Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

I don't usually do the "refs cost us the game" thing...(merge)


cmgww

Recommended Posts

But they had a BIG hand in Cincy's win. That was the worst display of officiating I've seen in a long time, including Ron Winter and his gang.

 

1. The TD. CLEARLY not a TD. End of story. One score game going into the half changes the dynamic.

2. Taunting call. Yes, it was stupid on Freeman's part, but that crap goes on all the time. And it turned a 5 yard loss into a 15 yard gain.

3. The PI call late in the 3rd. It wasn't there. Again, a momentum changer.

4. No grounding on ginger Dalton. Seriously?

 

There are others I am probably forgetting, but man, I don't recall a game so badly officiated...on both sides. Cincy had some bad calls go against them too

 

Bottom line, the Colts deserved to lose today. The Bengals are a really good team. But the officiating was terrible, and I hate seeing a game like this where the refs get so involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the Colts lost the football game but these last few weeks of officiating in the nfl have been horrible! Jeff Triplett clearly screwed us on at least 2 calls. One being the green-ellis td, and the no call on daltons throw away pass. Chap obviously tripped green ellis up and was down short of the goal line. There was no conclusive evidence that would change the ruling on the field which was originally called down by contact and short... then the throw away, it should have been intentional grounding since he was still in the pocket but yet there was no penalty and they went on to score again. I hope triplett is fined or suspended for this especially for the overruling call. The refs are not and should not be above the league office and should be subject to fines just as any player is for breaking any rule on the field. If we don't have fair officiating then why even play??? Essentially he gave them 7 points and an argument could be made he gave them 14 in all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they had a BIG hand in Cincy's win. That was the worst display of officiating I've seen in a long time, including Ron Winter and his gang.

 

1. The TD. CLEARLY not a TD. End of story. One score game going into the half changes the dynamic.

2. Taunting call. Yes, it was stupid on Freeman's part, but that crap goes on all the time. And it turned a 5 yard loss into a 15 yard gain.

3. The PI call late in the 3rd. It wasn't there. Again, a momentum changer.

4. No grounding on ginger Dalton. Seriously?

 

There are others I am probably forgetting, but man, I don't recall a game so badly officiated...on both sides. Cincy had some bad calls go against them too

 

Bottom line, the Colts deserved to lose today. The Bengals are a really good team. But the officiating was terrible, and I hate seeing a game like this where the refs get so involved.

I'm totally with you!!! I don't pay much attention to the officiating and I think teams just need to overcome bad officiating so I don't ever complain about it. But this was just terribly bad officiating to the point that the league needs to take a look at this. The call on the TD was so bad I have no words to explain it and that's very unusual for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The taunting call was bad. For us, bc Freeman did it...but to call it? EVERY PLAY there's trash talking. Freeman made the mistake of doing in front of the ref. But the assistant quickly went out to yell at him and get him back out on the field. The flag should have been kept in the ref's pocket. Big momentum changer there, when we were still in it. Let them play for heaven's sake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The taunting call was bad. For us, bc Freeman did it...but to call it? EVERY PLAY there's trash talking. Freeman made the mistake of doing in front of the ref. But the assistant quickly went out to yell at him and get him back out on the field. The flag should have been kept in the ref's pocket. Big momentum changer there, when we were still in it. Let them play for heaven's sake!

I didn't think the taunting was on Freeman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I NEVER said the officiating cost us the game...so don't put words into my mouth. I said it was a big factor in this game, and it was. It was terrible. You can throw up stats all day...but how many of those yards came after calls that benefited the Bengals? The final score should have read 35-28. End of story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. There's no telling if that 4th down TD call broke Indy's defensive morale. They were mostly sluggish the rest of the game after that.

It was a terrible call. Who knows what would have happened had that been different. I've been debating quitting watching the NFL for some time now with ask these penalties and terrible referees. This season might push me over that ledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not blame the refs for the loss.  The offense needs to play better in the first half of games and the defense did not play well.  That being said, the officiating in the NFL across the board this year has been bad.  Too many blatant mistakes by these refs, I hope the NFL will make changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the jerks explanation. The only thing that might make sense here is the official that ruled he was touched thought he saw the contact at the goal line. S that's where Triplett looked ? Dunno but it might be a legit call if that's the case...

 

 

 

 


CINCINNATI -- Here's the transcript on referee Jeff Triplett's explanation on why he reversed the play where the Colts appeared to stop the Bengals on fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line late in the first half of their 42-28 loss: 

Were there differing views among the officials about whether BenJarvus Green-Elliswas down initially? 

Triplett: There was discussion about whether the runner was touched down at the goal line or not. 

What did you see in the review? 

Triplett: When we reviewed the video at the goal line, there was nobody touching him there, and then he bounced into the end zone. 

What about the nose tackle? It appeared he might have had a shot at Green-Ellis? 

Triplett: I don't know about that, what position ... There was nobody that touched him at the goal line. 

So you didn't look at whether anybody touched him in the backfield? 

Triplett: We looked at the goal line, (those) were the shots that we looked at. 

There was a question about whether the nose tackle initially swiped at him and started him tripping? 

Triplett: We reviewed the goal line.
 
  •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they had a BIG hand in Cincy's win. That was the worst display of officiating I've seen in a long time, including Ron Winter and his gang.

