Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Midseason Super Bowl Predictions


bap1331

Recommended Posts

Super Bowl: Raiders vs. Cowboys

 

AFC Championship: Raiders win in the last few seconds of the game thanks to the Tuck Rule and upset the Patriots in Gillette Stadium.

 

NFC Championship: Tony Romo redeems himself properly placeholding the ball for the kicker to score the gamewinning field goal against the Vikings. Taking away the curse of the Cowboys back in 2007.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 19colt said:

LOL. I will go with Pittsburgh vs Seattle. 

 

Really?! Pittsburgh will never get passed the Patriots though unless Brady goes down. The 2 Super Bowls they won were because Brady got hurt in 2007 and they didnt have to go through New England in 2005. Plus, the team is horrible without Big Ben. I think Charlie Batch was a huuuuuge asset to the team.

 

Seattle will be in the mix for the next few years and the NFC is weak right now so i agree. They are all young still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My pre season pick was Vikings and Ravens. Imma stick with Minny but switch Baltimore with New England. 

 

I just don't see any team that can legitimately beat New England at this point. Pittsburgh maybe at home but now it seems like the AFC will likely go through Fox borough (again :yuk:)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bap1331 said:

 

Really?! Pittsburgh will never get passed the Patriots though unless Brady goes down. The 2 Super Bowls they won were because Brady got hurt in 2007 and they didnt have to go through New England in 2005. Plus, the team is horrible without Big Ben. I think Charlie Batch was a huuuuuge asset to the team.

 

Seattle will be in the mix for the next few years and the NFC is weak right now so i agree. They are all young still.


Well I'm bias against NE. I think Big Ben is the only QB capable of getting into a shootout with NE and having a chance. Obviously, I am anticipating Big Ben being back and staying healthy. They didn't shame themselves without him but it was in Pittsburgh. Denver is the only other chance of beating NE but they need HFA and I am not sure that will happen for them unless Siemian catches fire but that will be difficult behind his OL and also the AFC West is tough.

Seattle again I am selecting because they could potentially hang with NE but not unless Wilson somehow finds a way to get healthy and back to his old self.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at the healthiest team in football the Patriots who will have home field advantage and I'd have to take Seattle. If Wilson gets healthy and the OL stiffens a bit they have a team that has post season moxie. Can't see Dallas or Minnesota holding together come crunch time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pats vs Cowboys is what I'm thinking unless the Steelers spoil some party with Big Ben back just like in 2005 as a wild card when he missed 3 games, I think. The first game back from injury for Big Ben, Colts beat them 26-7 but they beat us in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying Patriots vs Cowboys as well, with Patriots winning it all. They have too much experience, talent and power on the offense. The two TEs alone can take over a game when everything else isn't working. 

 

Belichick's defense is not to be trifled with either. 

 

I don't think I'll be able to watch this year's postseason without feeling sick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 19colt said:


Well I'm bias against NE. I think Big Ben is the only QB capable of getting into a shootout with NE and having a chance. Obviously, I am anticipating Big Ben being back and staying healthy. They didn't shame themselves without him but it was in Pittsburgh.

 

I don't think you engage NE in a shootout to win, ever. Peyton is the only QB to have beaten Belichick and Brady, twice, when the Pats score 30 plus. One is the 4th and 2 game, and the other is the 2006 season AFCCG. Both those games came down to the last minute. Mighty mighty hard to do if that is what a team is banking on doing.

 

Beating the Patriots is about controlling tempo, shrinking possessions and the game with a running game keeping Brady's damage minimal and making it a low 20s game. Easier said than done but recently, that is how Brady has been beaten the last 5 playoff games (21-28 vs Jets, 17-21 vs Giants, 13-28 vs Ravens, 16-26 vs Broncos, 18-20 vs Broncos). Steelers would have to play out of the world D and control tempo not with their passing game but run game. Not happening.

 

That style is played by the Broncos, Vikings, Cowboys - only 2 of those 3 have a stellar D (Cowboys' D leaves much to be desired). Seahawks - RW will take an offseason to get back to what he was, their offense thus will be limited by RW and their OL. Panthers - too much of a hole dug and they cannot do it without HFA. Packers - D still sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

That's what you said last year

Jules may be right unfortunately. There is no Peyton in his way this season. I felt great last season with my Broncos pick because their Defense was off the charts but it was also because they had #18 under center as well who had big game experience. People can say what they want but if Peyton isn't under center against the Patriots, Patriots would've been in the SB last season and would've beat the Panthers IMO. I had the Packers winning it all this season beating the Steelers before the season, now it's looking like the Patriots will win it all and I am loving me some Cowboys in the NFC. I think the Cowboys are slightly better than the Vikings, they are more explosive on Offense. Zeke has an argument right now for being MVP in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Jules may be right unfortunately. There is no Peyton in his way this season. I felt great last season with my Broncos pick because their Defense was off the charts but it was also because they had #18 under center as well who had big game experience. People can say what they want but if Peyton isn't under center against the Patriots, Patriots would've been in the SB last season and would've beat the Panthers IMO. I had the Packers winning it all this season beating the Steelers before the season, now it's looking like the Patriots will win it all and I am loving me some Cowboys in the NFC. I think the Cowboys are slightly better than the Vikings, they are more explosive on Offense. Zeke has an argument right now for being MVP in the league. 

