Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Week 13: Colts @ Cowboys, SNF, December 4th, 2022, 8:15PM ET


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

He's with his face to the ball on contested 50/50 shots. Uses his body excellent. 

But agree he can body catch at times. But struggles on routes though too, and thinks too much when tosses are out front of him.

He'll improve. Just needs time. When it clicks, he'll click, and be very good. 

 

He's young. I'm sure Reggie will clean that up this summer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OffensivelyPC said:

That doesn’t make the incomplete incapable of being challenged. You can still challenge and not have to pick up the flag.

You can’t challenge something that was ruled incomplete that also had a PF on it. If Franklin doesn’t lay out that hit, then it could have been challenged. Refs ruled it incomplete on the field, so Franklin’s hit came AFTER the play was ruled dead. That’s why Indy couldn’t challenge, even if they wanted to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DougDew said:

LOL.  I said two things in this thread.  Both are true. 

 

Should have thrown to the EZ in the first half.....golly we did now from the 16 and got a TD....go figure.

And I said we should not have been aggressive at the end of the half.   And something bad happened. 

 

That isn't a Parks/Jeff narrative.  Its intelligence.    

 

Sorry... you open every game, with "bad play calling"... 

rinse, repeat... same narrative... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Indyfan4life said:

You can’t challenge something that was ruled incomplete that also had a PF on it. If Franklin doesn’t lay out that hit, then it could have been challenged. Refs ruled it incomplete on the field, so Franklin’s hit came AFTER the play was ruled dead. That’s why Indy couldn’t challenge, even if they wanted to. 

That can’t be a real rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Indyfan4life said:

You can’t challenge something that was ruled incomplete that also had a PF on it. If Franklin doesn’t lay out that hit, then it could have been challenged. Refs ruled it incomplete on the field, so Franklin’s hit came AFTER the play was ruled dead. That’s why Indy couldn’t challenge, even if they wanted to. 

Eh, okay I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IMO, he is the best WR in the league so I seen this coming. Question is, do you have the QB to get him the ball. With this guy , you did. I am still not high on McCarthy at all. If he pans out, I will eat crow. If he can't at least look better than average with Jefferson, then you know there is a problem. 
    • I think Ballard sincerely believes in everything he said about how players get dragged during the draft process. Like you said, he did it last year, mostly in defense of a player the Colts didn't even have a chance to draft.    But I also think he saw strategic value in publicly defending AD Mitchell on draft night. There's really no downside to sticking up for your players in front of the media, especially when we're talking about a prospect who is obviously upset with how things went in the draft, and who plays a diva-friendly position. We all know there were questions about AD; we heard the rumors and read the articles. Ballard's comments changed the narrative surrounding AD with a 60 second sound bite. And now it's on AD to prove Ballard right.
    • In a nutshell, AR sounded upbeat about the season and is looking forward to he and Taylor playing together. Give it a few hours and there will be a link to it, I am sure. The McAfee show will also be on Youtube hours later, someone always posts it once the show is over. 
    • I was at BDubs for lunch and they had it on there but no sound and no captions.  Hoping somebody will be able to find a clip of the segment a little later and be able to post it here so I can check it out.  Like to hear the confidence!
    • Even if Mitchell doesn't pan out, I don't find anything wrong with Ballard saying what he said.  He said the exact same thing last year regarding CJ Stroud and his S2 (I believe?) testing.  His point was just that people with these "anonymous sources" put out so much information with the explicit aim to tear these draft prospects down in teams' and the public's eyes.  It wasn't just an AD rant.  It's an overall, generally speaking rant.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...