 

1. The TD. CLEARLY not a TD. End of story. One score game going into the half changes the dynamic.

2. Taunting call. Yes, it was stupid on Freeman's part, but that crap goes on all the time. And it turned a 5 yard loss into a 15 yard gain.

3. The PI call late in the 3rd. It wasn't there. Again, a momentum changer.

4. No grounding on ginger Dalton. Seriously?

 

There are others I am probably forgetting, but man, I don't recall a game so badly officiated...on both sides. Cincy had some bad calls go against them too

 

Bottom line, the Colts deserved to lose today. The Bengals are a really good team. But the officiating was terrible, and I hate seeing a game like this where the refs get so involved.

are nfl refs allowed to bet on games, and if not who checks on this? triplett makes the nfl look bad,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here's the jerks explanation. The only thing that might make sense here is the official that ruled he was touched thought he saw the contact at the goal line. S that's where Triplett looked ? Dunno but it might be a legit call if that's the case...

 

 

 

 

CINCINNATI -- Here's the transcript on referee Jeff Triplett's explanation on why he reversed the play where the Colts appeared to stop the Bengals on fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line late in the first half of their 42-28 loss: 

Were there differing views among the officials about whether BenJarvus Green-Elliswas down initially? 

Triplett: There was discussion about whether the runner was touched down at the goal line or not. 

What did you see in the review? 

Triplett: When we reviewed the video at the goal line, there was nobody touching him there, and then he bounced into the end zone. 

What about the nose tackle? It appeared he might have had a shot at Green-Ellis? 

Triplett: I don't know about that, what position ... There was nobody that touched him at the goal line. 

So you didn't look at whether anybody touched him in the backfield? 

Triplett: We looked at the goal line, (those) were the shots that we looked at. 

There was a question about whether the nose tackle initially swiped at him and started him tripping? 

Triplett: We reviewed the goal line.

 
  •  

 

 

If that is his explanation he should be suspended.  They are supposed to review the whole play, not just a small part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is his explanation he should be suspended.  They are supposed to review the whole play, not just a small part of it.

 

 

I hear you but IMO , there was no visual evidence of Chapman contacting him. So if that wasn't the contact that was called , then it would have to be visual evidence that Chapman touched him. I don't think J- Green stumbling would be that. Not sure all this is the case, just trying to look with an open mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear you but IMO , there was no visual evidence of Chapman contacting him. So if that wasn't the contact that was called , then it would have to be visual evidence that Chapman touched him. I don't think J- Green stumbling would be that. Not sure all this is the case, just trying to look with an open mind.

There didn't have to be evidence he touched him. There had to be evidence he didn't touch him. And there wasn't any of that either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear you but IMO , there was no visual evidence of Chapman contacting him. So if that wasn't the contact that was called , then it would have to be visual evidence that Chapman touched him. I don't think J- Green stumbling would be that. Not sure all this is the case, just trying to look with an open mind.

 

I understand what you are saying, but the ruling on the field was down by contact.  There was no clear evidence that he was not touched by Chapman either, so the ruling should have stood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2. Taunting call. Yes, it was stupid on Freeman's part, but that crap goes on all the time. And it turned a 5 yard loss into a 15 yard gain.

 

They let Sheppard slide earlier for the same thing, you could see the ref warn him. Then Freeman decides to do the same thing later. Of all the penalties that are easy to avoid, taunting is the easiest to never commit. 

 

Sucks that Freeman did it at that point in the game. ......don't do that.

 

Triplett has a track record of deplorable calls. Today's reversal on the goaline stand was inexcusable. He should be fired, period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ha. Yep.    If ya ain't got one though, ya have to keep hittin' the slots until you win. 
    • Yeah, like Bo Nix??     So much over reaching for QBs. 
    • The Matt Gay hate is a convenient outlet for Chris Ballard hate. Which explains why it's mostly unreasonable.   However, I don't understand why they're putting him out there right now. He's evidently hurt, and he needs some time to get right.
    • Speaking of Baker:   I've been skeptical that Bryce Young can overcome the marks against him, so I'm not exactly waiting for him to turn it on. But I was skeptical about Baker as well, for different reasons. He never looked as ineffective and incapable as Bryce has looked so far, but he's a good example of a player who a) was in a bad situation, and b) still had to get better at QBing. 
    • Well, I thought the Olubi kid showed some solid play making ability with good tackling so i'm surprised they pushed rookie Carlies, who missed a fair amount of time, ahead of him so quickly. So one could say the position has been addressed by drafting a LB each of the last 2 seasons with guys our people like.  Carlies did play 46 snaps Sunday. Like our other Gus led LB's he didn't seem to be where he needed to be when needed. But what the hey, that becomes much more likely when you have 2-3 seasons under your belt, With a d-line playing well in front of you.     It wouldn't surprise me at all if Williams throws for 250+ with 3 touchdowns. The little devil on my shoulder tells me it would be a good thing, just another nail in Gus's coffin. And of course that is a sad place to be. lol  
  • Members

    • TigerColt

      TigerColt 114

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,210

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,634

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,593

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,305

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,202

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts1324

      Colts1324 1,079

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 22,012

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,657

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DavePSL

      DavePSL 119

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...