo: !!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ware would simply put a hand on the turf and become the Cowboys pass rushing Right Defensive End.

 

If the Cowboys blow up their system and put themselves in a position where their best player, a potential future Hall of Famer,  is no longer a good fit,  then they're more dysfunctional than we already think they are....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ware would simply put a hand on the turf and become the Cowboys pass rushing Right Defensive End.

 

If the Cowboys blow up their system and put themselves in a position where their best player, a potential future Hall of Famer,  is no longer a good fit,  then they're more dysfunctional than we already think they are....

 

Considering the owner is Jerry Jones and the GM is Jerry Jones, anything is possible.  He is Al Davis 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people need to realize that the switch from 3-4 to 4-3 is much much easier than the other way around. Virtually anybody that plays in a 3-4 defense can easily make the switch to a 4-3. Yeah, there may be a few players that are better suited to play a 3-4 and the other way around, but a 6'3" 260 lb OLBer in a 3-4 can easily make the transition to a 4-3 DE. Virtually a seamless transition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Freeney's a free agent.

I know, hence why not really a trade, but of they do swap schemes id imagine he's on their radar. If they deem Ware not able to fit a 4-3, which I doubt, I'm sure we would be interested. So in effect swapping but not being a trade.

Sorry for not making that clearer, it just struck me as ironic if it did happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @stitches is it Latu on your avatar? If I didn't know any better, I thought he looked like the guy making his call to his Mom at the beginning of the Independence Day movie.      
    • We drafted Tim Jennings cousin?     Someone hold me I’m having flashbacks
    • I feel like part of it is coachspeak, but part of it goes beyond that. He could have just said "we are really lucky he fell to us, so happy to draft him... On the character/attitude thing - we did our due diligence and we are happy to draft him. We think he is a good kid and we can work with him." Or something of the sort. But he went beyond that by directly targeting the reports and going off on them. Kind of like he did with Stroud last year. I think Ballard has a strong sense of justice and I don't think this is purely performative on his side. I think he really feels like those reports were not fair. And he's going to bat for his guy beyond what just picking him at any specific pick would mean. Picking him at any position simply means "we are good taking the risk for the potential reward if he pans out". Here it seems like Ballard is backing his guy not just in terms of risk/reward calculation. He is backing him character-wise. Which can backfire on him spectacularly if the guy starts having issues of that sort once he's in the league since Ballard's rant has already gone somewhat viral in NFL media. 
    • But this doesn’t really fit with Ballard defending Stroud last offseason though? IIRC he did so after the draft?
    • But Polian still gets the credit for taking the swing on Mathis like he gets the blame for his misses, has been most of our contention all along. Ballard should still get the credit for taking the swing on Raimann even if Raimann might have outplayed his draft slot like Polian having Mathis do that, which neither could have known. There has to be some level of scouting confidence (like with AD) to feel like they could take the leap of faith, it wasn't a blind leap of faith, it was founded in what they scouted the player could do. If the player did more than what he believed they could do, it is gravy.   So the GM knows the kind of player he is getting typically but how the player responds to coaching and shows heart and exceeds his draft slot, that is on the coaches and players, right? But the GM has to draft the player before the coaches can coach. That is purely logical.
  • Members

    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mikemccoy84

      Mikemccoy84 95

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,029

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,298

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,768

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 5,220

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Old Colt

      Old Colt 289

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 17,315

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,480

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,823

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...