It's week 8.   Nothing can definitely said about anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

True and the Patriots dominate every Regular Season and have only won 1 SB since 2004. Having said that they would have to be the favorites.

There just doesn't seem to be anyone currently putting their hand up to potentially beat them, especially if their O is full strength. Cowboys are a great story and all but two rookies going against the Evil Empire in the Superbowl? I just can't see them winning vs NE but hope I could be wrong. Denver can limit Brady but as mentioned by Jules I think, they can't score enough points to beat NE even if the D is GOAT worthy again. Even with all of PM's struggles last year, Denver has pretty much the same points for and against as they did this time last year. I'd say last years playoffs version of PM would have more points right now than Siemian/Lynch. 

 

Repeating myself here but I think only Big Ben has the kahuna's to knock them out in January on the road if you take Wilson out of the equation with his injury struggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2016 at 0:28 AM, Jules said:

Nobody this year is beating the Patriots sorry to say.

 

 

 

Nah they'll find a way to lose in the Superbowl. Even that last Superbowl win of theirs was very close. I'm not going to say it was lucky, because I know they practiced that INT play, but to allow them to get into that situation... it was close.

Defenses win championships. Ask the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BertJones said:

 

except Luck already has that position

Not yet I don't think, especially with the playoffs looking unlikely for the second year in a row (I know last year not his fault). I guess for Luck, he is going to need to beat Brady at some point and for Ryan he will need to get to a Superbowl. Luck may also need to pay more attention to his grooming ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DougDew, I have disagreed with you on many things.  However, I will give credit when it is due, this is the most cogent post I remember you making, excellent.
    • You know football season is back when this forum is in meltdown mode in May... Lol
    • Yeah, I don't think their QB problem is completely solved, but going from Pickett/Trubisky for Wilson/Fields, for less money and basically some pick swaps? That's great work. Even if Wilson is cooked and Fields is a mess, there's way more upside with Fields alone, not to mention a potential baseline level of competence that Wilson might provide if he's not completely done.   Even if Wilson is pretty good, I think they'll want to get Fields on the field for meaningful snaps, just to see what they might have before he hits free agency. He's too talented to let him ride the bench all season.
    • Hopefully Pitt is ok.   Loving the vibe and energy from everyone. I truly believe it's going to be a special season 
    • I'm pretty sure there's nothing that can be added in reference to anything medical.     Offsets could be part of what's being negotiated.    More than that, I think the sticking point in this range of the draft is overall guaranteed money. From the top of the second round to the middle, the difference in overall guarantees has been slightly growing in recent years, as early second round guys are getting more guaranteed.    For example, in 2021, the #33 pick was Tyson Campbell, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1&2 salary, and part of his Year 3 salary. The #52 pick that year was Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1&2 salary. In 2023, the #33 pick was Will Levis, and his guarantees included his signing bonus + Year 1-3 salary, and part of his Year 4 salary. The #52 pick was Zach Charbonnet, and his guarantees were the same as the guy in 2021 -- signing bonus +Year 1&2 salary. So there's been a lift at the top of the second round, but it has not extended to the middle of the round. Yet.   (A slight monkey wrench last year is that the Dolphins lost their first round pick for tampering, so the #33 pick in 2023 was actually the second pick of the second round, not the first pick of the second round. That would have been #32, Joey Porter Jr, who also got guaranteed money into Year 4.)   Plus, as more gets guaranteed in this range, the offset discussion becomes more important. No one cares about offsets when only Year 1 is guaranteed. As those guarantees go into Year 3 or 4, now we need to talk about offset language. Especially since fourth year players are not subject to waivers.   So I think the middle of the second round is where there's a big sticking point right now. In 2011, this was more seen at the end of the first round (which is why Anthony Castonzo's negotiations went a few days into training camp). It keeps moving back gradually, but this explains why only 11/32 second round picks are signed so far. As the dominoes fall, everyone kind of finds their level, and then the next year's class tries to push the guarantees a little bit further. By the end of the decade, the entire second round might be getting the first three years fully guaranteed, with no offset language.   By the way, there are 20 unsigned first rounders (including eight of the top ten), and 21 unsigned second rounders (including the five players who went right before AD Mitchell, and the eight players who went right after him). So everyone should buckle up, because there's a lot of work to be done league-wide, and for the most part it has nothing to do with the individual players involved.   (Sorry this went so long, I started getting carried away.)
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...